Oops, the address to check for the new implementation of sqwebmail is:
http://www.riikari.net/riwos
A live test account is provided. Css expert wanted to join the group to
raise cross browser level. Comments are welcome.
matti
matti writes:
[...]
Comments are welcome.
One of the points you seem proud of is that you have eliminated frames.
Yet
a cursory inspection of the SECURITY readme shows why frames are used. The
fact that you blithely eliminate a security feature without apparently
understanding why it is
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:08:35PM +0300, matti wrote:
Oops, the address to check for the new implementation of sqwebmail is:
http://www.riikari.net/riwos
A live test account is provided. Css expert wanted to join the group to
raise cross browser level. Comments are welcome.
Just
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:27:00AM +, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Not only that, most of the new
functionality, which is in demand, is missing from your implementation.
When you say something like that, perhaps you could reference an explicit
list of those things which you think are missing?
One of the points you seem proud of is that you have eliminated frames.
proud ?
Yet
a cursory inspection of the SECURITY readme shows why frames are used. The
I have not changed this.
Matti Riikari
email [EMAIL
Brian Candler writes:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:27:00AM +, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Not only that, most of the new
functionality, which is in demand, is missing from your implementation.
When you say something like that, perhaps you could reference an
explicit list of those things
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:23:03AM +, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Not only that, most of the new
functionality, which is in demand, is missing from your implementation.
When you say something like that, perhaps you could reference an
explicit list of those things which you think are
Brian Candler writes:
Oh I see what you mean: new functionality already in sqwebmail is missing
from riwos. I originally read it as there are new functions which are
missing from sqwebmail which are also missing from riwos
Sorry if my statement was ambiguous. The new functionality in
matti writes:
One of the points you seem proud of is that you have eliminated frames.
proud ?
So it appeared from your readme, which complained about sqwebmail's use
of frames.
Yet a cursory inspection of the SECURITY readme shows why frames are
used. The
I have not changed this.
So it appeared from your readme, which complained about sqwebmail's use
of frames.
The word frames is used once in the readme:
The riwos implementation does not use frames.
No complaints. Where did you read that?
I've added does not use frames to create the multi viewing setup.
Yet a
matti writes:
The word frames is used once in the readme:
The riwos implementation does not use frames.
In the sqwebmail source you will find a file called SECURITY (or
SECURITY.html if you prefer that). I suggest you read one or other of
them.
I've added does not use frames to
Paul L. Allen writes:
In the sqwebmail source you will find a file called SECURITY (or
SECURITY.html if you prefer that). I suggest you read one or other of
them.
Matti has since contacted me directly to explain that Riwos does use
frames to maintain security but does not use ADDITIONAL
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:24:02PM +, Paul L. Allen wrote:
In the sqwebmail source you will find a file called SECURITY (or
SECURITY.html if you prefer that). I suggest you read one or other of
them.
Matti has since contacted me directly to explain that Riwos does use
frames to
With this in mind,
Is there any sign of any sqwebmail templates appearing yet ?
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Candler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2003 15:03
To: Paul L. Allen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqwebmail] Re: customizing sqwebmail, nwe look
Title: Who is the list owner / moderator
Hi can someone tell me who the list owner/manager moderator is.
I am getting a few bounces and confirmation of my "abuse or spam reports" to att.net
I want to mail the list owner to get these addresses removed as they are becoming annoying.
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:55:19PM +0100, DARCY,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) wrote:
Hi can someone tell me who the list owner/manager moderator is.
I am getting a few bounces and confirmation of my abuse or spam
reports to att.net
I want to mail the list owner to get these
I'd be keep an eye to manage the list.
I spend a lot of my time just reading through the posts and learning as I
go.
Any one from Inter7 reading at the moment ???
If you want to keep control of the list, could you remove a few of the 2
dead entries ?
Thanks
Matt.
-Original
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:34:47AM +, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Exchange allows vacation messages (done
sensibly, not the qmailadmin/autoresponder broken way).
Now that I *strongly* disagree with. Exchange's autoresponders are
totally broken.
I have never, ever used Exchange, so I
Brian Candler writes:
[sound for incoming mail]
It would be hard to arrange anyway - server push? Client auto-refresh
every 60 seconds?
Our standard mod is a meta refresh on the folder list so people can see
when stuff arrives. Yes, it also means that it defeats the soft timeout,
making it
19 matches
Mail list logo
