[SM-USERS] problem with qmail

2003-01-09 Thread Abhay Kulkarni
Hi all. I downloaded Squirrelmail 1.2.10 and am successful to install it. I use "qmail" instead of "sendmail" in my setup and that to in the mailbox format. My mailbox is /home/username/Mailbox. Courier-imap server can't be used as it is for maildir format. I have installed Imap-2000 from Unive

Re: [SM-USERS] problem with qmail

2003-01-09 Thread Jason Wong
On Thursday 09 January 2003 03:04, Abhay Kulkarni wrote: > Hi all. > > I downloaded Squirrelmail 1.2.10 and am successful to install it. > I use "qmail" instead of "sendmail" in my setup and that to in the mailbox > format. My mailbox is /home/username/Mailbox. Courier-imap server can't be > used a

[SM-USERS] Background image in login.php

2003-01-09 Thread Ronald Roeleveld
Hey there everyone, Iam have set a background image in login.php, but when I am viewing login.php from the webbrowser is does show me the image, but the table where the login fields are located floats above the background image with a diffent color. Does anyone have any idea howto make the table t

[SM-USERS] Backgroud image login.php

2003-01-09 Thread Ronald Roeleveld
Hey there everyone, I have added a background image to the login.php. This works fine except that the table is not transparant, so I cannot see the background image through that. Does anyone know how I can make the table transparant so that the background is correctly displayed??? I have tried to

[SM-USERS] X-Authentication-Warning

2003-01-09 Thread Pontus Falk
Hi! I just successfully installed SquirrelMail on my Linux server. When I send an e-mail a warning is included in the outgoing mail. It says X-Authentication-Warning: se.homelinux.org: apache set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f I guess my setup is missconfigurated, but I can't see where...

Re: [SM-USERS] X-Authentication-Warning

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Hilts
> X-Authentication-Warning: se.homelinux.org: apache set sender to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f This is because you're using a binary to send the mail instead of talking SMTP directly. There are two things you can do: 1. Set up a SMTP daemon on your server and talk to it instead of using the se

[SM-USERS] help--squirrelmail 1.4.0 rc1

2003-01-09 Thread dderry
my error: Fatal error: Failed opening required 'SM_PATHfunctions/global.php' (include_path='.;c:\php\includes') in C:\Inetpub\webpub\squirrelmail\functions\prefs.php on line 14 I have yet to receive any help on this error other than it mayhave been a problem with my installation. so I have down

[SM-USERS] Sqmail and SMTP AUTH

2003-01-09 Thread Chris
Hi, I have Sqmail running on one machine and sendmail on another, I want it to use SMTP auth. I have enabled the smtp auth option in sqmail, however everytime I try to send a message I get a "user not found" error. What user name/password combo do I need to add to the sasldb to get it to work.

Re: [SM-USERS] help--squirrelmail 1.4.0 rc1

2003-01-09 Thread Stephen Hovey
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > my error: > Fatal error: Failed opening required 'SM_PATHfunctions/global.php' > (include_path='.;c:\php\includes') in > C:\Inetpub\webpub\squirrelmail\functions\prefs.php on line 14 I would open the prefs.php file, look at line 14, check it refere

Re: [SM-USERS] help--squirrelmail 1.4.0 rc1

2003-01-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Stephen, On Thursday, January 09, 2003, Stephen Hovey wrote... > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> my error: >> Fatal error: Failed opening required 'SM_PATHfunctions/global.php' >> (include_path='.;c:\php\includes') in >> C:\Inetpub\webpub\squirrelmail\functions\prefs.php o

Re: [SM-USERS] help--squirrelmail 1.4.0 rc1

2003-01-09 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Dderry, On Thursday, January 09, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... > Thank you for the reply. Out of curiosity, is there anything that I have > to do to set the SM_PATH on my current setup? > my configuration is as follows. > OS: windows2000 Adv. Server > mail server: Ms Exchange 2000 > (wo

[SM-USERS] next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread SqM
Hi! I am kind of confused of the meaning of next/previus in the message list when reading mail. If i click "next" when i read a mail i get an earlier mail, not a mail recieved later than the mail i'm just reading. The same stuff with "previus". But then i get a later mail. The same applies when

[SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread Erin Schnabel
SqM wrote: Hi! I am kind of confused of the meaning of next/previus in the message list when reading mail. If i click "next" when i read a mail i get an earlier mail, not a mail recieved later than the mail i'm just reading. The same stuff with "previus". But then i get a later mail. The same a

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Erin Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Previous and Next will work based on the order mail is displayed in the > index. If you have your mail sorted by date descending (newest at the > top), the next mail will be older, and the previous newer. > > If you don't like it, change your sort ord

Re: [SM-USERS] Memory error

2003-01-09 Thread Caleb Phillips
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:53, Keith Mastin wrote: > I just moved one of my sites over to a new server. Everything works fine > on the test account, but when I try to access any my user from the > previous server, the memory allocation arror pops up. Testing also othe > ruser accounts from the old

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread SqM
>> Is this by design or is there something strange going on >> in my installation? ( php4.3.0/apache1.3.27/SM1.2.10/UW ) > > Previous and Next will work based on the order mail is displayed in the > index. If you have your mail sorted by date descending (newest at the > top), the next mail will be

[SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread Erin Schnabel
SqM wrote: Is this by design or is there something strange going on in my installation? ( php4.3.0/apache1.3.27/SM1.2.10/UW ) Previous and Next will work based on the order mail is displayed in the index. If you have your mail sorted by date descending (newest at the top), the next mail will be

Re: [SM-USERS] Memory error

2003-01-09 Thread Keith Mastin
>On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 09:53, Keith Mastin wrote: >> I just moved one of my sites over to a new server. Everything works fine >> on the test account, but when I try to access any my user from the >> previous server, the memory allocation arror pops up. Testing also othe >> ruser accounts from th

[SM-USERS] attachments

2003-01-09 Thread Gulfstreme
They dont seem to be working. The attachments are being shown as the text of the message. What did I miss? --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.co

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread SqM
> > The little buttons over the index are your sort order controls. If you > set them, they should remain set across all mailboxes (unless it is > threaded) and between logins. I actally got them working over sessions now, read below.. > If you are using a database to backend the prefs, I discov

[SM-USERS] forwarding and CVS version

2003-01-09 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
I checked out the CVS version yesterday evening. When I tried to forward an e-mail, I received the following errors: Warning: Unable to call array() - function does not exist in ../class/mime/Rfc822Header.class.php on line 331 Warning: Unable to call array() - function does not exist in ../cla

Re: [SM-USERS] Cyrus+Postfix+Mysql+Web-Cyradm INBOX.sent permission problem

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Bassett
I solved the problem, it appears when using unixheirarchyes you must change the delimitor to / As in INBOX/Sent, INBOX/Trash, INBOX/Drafts then a lm command displays user/markb user/markb/Sent user/markb/Trash user/markb/Drafts after logging in through sm. Thanks all for the help and sorry for

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: next/previus

2003-01-09 Thread William R. Mussatto
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, SqM wrote: > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:11:00 +0100 (CET) > From: SqM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Re: next/previus > > > >> Is this by design or is there something strange going on > >> in my installation? ( php4.3.0/apache1.3.27/SM1.