Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Can't find resource solrconfig.xml
Hmmm, we've been moving around the config directory lately...
what version are you working off of. Check that the example directory
has ./solrconf in it.
Then check that there is a ./solrconf/ from wherever you are
On 3/21/06, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to have one SOLR instance host multiple
indices? Otherwise, I would need to deploy a separate WAR for every SOLR
instance I want, correct?
It's not currently possible. A fair amount would have to change
On 3/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Occasionally when inserting I get the error message
SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Any clues how to track down whenwhere it's happening?
Or any good way I can get better clues how to track it down?
What's the heap
Hi John,
The error message undefined field form means Solr doesn't know about
the form field.
Did you copy your schema.xml to the example/solrconf directory and
restart the app server?
I tried your schema and doc, and didn't get the error you did. I got
an error further down due to and invalid
, and that you
restarted the server so it would be re-read?
-Yonik
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is proper way to re-init index?
Hi John,
The error message undefined
It might be easier to download a recent Tomcat 5.5 distribution and
get it working with that first... then try with the bundled version of
Tomcat once you understand how everything works.
Thanks Yonik, maybe I should try that, though I now think that the
configuration is not the main
On 3/29/06, Clay Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could faceted browsing be accomplished without [Chris's] metadata
documents?
The most basic form:
consider if a field called category existed on each document.
You could then ask for the counts of the top 10 values in category
field for all
It's probably best to focus on the ideal interface first (query
parameters as input format, and desired XML output format).
We might also want to keep termvectors in mind when thinking about
this stuff... seems like they are related (per-field optional/extra
data).
-Yonik
On 4/7/06, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When is the replication part done or what is it used for? I need to get more
familar with that.
It's not builtin to Solr, and it's only needed if you want a single
master Solr instance that you update, and automated copying of the
index that
On 4/18/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To add to that: when thinking about how clients will specify what extra
info they want we should consider not only external clients using HTTP
and the StandardRequestHandler, but also what the internal API looks like
for people wanting to
On 4/27/06, David Trattnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thank you so much! Could you also explain me how to use these two
Tokenizers?
Here's the HTMLStrip tokenizer description:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#head-031d5d370010955fdcc529d208395cd556f4a73e
Read through
On 5/1/06, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to add attributes besides name to an xml node returned from
SolrQueryResponse? I've looked at the SolrQueryResponse.add and it looks
like a NamedList is my only option. I know that I can get by with nodes
that have only the name
On 5/3/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried sending in 100,000 deletes and it didn't cause a problem:
the memory grew from 22M to 30M.
Random thought: perhaps it has something to do with how you are
sending your requests?
Yep, I was able to reproduce a memory problem w
I verified that Tomcat 5.5.17 doesn't experience this problem.
-Yonik
On 5/4/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried sending in 100,000 deletes and it didn't cause a problem:
the memory grew from 22M to 30M.
Random thought
On 5/12/06, Michael Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How efficient is making a separate HTTP request per-document, when there
are millions of documents?
If you use persistent connections and add make multiple requests in
parallel, there won't be much difference than multiple docs per
request.
On 5/15/06, Marcus Stratmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only situation I get OutOfMemory
errors is after an optimize when the server performs an auto-warming
of the cahces:
A single filter that is big enough to be represented as a bitset
(3000 in general) will take up 1.3MB
Some ways to
On 5/16/06, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was checking around the solr site and pages at apache.org and wasn't
finding much.
Make sure you don't miss the Wiki, there's a fair amount of stuff there.
-Yonik
On 5/16/06, Morten Fangel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone just guide me with a step by step install of the example from
solr-nightly/example into Tomcat.
For development, It's probably easiest to download Tomcat Core (in tgz
or zip format) from
On 5/16/06, Doron Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, it seems the post.sh script has a type - for the demo add-docs stage
to work, the URL should be set by URL=http://localhost:8983/solr/update;
(rather than URL=http://localhost:7070/update;.
Hmmm, another victim of the downgrade. It's fixed
On 5/22/06, Nick Snels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible to define multiple uniqueKey fields in schema.xml?
Not currently, as one can normally get by with a single uniqueKey field.
If you have multiple unique key fields on each document you can make a
compound key.
If you have multiple
On 5/22/06, Nick Snels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I don't quit get how to make a compound key (but I'll
give it a try). I have multiple tables with an id, but if I put all of them
in a Solr index, the id isn't a unique field.
You have the different type of documents in the
On 5/23/06, maustin75 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh.. ok..
java -D solr.solr.home=/myhome/solr -jar start.jar - That will work.
It won't if you put a space after the -D ;-)
java -Dsolr.solr.home=/myhome/solr -jar start.jar
-Yonik
On 5/30/06, maustin75 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing a search based on price and was wondering what the performance
difference would be between these two queries:
1) +price:[0 TO 20]
2) +price:4567
Basically, to do a search with a range or pre-determine the range and do a
search based on
On 5/30/06, maustin75 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same speed if they are in Solr's cache :-)
Range query will be slightly slower, but if it becomes a bottleneck or
not depends on the total complexity of the queries/requests.
What does the cache use as a key to determine if it is cached?
On 5/31/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I also saw the two student proposals for using Solr and Lucene to index
: Apache mailing lists. That project should already have started. Where
: is the code for that going to go? I'd like to see how that's going.
I had no idea there had
Hi Tim,
Curl is a little command-line networking tool. The easiest way to get
it is cygwin if you are not on a UNIX system.
See the 'Requirements section of the tutorial:
3. On Win32, cygwin, for shell support. (If you plan to use Subversion
on Win32, be sure to select the subversion package
On 6/1/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't understand what web category means. SH.
The cygwin installer has different categories of packages... base,devel,etc.
If you are looking for the curl package, it should be filed under
web. It's not installed by default, so you need to
Thanks for the report Karl, much appreciated.
It looks like a problem with your servlet container/JVM not liking the
XML entity ../../../conf/web.external.xml in the web.xml
I guess the IBM JVM uses some stricter XML parsing rules or something.
If you remove that from the web.xml, it should be
On 6/1/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll need to install cygwin again I think. Thanks.
Don't uninstall cygwin... just re-run the cygwin setup.exe and it will
do incremental updates, installing packages that have changed, and
allowing you to select new packages to install.
On 6/1/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the web options. Thank you very much. While that is installing
incrementally, two last questions.
Are there any example stylesheets to review to see how the data flows into
the layout?
How would one go about injecting database
On 6/2/06, Darren Vengroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote just such a client within the last 24h to support load-testing Solr
for my application. The client stub is simple and independent of my
particular application, so it would be easy for me to contribute it if there
is interest. It has
On 6/2/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got solr installed and running, with only one failure left to date.
Whenver I try to select a stylesheet for my search, I get an error message
such as this:
Hi Tim,
There is no stylesheet :-)
It's a hold-over from an old XML format
On 6/2/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That'll be fine. As you can probably tell, I'm not a programmer. I am just a
dangerous end-user with expertise in marketing online operations trying to
save a buck. I am going to try to learn XSL or if that doesn't work, I'll
bastardize the
On 6/7/06, Paul Terray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to make an index: Is there any way to get a list of all indexed
terms for a field (especially a string or text one)?
Hi Paul,
There isn't currently a way to do this, except perhaps writing your
own custom request handler and using the
On 6/7/06, Joachim Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking at running read-only solr nodes embedded in our webapp
nodes. This would give us the
additional features of solr over lucene, but would keep it in memory and
reduce the overhead of http/xml
transport of results.
Looks like we
On 6/7/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solr's DocSets are a better way to go in the long run, I'm convinced
- I'm just now starting to leverage them in other ways.
Some random performance numbers... when I enabled HashDocSet support,
performance of CNET shoppers faceted browsing
On 6/14/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off the top of my head, i don't remember if omiting norms for fields
reduces the amount of resident memory needed by the index
It does indeed. 1 byte per document for the indexed field.
-Yonik
On 6/15/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a way to hook into the response writing by leveraging the ever
improving Solr codebase and its utilities rather than copy/pasting
would be a nice way to aim, I think.
It's a double edged sword. Making more things public facilitates
On 6/20/06, Kerry Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when trying to post any document.
Hi Kerry, could you provide an example document that show this?
-Yonik
On 6/21/06, Tricia Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there are any major differences in building an index
using Lucene and Solr. If there is no substantial differences, how would one
go about using an existing index created using Lucene in Solr?
You can definitely do
On 6/24/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This weekend :) I have imported more data than my hacked
implementation can handle without bumping up Jetty's JVM heap size,
so I'm now at the point where it is necessary for me to start using
the LRUCache. Though I have already refactored to
On 6/25/06, Eric Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to have PowerShot, powershot and power-shot match each
other. Solr has a WordDelimiterFilter, which works quite well, except that
powershot still won't match PowerShot (tokenized into power (shot
powershot), so power powershot would
On 6/25/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) a new QueryParser smart enough to make a boolean query instead of
a MultiPhraseQuery. Power Shot OR PowerShot
Thinking about this option a bit more...
The problem is ambiguity. Sometimes a MultiPhraseQuery is the correct
interpretation
On 6/26/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: My next challenge is to re-implement the catch-all facets that I used
: to do by unioning all documents in an (Open)BitSet and inverting it.
: How can I invert a DocSet (I realize I gat get the bits and do it
: that way, but is there a
On 7/11/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik,
Thanks for the slides.
Quick question. I'm looking at a new hosting provider for our newspaper
website. When reviewing your High Availability slide, I see a lot of
redundancy which is great, but it is not within my budget constraints
On 7/11/06, Wang, Ningjun (LNG-NPV) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SOLR scalable with respect to number of documents? Suppose I have
billions of documents that need to be indexed. I cannot store them on
one single machine. I have to spread them over to several machines. Can
I issues a search over
On 7/15/06, WHIRLYCOTT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to have my search result relevance influenced by time. Older
things in my index are less relevant than newer things. I don't want
to do a strict sort by date. Is this supported somehow by using a
dismax request handler? Or if you have
Those who aren't subscribed to solr-dev may be interested to know that
the lucene highlighter has been integrated into Solr, for both the
standard request handler, and the dismax handler.
See the highlight, highlightFields, and maxSnippets params documented here:
OK, lets split up the indexing side from the query side for a moment
and assume that you are indexing correctly (setting the content-type
correctly, etc).
I just added a new value to the multi-valued features field to the
solr.xml example document:
Good unicode support: héllo (hello with an
Definitely some Firefox bugs with UTF8 at least:
If I go to the admin screen, and paste in héllo into the query box,
then kill Solr and run netcat to see exactly what I get, it's the
following:
$ nc -l -p 8983
GET /solr/select/?stylesheet=q=h%E9lloversion=2.1start=0rows=10indent=on HT
TP/1.1
could have detected low memory and tried to reload the webapp.
-Yonik
On 7/26/06, sangraal aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for you help Yonik, I've responded to your questions below:
On 7/26/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's possible it's not hanging, but just takes a long time
updates while the server is hung... weird I know.
Thanks for all your help, I'll send a post if/when I find a solution.
-S
On 7/26/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomcat problem, or a Solr problem that is only manifesting on your
platform, or a JVM or libc problem, or even a client
Solr now has a JSON response format, in addition to Python and Ruby
versions that can be directly eval'd.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJSON
-Yonik
On 7/26/06, sangraal aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I removed everything from the Add xml so the docs looked like this:
doc
field name=id187880/field
/doc
doc
field name=id187852/field
/doc
and it still hung at 6,144...
Maybe you can try the following simple Python client to try and rule
out
You might also try the Java update client here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-20
-Yonik
On 7/27/06, sangraal aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commenting out the following line in SolrCore fixes my problem... but of
course I don't get the result status info... but this isn't a problem for me
really.
-Sangraal
writer.write(result status=\ + status + \/result);
While it's possible
It may be some sort of weird interaction with persistent connections
and timeouts (both client and server have connection timeouts I
assume).
Does anything change if you remove your .disconnect() call (it
shouldn't be needed).
Do you ever see any exceptions in the client side?
The code you show
writing something multi-threaded.
-Andrew
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 7/28/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Getting all the little details of connection handling correct can be
tough... it's probably a good idea if we work toward common client
libraries so everyone doesn't have
On 8/8/06, bo_b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As mentioned in another post i am trying to index a vbulletin database
containing roughly 7 million posts. The very first query where I apply
sorting after a full indexing, seems to take roughly QTime264998/QTime
ms. Subsequent searches are fast.
I
On 8/10/06, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, xml.com just published an article that I wrote after testing Solr
in the last few weeks:
Solr: Indexing XML with Lucene and REST
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2006/08/09/solr-indexing-xml-with-lucene-andrest.html
It's basic stuff, but
On 8/10/06, Martyn Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to index data in a system that implements some rather nasty
access controls on the data.
Basically, there are users, and communities, and users are members of
the communities. Potentially a user could be a member of hundreds or
even
On 8/14/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something else to consider is using the compound file format to reduce the
number of files for your index.
this is mentioned in the Lucen FAQ...
Yeah, although unless you have a *lot* of fields with norms, I'd
sooner reduce the mergeFactor
On 8/16/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah ... the dismax handler is designed this way -- it doesn't support the
full syntax of the lucene QueryParser, instead it treats the text input as
literal text the user is searching for,
I think there is value in this type of feature...
A
On 8/17/06, Ken Krugler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Lucene index generated by Solr. After optimizing it, I'm
able to view it using LIMO. But when I download it to my Mac and try
to use Luke, it fails - Luke complains that:
.../index/_jdi4.f1 (No such file or Directory).
The
On 8/28/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: By looking at what is stored. Has this worked for others?
the stored value of a field is allways going to be the pre-analyzed text
-- that's why the stored values in your text fields still have upper
case characters and stop words.
And
On 8/29/06, sangraal aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem only occurs when adding docs that contain ![CDATA[]] tags in
the body of the field tag. The problem also only seems to cause an add
limit on an individual post. I limited the size of my HTTP posts to 5000
documents per post, and the
On 9/13/06, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the heads up on the merchant_name. I would probably just keep a
dictionary in memory, but if I wanted to pull the stored merchant_name back,
how would/can I do that?
If you don't want merchant_name tokenized at all, just change
On 9/13/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it ever make sense to generate facets on a tokenized field?
Maybe the facet implementation could throw an error if the field name
specified is tokenized?
I think it probably can make sense...
- finding top terms in a full-text field that
On 9/13/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to use an untokenized field for facets.
At least 3 answers in 5 minutes... we should try synchronized swimming ;-)
-Yonik
On 9/15/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, Paul Terray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I am close to have a list of index terms, using facet searching.
However, I still have a question: I would like to limit the terms to a
query. My goal is to do a simple google suggest
On 9/15/06, Mike Baranczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solr has a replication scheme built-in:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution
Wow, that was easy. This looks like exactly what I need. I had
somehow completely missed that.
The main pain of it all is configuration (of cron,
On 9/18/06, Michael Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a little follow-up - I did a little more testing, and the query
takes 20 seconds no matter what - If there's one document in the results
set, or if I do a query that returns all 13 documents.
Yes, currently the same strategy is
On 9/18/06, Michael Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
For cases like author, if there is only one value per document, then
a possible fix is to use the field cache. If there can be multiple
occurrences, there doesn't seem to be a good way that preserves exact
counts
I just updated the comments in solrconfig.xml:
!-- Cache used by SolrIndexSearcher for filters (DocSets),
unordered sets of *all* documents that match a query.
When a new searcher is opened, its caches may be prepopulated
or autowarmed using data from caches in the old
On 9/19/06, Brian Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The unusual characters on lst name=… are what I can't figure out, as it
DEFINITELY
is not the id. I've tried indexed id with integer, sint, and string all
with the
same result.
Yes, looks like you hit a bug where you are seeing the indexed
On 9/19/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fix would be to use
FieldType.indexedToReadable() to convert the indexed form back to a
readable form.
Oops, that should be storedToReadable since the id is obtained from
the stored fields, not from the index.
Hmmm, a quick look
On 9/19/06, Brian Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Converting to 'integer' and deleting/reindexing fixed it. Can 'sint' be
used for the id with highlighting, or does one need to use integer or string
for that?
It should be usable (but I personally haven't tested that).
If it's not, it's a bug
On 9/19/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick Question: did you say you are faceting on the first name field
seperately from the last name field? ... why?
You'll probably see a sharp increase in performacne if you have a single
untokenized author field containing hte full name and
On 9/20/06, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My step to support CJK...:
1:add lucene-analyzers-2.0.0.jar to
C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\lib
2:use cmd, cd C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly,ant dist
3:copy C:\cygwin\tmp\solr-nightly\dist\solr- 1.0.war to
On 9/20/06, Marcio Pinto Motta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some doubts about dynamic fields, when we add a doc with a new
dynamic filed, this new dynamic filed is only append to doc's that will
have it defined in the xml, or for every document in the index?
Just for documents that the
On 9/21/06, sangraal aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a silly questions, but I'm wondering if anyone can tell me why solr
outputs XML like this:
During the initial development of Solr (2004), I remember throwing up
both options, and most developers preferred to have a limited number
of
On 9/21/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: i just wanna say: no your help,maybe i will give up.thk u again.
:
: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/248815068/
: thk Hoss,Nick Snels,Koji,Mike and everybody who helped me and wanna help
: me..
:
: i can use solr
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way to dynamically change solrconfig.xml and have the changes
take effect?
Everything would need to be designed for that, and it's currently not.
You might be able to reload the config, but all the classes that
looked at
On 9/21/06, Michael Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turns out that journal_name has 17038 different tokens, which is
manageable, but first_author has 400 000. I don't think this will ever
yield good performance, so i might only do journal_name facets.
Hang in there Michael, a fix is on
On 9/21/06, Michael Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, Any plans for a facets cache?
Maybe a partial one (like caching top terms to implement some other
optimizations). My general philosophy on caching in Solr has been to
cache things the client can't: elemental things, or *parts* of
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, that's actually simpler and it will work for me.
Since I'm thinking of only changing mergeFactor and friends on the fly, I
suppose I'd only need to modify Master's solrconfig.xml.
Is this for testing or something?
I could think of
On 9/21/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hang in there Michael, a fix is on the way for your scenario (and
subscribe to solr-dev if you want to stay on the bleeding edge):
OK, the optimization has been checked in. You can checkout from svn
and build Solr, or wait for the 9-22 nightly
On 9/21/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a situation where I want certain documents to appear at the top of the
hit list for certain searches, regardless of their score. One can think of it
as the ads right on top of Google's search results (but I'm not dealing with
ads).
On 9/21/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could make anything with an isSpecial boolean field appear first:
search_field:java; score desc, special desc
Oops, that should be
search_field:java; special desc, score desc
score desc should be the secondary sort, or whatever you
On 9/22/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of questions from some online newspaper folks who are
interested in Solr and are trying to understand how and why it came to be. I
think inherent in these questions is the underlying theme I hear all the
time and that is Solr
On 9/22/06, Walter Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be a Solr bug. Solr should be able to accept XML in any
of the required encodings (ASCII, Latin 1, UTF-8, and UTF-16).
Getting XML content types exactly right is tricky, see RFC 3023.
Right now Solr pays attention to Content-type
On 9/22/06, Tim Archambault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been talking with other papers about Solr and I think what bothers many
is that there a is a deposit of information in a structured database here
[named A], then we have another set of basically the same data over here
[named B] and they
On 9/23/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about another approach - expose all Solr admin data via HTTP/XML, just like
it's done with search requests?
Things like the stats page should already be XML with a stylesheet
(for exactly the reasons you mention).
IIRC, the XML may be
On 9/26/06, climbingrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I right that we can only have one schema per solr server? If so, how
would you deal with the issue of submitting completely different data models
(such as clothes and cars)?
If they have no relation, put them in separate servers or webapps.
On 9/26/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, some people I talked to also expressed interest in JMX, so
I'd encourage Simon to make that contribution.
I'm also interested in JMX.
It has different adapters, including an HTTP one AFAIK, but I don't
know how easy it
On 9/27/06, Vish D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that link on the first reply from Yonik about
FederatedSearch. I see that a lot of thought went in to it. I guess the
question to ask would be, any progress on it, Yonik? :)
No code, but great progress at shooting holes in various
Hi Steve,
It looks like the commit is taking a long time and jetty is timing it out.
See this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Synchronizing-commit-and-optimize-tf1498513.html#a4067023
-Yonik
On 9/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're having something strange with our SOLR
-of-memory error
too.
Oh, and there's no security in Solr, so I wouldn't expose it directly
to the internet indefinitely w/o something protecting it from vandals
:-)
-Yonik
On 9/27/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steve,
It looks like the commit is taking a long time and jetty is timing
On 9/27/06, Ken Krugler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One trick I've heard is to do cat path to Lucene index
directory/_*.* /dev/null to force all of the index data into the
OS cache.
For Solr, I don't think I'd do this:
- If you are using replication, the new segment files that just got
rsync'd
On 10/2/06, Panayiotis Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone, i just discovered Solr and tried to setup today but without
any success altough i read many of previous posts in the mailing list...
I did what i was supposed to do namely:
* Install jdk 1.5 (on ubuntu)
* Install tomcat
*
1 - 100 of 2724 matches
Mail list logo
