Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Aaron Greenspan
Hi again, My two cents: I’m glad to see the discussion over improved documentation, but if you give me a choice between better docs and better UI, I’ll choose a better UI every time. If contributors are going to spend real time on the concerns raised in this thread, spend the time on making

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Nick Vasilyev
Just wanted to chime in on the technical set-up of the Solr "petting zoo", I think I can help here; just let me know what you need. Here is the idea; just have a vagrant box with ansible provisioning Zoo keepers and Solr, creating collections, and etc That way anyone starting out can just

Re: (Survey/Experiment) Are you interested in a Solr example reading group?

2016-09-15 Thread John Bickerstaff
I'm in whether it's Slack or email or whatever. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Count me in to participate if it’s a Slack channel. (if it’s > e-mail-based, it won’t hit my radar and I wouldn’t tune in much) > > I’d love to chat up example/files*

Distributing nodes with the collections API RESTORE command

2016-09-15 Thread Stephen Lewis
Hello, I have a solr cloud cluster in a test environment running 6.1 where I am looking at using the collections API BACKUP and RESTORE commands to manage data integrity. When restoring from a backup, I'm finding the same behavior occurs every time; after the restore command, all shards are

Re: (Survey/Experiment) Are you interested in a Solr example reading group?

2016-09-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
Count me in to participate if it’s a Slack channel. (if it’s e-mail-based, it won’t hit my radar and I wouldn’t tune in much) I’d love to chat up example/files* and hear what folks have troubles with and what we can do to make Solr examples more robust and useful. Erik *

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 9/15/2016 8:24 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > The WIKI may be an official community-contributing forum, but its > technological implementation has gotten so bad it is impossible to > update. Every time I change the page, it takes minutes (and feels like > hours) for the update to come

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread John Bickerstaff
Maybe it's too much to manage without a corporate sponsor, as you say... But what about a cloneable AWS instance which people can then take responsibility for themselves? Or a set of VM's that could be downloaded? Or a Docker? I haven't done this so there may be roadblocks I'm unaware of - and

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
On 15 September 2016 at 21:47, John Bickerstaff wrote: > One thing I'd like to suggest is that I believe the ideal tutorial does not > require someone to even install the software. Well, if somebody would just agree to run a hosted read-only instance of Solr we could

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread John Bickerstaff
YES, YES, YES!!! I think nearly everyone on this list will agree that getting started with almost any open-source project is agony - it's just that we've all gotten used to sucking it up and getting past it. Solr, given it's many moving parts and multiple ways of doing things is "worse" than

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
The WIKI may be an official community-contributing forum, but its technological implementation has gotten so bad it is impossible to update. Every time I change the page, it takes minutes (and feels like hours) for the update to come through. No clue what to do about that though. Creating the

Re: How to enable JMX to monitor Jetty

2016-09-15 Thread John Bickerstaff
I'm very interested in Solr Docker images... Is this the "official" thing? I see it's supported by Lucidworks... On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Georg Sorst wrote: > If you are using the Solr's Docker images this is even easier: > > FROM solr:6.0.0 > > USER $SOLR_USER

Re: (Survey/Experiment) Are you interested in a Solr example reading group?

2016-09-15 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
Please, everybody who is interested, just click through to the survey. It is a single page and that way I know who to contact if this does happen :-) And yes, it would be somewhere NOT on this mailing list to avoid hogging the bandwidth of this one. A new time-limited list, a Google Group, Slack.

Re: JSON Facets and excluded tags - not working for empty results

2016-09-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9519 -Yonik On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: >> I’m not entirely sure i’m describing the correct problem here - for now it >>

RE: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the index

2016-09-15 Thread Pushkar Raste
Markus, Can you pick up one of the values in the facets and try running query using that. Ideally numFound should match the facet count. If those aren't matching I guess your index is still sorta damaged but you aren't really noticing it. On Sep 15, 2016 4:44 AM, "Markus Jelsma"

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread john saylor
hey On 09/15/16 04:35, Jan Høydahl wrote: and the official user-contributed docs is at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ But I wonder if we should consider creating an official, slim Solr User Guide as well, for end users, structured as a getting-started guide and

Re: (Survey/Experiment) Are you interested in a Solr example reading group?

2016-09-15 Thread WebDawg
On Sep 13, 2016 11:30 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote: > > Is anybody interested in joining an example reading group for Solr > (6.2 or latest). > > Basic idea: we take one of the examples that ship with Solr and ask > each other any and all questions related to it.

Re: JSON Facets and excluded tags - not working for empty results

2016-09-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote: > I’m not entirely sure i’m describing the correct problem here - for now it > looks like the only way it occurs and i hope it’s not misleading any pointers > that would be helpful. so in case you think i got it wrong,

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 9/15/2016 2:35 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > But I wonder if we should consider creating an official, slim Solr > User Guide as well, for end users, structured as a getting-started > guide and with focus on how you achieve a task, not documenting all 99 > parameters a plugin can take. Yes, I like

Exception is thrown when using TimestampUpdateProcessorFactory

2016-09-15 Thread preeti kumari
Hi All, I am trying to get solr index time as solrtimestamp field. I am using solr 5.2.1 in solr cloud mode. solrtimestamp update-script.js example config parameter xnum,xnum2 But I am getting below exception when

RE: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the index

2016-09-15 Thread Markus Jelsma
Mikhail - yes, there are results for the query. The set is empty as if there are no values for the field, {}. Everything checked out correctly but no facet results, until immediately after the optimize. Thanks, Markus -Original message- > From:Mikhail Khludnev >

Re: Miserable Experience Using Solr. Again.

2016-09-15 Thread Jan Høydahl
I was not proposing StackOverflow as some official docs. Solr’s only official doc is the RefGuide, and the official user-contributed docs is at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ But it may be that some of you Solr users want to contribute to StackOverflow’s Solr topic,

Re: JSON Facets and excluded tags - not working for empty results

2016-09-15 Thread Stefan Matheis
Thanks for the Pointer Mikhail, i didn’t ;o i’ve seen it in some tests but i didn’t realize that it might help (now pretty obvious) .. and now i’m finding all the relevant threads as well. Thanks again, Stefan On September 15, 2016 at 10:10:32 AM, Mikhail Khludnev (m...@apache.org) wrote: >

Re: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the index

2016-09-15 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Markus, Could you spot more details about this particular field type? How does 'empty set of facets' look like? Is there results in that query? On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello - we've just spotted the weirdest issue on Solr 6.1. > > We

Re: JSON Facets and excluded tags - not working for empty results

2016-09-15 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello Stefan, Have you tried to add processEmpty:true ? json.facet={processEmpty:true,"source":{"type":"terms","field":"source"," domain":{"excludeTags":"source"}}} On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote: > I’m not entirely sure i’m describing the correct

Re: changed query parsing between 4.10.4 and 5.5.3?

2016-09-15 Thread William Bell
We need to get this fixed. Do you have some sample queries? On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Bernd Fehling < bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > after trying several hours with all combinations of parameters and not > getting any useful search result with complex search terms

Re: How to enable JMX to monitor Jetty

2016-09-15 Thread Georg Sorst
If you are using the Solr's Docker images this is even easier: FROM solr:6.0.0 USER $SOLR_USER # Expose JMX port EXPOSE 1${SOLR_UID} # Enable JMX RUN sed -i -e 's/^ENABLE_REMOTE_JMX_OPTS=.*$/ENABLE_REMOTE_JMX_OPTS="true"/' bin/ solr.in.sh RUN sed -i -e

Re: changed query parsing between 4.10.4 and 5.5.3?

2016-09-15 Thread Bernd Fehling
Your statement "using the old behaviour as a baseline for checking the correctness of 5.5 behaviour" might be a point of view. Let me give an example, my query: q=(text:(star AND trek AND wars)^200 OR text:("star trek wars")^350) results to 159 hits from 99 million records in the index (version