[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
Sorry for replying to myself, but the thing never got off the starting blocks. Andrew Meredith wrote: > > Digging futher into the code there is a third parameter, that is > currently set to zero, the itf. According to the Linux ATM API Spec "itf > is the number of the local interface (zero-ba

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Meredith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:52 PM Subject: [speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Could you also give the sequence of commands you execute and the error > > messa

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Could you also give the sequence of commands you execute and the error > messages you get when the system fails? The kernel does the firmware upload and line grabbing thing with no problem, across both modems. kernel: ADSL line is up (4800 Kib/s down | 448 Kib/s up)

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
Gilles Espinasse wrote: > http://www.freestuffjunction.co.uk/bondedcd.shtml > But I suppose it is only for bonded links. Sadly > So the problem should be narrowed in the ppp related scripts or in your usb > hardware. I'm wondering if the pppoatm.so plugin would need another parameter for this

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread m . bell
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:02:54PM +0200, Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > Selon Andrew Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > > I doubt this could be related to atm side. > > > > I don't know enough about ATM. > > > > > There was one distrib made at one time with the sup

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Gilles Espinasse
Selon Andrew Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Gilles Espinasse wrote: > > I doubt this could be related to atm side. > > I don't know enough about ATM. > > > There was one distrib made at one time with the support of this type of > > configuration en England. > > Excellent .. I don't suppose you

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
Gilles Espinasse wrote: > I doubt this could be related to atm side. I don't know enough about ATM. > There was one distrib made at one time with the support of this type of > configuration en England. Excellent .. I don't suppose you know of any references I can use to pick this up. My search

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > VPI/VCI numbers are per interface, so this shouldn't be a problem. There is some hope then ! > However, I know that the pppd pppoatm plugin always uses the default > ATM interface, so that may be where you are having issues. Part of my due diligence was a poke arou

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Gilles Espinasse
Selon Andrew Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Folks, > > I am having a problem getting a second Speedtouch 330 set up on my FC5 > router/firewall. Up to press I have been using a pair of ADSL routers on > two ethernet cards, which has been working ok, but would like to > simplify the BoM and

[speedtouch] Re: Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread m . bell
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Andrew Meredith wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I am having a problem getting a second Speedtouch 330 set up on my FC5 > router/firewall. Up to press I have been using a pair of ADSL routers on > two ethernet cards, which has been working ok, but would like t

[speedtouch] Dual line ADSL with Speedtouch 330

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Meredith
Hi Folks, I am having a problem getting a second Speedtouch 330 set up on my FC5 router/firewall. Up to press I have been using a pair of ADSL routers on two ethernet cards, which has been working ok, but would like to simplify the BoM and get more control over the WAN endpoints. Getting one