Hi,
good feature to have,
maintaining top N would also require storing all the search queries
done so far and keep updating (or atleast in some time window).
having pluggable persistent storage for all time search queries would be great.
tell me how can I help?
-umar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at
at Nabble.com.
--
Umar Shah
Research Engineer
Wisdomtap Solutions India (P) Ltd.
---
Get WisdomRank for your products @ http://services.wisdomtap.com
View opinions and recommendations about:
Point and Shoot Cameras
function query seems have to do is to find ONLY socks and assign constant
score to all of them. Isn't it correct? I took function query with constant
value just as an example.
--
Andrew Klochkov
--
Umar Shah
Research Engineer
Wisdomtap Solutions India (P) Ltd
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Andrey Klochkov
akloch...@griddynamics.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Umar Shah u...@wisdomtap.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Andrey Klochkov
akloch...@griddynamics.com wrote:
Hi!
Base on docs in the wiki I thought
at Nabble.com.
--
Umar Shah
Research Engineer
Wisdomtap Solutions India (P) Ltd.
---
Get WisdomRank for your products @ http://services.wisdomtap.com
View opinions and recommendations about:
Point and Shoot Cameras
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I am using the same folder to start solr/ jetty on many local machines
: running same version of linux.
if the same solr + jetty + solr.solr.home combination is working for you
on other machines, then i don't think
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange behavior while using the default example solr/
jetty container on a hosted ubuntu 7.10 linux machine
after running
java -jar start.jar
from the example folder, it just outputs 2 lines and hangs
2008-07-01 09:46:35.299::INFO: Logging to STDERR via
thanks Hoss,
once again.
-umar
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I am using a servlet filter to alter the query parms sent to the solr ,
: now I have a problem where I want to take some extra action (like drop
some
: query terms or filters ) if
2008/6/9 Mihails Agafonovs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Some questions:
1) Is it possible to make Solr to use, for example, MySQL database,
or it only supports *.xml files as a database?
you can use DataImportHandler to index from MySql (or other databases)
2) Is there a way to add data in
thanks hoss,
will surely do that.
-umar
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I am using function queries to rank the results,
: if some/ allthe fields (used in the function ) are missing from the
document
: what will be the ranking behavior for such
Hi,
I am using a servlet filter to alter the query parms sent to the solr ,
now I have a problem where I want to take some extra action (like drop some
query terms or filters ) if the current query returns no reults.
Now my question is
How can i efficiently get the count of the results for a
outside via
a properties file or something similar)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks hoss,
will surely do that.
-umar
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I am using function queries to rank the results
Hi,
I am using function queries to rank the results,
if some/ allthe fields (used in the function ) are missing from the document
what will be the ranking behavior for such documents?
thanks
-umar
Hi,
is there some way of limiting the results above some fixed threshold?
thanks in anticipation
-umar
Hi,
I have a problem wherein
I have field 'type' which can have value A, B C,
I want to return facet count for each type but need only show one type of
result ( say with max count)
so if i have following counts
type:A = 300
type:B = 400
type:D = 100
I should only show type:B results
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
2008/5/21 Dan Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One year between releases is a very long time for such a useful and
dynamic system. Are project leaders willing to (re)consider the
development process to prioritize
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:26 PM, dharhsana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi umar, thanks for ur reply ...
As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well...
i have two more question
1) how to delete an id in a solr
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:16 PM, dharhsana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi this is rekha,iam new to solr..
I need to search the solr with limits,for example if we are going to get
100
records ,those records should be seperated to 10 records each in seperate
xml .can any one give me the sample
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:56 PM, dharhsana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hello umar,
Thank u so much for replying me.
I have a requirement that i have to display first 10 values in jsp page .
In
that page itself i have (NEXT) button while clicking, it should query the
next 10 records from
Hi,
I'm using the latest trunk code from SOLR .
I am basically using function queries (sum, product, scale) for my project
which are not present in 1.2.
I wanted to know if there is some decided date for release of Solr1.3.
If the date is far/ not decide, what should be the best practice to adopt
in the contents of the file..
thanks for your help
-umar
Look at
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/05/10/servlet_filters.html?page=1for
more details.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you put a filter-mapping in web.xml?
no,
I just did that and it seems to be working...
what is filter-mapping required for?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon
Hi,
Due some requirement I need to transform the user queries before passing it
to the standard handler in Solr, can anyone suggest me the best way to do
this.
I will need to use a transfomation class that would provide functions to
process the input query 'qIn' and transform it to the
?
:
chain.doFilter( myRequest, response );
And you have MyServletRequestWrapper that extends ServletRequestWrapper.
Then you can get|set q* parameters through getParameter() method.
Hope this helps,
Koji
Umar Shah wrote:
Hi,
Due some requirement I need to transform the user
to solr request handler and I need to pack this servlet class file into Solr
war file.
But How would I ensure that my servlet is called instead of solr request
handler?
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi [EMAIL
thanks mike,
some how it was not evident from the wiki example, or i was too presumptious
;-).
-umar
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7-May-08, at 11:40 PM, Umar Shah wrote:
That would be sufficient for my requirements,
I'm using the following
for developers who are very familiar with a system to write
good documentation for beginners, alas.)
-Mike
On 8-May-08, at 11:44 PM, Umar Shah wrote:
thanks mike,
some how it was not evident from the wiki example, or i was too
presumptious
;-).
-umar
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:53 AM
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7-May-08, at 5:01 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
Hi,
I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values
for
ranking the results,
can I also return the value of the computed function along with other
Hi,
I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values for
ranking the results,
can I also return the value of the computed function along with other fields
of the documents returned.
thanks in anticipation
-umar
wondering if there
will be a performance problem?
-Grant
On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know what would be the performance of SOLR for the following
scenario:
the documents contain say 200 fields with
say 100 of the fields (containing numbers)
and rest
Hi,
I wanted to know what would be the performance of SOLR for the following
scenario:
the documents contain say 200 fields with
say 100 of the fields (containing numbers)
and rest containing short strings of 40-50 character length.
the sparseness of the data can be assumed to be as
hi,
a related question:
is there some way where we can specify action based on
whether field A exists or not?
-umar
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If every document will definitely have a value for both fields, you can
do...
q =
Hi,
If i through a query at the solr index , is there a mechanism where i can
find out which fields matced the query... (score of that match).
Example:
for Fields A,B and C,
if query q has term1 term2 term3
Field A matches term1 term 2
Field C matches term3
can i get component scores of the
Thanks!
I'll have a look at that.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: I am computing a sorted rank list and returning a slice (for pagination)
but
: have to recompute the result for each request, although the actual q
: parameter and fq would be
If you want this behavior then the field type should not be 'text'.
for default fieldtype=text there are many filters applied before the values
are indexed, this includes stemming (reducing the word to root word,
removing s in ur case.
try using fieldtype=string instead. this will match strictly
thanks ryan
seems like this would be helpful.
will try it out.
thanks again.
-umar
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: 2. Augment the documents with a field value -- this is a bit more
: complex and runs the risk of name collisions with fields in
Hi,
it took me some but I implemented the required function by developing a
custom plugin for our specific example. However Now I have another issue:
I am computing a sorted rank list and returning a slice (for pagination) but
have to recompute the result for each request, although the actual q
the field.. any specific
methods to do that?
If #1 works, go with that...
ryan
On Mar 31, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
thanks ryan for the reply.
I have looked at the prepare and process methods in
SearchComponents(Query,
Filter etc).
I'm using all the default components
On 3/21/08, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I am investigating to implement an aggregate average function for a
document
: and require help for the same.
First off: please don't repost the same email with a different subject
(on either solr list) just because you don't recieve
Hi,
I am investigating to implement an aggregate average function for a document
and require help for the same.
The problem is that I have documents containing manufacturer, product,
rating (m,p,r)
and i want to find the top manufacturers for product (p1,p2,...) can be
around 10 to 20 products
Hi,
I have a problem of returning an list of results which is sorted on a
average of ranks returned from aggregates.
the qury would be something like ?
q=product:p1+product:p2+product:p3; sort score desc
To explain Supose I have documents with fields Product, Manufacturer, Rank
and I want to
sense.
Keep those two (cat and catrank) as two distinct fields and I think you'll
have what you are after.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, March
second question, just add category:X to your query and you'll
get matches ordered/ranked by score by default.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Umar Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March
Umar Shah
44 matches
Mail list logo