Hi,
the problem is not the GET request type, the problem is that you build a
far too complicated query. This won't scale very much and looks rather
weird.
Why don't you just add all parent category ids to every document at
index time? Then you could simply filter your request with the topmost
You need to change the way how your data is imported. Or look for an
alternative how to build your query. It depends on your data model, and
your import mechanism.
Do your really have hundreds of categories?
BTW, childs is amusing! ;-)
-Michael
Am 13.04.2010 14:12, schrieb stockii:
hi. thx
Hi,
Am 13.04.2010 14:52, schrieb stockii:
some cat, have 300 child-categories.
And that's the reason why you shouldn't add them all to your filter query.
or, how can i import the cat-data ?
Again: How do you do it NOW?
-Michael
I wouldn't do autosuggestion with normal queries anyway. Because of
better performance... :-)
I don't use DIH, so I can't tell what to do then. For us, we import data
with a simple PHP script, which was rather easy to write. So we have
full control on Solr's data structure. You somehow have to
Am 15.04.2010 17:45, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
Is it possible to turn off request logging for some handlers?
Specifically, I'd like to stop logging requests to /admin/ping and
/replication, which get hit very often.
Hi,
you can set logging for nearly every single task here:
Am 19.04.2010 16:09, schrieb stockii:
so i want to see how it is indexed.
Go to the admin panel, open the schema browser, and set the number of
shown tokens to 1 or something.
-Michael
Am 19.04.2010 16:29, schrieb stockii:
oha, yes thx but
we have 800 000 items ... to find the right in this way ? XD
Then use the TermsComponent: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
-Michael
Nice site. Really!
In addition to Dave:
How do I search with tags enabled?
If I search for Blog, I can see that there's one blog software written
in Java. When I click on the Java tag, then my search is discarded, and
I get all Java software. when I do my search again, the tag filter is
lost. It
Am 03.05.2010 16:43, schrieb Jan Kammer:
Hi,
It worked fine with a normal field. There must something wrong with
copyfield, or why does dataimporthandler add/update no more documents?
Did you define your destination field as multivalue?
-Michael
Am 03.05.2010 23:32, schrieb Satish Kumar:
Hi,
Can someone give clues on how to implement this feature? This is a very
important requirement for us, so any help is greatly appreciated.
Hi,
I just implemented exactly this feature. You need to patch Solr to make
this work.
We at Zalando
Am 18.05.2010 16:54, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
2. Query=rock where bitrate128 where it should return
only first and third docs where bitrate128
q=rockfq:bitrate:[* TO 128] for this bitrate field must be tint type.
q=rockfq:bitrate:[* TO 127] would be better, because bitrate should be
lower
Am 31.05.2010 11:50, schrieb olivier sallou:
Hi,
I have created in index with several fields.
If I query my index in the admin section of solr (or via http request), I
get results for my search if I specify the requested field:
Query: note:Aspergillus (look for Aspergillus in field note)
Am 31.05.2010 12:36, schrieb olivier sallou:
Is there any way to query all fields including dynamic ones?
Yes, using the *:term query. (Please note that the asterisk should not
be quoted.)
To answer your question, we need more details on your Solr
configuration, esp. the part of schema.xml that
Am 02.06.2010 16:13, schrieb Paul Libbrecht:
Is your server Linux?
In this case this is very normal.. any java application spawns many new
processes on linux... it's not exactly bound to threads unfortunately.
Uh, no. New threads in Java typically don't spawn new processes on OS level.
I
Am 02.06.2010 16:15, schrieb Jörg Agatz:
yes i done.. but i dont know how i get the information out of the big
Array...
They're simply the keys of a single response array.
Am 02.06.2010 16:39, schrieb Paul Libbrecht:
This is impressive, I had this in any Linux I've been using: SuSE,
Ubuntu, Debian, Mandrake, ...
Maybe there's some modern JDK with a modern Linux where it doesn't happen?
It surely is not one process per thread though.
I'm not a linux thread
Am 02.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Jörg Agatz:
i don't understand what you mean!
Then you should ask more precisely.
The only solution without doing any custom work would be to perform a
normal query for each suggestion. But you might get into performance
troubles with that, because suggestions are typically performed much
more often than complete searches.
The much faster solution that needs own work would be
Am 03.06.2010 13:02, schrieb Andrzej Bialecki:
..., and deploy this
index in a separate JVM (to benefit from other CPUs than the one that
runs your Solr core)
Every known webserver ist multithreaded by default, so putting different
Solr instances into different JVMs will be of no use.
Am 03.06.2010 16:45, schrieb Andrzej Bialecki:
You are right to a certain degree. Still, there are some contention
points in Lucene/Solr, how threads are allocated on available CPU-s, and
how the heap is used, which can make a two-JVM setup perform much better
than a single-JVM setup given the
Hi all,
I have a field with some kind of category tree as a string. The format
is like this:
prefixfirstsecond#prefixotherfirstothersecond
So, the document is categorized in two categories, separated by '#', and
all categories start with the same prefix which I don't want to use.
For
/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFiltersHTH
Erick
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Michael Kuhlmann
michael.kuhlm...@zalando.de wrote:
Hi Erick,
On 03/12/10 17:09, Erick Erickson wrote:
What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems.
Field or fieldType?
...one of my fields with a fieldtype that does not have any analyzer
defined at all,
Hi,
I have some fields that are only used for faceting, so they're only
queried by facet results. No modification is needed, no lowercase,
nothing. So the KeywordTokenizerFactory seems to be perfect for them.
Alas, when the value contains spaces, I'm still getting too many
results. I have a
On 03/12/10 17:51, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
try using Parenthesis with queries that contain more than
one term. fq=label:(Aces+of+London)
Otherwise
defaultSearchField/defaultSearchField jumps
in.
defaultSearchField stuff is correct but I just realized that you need to use
quotes in your
On 03/15/10 08:56, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:12 AM, blargy zman...@hotmail.com wrote:
How would I go about splitting a column by a certain delimiter AND ignore
all
empty matches.
[...]
You will probably have to write a custom Transformer to remove empty values.
On 03/19/10 11:18, muneeb wrote:
Hi,
I have indexed almost 7 million articles on two separate cores, each with
their own conf/ and data/ folder, i.e. they have their individual index.
What I normally do is, use core0 for querying and core1 for any updates and
once updates are finished i
Does the random sort function help you here?
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/RandomSortField.html
However, you will get some very old listings then, if it's okay for you.
-Kuli
Am 12.01.2012 14:38, schrieb Alexandre Rocco:
Erick,
This document already has a field
Hi Jonty,
no, not really. When we first had such problems, we really thought that
the number of open files is the problem, so we implemented an algorithm
that performed an optimize from time to time to force a segment merge.
Due to some misconfiguration, this ran too often. With the result
Hi rzao!
I think this is the problem:
On 02.02.2012 13:59, rzoao wrote:
UpdateRequest req = new UpdateRequest();
req.setAction(AbstractUpdateRequest.ACTION.COMMIT, false,
false);
I'd suggest that you check which documents *exactly* are missing in Solr
index. Or find at least one that's missing, and try to figure out how
this document differs from the other ones that can be found in Solr.
Maybe we can then find out what exact problem there is.
Greetings,
-Kuli
On
I don't know much about Tika, but this seems to be a bug in PDFBox.
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-797
Yoz might also have a look at this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7489206/error-while-parsing-binary-files-mostly-pdf
At least that's what I found when I googled the
Hi!
On 14.02.2012 13:09, PeterKerk wrote:
I want to sort my results on the facetnames (not by their number of results).
From the example you gave, I'd assume you don't want to sort by facet
names but by facet values.
Simply add facet.sort=index to your request; see
I had the same problem, without auto-commit.
I never really found out what exactly the reason was, but I think it was
because commits were triggered before a previous commit had the chance
to finish.
We now commit after every minute or 1000 (quite large) documents,
whatever comes first. And
Am 14.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Finotti Simone:
I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value?
Yes, it is. It must be indexed, indeed.
-Kuli
Ah, good to know! Thank you!
I already had Jetty under suspicion, but we had this failure quite often
in October and November, when the bug was not yet reported.
-Kuli
Am 14.03.2012 12:08, schrieb Colin Howe:
After some more digging around I discovered that there was a bug reported
in jetty
Am 16.03.2012 15:05, schrieb stockii:
i have 8 cores ;-)
i thought that replication is defined in solrconfig.xml and this file is
only load on startup and i cannot change master to slave and slave to master
without restarting the servlet-container ?!?!?!
No, you can reload the whole core at
Am 16.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Mike Austin:
It seems that the biggest real-world advantage is the ability to control
core creation and replacement with no downtime. The negative would be the
isolation however the are still somewhat isolated. What other benefits and
common real-world situations
Hi Ramdev,
add() is a blocking call. Otherwise it had to start an own background
thread which is not what a library like Solrj should do (how many
threads at most? At which priority? Which thread group? How long keep
them pooled?)
And, additionally, you might want to know whether the
Am 23.03.2012 10:29, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
I'm looking at the following. I want
to (1) map some query fields to
some other query fields and add some things to FL, and then
(2)
rescore.
I can see how to do it as a RequestHandler that makes a
parser to get
the fields, or I could see making a
Am 23.03.2012 11:17, schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
Adding an own SearchComponent after the regular QueryComponent (or
better as a last-element) is goof ...
Of course, I meant good, not goof! ;)
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 25.04.2012 15:57, schrieb stockii:
is it not fucking possible to import DIH !?!?!? WTF!
It is fucking possible, you just need to either point your goddamn
classpath to the data import handler jar in the contrib folders, or you
have to add the appropriate contrib folder into the lib dir
Am 26.04.2012 00:57, schrieb Joe:
Hi,
I'm using the solrj API to query my SOLR 3.6 index. I have multiple text
fields, which I would like to weight differently. From what I've read, I
should be able to do this using the dismax or edismax query types. I've
tried the following:
SolrQuery query =
Am 26.04.2012 16:17, schrieb pprabhcisco123:
The use case is to create a core for each customer as well as partner .
Since its very difficult to create cores statically in solr.xml file for all
4500 customers , is there any way to create the cores dynamically or on the
fly.
Yes there is.
Am 08.05.2012 04:13, schrieb Jeff Schmidt:
Francois:
Check out DataStax Enterprise 2.0, Solr integrated with Cassandra:
http://www.datastax.com/docs/datastax_enterprise2.0/search/index
And, Solbase, Solr integrated with HBase: https://github.com/Photobucket/Solbase
I'm sure there are others,
Am 08.05.2012 23:23, schrieb Lance Norskog:
Lucene does not support more 2^32 unique documents, so you need to
partition.
Just a small note:
I doubt that Solr supports more than 2^31 unique documents, as most
other Java applications that use int values.
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 10.05.2012 14:33, schrieb Bruno Mannina:
like that:
field name=inventor-countryCH/field
field name=inventor-countryFR/field
but in this case Ioose the link between inventor and its country?
Of course, you need to index the two inventors into two distinct documents.
Did you mark those
I don't know the details of your schema, but I would create fields like
name, country, street etc., and a field named role, which contains
values like inventor, applicant, etc.
How would you do it otherwise? Create only four documents, each fierld
containing 80 mio. values?
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 10.05.2012 22:27, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
It's possible to see what terms are indexed for a field of
document that
stored=false?
One way is to use http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LukeRequestHandler
Another approach is this:
- Query for exactly this document, e.g. by using the unique field
-
Am 11.05.2012 15:48, schrieb Anderson vasconcelos:
Hi
Analysing the solr server in glassfish with Jconsole, the Heap Memory Usage
don't use more than 4 GB. But, when was executed the TOP comand, the free
memory in Operating system is only 200 MB. The physical memory is only 10GB.
Why machine
Am 14.05.2012 05:56, schrieb arjit:
Thanks Erick for the reply.
I have 6 cores which doesn't contain duplicated data. every core has some
unique data. What I thought was when I read it would read parallel 6 cores
and join the result and return the query. And this would be efficient then
reading
Am 14.05.2012 13:22, schrieb Sami Siren:
Sharding is (nearly) always slower than using one big index with sufficient
hardware resources. Only use sharding when your index is too huge to fit
into one single machine.
If you're not constrained by CPU or IO, in other words have plenty of
CPU cores
Am 14.05.2012 16:18, schrieb Otis Gospodnetic:
Hi Kuli,
In a client engagement, I did see this (N shards on 1 beefy box with lots of
RAM and CPU cores) be faster than 1 big index.
I want to believe you, but I also want to understand. Can you explain
why? And did this only happen for single
Am 21.05.2012 12:07, schrieb Tolga:
Hi,
I am getting this error:
[doc=null] missing required field: id
[...]
I've got this entry in schema.xml: field name=id type=string
stored=true indexed=true/
What to do?
Simply make sure that every document you're sending to Solr contains
this id
Am 21.05.2012 12:40, schrieb Tolga:
How do I verify it exists? I've been crawling the same site and it
wasn't giving an error on Thursday.
It depends on what you're doing.
Are you using nutch?
-Kuli
Am 14.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Jithin:
Hi,
Is it possible to refresh the stop word list periodically say once in 6
hours. Is this already supported in Solr or are there any work arounds.
Kindly help me in understanding this.
Hi,
you can trigger a reload command to the core admin, assuming
I think what Radha Krishna (is this really her name?) means is different:
She wants to return only the matching token instead of the complete
field value.
Indeed, this is not possible. But you could use highlighting
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters), and then extract
the
Hi,
Am 25.10.2011 23:53, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
On 10/20/2011 11:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
[...] I've noticed a performance discrepancy when
processing every one of my delete records, currently about 25000 of
them.
I din't understand what a delete record is. Do you delete records in
Solr?
Hi;
we have a similar problem here. We already raised the file ulimit on the
server to 4096, but this only defered the problem. We get a
TooManyOpenFilesException every few months.
The problem has nothing to do with real files. When we had the last
TooManyOpenFilesException, we investigated with
Am 26.10.2011 18:29, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
For inserting, I do use a Collection of SolrInputDocuments. The delete
process grabs values from idx_delete, does a query like the above (the
part that's slow in Java), then if any documents are found, issues a
deleteByQuery with the same string.
Sorry, I was wrong.
Am 27.10.2011 09:36, schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
and you'll get the number of affected documents in your response anyway.
That's not true, you don't get the affected document count. Anyway, it's
still true that you don't need to check for documents first, at least
not when you
Am 28.10.2011 11:16, schrieb Robert Brown:
Is there no way to return the total number of docs as part of a search?
No, it isn't. Usually this information is of absolutely no value to the
end user.
A workaround would be to add some field to the schema that has the same
value for every document,
Hi,
this is not exactly true. In Solr, you can't have the wildcard operator
on both sides of the operator.
However, you can tokenize your fields and simply query for Solr. This
is what's Solr made for. :)
-Kuli
Am 01.11.2011 13:24, schrieb François Schiettecatte:
Arshad
Actually it is
Am 01.11.2011 16:06, schrieb Erick Erickson:
NGrams are often used in Solr for this case, but they will also add to
your index size.
It might be worthwhile to look closely at your user requirements
before going ahead
and supporting this functionality
Best
Erick
My opinion. Wildcards are
Am 08.11.2011 23:38, schrieb Cam Bazz:
How can I store a 2d point and index it to a field type that is
latlontype, if I am using solrj?
Simply use a String field. The format is $latitude,$longitude.
-Kuli
Am 14.11.2011 09:33, schrieb rajini maski:
query :
http://localhost:8091/Group/select?/indent=onq=studyid:120sort=studyidasc,groupid
asc,subjectid ascstart=0rows=10
Is it a copy-and-paste error, or did you realls sort on studyidasc?
I don't think you have a field studyidasc, and Solr
Am 14.11.2011 21:50, schrieb alx...@aim.com:
Hello,
I use solr3.4 and nutch 1.3. In request handler we have
str name=mm2lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%/str
As fas as I know this means that for two word phrase search match must be 100%.
However, I noticed that in most cases documents with both words are
I don't know much about nutch, but it looks like there's simply a commit
missing at the end.
Try to send a commit, e.g by executing
curl http://host:port/solr/core/update -H Content-Type: text/xml
--data-binary 'commit /'
-Kuli
Am 15.11.2011 09:11, schrieb Armin Schleicher:
hi there,
Hi,
Am 15.11.2011 10:25, schrieb rajini maski:
fieldType name=long class=solr.TrieLongField precisionStep=0
omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/
[...]
fieldType name=tlong class=solr.TrieLongField precisionStep=8
omitNorms=true positionIncrementGap=0/
[...]
field
Am 16.11.2011 17:11, schrieb Travis Low:
If I can't solve this problem then we'll basically have to write our own
PHP Solr client, which would royally suck.
Oh, if you really can't get the library work, no problem - there are
several PHP clients out there that don't need a PECL installation.
Am 17.11.2011 08:46, schrieb Kashif Khan:
Please advise how we can reindex SOLR with having fields stored=false. we
can not reindex data from the beginning just want to read and write indexes
from the SOLRJ only. Please advise a solution. I know we can do it using
lucene classes using
Am 17.11.2011 11:53, schrieb sbarriba:
The 'params' logging pointer was what I needed. So for reference its not a
good idea to use a 'wget' command directly in a crontab.
I was using:
wget http://localhost/solr/myfeed?command=full-importrows=5000clean=false
:))
I think the shell handled the
Am 29.11.2011 15:20, schrieb Erick Erickson:
Hmmm, I tried this in straight Java, no Solr/Lucene involved and the
behavior I'm seeing is that no example works if it has more than
one whitespace character after the hyphen, including your failure
example.
I haven't lived inside regexes for long
Hi Mark,
I'm sure you can manage this using function queries somehow, but this is
rather complicated, esp. if you both want to return the price and sort
on it.
I'd rather update the index as soon as a campaign starts or ends. At
least that's how we did it when I worked for online shops.
Hi Alan,
Solr can do this fast and easy, but I wonder if a simple key-value-store
won't fit better for your suits.
Do you really only need to query be chart_id, or do you also need to
query by time range?
In either case, as long as your data fits into an in-memory database, I
would
Am 05.12.2011 14:28, schrieb Per Steffensen:
Hi
Reading http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication I notice the
pollInterval (guess it should have been pullInterval) on the slaves.
That indicate to me that indexed information is not really pushed from
master to slave(s) on events defined by
Am 07.12.2011 14:26, schrieb Finotti Simone:
That's the scenario:
I have an XML that maps words W to URLs; when a search request is issued by my
web client, a query will be issued to my Solr application. If, after stemming,
the query matches any in W, the client must be redirected to the
Am 07.12.2011 15:09, schrieb Finotti Simone:
I got your and Michael's point. Indeed, I'm not very skilled in web devolpment
so there may be something that I'm missing. Anyway, Endeca does something like
this:
1. accept a query
2. does the stemming;
3. check if the result of the step 2.
In addition to Bob's response:
Am 15.06.2011 13:59, schrieb Omri Cohen:
[...]
field name=at_location type=text indexed=index
stored=true required=false /
field name=at_country type=text indexed=index
stored=true required=false /
field name=at_city
Hi Omri,
there are two limitations:
1. You can't sort on a multiValued field. (Anyway, on which of the
copied fields would you want to sort first?)
2. You can't make the multiValued field the unique key.
Both are no real limitations:
1. Better sort on at_country, at_state, at_city instead.
2.
Am 22.06.2011 05:37, schrieb Bill Bell:
It can get more complicated. Here is another example:
q=cardiologydefType=dismaxqf=specialties
(Cardiology and cardiologist are stems)...
But I don't really know which value in Cardiologist match perfectly.
Again, I only want it to return:
Am 22.06.2011 09:49, schrieb Bill Bell:
You can type q=cardiology and match on cardiologist. If stemming did not
work you can just add a synonym:
cardiology,cardiologist
Okay, synonyms are the only way I can think of a realistic match.
Stemming won't work on a facet field; you wouldn't get
Am 27.06.2011 15:56, schrieb Jihed Amine Maaref:
- normalizedContents:(EDOUAR* AND une) doesn't return anything
This was discussed few days ago:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tt3095198.html
- normalizedContents:(edouar* AND un)
Am 28.06.2011 09:24, schrieb Romi:
But as i suppose it would be very hard to include synonyms manually for each
word as my application has large data.
I want to know is there any way that this synonym.text file generate
automatically referring to all dictionary words
I don't get the point
Am 29.06.2011 12:30, schrieb samuele.mattiuzzo:
fieldType name=salary_min_text class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
...
this is the final version of my schema part, but what i get is this:
doc
float name=score1.0/float
str name=salaryNegotiable/str
str
Am 07.07.2011 16:14, schrieb Bob Sandiford:
[...] (Without the optimize, 'deleted' records still show up in query
results...)
No, that's not true. The terms remain in the index, but the document
won't show up any more.
Optimize is only for performance (and disk space) optimization, as the
Am 07.07.2011 16:52, schrieb Mark juszczec:
Ok. That's really good to know because optimization of that kind will be
important.
Optimization is only important if you had a lot of deletes or updated
docs, or if you want your segments get merged. (At least that's what I
know about it.)
What
Am 12.07.2011 12:03, schrieb alexander sulz:
Still, why the PHP stops working correctly is beyond me, but it seems to
be fixed now.
You should mind the max_execution_time parameter in you php.ini.
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 12.07.2011 12:13, schrieb Lox:
Hi,
In the case where two or more documents are returned with the same score, is
there a way to tell Solr to sort them alphabetically?
Yes, add the parameter
sort=score desc,your_field_that_shall_be_sorted_alphabetically asc
to your request.
Greetings,
Am 13.07.2011 14:05, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
this is what i was expecting. Otherwise updating a field of a document that
has an unstored but indexed field is impossible (without losing the unstored
but indexed field. I call this updating a field of a document AND
deleting/updating all its
Am 13.07.2011 15:37, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
Well, I'm !sure how usual this scenario would be:
1. In general those using solr with nutch don't store the content field to
avoid storing the whole web/intranet in their index, twice (1 in the form of
stored data, and one in the form of indexed
Am 13.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
Solr is already configured by default not to store more than a
maxFieldLength anyway. Usually one stores content only to display
snippets.
Yes, but the snippets must come from somewhere.
For instance, if you're using Solr's highlighting feature,
Hi,
we are running Solr 3.2.0 on Jetty for a web application. Since we just
went online and are still in beta tests, we don't have very much load on
our servers (indeed, they're currently much oversized for the current
usage), and our index size on file system ist just 1.1 MB.
We have one
Am 22.07.2011 14:27, schrieb cnyee:
I think I know what it is. The second query has higher scores than the first.
The additional condition domain_ids:(0^1.3 OR 1) which evaluates to true
always - pushed up the scores and allows a LOT more records to pass.
This can't be, because the score
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can acquire, the more documents can you send in one update.
However, I wouldn't pish it too jard anyway. If you can send, say, 100
documents
pish it too jard - sounds funny. :)
I meant push it too hard.
Am 24.05.2012 11:46, schrieb Michael Kuhlmann:
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can acquire, the more documents
, no problem, I will check it
and re-generate it.
Is it bad to create a file with 5M doc ?
Le 24/05/2012 11:46, Michael Kuhlmann a écrit :
There is no hard limit for the maximum nunmber of documents per update.
It's only memory dependent. The smaller each document, and the more
memory Solr can
Hi Wenca,
I'm a bit late. but maybe you're still interested.
There's no such functionality in standard Solr. With sorting, this is
not possible, because sort functions only rank each single document,
they know nothing about the position of the others. And query elevation
is similar, you'll
Am 07.06.2012 09:55, schrieb sheethal shreedhar:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=fruitversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on
I get
HTTP ERROR 400
Problem accessing /solr/select/. Reason:
undefined field text
Look at your schema.xml. You'll find a line like this:
Hi Laurent,
alas there is currently no such option. The time limit is handled by an
internal TimeLimitingCollector, which is used inside SolrIndexSearcher.
Since the using method only returns the DocList and doesn't have access
to the QueryResult, it won't be easy to return this information
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
