Johnny Bufu wrote:
I believe a key difference here is between what people would be
willing to do, and what people actually (will) do. For example:
- I would be willing to go to a rugby game, but I don't know if any
of my friends are going, so I probably won't go
- most of my friends
Johnny Bufu wrote:
These two seem to have been the rationale of the recent discussions
about splitting the OpenID spec into core/discovery/etc., which
seemed to make sense to a number of people (I'm just not sure if it's
worth / good tactical move at this stage).
I tend to think
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:18 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
I don't think this is really that important of a point given all the
other things we need to do. People are doing to do things different
then you would, but get the same result -- is that ok?
I'm fine with doing things differently, I'm not
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:24 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
Dick, see my other message but this is not about ME stopping you!
We wanted to publish them on the website so that other people could
look at them, but you did not want to do that, and you control the
domain.
Dick, that isn't a fair statement
On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:21, Dick Hardt wrote:
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:18 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
... IMHO for simplicity sake of
reading the AX documents this format description should be merged
into
the core protocol spec. If down the road it should be split out
then it always can be.
Well,
On 4/6/07, Dick Hardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:18 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
I'm fine with doing things differently, I'm not arguing that a
metadata
format should not be created, just that IMHO for simplicity sake of
reading the AX documents this format description
On 6-Apr-07, at 10:34 AM, Johannes Ernst wrote:
Well, as one of the people that wrote the documents. We decided that
having separate documents was better. Thanks for sharing your
opinion. I have a different opinion.
For somebody who currently doesn't have an opinion on this subject,
could
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:24 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
I'm all about taking advantage of existing momentum, but I have a hard
time seeing anyone who cares about AX being unwilling to have this
discussion as a part of the ID Schemas community. If there is anyone,
I'd certainly like to understand the
list
Subject: RE: Moving AX Forward (WAS RE: SREG namespace URI rollback)
Johnny,
I see a lot of, at least my initial confusion, coming from there being
multiple documents. This is why I urge merging the transport and
metadata since the reality is they currently are only being used with
each
On 4-Apr-07, at 1:16 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Johnny,
I see a lot of, at least my initial confusion, coming from there being
multiple documents. This is why I urge merging the transport and
metadata since the reality is they currently are only being used with
each other. As the metadata
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:00 AM
To: Drummond Reed
Cc: Recordon, David; 'Johnny Bufu'; 'OpenID specs list'
Subject: Re: Moving AX Forward (WAS RE: SREG namespace URI rollback)
Doing the work in the ID Schemas project was a good idea 3 months ago
and 6 months ago. So far not much
]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:27 AM
To: Recordon, David
Cc: Johnny Bufu; OpenID specs list
Subject: Re: Moving AX Forward (WAS RE: SREG namespace URI rollback)
On 4-Apr-07, at 1:16 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
Johnny,
I see a lot of, at least my initial confusion, coming from there being
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:06 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
Actually it is describing a document format, and it could easily be
used
by other groups as evidenced by references from people in the ID
Schemas
group.
I agree that it could be, but is anyone?
It leaves the option open.
I love shooting
On Apr 5, 2007, at 9:02, Recordon, David wrote:
In some senses, I think if people gather as part of the ID
Schemas project and try to move this work forward, it will actually be
more successful than trying to do it here.
I would agree with this.
Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.
If you would let us put the attributes on the website, then other
people could see them and comment on them.
On 5-Apr-07, at 9:02 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
I guess I don't see why blaming the ID Schemas project for not much
happening is a good excuse for not doing it there.
Blame? ... just
On 4-Apr-07, at 12:18 PM, Recordon, David wrote:
One thing that I do think would be worthwhile in smoothing more of
this
SREG/AX confusion would be adding SREG support to Sxip's OpenID
libraries.
This is on the todo list, and judging by the interest showed by some
contributors could
: Moving AX Forward (WAS RE: SREG namespace URI rollback)
Johnny,
I see a lot of, at least my initial confusion, coming from there being
multiple documents. This is why I urge merging the transport and
metadata since the reality is they currently are only being used with
each other
17 matches
Mail list logo
