[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
AKS-Gmail-IMAP
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:49 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
I heard more about this today from an Illinois plumbing inspector
: Thursday, June 07, 2012 9:29 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
Then should public street hydrants need BFP installed?
Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
24400 Highland Rd rm
@firesprinkler.org sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
Well ... as ridiculous as all this may sound ...
In SoCal, we have water districts that are moving hard into reclaimed
water. Golf courses and public green
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
Most THINK that the AWWA recommends BFP's on ALL firelines, especially
deadened lines over 100 feet, but the AWWA does NOT recommend backflow
protection on hydrant only lines.
For I
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
Well ... as ridiculous as all this may sound ...
In SoCal, we have water districts that are moving hard into reclaimed
water. Golf courses
: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Leyton
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 9:53 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
We are doing our first
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
That's for full doc in AutoCad and CA? Presuming yes, design team
meetings are to be in San Diego? Only one trip to the project site for
CA inspection? That's pretty tight, but I'm inclined to do
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
We are doing our first building system off RW at this time. From our due
diligence for the current project, we learned that in NorCal, there have been a
few building systems connected to reclaimed
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having
fire hydrants
We are doing our first building system off RW at this time. From our due
diligence for the current project, we learned that in NorCal, there have
been a few building systems connected to reclaimed
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
Really RW? We have a few problems with corrosion and MIC in potable water.
What else might be in these RW system that is going to eat up our systems or I
suppose might be better as a slim chance. Can
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
We are doing our first building system off RW at this time. From our due
diligence for the current project, we learned that in NorCal, there have been a
few building systems connected
Church
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:29 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
Makes you wonder what we did before all the DCDA, RPZ, etc.
Oh, that's right- a single check, sometimes with a cheater meter
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George
Church
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 5:29 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
Makes you wonder what we did before all the DCDA, RPZ, etc.
Oh, that's
Most THINK that the AWWA recommends BFP's on ALL firelines, especially deadened
lines over 100 feet, but the AWWA does NOT recommend backflow protection on
hydrant only lines.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel , , because it is God’s power for salvation
to everyone who believes... HCS Romans
: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:40 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains having fire
hydrants
Most THINK that the AWWA recommends BFP's on ALL firelines, especially deadened
lines over 100 feet, but the AWWA does NOT recommend backflow
Subject: Re: RPZ for a dedicated private underground fire mains
having fire hydrants
Most THINK that the AWWA recommends BFP's on ALL firelines,
especially deadened lines over 100 feet, but the AWWA does NOT
recommend backflow protection on hydrant only lines.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel
Hearing? Is this rumor or have you talked directly with the AHJ?
In WA State I know of one case where this level of protection was utilized,
apropriately, on a Superfund site.
Bv
Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on ATT
-Original message-
From: AKS-Gmail-IMAP aksei...@gmail.com
To:
Next thing you know they'll require all the fire trucks to carry a portable
back flow preventer. Are fire hoses NSF61 compliant? :-)
J. Scott Mitchell, PE
AKS-Gmail-IMAP aksei...@gmail.com wrote:
I am hearing that in Illinois the state plumbing inspectors insist on
RPZ back flow prevention
I am hearing it, not from the horse's mouth so to speak, without an
unusual health hazard context. That might be construed as
rumormongering.
On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Bruce Verhei wrote:
Hearing? Is this rumor or have you talked directly with the AHJ?
In WA State I know of one case
Private fire service mains in CA have required backflows for years. The type
of device varies by water authority standards, but pretty much throughout
Southern California the use of an RPDA is standard practice. Whether the
downstream connections are sprinklers only, plus one hydrant or with
20 matches
Mail list logo
