RE: solr query

I don’t want to add separate fields since I have many dates to index. How to index it as timestamp and do function query, any example or documentation? Regards, Albert From: Emir Arnautović Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:38 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr query Hi

Re: solr query

th? > > Regard, > Albert > > > From: Emir Arnautović > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:26 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: solr query > > Hi Albert, > It does - you can use NOW/MONTH and NOW/YEAR to get the start of month/year. > Here is ref

RE: solr query

NOW/MONTH and NOW/YEAR to get the start of month/year, but how can I get current month of regardless year. Like the use case, people who’s birthdate is this month? Regard, Albert From: Emir Arnautović Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:26 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr

Re: solr query

Hi Albert, It does - you can use NOW/MONTH and NOW/YEAR to get the start of month/year. Here is reference to date math: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/working-with-dates.html#WorkingwithDates-DateMathSyntax

solr query

Dear Solr, I want to whether solr support query by this year or this month? If can, how to do that. Thanks. Regards, Albert

Re: Search for a word NOT followed by another on a Solr query

Hi Ivan, You might be able to use complexphrase query parser to get what you need, you can test something like this: {!complexphrase df=my_field}”Leonardo -(da Vinci)” HTH, Emir -- Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training -

RE: Search for a word NOT followed by another on a Solr query

Markus Jelsma-2 wrote > You can abuse phrase query for that, q=leonardo AND -"leonardo da vinci" > (asuming you have a proper default field set). > > Markus This way i'm losing results where i have both "Leonardo" and "Leonardo da vinci in the same field, see example number 3 "Leonardo foo bar

RE: Search for a word NOT followed by another on a Solr query

; Subject: Search for a word NOT followed by another on a Solr query > > What i'm trying to do is to only get results for "Leonardo" when is not > followed by "da vinci". > If i have "Leonardo da vinci" in my result is fine as long as i have another &g

Search for a word NOT followed by another on a Solr query

What i'm trying to do is to only get results for "Leonardo" when is not followed by "da vinci". If i have "Leonardo da vinci" in my result is fine as long as i have another "Leonardo" without "da vinci". Examples: "Leonardo foo bar" OK "Leonardo da vinci foo bar" KO "Leonardo foo bar Leonardo da

Benchmarking Solr Query performance

Hi all, We would like to perform a benchmark of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11831 The patch improves the performance of grouped queries asking only for one result per group (aka. group.limit=1). I remember seeing a page showing a benchmark of the query performance on Wikipedia,

Re: Required "cql solr query" for given "http api based json solr query"

On 1/25/2018 1:04 AM, Mahesh Gupta wrote: can any one help me on writing equalent cql solr query of below "http api based json solr query" CQL is a query language for Cassandra, not Solr. You'll need to talk to that project, not this one. CQL will not be involved with a Solr que

Required "cql solr query" for given "http api based json solr query"

Hi Team, can any one help me on writing equalent cql solr query of below "http api based json solr query" My Running json solr query: http://hostname:8983/solr/tablename/select?q=*%3A*=pre_upgrade%3A%22yes%22=json=true:true,group.field:product_family Expecting : equal-ant cql

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

I have never been a big fan of " getting N results from Solr and then filter them client side" . I get your point about the document modelling, so I will assume you properly tested it and having the small documents at Solr side is really not sustainable. I also appreciate the fact you want to

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results And you want to show to the users only the Lucene documents that matched the original query sent to Solr? (what if a lucene document matches only part of the query?) From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/23/18 13:55:46To: Diego

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results Hi Diego, Basically, each Solr document has a text field , which contains large amount of text separated by some delimiters. I split this text into parts and then assign each part to a separate lucene Document object. The field

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

to post-process Solr query results Rahul, can you provide more details on how you decide that the smaller lucene objects are part of the same solr document? From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/23/18 09:59:17To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Using lucene to post-process Solr query

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

at streaming expressions, looks interesting. Regards, Rahul Chhiber -Original Message- From: Atita Arora [mailto:atitaar...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 3:29 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results Hi Rahul, Looks like

Re: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

Rahul, can you provide more details on how you decide that the smaller lucene objects are part of the same solr document? From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/23/18 09:59:17To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results Hi Rahul, Looks like

Re: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

Hi Rahul, Looks like Streaming expressions can probably can help you. Is there something else you have tried for this? Atita On Jan 23, 2018 3:24 PM, "Rahul Chhiber" wrote: Hi All, For our business requirement, once our Solr client (Java) gets the results

Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

Hi All, For our business requirement, once our Solr client (Java) gets the results of a search query from the Solr server, we need to further search across and also within the content of the returned documents. To accomplish this, I am attempting to create on the client-side an in-memory

Re: Solr query not returning all results

On 10/17/2017 5:53 PM, Phillip Wu wrote: > I've indexed a lot of documents (*.docx & *.vsd). > > When I run a query from the website it returns only a small proportion of the > data in the index: > { > "responseHeader":{ > "status":0, > "QTime":66, > "params":{ >"q":"NS Finance 9.2", >

Re: Solr query not returning all results

bq: Is this expected behavior where it returns only a subset of the documents it has found? No. But there is _so_ much you're leaving out here that it's totally impossible to say much. bq: I've indexed a lot of documents (*.docx & *.vsd). how? Tika? ExtractingRequestHandler? Some custom code?

Solr query not returning all results

Hi, I've indexed a lot of documents (*.docx & *.vsd). When I run a query from the website it returns only a small proportion of the data in the index: { "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":66, "params":{ "q":"NS Finance 9.2", "fl":"id,date", "start":"0", "_":"1508193512223"}},

Re: Solr query help

You can add a ~3 to the query to allow the order to be reversed, but you will get extra hits. Maybe it is a ~4, i can never remember on phrases and reversals. I usually just try it. Alternatively, you can create a custom query field for what you need from dates. For example, if you want to

Re: Solr query help

What field types are you using for your dates? Have a look at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Working+with+Dates On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal wrote: > Hi Krishna > > I haven't used date range queries myself. But if Solr only

Re: Solr query help

Hi Krishna I haven't used date range queries myself. But if Solr only supports a particular date format, you can write a thin client for queries, which will convert the date to solr's format and query solr. Nawab On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:36 AM, chiru s wrote: > Hello

Solr query help

Hello guys I am working on Apache solr and I am stuck with a use case. The input data will be in the documents like 2017/03/15 in 1st document, 2017/04/15 in 2nd doc, 2017/05/15 in 3rd doc, 2017/06/15 in 4th doc so on But while fetching the data it should fetch like 03/15/2017 for the first

How to Join more than two(2) cores in solr query

with core1.empid. Below is my solr query to join core2.sid = core3.sid, but do not know how to write the query to join core1.empid = core2.empid and core2.pid = core3.pid. http://localhost:8983/solr/core2/select?q={!join from=sid to=sid fromIndex=core3 v='*:*'} currently i am not able to write solr

Re: Solr query with more than one field

: I could have sworn I was paraphrasing _your_ presentation Hoss. I : guess I did not learn my lesson well enough. : : Thank you for the correction. Trust but verify! ... we're both wrong. Boolean functions (like lt(), gt(), etc...) behave just like sum() -- they "exist" for a document if and

Re: Solr query with more than one field

Bother, I could have sworn I was paraphrasing _your_ presentation Hoss. I guess I did not learn my lesson well enough. Thank you for the correction. Regards, Alex. http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 1 June 2017 at 15:26, Chris Hostetter

Re: Solr query with more than one field

: Because the value of the function will be treated as a relevance value : and relevance value of 0 (and less?) will cause the record to be : filtered out. I don't believe that's true? ... IIRC 'fq' doesn't care what the scores are as long as the query is a "match" and a 'func' query will match

Re: Solr query with more than one field

Function queries: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries The function would be sub Then you want its result mapped to a fq. could probably be as simple as fq={!func}sub(value,cost). Because the value of the function will be treated as a relevance value and relevance

Solr query with more than one field

Hi,I have 2 fields "cost" and "value" at my records. I want to get all documents that have "value" greater than "cost". Something likeq=value:[cost TO *] Please advise. Thanks

Re: SOLR query validation

r > search results which is not present in Solr and return accordingly... > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:58 AM, mganeshs <mgane...@live.in> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> In my use case, we need to validate the solr query which is getting fired >> to >> SOLR in the s

Re: SOLR query validation

of the option where you can add you additional data to your search results which is not present in Solr and return accordingly... On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:58 AM, mganeshs <mgane...@live.in> wrote: > Hi, > > In my use case, we need to validate the solr query which is getting fi

SOLR query validation

Hi, In my use case, we need to validate the solr query which is getting fired to SOLR in the solr layer. Validation like, we want few fields to be passed always in the query, we don't want few fields not to be passed in the query. Which is the right place to do in the SOLR ? Currently we

Re: Solr Query Limits

On 5/10/2017 12:33 AM, Adnan Shaikh wrote: > Thanks Alexandre for the update. > > Please help me to understand the other part of the query as well , if there > is any limit to how many values we can pass for a key. The limit is not the number of values, but the size of the request in bytes. A

Re: Solr Query Limits

know that Solr can accept the query parameters in > the POST body as well. > > Regards, > Alex. > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced > > > On 9 May 2017 at 10:19, Adnan Shaikh <adnanj.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: Solr Query Limits

rt.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 9 May 2017 at 10:19, Adnan Shaikh <adnanj.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Team, Have a query pertaining to how many values are we able to pass in a Solr query. Can we please find out if: 1. There is a limit to the number of charac

Re: Solr Query Limits

://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 9 May 2017 at 10:19, Adnan Shaikh <adnanj.sha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Team, > > Have a query pertaining to how many values are we able to pass in a Solr > query. > > Can we please find out if:

Solr Query Limits

Hello Team, Have a query pertaining to how many values are we able to pass in a Solr query. Can we please find out if: 1. There is a limit to the number of characters that we can pass in a Solr query field? 2. Is there a limit to how many values we can pass for the one key? Thanks, Mohammad

Re: EXT: Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Thanks everyone for taking time to respond to my email. I think you are correct in that the query results might be coming from main memory as I only had around 7k queries. However it is still not clear to me, given that everything was being served from main memory, why is that I am not able to

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

On 4/28/2017 12:43 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > Shawn Heisey wrote: >> Adding more shards as Toke suggested *might* help,[...] > I seem to have phrased my suggestion poorly. What I meant to suggest > was a switch to a single shard (with 4 replicas) setup, instead of the >

RE: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Beautiful, thank you. -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 3:07 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking I use the JMeter plugins. They’ve been reorganized recently, so

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] > <daniel.da...@nih.gov> wrote: > > Walter, > > If you can share a pointer to that JMeter add-on, I'd love it. > > -Original Message- > From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 2:53 PM > To: sol

RE: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Walter, If you can share a pointer to that JMeter add-on, I'd love it. -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 2:53 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking I use production logs

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

I use production logs to get a mix of common and long-tail queries. It is very hard to get a realistic distribution with synthetic queries. A benchmark run goes like this, with a big shell script driving it. 1. Reload the collection to clear caches. 2. Split the log into a cache warming set

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Shawn Heisey wrote: > Adding more shards as Toke suggested *might* help,[...] I seem to have phrased my suggestion poorly. What I meant to suggest was a switch to a single shard (with 4 replicas) setup, instead of the current 2 shards (with 2 replicas). - Toke

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Well, the best way to get no cache hits is to set the cache sizes to zero ;). That provides worst-case scenarios and tells you exactly how much you're relying on caches. I'm not talking the lower-level Lucene caches here. One thing I've done is use the TermsComponent to generate a list of terms

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

(aside: Using Gatling or Jmeter?) Question: How can you easily randomize something in the query so you get no cache hits? I think there are several levels of caching. -- Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

re: the q vs. fq question. My claim (not verified) is that the fastest of all would be q=*:*={!cache=false}. That would bypass the scoring that putting it in the "q" clause would entail as well as bypass the filter cache. But I have to agree with Walter, this is very suspicious IMO. Here's what

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

More “unrealistic” than “amazing”. I bet the set of test queries is smaller than the query result cache size. Results from cache are about 2 ms, but network communication to the shards would add enough overhead to reach 40 ms. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

On 4/27/2017 5:20 PM, Suresh Pendap wrote: > Max throughput that I get: 12000 to 12500 reqs/sec > 95 percentile query latency: 30 to 40 msec These numbers are *amazing* ... far better than I would have expected to see on a 27GB index, even in a situation where it fits entirely into available

Re: Solr Query Performance benchmarking

On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 23:20 +, Suresh Pendap wrote: > Number of Solr Nodes: 4 > Number of shards: 2 > replication-factor:  2 > Index size: 55 GB > Shard/Core size: 27.7 GB > maxConnsPerHost: 1000 The overhead of sharding is not trivial. Your overall index size is fairly small, relative to

Solr Query Performance benchmarking

Hi, I am trying to perform Solr Query performance benchmarking and trying to measure the maximum throughput and latency that I can get from.a given Solr cluster. Following are my configurations Number of Solr Nodes: 4 Number of shards: 2 replication-factor: 2 Index size: 55 GB Shard/Core size

Re: Solr Query Suggestion

Hi Emir,Grouping is exactly what I wanted to achieve. Thanks !!Thank you,Vrinda Davda -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-Suggestion-tp4323180p4323743.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr Query Suggestion

this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-Suggestion-tp4323180.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/

Solr Query Suggestion

: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Query-Suggestion-tp4323180.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

get the top 10 items first, >>>>> before >>>>> I run the JSON Facet to get the total amount and average amount for >>>>> that >>>>> 10 >>>>> items. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>&g

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

ontext: http://lucene.472066.n3. nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

g here ... >>>> You want to fetch the top 10 results for your query, and allow the user >>>> >>> to >>> >>>> navigate only those 10 results through facets ? >>>> >>>> Which facets are you interested in ? >>>> F

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

uld need an additional query ? Cheers - --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html Sent from

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

y ? > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > - > > --- > > Alessandro Benedetti > > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > > -- > > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > > nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

l query ? > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> --- > >> Alessandro Benedetti > >> Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > >> Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > >> nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

gt; Cheers > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

;> shouldn't be that problematic. >> Are we missing something ? Why you would need an additional query ? >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> - >> --- >> Alessandro Benedetti >> Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director >> Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io >> -- >> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. >> nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

an additional query ? > > Cheers > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Select-TOP-10-items-from-So

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

-items-from-Solr-Query-tp4320863p4320910.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

>> Am 17.02.2017 um 05:00 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Would like to check, is it possible to do a select of say TOP 10 items >> from >>> Solr query, and use the list of the items to do another query (Eg: JSON >>> Facet)? >>

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

m 17.02.2017 um 05:00 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo: > > Hi, > > > > Would like to check, is it possible to do a select of say TOP 10 items > from > > Solr query, and use the list of the items to do another query (Eg: JSON > > Facet)? > > > > Currently, I'

Re: Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

, you can't determine whether this will make it into the top x elements or not since there will come more. -Michael Am 17.02.2017 um 05:00 schrieb Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo: > Hi, > > Would like to check, is it possible to do a select of say TOP 10 items from > Solr query, and use the list

Select TOP 10 items from Solr Query

Hi, Would like to check, is it possible to do a select of say TOP 10 items from Solr query, and use the list of the items to do another query (Eg: JSON Facet)? Currently, I'm using a normal facet to retrieve the list of the TOP 10 item from the normal faceting. After which, I have to list out

Re: solr query help

On 2/2/2017 6:16 AM, deepak.gha...@mediawide.com wrote: > I am writting query for getting response from specific index content first. > eg. > http://192.168.200.14:8983/solr/mypgmee/select?q=*blood*=id:(*/939/* OR > **)=id=json=true > > In above query I am getting response, Means suppose I Get

solr query help

Hello Sir, I am writting query for getting response from specific index content first. eg. http://192.168.200.14:8983/solr/mypgmee/select?q=*blood*=id:(*/939/* OR **)=id=json=true In above query I am getting response, Means suppose I Get 4 result for course "939" out of 10. It works fine by

Solr Query Debugger

free plugin: Solr Query Debugger https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/solr-query-debugger/gmpkeiamnmccifccnbfljffkcnacmmdl Solr Query Debugger aims to help Solr developers and users with queries. You can modify Solr queries, execute, debug and, very important, see the explain in a clear

Re: Max length of solr query

st is 2MB, since about version >> >> >> 4.1. Before that version, it was controlled by the container config, >> >> >> not Solr. This can be adjusted with the formdataUploadLimitInKB setting >> >> >> in solrconfig.xml. The default value for this is 2048, resulting in the >&g

Re: Max length of solr query

; > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/RequestDispatcher+in+SolrConfig > > Thanks, > > > Shawn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > If you reply to this e

Re: Max length of solr query

On 1/12/2017 9:36 AM, 武井宜行 wrote: > My Application throws too large query to solr server with solrj > client.(Http Method is Post) > > I have two questions. > > At first,I would like to know the limit of clauses of Boolean Query.I Know > the number is restricted to 1024 by default, and I can

Re: Max length of solr query

That doesn't seem like an efficient use of a search engine. Maybe what you want to do is use streaming expressions to process some data: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions k/r, Scott On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, 武井宜行 wrote: > Hi,all >

Max length of solr query

Hi,all My Application throws too large query to solr server with solrj client.(Http Method is Post) I have two questions. At first,I would like to know the limit of clauses of Boolean Query.I Know the number is restricted to 1024 by default, and I can increase the limit by setting

Re: Solr query *:* timeout

Hmmm i have to check something it seems, that it's no error There are some zip files which are indexed, and on the admin page there are fetched all fields, including the contents ... and the zip document has a realy big content :O Zitat von sn0...@ulysses-erp.com: Hello - an hour ago,

Solr query *:* timeout

Hello - an hour ago, solr worked fine i had about 2 documents in the index. I had made an upadte/extract process from the batch, and saw that on document has blocked the batch I waited fo about 2 minutes than i killed the update batch process. After a restart of the server, i started

ordering results by the min and max difference / converting mysql into solr query

hi everyone. hope you all had a great christmas! i'm having trouble converting an example mysql script into a solr query. here's my preliminary query: select vendorItem, min(unitPrice), max(unitPrice), -(min(unitPrice) - > max(unitPrice)) as `diff` > from transactions > where orgId

java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException during Solr query request

Hi I am encountering the following exception with Solr 6.2.1 occasionally when querying the index. The exception causes the request to fail. java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException at org.apache.lucene.search.FieldComparator$LongComparator.(FieldComparator.java:406) at

Re: solr query time

- that should not slow down query time. More indexed fields, more likely that you will create more complex query and more complex query, slower query time. Assuming you are interested in end user query time not Solr query only time, more stored fields, more likely that more fields are returned. More

solr query time

Hi, I am having 120 fields in a single document and i am indexing all of them i.e. index=true and stored=true in my schema. I need to understand how that might be affecting my query time overall. what is the relation between query time with respect to indexing all fields in schema?? Regards,

Re: Solr query - response status

Thanks Shawn for your insight! On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 7/22/2016 12:41 AM, Shyam R wrote: > > I see that SOLR returns status value as 0 for successful searches > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; [users_shadow_shard1_replica1] > >

Re: Solr query - response status

On 7/22/2016 12:41 AM, Shyam R wrote: > I see that SOLR returns status value as 0 for successful searches > org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; [users_shadow_shard1_replica1] > webapp=/solr path=/user/ping params={} status=0 QTime=0 I do see that > the status come's back as 400 whenever the search is

Solr query - response status

All, I see that SOLR returns status value as 0 for successful searches org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; [users_shadow_shard1_replica1] webapp=/solr path=/user/ping params={} status=0 QTime=0 I do see that the status come's back as 400 whenever the search is invalid ( invoking query with

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

Perfect - got it. Now I know where I stand when I'm writing the bq, bf, etc... Thank you very much. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > bq: > > My big question however is whether I can > trust that the Boost Functions and > Boost Query are running

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

bq: My big question however is whether I can trust that the Boost Functions and Boost Query are running against the entire index In a word "no". The bf's are intended to alter the score of the documents found by the primary query by multiplying the function results by the raw score. If a

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

Oh - gotcha... Thanks for taking the time to reply. My use of the phrase "sub query" is probably misleading... Here's the XML (below). I'm calling the Boost Query and Boost Function statements "sub queries"... The thing I was referencing was this -- where I create an "alias" for the query

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

John: I'm not objecting to the XML, but to the very presence of "more than one query in a request handler". Request handlers don't have, AFAIK, "query chains". They have a list of defaults for the _single_ query being sent at a time to that handler. So having blah blah is something I've never

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

Hi Erick - I was trying to simplify and not waste anyone's time parsing my requestHandler... That is, as you imply, bogus xml. The basic question is: If I have two "sub queries" in a single requestHandler, do they both run independently against the entire index? Alternatively, is there some

Re: Solr Query Processing Detail

Where are you seeing that this does anything? It wouldn't be the first time new functionality happened that I totally missed, but I've never seen that config. You might get some mileage out of ReRankingQParserPlugin though, that runs the top N queries from one query through another. Best, Erick

Solr Query Processing Detail

Hi all, I have a question about whether sub-queries in Solr requestHandlers go against the total index or against the results of the previous query. Here's a simple example: {!edismax qf=blah, blah} {!edismax qf=blah, blah} My question is: What does Query2 run

Re: debugging solr query

Thanks for the suggestion. At this time I wont be able to change any code in the API ...my options are limited to changing things at the solr level. Any suggestions regarding solr settings in config or schema changes are something in my control. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Ahmet Arslan

Re: debugging solr query

Hi Jay, Please separate the clauses. Feed one of them to the main q parameter with content score operator =^ since you are sorting on a structured field(e.g. date) q:fieldB:(123 OR 456)^=1.0 =dt1:[date1 TO *] =dt2:[* TO NOW/DAY+1] =fieldA:abc =dt1 asc,field2 asc, fieldC desc Play with the

Re: debugging solr query

I updated almost 1/3 of the data and ran my queries with new columns as mentioned earlier. The query returns data in almost half the time as compared to before. I am thinking that if I update all the columns there would not be much difference in query response time. Are there any

Re: debugging solr query

Hi, Thanks for the feedback. The queries I run are very basic filter queries with some sorting. q:*:*=(dt1:[date1 TO *] && dt2:[* TO NOW/DAY+1]) && fieldA:abc && fieldB:(123 OR 456)=dt1 asc,field2 asc, fieldC desc I noticed that the date fields(dt1,dt2) are using date instead of tdate fields &

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >