> This also is an anecdote from some time back. As we were
> signing a fairly significant software contract with a large
> organization their manager told us "You guys know nothing
> about marketing. Your presentation was unprofessional, no
> glossy brochures, no audio visuals and we would
> My intent is to provide complete detailed technical
> information about SQLite, including its limitations and
> faults, and honest comparisons and even recommendations of
> other products (including, but not limited to DeviceSQL). My
> intent is to avoid sophistry, misrepresentation,
>
stay the same...
Fred
Running Windoze on a "PC".
I know, I know it should be Linux on a Mac. But I live in the "real
world" today.
I rest my case.
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:04 AM
To: s
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
That's true. A lot of those kinds of sales presentations are correctly
targeted at decision makers that make financial decisions. I don't
consider
it a bad thing - it's really a necessity to be competitive. The bear
in the
woods isnt evil,
e same...
Fred
Running Windoze on a "PC".
I know, I know it should be Linux on a Mac. But I live in the "real
world" today.
I rest my case.
> -Original Message-
> From: D. Richard Hipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:04
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
That's true. A lot of those kinds of sales presentations are correctly
targeted at decision makers that make financial decisions. I don't
consider
it a bad thing - it's really a necessity to be competitive.
My intent is to provide
> This scenario has played out multiple times.
>
> Say what you want about DeviceSQL the product, but one thing
> is undeniable: their sales presentations are top-notch. The
> first remark of yours that I quoted above shows this to be the case.
Yes - but a company that sells technical
"Lynn Fredricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know anything about DeviceSQL but their
> presentation is enough to get my respect :-)
>
[...]
>
> It seems to me that if the engineers are coming to you to defend their
> selection of SQLite, then they didnt know SQLite as well as they
> > August? We start to discuss about DeviceSQL some days ago, or I am
> > wrong?
> >
>
> I have several support customer in Europe who have been
> visited by the Encirq sales rep there, trying to get them to
> abandon SQLite in favor of DeviceSQL. The way this normally
> happens is that a
oops, fingers are moving faster than the brain :-) of course, you are right,
Dennis.
Steve
Dennis Cote wrote:
>
> steveweick wrote:
>> the tests were done
>> using Windows XP SP2 and Linux FC5 on a 3GHz P4 with 1MB
>>
>
> That must be very slow. ;-)
>
> I'm sure you meant 1GB for windows
steveweick wrote:
the tests were done
using Windows XP SP2 and Linux FC5 on a 3GHz P4 with 1MB
That must be very slow. ;-)
I'm sure you meant 1GB for windows XP.
Dennis Cote
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop the
FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest you
not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately misleading
Hi Sam,
re your points below:
1. I think I said "innovative", not "revolutionary". The scheme involves
using "dirty bits" rather than a log to record the transactional state of a
page.
2. We plan on publishing all the details of the benchmarks in a few days.
But to answer your question about
Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We wrote Richard back in August to correct his misstatements then. He chose
> >to ignore the letter.
>
> August? We start to discuss about DeviceSQL some days ago, or
> I am wrong?
>
I have several support customer in Europe who have been
visited by
act [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: steveweick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 8:59 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Improving performance of SQLite. Anyone heard of
DeviceSQL?
oops, I guess I need to get used to this message lis
steveweick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, Steve Weick might not see your comment
> > since he appears to have unsubscribed from the mailing list
> > immediately after sending his inflammatory missive.
> >
Hmmm... Further digging prompted by the
oops, I guess I need to get used to this message list protocol.
First let me apologize for letting Richard get me mad. Most of my friends
would describe me as one of the most laid back people they know. Why am I
mad you ask?
We wrote Richard back in August to correct his misstatements then. He
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop
>> the
>> >FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest
>> you
>> >not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately
Ion Silvestru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >SW: Richard, We have written to you directly before to ask you to stop the
> >FUD and incorrect statements, and you have chosen to continue. I suggest you
> >not waste everyone's time by circulating deliberately misleading
> >information.
>
> I think
This is Steve Weick, CTO & VP Engineering at Encirq Corp., developers and IP
owners of DeviceSQL. I would like to address D. Richard Hipp’s statements.
RDH:"If you view their web presentation and/or try out Encirq's products, I
would be very interested to hear your impressions. Even better would
Robert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After spending some time trying various methods to optimize the performance
> of SQLite for an ARM-based application, I've come across a technology called
> DeviceSQL. The developers of DeviceSQL (Encirq) claim it has 5x the
> performance of SQLite and
21 matches
Mail list logo
