http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n859016/qa.writepublic.com.xml
qa.writepublic.com.xml
I modified your schema.xml
You need to restart jetty and re-index you documents.
After that in the solr admin page, if you search
prefix_full:george clo prefix_token:(george clo)
you will get your
--- On Fri, 5/28/10, efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Does SOLR Allow q= (A or B) AND (C or D)?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, May 28, 2010, 4:42 AM
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks again for the feedback. We will be searching
Hi Ahmad,
Thanks for this. So do we need this:*defType=luceneq.op=ORfl=Title* at
the end?
Also, I'm guessing we will need to install EdgeNGramFilterFactory?
Here are the analyzers / filters we currently are using (just the default
stuff):
*Index Analyzer:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, efr...@gmail.com efr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a query need that requires multiple OR conditions, and, there must
be a match in each condition for the query to provide a result.
The search would be * (A or B) AND (C or D)* and the only valid results
I have a query need that requires multiple OR conditions,
and, there must be
a match in each condition for the query to provide a
result.
The search would be * (A or B) AND (C or D)* and the only
valid results it
could turn up are:
A B
A C
B C
B D
Can anyone provide guidance as
Thank you. That seems to be working well, except when I included a wild card
for any of the terms, the wildcard term isn't being found out.
My searches are actually:
q=+(A A*) +(C C*)q.op=OR
When I do a regular search on A* or C* I get matches but not in the
context of the above query. The
Thank you. That seems to be working
well, except when I included a wild card
for any of the terms, the wildcard term isn't being found
out.
My searches are actually:
q=+(A A*) +(C C*)q.op=OR
When I do a regular search on A* or C* I get matches
but not in the
context of the above
You can get a lot of mileage out of the admin
analysis page and the full interface page, especially
by turning on the debug option on the admin
full interface page.
It takes a bit of practice to read the debug output, but
it's really, really, really worth it
Best
Erick
On Thu, May 27, 2010
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for the response again. The best way I could illustrate our live
search feature is an example implementation:
http://www.krop.com/
Notice when you search the word senior in the keywords field, the results
filter down to just the job postings with that word in it.
So it's not
Thanks for the response again. The best way I could
illustrate our live
search feature is an example implementation:
http://www.krop.com/
Notice when you search the word senior in the keywords
field, the results
filter down to just the job postings with that word in it.
So it's not
Thanks, I found full interface :)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
You can get a lot of mileage out of the admin
analysis page and the full interface page, especially
by turning on the debug option on the admin
full interface page.
It takes a
Responses in blue
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the response again. The best way I could
illustrate our live
search feature is an example implementation:
http://www.krop.com/
Notice when you search the word senior in the
We don't mind the order of terms. We basically are
sorting by two variables
that are independent of relevency. So I would assume
the order doesn't
matter... we just need to make sure any results we filter
down to (as you
saw in the krop.com example) contain the words the user has
typed.
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks again for the feedback. We will be searching several fields of each
object in the index (title, description, tags). The matches on keywords need
to be in any of these fields and there will be no different weights.
Does this affect your solution?
I'm trying to understand it as
14 matches
Mail list logo