Hi Roman,
Ok, I will. Thanks!
Cheers,
Dmitry
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, it is indeed jmeter issue (or rather, the
issue of the plugin we use to generate charts). You may want to use the
github for
Hi Roman,
Thanks, the --additionalSolrParams was just what I wanted and works fine.
BTW, if you have some special bug tracking forum for the tool, I'm happy
to submit questions / bug reports there. Otherwise, this email list is ok
(for me at least).
One other thing I have noticed in the err
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the feedback. Yes, it is indeed jmeter issue (or rather, the
issue of the plugin we use to generate charts). You may want to use the
github for whatever comes next
https://github.com/romanchyla/solrjmeter/issues
Cheers,
roman
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dmitry Kan
Hi Roman,
What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
Would something like this work:
field:foo =50 fq=other_field:bar facet=true facet.field=facet_field_name
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
With
filter and facet queries can be freely intermixed, it's not a problem.
What problem are you seeing when you try this?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
What's the format for running the facet+filter queries?
Would something like
Hi Erick,
Agree, this is perfectly fine to mix them in solr. But my question is about
solrjmeter input query format. Just couldn't find a suitable example on the
solrjmeter's github.
Dmitry
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
filter and facet queries
Hi Dmitry,
If it is something you want to pass with every request (which is my use
case), you can pass it as additional solr params, eg.
python solrjmeter
--additionalSolrParams=fq=other_field:bar+facet=true+facet.field=facet_field_name
the string should be url encoded.
If it is something
Hi Roman,
With adminPath=/admin or adminPath=/admin/cores, no. Interestingly
enough, though, I can access
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/system
But I can access http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores, only when with
adminPath=/admin/cores (which suggests that this is the right value
Hi Dmitry,
So it seems solrjmeter should not assume the adminPath - and perhaps needs
to be passed as an argument. When you set the adminPath, are you able to
access localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/cores ?
roman
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Hi Roman,
I have noticed a difference with different solr.xml config contents. It is
probably legit, but thought to let you know (tests run on fresh checkout as
of today).
As mentioned before, I have two cores configured in solr.xml. If the file
is:
[code]
solr persistent=false
!--
Hi Roman,
This looks much better, thanks! The ordinary non-comarison mode works. I'll
post here, if there are other findings.
Thanks for quick turnarounds,
Dmitry
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry, oh yes, late night fixes... :) The latest
Hi Roman,
Something bad happened in fresh checkout:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
./queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost -p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R
cms -t /solr/statements -e statements -U 100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File solrjmeter.py, line 1392,
Hi Dmitry, oh yes, late night fixes... :) The latest commit should make it
work for you.
Thanks!
roman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
Something bad happened in fresh checkout:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
Hi Roman,
Good point. I managed to run the command with -C and double quotes:
python solrjmeter.py -a -C g1,cms -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
As a result got several files (html, css, js, csv) in the running directory
(any way to specify where the output should be stored in this case?)
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
Good point. I managed to run the command with -C and double quotes:
python solrjmeter.py -a -C g1,cms -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
As a result got several files (html, css, js, csv) in the
Hi Roman,
Finally, this has worked! Thanks for quick support.
The graphs look awesome. At least on the index sample :) It is quite easy
to setup and run + possible to run directly on the shard server in
background mode.
my test run was:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
Hi Roman,
One more question. I tried to compare different runs (g1 vs cms) using the
command below, but get an error. Should I attach some other param(s)?
python solrjmeter.py -C g1,foo -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx
**ERROR**
File solrjmeter.py, line 1427, in module
main(sys.argv)
Hi Dmitry,
The command seems good. Are you sure your shell is not doing something
funny with the params? You could try:
python solrjmeter.py -C g1,foo -c hour -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -a
where g1 and foo are results of the individual runs, ie. something that was
started and saved with '-R g1'
Hi Roman,
With fresh checkout, the reported admin_endpoint is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin. This url redirects to
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/ . I'm using solr 4.3.1. Is your tool
supporting this version?
Of three URLs you asked for, only the 3rd one gave response:
On 8/6/2013 6:17 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Of three URLs you asked for, only the 3rd one gave response:
snip
The rest report 404.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
So I think the admin pages are different on your version of solr, what do
you
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification, Shawn!
So with this in mind, the following work:
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/system?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/statements/admin/mbeans?wt=json
not copying their output to save space.
Roman:
is this something that should be set via -t
Hi Dmitry,
I've modified the solrjmeter to retrieve data from under the core (the -t
parameter) and the rest from the /solr/admin - I could test it only against
4.0, but it is there the same as 4.3 - it seems...so you can try the fresh
checkout
my test was: python solrjmeter.py -a -x
Hi Roman,
No problem. Still trying to launch the thing..
The query with the added -t parameter generated an error:
1. python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
./queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost -p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R
test -t /solr/statements [passed relative path
Hi Dmitry,
So I think the admin pages are different on your version of solr, what do
you see when you request... ?
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/system?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/mbeans?wt=json
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?wt=json
If your core -t was
:
On 8/1/2013 2:08 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run
with
added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting
confused
;)
http://29min.wordpress.com/**2013/08/01/measuring-solr-**performance-ii/
http
Hi Roman,
Sure:
python solrjmeter.py -a -x ./jmx/SolrQueryTest.jmx -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries -s localhost
-p 8983 -a --durationInSecs 60 -R test
This is vanilla install (git clone) except for one change that I had to do
related to solr cores:
git diff
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks, It was a toothing problem, fixed now, please try the fresh checkout
AND add the following to your arguments: -t /solr/core1
that sets the path under which solr should be contacted, the handler is set
in the jmeter configuration, so if you were using different query handlers
Yes, UseNuma is only for Parallel Scavenger garbage collector and only
for Solaris 9 and higher and Linux kernel 2.6.19 and glibc 2.6.1.
And it performs with 64-bit better than 32-bit.
So no effects for G1.
With standard applications CMS is very slightly better than G1 but
when it comes to huge
Hi Roman,
When I try to run with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
here what is reported:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File solrjmeter.py, line 1390, in module
main(sys.argv)
File solrjmeter.py, line 1309, in main
tests = find_tests(options)
Dmitry,
Can you post the entire invocation line?
roman
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
When I try to run with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
here what is reported:
Traceback (most recent call last):
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Yes, UseNuma is only for Parallel Scavenger garbage collector and only
for Solaris 9 and higher and Linux kernel 2.6.19 and glibc 2.6.1.
And it performs with 64-bit better than 32-bit.
So no
Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run with
added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting confused ;)
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/
roman
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com
On 8/1/2013 2:08 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
Hi, here is a short post describing the results of the yesterday run with
added parameters as per Shawn's recommendation, have fun getting confused ;)
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/
I am having a very difficult time
/**2013/08/01/measuring-solr-**performance-ii/http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/08/01/measuring-solr-performance-ii/
I am having a very difficult time with the graphs. I have no idea what
I'm looking at. The graphs are probably self-explanatory to you, because
you created them and you've been
Hi Roman,
What version and config of SOLR does the tool expect?
Tried to run, but got:
**ERROR**
File solrjmeter.py, line 1390, in module
main(sys.argv)
File solrjmeter.py, line 1296, in main
check_prerequisities(options)
File solrjmeter.py, line 351, in check_prerequisities
Ok, got the error fixed by modifying the base solr ulr in solrjmeter.py
(added core name after /solr part).
Next error is:
WARNING: no test name(s) supplied nor found in:
['/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/demo/queries/demo.queries']
It is a 'slow start with new tool' symptom I guess.. :)
On 7/31/2013 12:24 AM, William Bell wrote:
But that link does not tell me which on you are using?
You are listing like 4 versions on your site.
Also, what did it fix? Pause times?
Any other words of wisdom ?
I'm not sure whether that was directed at me or Roman, but here's my
answers:
Hi Dmitry,
probably mistake in the readme, try calling it with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
as for the base_url, i was testing it on solr4.0, where it tries contactin
/solr/admin/system - is it different for 4.3? I guess I should make it
configurable (it
I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how it goes.
I've rechecked details for the G1 (default) garbage collector run and I can
confirm that 2 out of 3 runs were showing high max response times, in some
cases even 10secs, but the customized G1 never - so definitely the
is obviously higher with G1GC.
-Original message-
From:Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013 18:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Measuring SOLR performance
I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how it goes.
I've
with G1GC.
-Original message-
From:Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013 18:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Measuring SOLR performance
I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how it goes.
I've rechecked details
Hello,
I have been wanting some tools for measuring performance of SOLR, similar
to Mike McCandles' lucene benchmark.
so yet another monitor was born, is described here:
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/measuring-solr-query-performance/
I tested it on the problem of garbage collectors (see
On 7/30/2013 6:59 PM, Roman Chyla wrote:
I have been wanting some tools for measuring performance of SOLR, similar
to Mike McCandles' lucene benchmark.
so yet another monitor was born, is described here:
http://29min.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/measuring-solr-query-performance/
I tested it
43 matches
Mail list logo
