, October 12, 2016 6:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: In-Rack Sprinkler Control Valve [EXTERNAL]
I thought the reason this was commonly done was driven by friction loss.
As far as zoning alarm local jurisdictions commonly tinker with this area of
model codes during
mail jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca
>
>
>
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of rongreenman .
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:19 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: Re: In-Rack Sprinkler Con
...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of rongreenman .
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:19 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: In-Rack Sprinkler Control Valve
Why is it zoned? Just because it's bigger than 52K? One big open space? Not
trying to be a smart ass (or maybe I am) but the FD won't
FM and xl gaps requires isolation valves and it's a good operationally practice
because someone will break a head or line
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
On Oct 12, 2016 5:25 PM, "Travis Mack, SET" wrote:
Don't you want the racks separately controlled because they are
Why is it zoned? Just because it's bigger than 52K? One big open space? Not
trying to be a smart ass (or maybe I am) but the FD won't fight a fire in
zone 2 that is happening in Zone 1 bec aide an annunciation says here, not
there, and it sounds like they'd be able too see the fire on entry.
On