Hi,
I have made an index using CommonGrams. Now when I query a b and explain
it, SOLR makes it +MultiPhraseQuery(Contents:(a a_b) b).
Shouldn't it just be searching a_b? I am asking this coz even though I am
using CommonGrams it's much slower than normal index which just searches on
a b.
Note:
Hi Grijesh,
Though i use autosuggest i maynot get the exact results, the
order is not accurate.. As for example if i type
http://localhost:8080/solr/terms/?terms.fl=spellterms.prefix=solrterms.sort=indexterms.lower=solrterms.upper.incl=true
i get results
Hi Satya,
In this example you are not using spellchecking .I am saying use spellcheck
component also with Terms component so it will give you the spellcheck
suggestion also. Then combined both the lists.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
Ok sorry it was my fault.
I wasn't using CommonGramsQueryFilter for query, just had Filter for
indexing. The query seems fine now.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote:
Hi,
I have made an index using CommonGrams. Now when I query a b and
Hi guys,
I use solr with utf8 charset and i've a sort problem. For example, i
make a sort on a name field.. results looks like:
Article
Banana
Foo
aviation
brunch
...
So my question is, how to force solr to ignore case in result ? I would
like to have result as:
Article
aviation
Banana
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sort-problem-tp2271207p2271231.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Grijesh,
i added both the termscomponent and spellcheck component to the
terms requesthandler, when i send a query as
http://localhost:8080/solr/terms?terms.fl=textterms.prefix=javarows=7omitHeader=truespellcheck=truespellcheck.q=javaspellcheck.count=20
the result i get is
response
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
Thanks,
so tell me if i m wrong... i need to modify my schema.xml to add
lowercase filter and reindex my content?
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
vincent.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search
time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
Thanks,
so tell me if i
I need to dive into search grouping / field collapsing again. I've seen there
are lot's of issues about it now.
Can someone point me to the minimum patches I need to run this feature in
trunk? I want to see the code of the most optimised version and what's being
done in distributed search. I
In that case why is there a separate lock factory of SingleInstanceLockFactory?
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
This will not work. At all.
You can only have one Solr core instance changing an index.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Tri Nguyen
No, I have both, a single field (for free form text search), and individual
fields (for directed search). I already duplicate the data and that's not a
problem, disk space is cheap. What I wanted to know was whether it is best
to make the single field multiValued=true or not. That is, should my
In the Wiki and the book by Smiley and Pugh, and in the comments inside the
solrconfig.xml file itself, it always talks about the various settings in
the context of a blended use solr index. By that I mean, it assumes you are
indexing and querying from the same solr instance. However, if I have a
Thanks Ken,
this what I wanted to know, I'm not very familiar with this kind of
modification. However, I will try to do it and ask you some information
in case of need.
regards,
Arno
Le 14.01.2011 18:04, Ken Krugler a écrit :
Hi Arno,
On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:57am, arnaud gaudinat wrote:
In the Wiki and the book by Smiley and Pugh, and in the
comments inside the
solrconfig.xml file itself, it always talks about the
various settings in
the context of a blended use solr index. By that I mean, it
assumes you are
indexing and querying from the same solr instance. However,
if I
Dear All,
Can anyone tell me how to use carrot2 clustering component
to cluster search results. What are its dependencies ? Which type of
changes are required in solr.config or anywhere else.
Thanks!
Isha
Hi List,
we are sometimes reaching the maxBooleanClauses Limit (which is 1024, per
default). So, the used query looks like:
?q=name:Stefanfq=5 10 12 15 16 [...]
where the values are ids of users, which the current user is allowed to see
- so long, nothing special. sometimes the filter-query
Haha, Yes, you're not wrong.
The field you are sorting on should be a fieldtype that has the lowercase
filter applied. You'll probably have to re-index your data, unless you happen
to already have such a field (via copyField, perhaps).
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Salman Akram
Functionally, the two options are equivalent, and I've never really
heard of any speed difference. Assuming it's not that big a programming
change, though, you probably want to just test...
Do be aware of one subtle difference in the approaches, though. If the
increment gap is != 1 then
You can index a field which can the User types e.g. UserType (possible
values can be TypeA,TypeB and so on...) and then you can just do
?q=name:Stefanfq=UserType:TypeB
BTW you can even increase the size of maxBooleanClauses but in this case
definitely this is not a good idea. Also you would hit
Note two things:
1 the lowercasefilter is NOT applied to the STORED data. So the
display will still have the original case although the sorting
should be what you want.
2 you should NOT be sorting on a tokenized field. Use something
like KeywordTokenizer followed by the lowercase
Thanks Salman,
talking with others about problems really helps. Adding another FilterQuery
is a bit too much - but combining both is working fine!
not seen the wood for the trees =)
Thanks, Stefan
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote:
You
You are welcome.
By new field I meant if you don't have a field for UserType already.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Stefan Matheis
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Salman,
talking with others about problems really helps. Adding another FilterQuery
is a bit too much - but
Hey!
Thanks a lot, nice tip.. works fine..
But one Problem i have too...
to indexing ZIP. i tryed :
curl
http://192.168.105.66:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.id=zipuprefix=attr_commit=true;
-F myfile@constellio_standalone-1.0.zip
and i get:
Warning: Illegally formatted input field!
curl:
missing the = char between myfile and @filename.ext?
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jörg Agatz joerg.ag...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hey!
Thanks a lot, nice tip.. works fine..
But one Problem i have too...
to indexing ZIP. i tryed :
curl
ohh, your right.. embarrassing!
i have tryed, and it works, but it seems it works not Perfect, the txt
documents into the ZIP are not indext, lonly the Names of documents into the
zip..
King
Hi,
I am trying to use CommonGrams with SOLR - 1604 patch but doesn't seem to
work.
If I don't add {!complexphrase} it uses CommonGramsQueryFilterFactory and
proper bi-grams are made but of course doesn't use this patch.
If I add {!complexphrase} it simply does it the old way i.e. ignore
Hi everybody,
Is it possible to reset solr statistics without restarting solr or reloading
cores?
Conform the thread here
http://osdir.com/ml/solr-user.lucene.apache.org/2010-03/msg01078.html
this was not possible in March 2010.
I am wondering if something like this has been implemented in
Hi All,
can we get the spellchecking results even when the keyword is true.
As for spellchecking will give only to the wrong keywords, cant we get
similar and near words of the keyword though the spellcheck.q is true..
as an example
Hi,
I'm crawling different intranets so i developed a nutch plugin to add a
static field for each of these crawls.
I do have now in SOLR my documents with their specific craw field. If
i search withing solr i can see my documents being returned with that field.
The field definition in the schema
String fields are unanalyzed, so case matters. Are you sure you're not
using a different case (try KeywordTokenizer + lowercaseFilter if you
want these normalized to, say, lower case).
If that isn't the problem, could we see the results if you add
debugQuery=on
to your URL? That often helps
Thanks for your answer.
Yes, schema browser shows that the field contains the right values as i
expect.
From debugQuery=on i see there must be some problem though:
str name=rawquerystringcrawl:DIGITALDATA/str
str name=querystringcrawl:DIGITALDATA/str
str
It looks like there's some problem with my dismax query
handler. It
doesn't recognize the query with the colon format.
Here's the handler definition:
It is expected behavior of dismax. You can append/use defType=lucene for colon
format.
I am facing exact same issue. Did you find out root cause for this? Please
let me know any information you have
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-would-cause-large-numbers-of-executeWithRetry-INFO-messages-tp1453417p2274077.html
Sent from the Solr -
As Ahmet says, this is what dismax does. You could also append a
filter query (fq=crawl:DIGITALDATA) to your query.
eDismax supports fielded queries, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
This is already in the trunk and 3.x code lines I'm pretty sure.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jan 17,
Camden,
You may also want to be aware that there is a new feature added to Spell
Check's collate functionality that will guarantee the collations will return
hits. It also is able to return more than one collation and tell you how many
hits each one would result in if re-queried. This might
Add spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true to your query and I think it'll do what you
want. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.onlyMorePopular for
more info.
One caveat is if you use spellcheck.collate, this will likely result in
useless, nonsensical collations most of
James,
Thank you, but I'm not sure that will work for my needs. I'm very
interested in contextual spell checking. Take for example the author
stephenie meyer. stephenie is a far less popular spelling than
stephanie, but in this context it's the correct option. I feel like
shingles with an un
Hi Stevo,
Thanks for reviewing the Maven POMs in LUCENE-2657 - I appreciate it.
In those poms, not all modules have explicit version and groupId which
is a bad practice.
Really? According to the POM best practices section in Sonatype's Maven book
Camden,
Have you seen SmileyPugh's Solr book? They describe something very similar to
what you're trying to do on p180ff. The difference seems to be they use a
field that only has a couple of terms so they don't bother with shingles. The
book makes a big point about using spellcheck.q in
Are their goal fudanmentally different at all or just different approaches
to solve the same problem (sharding)? Can someone give a technical review?
Thanks,
--Sean
Just wanted to know how efficient field collapsing is. And if there is a
performance penalty, how big is it likely to be?
I'm interested in using field collapsing with faceting.
Thanks.
Say I do a query that matches 4000 documents. Is there a query syntax or
parser that would allow me to say retrieve offsets 1000, 2000, 3000?
I would prefer to not do multiple starts and limit 1's.
Thanks in advance.
Steve
Have you seen the start and rows parameters? If they don't work,
perhaps you could explain what you need that they don't provide.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:58 PM, 5 Diamond IT
i...@smallbusinessconsultingexperts.com wrote:
Say I do a query that matches 4000 documents. Is there a
I think Steve wants the 1000th, 2000th and 3000th document from the query. And
since there's no method of doing so you're constrained to executing three
queries with rows=1 and start is resp. 1000, 2000 and 3000.
If you want these documents to return you will have to do multiple queries
with
I want to start at row 1000, 2000, and 3000 and retrieve those 3 rows ONLY from
the result set of whatever search was used. Yes, I can do 3 queries, start=1000
and limit 1, etc., but, want ONE query to get those 3 rows from the result set.
It's the poor mans way of doing price buckets the way I
There is always CPU and RAM involved for every nice component you use. Just
how much the penalty is depends completely on your hardware, index and type of
query. Under heavy load it numbers will change.
Since we don't know your situation and it's hard to predict without
benchmarks, you should
In my opinion it should work for every update handler. If you're really sure
your configuration if fine and it still doesn't work you might have to file an
issue.
Your configuration looks alright but don't forget you've configured
overwriteDupes=false!
Hello,
here is an excerpt of my
How is NRT doing, being used in production?
Which Solr is it in?
And is there built in Spatial in that version?
How is Solr 4.x doing?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from
I understand that the specific figures differ for everybody.
I just wanted to see if anyone who has used this feature could share their
experience. A ballpark figure -- e.g. 50% slowdown or 10 times slower -- would
be helpful.
--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
James,
Thanks, the spellcheck.q was exactly what I needed to be using!
-Camden
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.comwrote:
Camden,
Have you seen SmileyPugh's Solr book? They describe something very
similar to what you're trying to do on p180ff. The
No other way around to fit this requirement?
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Chamnap Chhorn chamnapchh...@gmail.comwrote:
Ahh, thanks guys for helping me!
For Adam solution, it doesn't work for me. Here is my Field, FieldType, and
solr query:
fieldType name=text_keyword
How is NRT doing, being used in production?
It works and there are not any lingering bugs as it's been available
for quite a while.
Which Solr is it in?
Per-segment field cache is used transparently by Solr,
IndexWriter.getReader is what's not used yet. I'm not sure where
per-segment
Solr itself does all three things. There is no need for Nutch- that is
needed for crawling web sites, not file systems (as the original
question specifies).
Solr operates as a web service, running in any Java servlet container.
Detecting changes to files is more tricky: there is no
First of all, seems like a good book,
Solr-14-Enterprise-Search-Server.pdf
Question, is it possible to choose locale at search time? So if my customer is
querying across cultural/national/linguistic boundaries and I have the data for
him different languages in the same index, can I sort based
Hi,
Please tell me how can I get the libraries and plugins for
carrot2 clustering component in solr1.4.Tell me the site from where i
can get them.
Thanks!
Isha
Hi,
I am not able to understand the caarot2 clustering component from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent
please provide me more detailed information if someone had already worked on
this. How to run this and use this during search query.
Thanks!
Isha
Isha,
You'll get more and better help if you provide more details about what you have
done, what you have tried, what isn't working, what errors or behaviour you are
seeing, etc.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::
Is there any tabular data anywhere on ALL field types and ALL options?
For example, I've looked everywhere in the last hour, and I don't see anywhere
on Solr site, google, or in the 1.4 manual where it says whether a copyField
'directive' can be made ' required=true '.
Dennis Gearon
how to write a parser program that will convert log files into XML..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Getting-started-with-writing-parser-tp2278092p2278092.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 01/12/2011 12:02 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello,
I'm indexing some content (articles) whose text I cannot store in its
original
form for copyright reason. So I can index the content, but cannot store it.
However, I need snippets and search term highlighting.
Any way to
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 11:12 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Isha,
You'll get more and better help if you provide more details about what you have
done, what you have tried, what isn't working, what errors or behaviour you are
seeing, etc.
Otis
Sematext ::http://sematext.com/ :: Solr -
Isha,
Next, you need to run the actual search so Carrot2 has some search results to
cluster.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Isha Garg isha.g...@orkash.com
To:
Hi,
How is NRT doing, being used in production?
Which Solr is it in?
Unless I missed it, I don't think there is true NRT in Solr just yet.
And is there built in Spatial in that version?
How is Solr 4.x doing?
Well :)
3 ways to know this sort of stuff:
* follow the dev list - high
Hi,
Don't think so. If you search across multiple languages and sort, I think the
sort if based on UTF8 order.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Dennis Gearon
I could be wrong, have a look at
http://search-lucene.com/?q=locale+sortfc_project=Solr
plus:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.CollationKeyFilterFactory
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::
Hi Tarjei,
:)
Yeah, that is the solution we are going with, actually.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Tarjei Huse tar...@scanmine.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sean,
First 2 things that come to mind:
* Katta keeps shards on HDFS and they then get deployed to regular servers/FS
* SolrCloud doesn't involve HDFS at all.
* Katta is a Lucene-level system
* SolrCloud is a Solr-level system
Both make heavy use of ZooKeeper.
Otis
Sematext ::
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Dennis Gearon gear...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Is there any tabular data anywhere on ALL field types and ALL options?
There is this:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch04_4.4.2
Not sure if it meets your needs.
For example, I've looked
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Dinesh mdineshkuma...@karunya.edu.in wrote:
how to write a parser program that will convert log files into XML..
[...]
There is no point to starting multiple threads on this issue,
hoping that someone will somehow solve your problem.
You have been given the
Otis,
Any pointer to an architecture view of either system?
Thanks,
Sean
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sean,
First 2 things that come to mind:
* Katta keeps shards on HDFS and they then get deployed to regular
servers/FS
* SolrCloud
71 matches
Mail list logo
