Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-10 Thread Erik Hare
Final chance to comment on rules revision, go to:
http://e-democracy.org/rules
---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, John Birrenbach wrote:
As I read and re-read this and what I posted yesterday the more and more I 
began to realize that what was built for Ireland, by Lowry, is what started 
the urban sprawl to begin with, and is the root of the whole metro area's 
current transit problems.  We are sprawled out, not up.
I happen to believe that you are precisely correct.  We can assign blame 
to people or organizations or technologies all we want, but the simple 
fact is that this is, outside of my immediate 'hood, a sprawling prairie 
with few natural barriers like those Manhatten has.  We were simply 
destined to keep going until we hit some kind of limiting size that made 
the lenght of commute unreasonable.

And, I happen to think we are hitting that wall right about now.  That's 
why it's time to act and start changing things, while we have a chance to 
experiement and learn.

Another part of the problem that really needs to be talked about is the 
density of population per acre.  It is my general understanding that those 
Rail transit systems that work, not only for the consumer but are also less 
of a drain on limited tax dollars, are those in area's of extreme population 
density.
I dunno about extreme, but high for sure.  But you have to look at this as 
a dollars per rider thang.  If we don't have the net ridership, we have to 
keep the dollars down.  That's why I stress cheaper alternatives.   It's 
like any other buiness.  We don't have the density to operate a Wal-Mart 
high valume system.  We have to have one that is more carefully targeted 
to the right audience, and really meets their needs.  In the end, it can 
be much more rewarding, IMHO

I look at who is gonna end up paying for the vast majority of this. I wonder 
what the rider costs vs the actual costs of setup and running are going to 
be.  Anyone know what the costs per passenger are for the Hiawatha line vs 
the ticket price?
Typically, LRT costs 35 cents a mile to operate.  This particular line was 
expensive to build, but I do not think an appropriate amortization is 
included in that 35 cents so do with that figure what you will.  This 
compares with 40 and more cents for a car (on average) and 53 cents for a 
bus (ouch!).

The amount riders pay for mass transit is a stunningly consistant 12-15 
cents per mile, regardless.  This is roughly equal to the variable cost of 
a car, which is to say maintenance and gasoline, but NOT purchase, 
inurance, etc.  In other words, riders pay about the same as what it would 
cost to fire up the car, but they still have one.

That means that for LRT there is typically 20-23 cents to make up, and I 
think Hiawatha is no different than average on that.  Special arrangements 
and other income generate 6 cents average nationally, so the pot from 
government is about 14 cents per mile -- 5 from the Feds and 9 from state 
and local sources.  Again, these are more national averages, but what I've 
seen of Hiawatha was right in line.

The net subsidy to the car that I've been able to calculate is 3 cents per 
mile, incidentally.

I have to agree with Eric that serious leadership needs to come from the 
County, serious money too if they want us to run outside the city.  At the 
same time those other communities everyone is so quick to say the eventual 
routes will run through need to be involved as well... we don't need another 
35E unconnected in the middle for three decades do we?
Thanks.  The County has done a good job really, but they always have it 
farmed out to consultants who really don't get in touch with the 'hoods 
enough, IMHO.  They wind up with a pretty report, like the Red Rock one, 
and no one behind it.   Sometimes, they have good ideas but sometimes they 
just tick people off.  I think the real leadership has to be grassroots, 
which hasn't happened yet.

Some sources:
http://www.redrockrail.org
http://www.nhhsrail.com/Chapter-7-Ridership_Fare_Revenue_and_Cost_Database.pdf
http://www.friends4expo.org/lrstats.htm
Erik Hare  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://home.comcast.net/~wabbitoid/
Irvine Park, West End, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, North America, Earth
Fine Amish furniture, cedar chests, and crafts  http://www.harmonycedar.com
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


[StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back - We're still missing the big picture here

2004-11-10 Thread Dan Dobson
Final chance to comment on rules revision, go to:
http://e-democracy.org/rules
---
While the nay-sayers keep talking about how mass
transit won't work, a very important part of the
equation has not been discussed. Today human beings
are using fossil fuels at the rate of 80 MILLION
BARRELS of oil a day, or 28 BILLION BARRELS a year.

http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/oil.html

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/ene_oil_con

http://www.bartleby.com/151/fields/82.html

If we continue to use fossil fuels at this rate, (this
does not include increased usage by Third World
Countries such as China and India), we will delete all
known petroleum reserves of 1,032,132 million barrels
or 1.032 Trillion barrels in 35 to 37 years, well
within the lifetime of a lot of people on this board. 
Even if we double the amount of known reserves, say to
2.064 Trillion barrels, and keep usage at the present
level, we will delete most petroleum in 70 to 74
years. 

Thus it is critical that we begin to convert our
transportation systems now, when there are funds and
fuels available. Do you really want to own a home in
Eden Prairie and Maplewood, or even further out, when
gas hits the equivalent of $6.00, $7.00 of $10.00 a
gallon or would you rather be able to walk from your
front door to a street-car or light rail system run by
electrcity?

Unless we begin to make a huge shift to a hydrogen
economy, created by wind and other renewables, come 50
to 100 years from now, the societal dislocations will
be so severe we can't even begin to imagine the
consequences today. 

Hopefully, I'll be 85 years old driving my hydrogen
powered car with hydrogen created from tap water by my
own wind turbine, but where are the plans?

Dan Dobson
Summit Hill


--- John Birrenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Final chance to comment on rules revision, go to:
 http://e-democracy.org/rules
 ---
 At 2:18 PM -0600 11/9/04, Andy Driscoll wrote:
   after William (?) Lowry built Archbishop
 John Ireland's Grand Avenue streetcar line all the
 way out to the farm
 fields
 
 As I read and re-read this and what I posted
 yesterday the more and 
 more I began to realize that what was built for
 Ireland, by Lowry, is 
 what started the urban sprawl to begin with, and is
 the root of the 
 whole metro area's current transit problems.  We are
 sprawled out, 
 not up.
 
 How Ironic that we are now looking at building is
 the very thing that 
 allowed communities like Merriam Park to SPRAWL out
 from the city of 
 St Paul and Mpls, which in turn eventually caused
 the very transit 
 issues we see today.  See how the best laid plans of
 Mice and Men can 
 go awry?
 
 Another part of the problem that really needs to be
 talked about is 
 the density of population per acre.  It is my
 general understanding 
 that those Rail transit systems that work, not only
 for the consumer 
 but are also less of a drain on limited tax dollars,
 are those in 
 area's of extreme population density.
 
 NY for example all those people living in
 apartments in the HEART 
 of the city (yea there are commuters, but look at
 the population 
 density of residents the vast majority of the
 systems users).
 
 When you look at some of these cities, you see
 massive towers, for 
 MILES, packed with people.  Here we have everyone
 spread out all over 
 the place (thanks to planning in the early part of
 this century).
 
 I look at who is gonna end up paying for the vast
 majority of this. 
 I wonder what the rider costs vs the actual costs of
 setup and 
 running are going to be.  Anyone know what the costs
 per passenger 
 are for the Hiawatha line vs the ticket price?
 
 Is this a totally free ride at the expense of the
 taxpayers or is 
 it's costs going to be born, eventually, by the
 riders?  If it's 
 going to be paid in total by ridership it seems to
 me that the 
 population density of the cities doesn't make that
 happen, unless 
 your able to drive and park at some station to ride
 the train.
 
 If the costs are born by the taxpayers then there is
 no reason to not 
 start right now, it's only gonna get more expensive
 as time goes on. 
 If it's a free ride for anyone who wants to get on,
 it would 
 certainly increase ridership and reduce traffic on a
 scale never seen 
 before.
 
 I have to agree with Eric that serious leadership
 needs to come from 
 the County, serious money too if they want us to run
 outside the 
 city.  At the same time those other communities
 everyone is so quick 
 to say the eventual routes will run through need to
 be involved as 
 well... we don't need another 35E unconnected in the
 middle for three 
 decades do we?
 
 -- 
 Sincerely,
 John Birrenbach
 W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
 === Political  Business Consulting ===
 http://www.birrenbach.com/
 ==
 The Counter to Republican Radio
 http://www.airamericaradio.com/
 

Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-09 Thread Erik Hare

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, John Birrenbach wrote:
LRT is very nice idea to bring people in and get them off the Interstates. 
But you have to do it smartly kinda like Chicago does. Pick a point (Union 
Station) and have all your communter trains from the burbs converge there, 
then it's just a matter of picking up either another train or a bus to reach 
your local destination.  No where do Trolly's fit into a picture of a ever 
changing transit system needs.
John, there's always the possibility that the larger number of people 
(thanks, Charlie!) that a streetcar carries, plus some big savings in 
operational costs since they are electric, would be justified once the 
main commuter rail was up and operating.  Certainly, we should get things 
going with buses and learn a bit what has happened to the patterns of 
people moving first.  But eventually streetcars may be a good idea.   And 
if someone could convince me that they were a draw in and of themsevles as 
a novelty, that could also be another point.

But yes, anytime people say, Here a technology that will solve your 
transportation needs! it's important to ask, What problem does this 
actually solve?  To me, nothing is more important than to meet the needs 
of the passengers.  That will require trying things much more than the 
eternal planning we do, and trying things out means that we have to keep 
the costs low so we can afford some level of failure, IMHO.

Erik Hare  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://home.comcast.net/~wabbitoid/
Irvine Park, West End, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, North America, Earth
Fine Amish furniture, cedar chests, and crafts  http://www.harmonycedar.com
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-09 Thread Mike Fratto

John makes some valid points, as do many of the posters regarding
light rail or street cars.
 
However, I would disagree that this metro area was designed for the
auto.  There was a very good street car system in place until our
venerable Carl Pohlad and his friends destroyed it for his bus
system.
 
The cost for the installation of a rail system is large.  But it
also affords opportunities the current system of highways and
byways.  The one thing that a rail system can do that paved roads
can't do is increase the amount of passengers without additional
lanes of traffic.
 
The cost of additional lanes of traffic is more than just the money
it takes to acquire the land, and build it.  The cost includes
destruction of neighborhoods, added pollution etc.
 
We may be a community of cars, but if you look most of the cars
have only one person in it.  Talk about an expensive proposition. 
Think about this.  How fast could we build a light or heavy rail
system, if the money we spend on cars and other modes of
transportation annually were devoted to the rail system?
 
Many of us seem to think its necessary that we have a car at hand. 
It allows us to go where we want to go when we want to go. 
Unfortunately, most of us also think its our right.  Yet if you
moved to Washington, New York Chicago and other cities, I think you
would quickly change your mind.
 
I have ridden the  European, Salt Lake and the entire Portland
systems.  When in Washington, I only use the Metro.  The wait is
short.  The rides are enjoyable and you don't have a whole lot of
limitation to getting to where you want to go.  In fact, the bus
system works in partnership with the Metro.
 
What can be better.
 
I favor a spoke system.  One spoke to St. Cloud through Maple
Grove.  One Spoke North to, Say, Hinkley, One South to Red Wing,
Cannon Falls, and Rochester.  One Spoke South west to Burnsville.
One spoke West to Willmar.  One Spoke North East to Stillwater.  One
East to Hudson.  Of course there would be a link between St. Paul
and Minneapolis.
 
In many cases there are old rail lines that could be used.  Yes, in
many cases this would mean working within the current bike system to
ensure that we wouldn't lose those amenities.
 
Mike Fratto
Payne Phalen

 John Birrenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/08/2004 8:36:49 PM



I don't know I get conflicting ideas from the City... on one hand 
they have this idea of Street cars which well might look cutsie are

really a pain and don't adjust to the needs, wants, or changing
needs 
of the community (rail tracks and all).  On the other you have what

is on the Cities website (which you should really take a look at 
http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/maps/DowntownMaps/index.html ).  It 
happens to show LRT going down Univerisity going in and out of 
Downtown through what looks like Robert St to the Union Depot.

St Paul, Minneapolis the entire metro area was designed to be a
place 
to drive your car (for goodness sakes we have one of the remaining

DRIVE IN THEATERS in the East Metro).  People in MN are attached to

their cars and that is not likely to change.  We might, if the 
transit system metro wide, is convenient enough, get a few people 
from WI, Northern, Western, and Southern suburbs to use LRT to get
to 
and from work, but traveling to the airport and between DT's is not

really gonna happen to as great a degree as I think (my Opinion) 
others believe.

LRT is very nice idea to bring people in and get them off the 
Interstates.  But you have to do it smartly kinda like Chicago
does. 
Pick a point (Union Station) and have all your communter trains
from 
the burbs converge there, then it's just a matter of picking up 
either another train or a bus to reach your local destination.  No

where do Trolly's fit into a picture of a ever changing transit 
system needs.

The idea of connecting each of the DT's is nice, but not many are 
gonna wait for a train they will want to use their cars especially
if 
it's a regular thing, but it is not really gonna solve the problem
of 
94, 280, 35W, 35E intersections being congested.

What strikes me odd is that in one single swipe, the Native 
American's could shut the yam holes of everyone now wanting a piece

of their pie, by building a LRT to the Hinkley Casino.  Not only 
would it be usable as a commuter rail but also to bring people to 
their Casino.  It would be a move that would make so many people 
happy it would be a coup in public relations state wide for all the

tribes.

-- 
Sincerely,
John Birrenbach
W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
=== Political  Business Consulting ===
http://www.birrenbach.com/
==
The Counter to Republican Radio
http://www.airamericaradio.com/
==
Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long

periods of time
Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
+++
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  

Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-09 Thread M Charles Swope


On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, John Birrenbach wrote:

...you have to do it smartly kinda like Chicago
does. Pick a point (Union Station) and have all your
communter trains from the burbs converge there ... 

A correction. Chicago's commuter trains do not all
converge in a single location. In addition to Union
Station, Chicago also has suburban commuter lines
terminating at LaSalle Street station and Randolph
Street station. This doesn't negate John's point, of
course. It's important to have the various lines
intersecting so that the entire system is useable
without having to go from one mode to another (i.e.,
it shouldn't be necessary to take a bus to get from
one rail line to another). However, I'm not so sure
that it's necessary to have the lines converging at a
single point. It seems that would require an in and
out ride anytime one's origin and destination were on
different lines. There are probably other
configurations with distributed intersections that
would work better (NYC's or Paris' subways e.g.)

More seriously, John's argument that the Twin Cities
is designed around the automobile may, at this point
in time, be true (It wasn't always so). However, that
doesn't mean that that design is appropriate for the
future. Can an almost exclusively car-based system
accomodate a million more people in the region without
causing immense problems. Remember, miles driven don't
increase in a linear fashion as a region grows in
size. They increase geometrically. We simply can't
depend on roads and freeways to deal with the traffic
that will be present in the not allthat distant
future. I happen to believe that a combination of
heavy rail, light rail (including streetcars) and
buses has to be added to the road system to keep us
mobile. It will be expensive to build but the costs of
not building this system will be large as well.

And let's recognize too that we can learn much from
looking at how other regions have dealt with the
problem, both here in North America and abroad. We can
emulate solutions that work and avoid the mistakes
that are evident in some places (Atlanta's freeways,
e.g.)

Charlie Swope
Ward 1 


_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-09 Thread John Birrenbach
Please don't get me wrong with what I am about to write, I am all in 
favor of Mass Transit and alevieating all of the problems associated 
with petro-chemically driven vehicles, BUT.

I think the point I was attempting to make is that unlike alot of 
other cities, we are very spread out, we gave into roads as our main 
mode of transportation during horse and buggy days, and MN's for some 
reason have a real tie to their car.

Unlike cities that, granted because of cars but also delivery trucks, 
have developed large expansive underground and above ground tansit 
systems (like New York city), and still have reached grid lock, we 
have not reach a point where total gridlock has been achieved (yes we 
are on our way, but it's not like Rush hour in LA yet).

All of which are difficulties to overcome when it comes to mass 
transit that does what it's designed to do.  Get people out of cars 
and onto buses or rail.  They really need a reason to do so.  One is 
cause they see a express bus or train moving past them as they sit in 
traffic, the other is that it is convenient for them to access.

Yes we do have alot of rail lines in the metro area.  Why?  because 
we are also (were also) a major hub for freight transit around the 
northern corridor of the US.  That doesn't mean that they can be used 
(being heavy rail lines, locations, etc.. ) or that the owners will 
allow such use (frankly if I was an owner of the right of way I 
wouldn't be looking to add to the liability to maintain the track for 
commuter rails).

We are also a continuely changing community.  The developments in St 
Paul on both sides of the River, which at one time were places of 
business and housing.  Then flood plans changed them to industrial 
and airports, now we are going back to putting housing and business 
back down there again.

At one time the East side was the place to live and work then not 
then it was again, Grand Ave at one time was all residential, now 
it's largely commercial and educational.  I recall looking at 
University Ave and seeing Crack Street, now it's a great street to 
ride from the Capitol to Mpls, it's thriving.  We are a community 
without any sort of real long term vision of what we want to be, and 
if we do come up with a vision it only lasts as long as an 
administration or city council then the vision or focus changes.  We 
are like 7 little cities, each with it's own agenda, crammed into one.

With some few exceptions, in such a place it's really hard to put 
into place something as locked in as RAIL (be it light or trolly 
cars).

There are alternatives to buses that run on Petro products, there are 
hybrid buses, there are natural gas buses, there are buses that could 
be designed to run on fuel cell technology developed by NASA in the 
60's.

For an area that is in a constant state of flux the vast majority of 
the real transit needs to be in easily changeable routes, that is 
obtained presently via buses, unobtainable with any sort of rail as 
the main mode of transportation.

Does anyone remember the Trolly Cars (actually fancy old fashioned 
buses) they had running around DT for awhile a few years back?  Are 
they still running?

There fuel for the fire :-)
--
Sincerely,
John Birrenbach
W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
=== Political  Business Consulting ===
http://www.birrenbach.com/
==
The Counter to Republican Radio http://www.airamericaradio.com/
==
Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long 
periods of time
Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
+++
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-09 Thread John Birrenbach
At 2:18 PM -0600 11/9/04, Andy Driscoll wrote:
Let me correct this base assumption right off the top. The core cities of
Minneapolis/St. Paul were, in fact, designed for and using trolley
transportation from about 1870-on - after William (?) Lowry built Archbishop
John Ireland's Grand Avenue streetcar line all the way out to the farm
fields near the river where St. Thomas College was built and expanding even
then. Lowry had a lock on the public transit system in the cities - what
became the Twin Cities Street Railway system, the Twin Cities Rapid Transit.
One line doesn't change the fact that 99% of the roads didn't have 
Rapid Transit.  Nor that
Long before there was any sort of Rail service into the cities, there 
were streets with horses and buggies on them.

See you also fail to mention that back in 1870 Minneapolis was a long 
trip away, the space between DT St Paul and DT Mpls was forest and 
farmlands, with some small developments as the century changed and we 
moved forward (and the property was sold off to people by these very 
individuals that built the rail line you talk about, so it was more 
in their economic interest than any community interest to put in this 
spar lines).  These developments came along the railroad that did at 
that time run between Mpls and St Paul on it's way west to OR, and 
the spar lines developed along the route.  Hence Merriam Park and a 
few others, but it was more like AMTRACK passenger service than it 
was anything like what we would now consider commuter transportation.

We have a long way to go, and I see today that they must be 
conducting some sort of test as there is a Limited Stop Express Bus 
running down W7th St, DT to the Airport and Mall of America.  But nah 
I heard they would never test that to see if it works would they :-)

--
Sincerely,
John Birrenbach
W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
=== Political  Business Consulting ===
http://www.birrenbach.com/
==
The Counter to Republican Radio http://www.airamericaradio.com/
==
Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long 
periods of time
Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
+++
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


[StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-08 Thread List Manager

I know that a couple of people have tried to post this to SPIF. John 
succeeded, but the text was a little disjointed, so let me try once 
again.

-
Bring the streetcars back!
   Saint Paul Launches a Civic Dialogue
  Wednesday Nov. 17, 2004  Thursday, Nov. 18, 2004
Former Portland City Commissioner Charlie Hales will be speaking at 
four different events in Saint Paul on Nov. 17-18, 2004. Hales is a 
transit planning principal at HDR Engineering, working with 
communities on transit options. As a member of the Portland City 
Council from 1992 through 2002, Hales was the driving force behind 
the effort to raise $58 million in bonds to create the Portland 
Streetcar, the nation's first modern streetcar. With the success of 
the new Hiawatha LRT line, Saint Paul welcomes the opportunity to 
explore streetcars as a way to link downtown arts, entertainment and 
business with our city's vibrant neighborhoods for residents and 
visitors alike.

On Wednesday, Nov. 17, 3:30 p.m.
-
Charlie will address the Saint Paul City Council at its regular 
meeting, which will be televised on St. Paul Cable Channel 18.

Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2004, 7 to 8:30 p.m.

Public Event: Bringing Back the Streetcars
Minnesota History Center, 3M Auditorium, St. Paul
HDR Transit Planning Principal Charlie Hales is helping to revive the 
electric streetcar as a popular, ef. cient, and cost-effective 
transit option in cities across the U.S. Charlie shares his 
experiences in this presentation, as both Twin Cities consider 
reviving the streetcar
on lines like the Midtown Greenway and Grand Avenue. From 6 to 7 
p.m., visit the exhibit Going Places:  The Mystique of Mobility to 
enjoy archival streetcar film footage and read riders' stories.

Wednesday, Nov. 17, 11:30-1:00 p.m.

Brown Bag Lunchtime Talk for Activists and Engineers: The Nuts and 
Bolts of Streetcars Saint Paul City Hall, Room 40, 15 West Kellogg 
Blvd., St. Paul

Transit enthusiasts, transportation planners, neighborhood activists, 
public works engineers and interested members of the public are 
invited to join Charlie to talk about how to start planning for St. 
Paul streetcar. Bring your own lunch and RSVP to reserve a chair by 
calling Jane Prince at
651/266-8641. Pop machines available.

Thursday, Nov. 18, 8-9 a.m.
---
Streetcars, LRT and Buses: Regional Transit Leaders and Charlie Hales
Macalester Campus Center, John B. Davis Lecture Hall, Grand  
Snelling, St. Paul

Charlie will discuss how streetcars can enhance our region's 
multi-modal transit system by linking downtown and neighborhood 
residents, workers and visitors. A responder panel of regional 
transit and business leaders will respond. Coffee and Rolls.

Presented with support from the City of Saint Paul, the Minnesota 
History Center, Macalester College, University UNITED, the 
Capitol/River Council, Merriam Park Community Council, Midway 
Transportation Management Organization, Capital City Partnership, HDR 
Engineering, Inc., Dayton's
Bluff District 4 Community Council, Macalester Groveland Community Council.

If you have questions about any of these events, call the Saint Paul 
City Council at 651/266-8641.

Russ Stark
Executive Director
Midway Transportation Management Organization (TMO)
1954 University Avenue, Suite 9
St. Paul, MN  55104
651-644-5108
--
=
Tim Erickson  http://www.politalk.com
St. Paul, MN - USA   651-643-0722
[EMAIL PROTECTED] iChat/AIM: stpaultim
=

_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-08 Thread Bob Spaulding

I think the main discussion at this point is about an
east-west streetcar line running around downtown and
possibly along Selby or Grand.  I'm quite certain a
line out along West 7th is not the focus of the
effort.

There's already a coordinated effort to bring a
similar streetcar from Uptown along the Midtown
Greenway in Minneapolis (just north of Lake), and one
thought is this could connect with that line, possibly
via the 26th Street railroad bridge over the
Mississippi.

This effort is being promoted by different people than
the West 7th busway, under different circumstances. 
This is being described from the outset as a Civic
Dialogue.  I think there's a real attempt to get a
neighborhood-level discussion going before going
forward.  In Minneapolis, for example, it is a
non-profit called the Midtown Greenway Coalition
advancing the streetcar concept, which is made up
basically of representatives from all the surrounding
neighborhood organizations.

But that about exhausts my knowledge on the project -
anyone who has important questions can to go to one of
the forums.

Bob Spaulding
Downtown Saint Paul Resident

---

 Bring the streetcars back!
Saint Paul Launches a Civic Dialogue

   Wednesday Nov. 17, 2004  Thursday, Nov. 18, 2004

Former Portland City Commissioner Charlie Hales will
be speaking at four different events in Saint Paul on
Nov. 17-18, 2004. Hales is a transit planning
principal at HDR Engineering, working with communities
on transit options. As a member of the Portland City
Council from 1992 through 2002, Hales was the driving
force behind 
the effort to raise $58 million in bonds to create the
Portland Streetcar, the nation's first modern
streetcar. With the success of the new Hiawatha LRT
line, Saint Paul welcomes the opportunity to 
explore streetcars as a way to link downtown arts,
entertainment and business with our city's vibrant
neighborhoods for residents and visitors alike.

On Wednesday, Nov. 17, 3:30 p.m.
-
Charlie will address the Saint Paul City Council at
its regular meeting, which will be televised on St.
Paul Cable Channel 18.

Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2004, 7 to 8:30 p.m.

Public Event: Bringing Back the Streetcars
Minnesota History Center, 3M Auditorium, St. Paul

HDR Transit Planning Principal Charlie Hales is
helping to revive the electric streetcar as a popular,
efficient, and cost-effective transit option in cities
across the U.S. Charlie shares his experiences in this
presentation, as both Twin Cities consider 
reviving the streetcar on lines like the Midtown
Greenway and Grand Avenue. From 6 to 7 p.m., visit the
exhibit Going Places:  The Mystique of Mobility to
enjoy archival streetcar film footage and read riders'
stories.

Wednesday, Nov. 17, 11:30-1:00 p.m.

Brown Bag Lunchtime Talk for Activists and Engineers:
The Nuts and Bolts of Streetcars Saint Paul City
Hall, Room 40, 15 West Kellogg 
Blvd., St. Paul

Transit enthusiasts, transportation planners,
neighborhood activists, public works engineers and
interested members of the public are invited to join
Charlie to talk about how to start planning for St.
Paul streetcar. Bring your own lunch and RSVP to
reserve a chair by calling Jane Prince at
651/266-8641. Pop machines available.

Thursday, Nov. 18, 8-9 a.m.
---
Streetcars, LRT and Buses: Regional Transit Leaders
and Charlie Hales Macalester Campus Center, John B.
Davis Lecture Hall, Grand  
Snelling, St. Paul

Charlie will discuss how streetcars can enhance our
region's multi-modal transit system by linking
downtown and neighborhood residents, workers and
visitors. A responder panel of regional 
transit and business leaders will respond. Coffee and
Rolls.

Presented with support from the City of Saint Paul,
the Minnesota History Center, Macalester College,
University UNITED, the CapitolRiver Council, Merriam
Park Community Council, Midway 
Transportation Management Organization, Capital City
Partnership, HDR Engineering, Inc., Dayton's
Bluff District 4 Community Council, Macalester
Groveland Community Council.

If you have questions about any of these events, call
the Saint Paul City Council at 651/266-8641.


Russ Stark
Executive Director
Midway Transportation Management Organization (TMO)
1954 University Avenue, Suite 9
St. Paul, MN  55104
651-644-5108
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   

Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-08 Thread Erik Hare

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bob Spaulding wrote:
There's already a coordinated effort to bring a
similar streetcar from Uptown along the Midtown
Greenway in Minneapolis (just north of Lake), and one
thought is this could connect with that line, possibly
via the 26th Street railroad bridge over the
Mississippi.
That's all great!  Personally, I'd use that bridge for a higher speed 
commuter rail, and run the streetcar along Lake through to Selby all the 
way -- connecting to the high speed line whenever reasonable.  But the 
idea is the same, and it's all worth talking about.  It's a very cheap 
alternative, comapred to what we normally talk about.

This effort is being promoted by different people than
the West 7th busway, under different circumstances.
This is being described from the outset as a Civic
Dialogue.  I think there's a real attempt to get a
neighborhood-level discussion going before going
forward.
To me, this is the key to success.  The neighbors are the likely riders of 
such a system, and it's got to be about their needs.  The other group that 
could benefit, Lake St Bizes, needs to be heard from as well as to what 
they need.  How this fits into St Paul at Merriam park is also critical, 
and I think we have exactly the same issues.

Erik Hare  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://home.comcast.net/~wabbitoid/
Irvine Park, West End, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, North America, Earth
Fine Amish furniture, cedar chests, and crafts  http://www.harmonycedar.com
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-08 Thread Dan Dobson

I agree with Erik completely that the 26th Avenue
bridge should be used for high speed rail, either
light rail or the link for the NorthStar to Hastings
Heavy rail lines. 

I just looked at the Portland Light Rail system and it
runs all the way from Hillsboro on the west end of
Portland to Gresham on the East.

What is still missing is a coordinated long term plan 
like both Denver and Portland have. We first need to
build one major eastwest line, (NOT ON UNIVERSITY
AVENUE), connecting Minneapolis and Saint Paul and
extending out to Excelsior, Minnetonka or Eden Prairie
on the West and extending out to Hudson on the East. 

Then over the next 20 to 30 years arms can be built
off that main line to Stillwater, Hastings, Rochester,
Blaine and Coon Rapids, Apple Valley, and Maple Grove.

But it is essential that we build the backbone of the
system first and everything can grow from that. My
preferred route is along I-94 to Hudson, across the
26th Avenue bridge, along the Greenway to the Hiawatha
Corridor line and then west to Eden Prairie.

Dan Dobson
Saint Paul

--- Erik Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bob Spaulding wrote:
 
  There's already a coordinated effort to bring a
  similar streetcar from Uptown along the Midtown
  Greenway in Minneapolis (just north of Lake), and
 one
  thought is this could connect with that line,
 possibly
  via the 26th Street railroad bridge over the
  Mississippi.
 
 That's all great!  Personally, I'd use that bridge
 for a higher speed 
 commuter rail, and run the streetcar along Lake
 through to Selby all the 
 way -- connecting to the high speed line whenever
 reasonable.  But the 
 idea is the same, and it's all worth talking about. 
 It's a very cheap 
 alternative, comapred to what we normally talk
 about.
 
  This effort is being promoted by different people
 than
  the West 7th busway, under different
 circumstances.
  This is being described from the outset as a
 Civic
  Dialogue.  I think there's a real attempt to get
 a
  neighborhood-level discussion going before going
  forward.
 
 To me, this is the key to success.  The neighbors
 are the likely riders of 
 such a system, and it's got to be about their needs.
  The other group that 
 could benefit, Lake St Bizes, needs to be heard from
 as well as to what 
 they need.  How this fits into St Paul at Merriam
 park is also critical, 
 and I think we have exactly the same issues.
 
 Erik Hare  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://home.comcast.net/~wabbitoid/
 Irvine Park, West End, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA,
 North America, Earth
 
 Fine Amish furniture, cedar chests, and crafts 
 http://www.harmonycedar.com
 
 
 _
 To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 _
 
 St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail

http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
 _
 NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your
 password - visit:
 http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
 
 Archive Address:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
 

_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/


Re: [StPaul] Bring The Streetcars Back

2004-11-08 Thread John Birrenbach
I don't know I get conflicting ideas from the City... on one hand 
they have this idea of Street cars which well might look cutsie are 
really a pain and don't adjust to the needs, wants, or changing needs 
of the community (rail tracks and all).  On the other you have what 
is on the Cities website (which you should really take a look at 
http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/maps/DowntownMaps/index.html ).  It 
happens to show LRT going down Univerisity going in and out of 
Downtown through what looks like Robert St to the Union Depot.

St Paul, Minneapolis the entire metro area was designed to be a place 
to drive your car (for goodness sakes we have one of the remaining 
DRIVE IN THEATERS in the East Metro).  People in MN are attached to 
their cars and that is not likely to change.  We might, if the 
transit system metro wide, is convenient enough, get a few people 
from WI, Northern, Western, and Southern suburbs to use LRT to get to 
and from work, but traveling to the airport and between DT's is not 
really gonna happen to as great a degree as I think (my Opinion) 
others believe.

LRT is very nice idea to bring people in and get them off the 
Interstates.  But you have to do it smartly kinda like Chicago does. 
Pick a point (Union Station) and have all your communter trains from 
the burbs converge there, then it's just a matter of picking up 
either another train or a bus to reach your local destination.  No 
where do Trolly's fit into a picture of a ever changing transit 
system needs.

The idea of connecting each of the DT's is nice, but not many are 
gonna wait for a train they will want to use their cars especially if 
it's a regular thing, but it is not really gonna solve the problem of 
94, 280, 35W, 35E intersections being congested.

What strikes me odd is that in one single swipe, the Native 
American's could shut the yam holes of everyone now wanting a piece 
of their pie, by building a LRT to the Hinkley Casino.  Not only 
would it be usable as a commuter rail but also to bring people to 
their Casino.  It would be a move that would make so many people 
happy it would be a coup in public relations state wide for all the 
tribes.

--
Sincerely,
John Birrenbach
W 7th Neighborhood, St Paul MN
=== Political  Business Consulting ===
http://www.birrenbach.com/
==
The Counter to Republican Radio
http://www.airamericaradio.com/
==
Six years on the council has trained me to feign interest for long 
periods of time
Chris Coleman Jan 21, 2004
+++
_
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
_

St. Paul Topics - This Week: Light Rail
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul-topics
_
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/