dgraham 2003/09/25 23:22:05
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java
Log:
Removed the instanceof String check before calling
result.toString(). If result is already a String, there is no
harm in calling its toString() method.
Revision Changes
dgraham 2003/09/25 23:28:05
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html CheckboxTag.java
Log:
Refactored the checked logic into a new isChecked()
method.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +32 -21
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I know axis4struts (http://sourceforge.net/projects/axis4struts/), but I
think the project is not active...
XML Apache Axis access to Jakarta Struts Applications! Our goal is to
provide a standard Axis/SOAP Interface to Struts that allows the same
Struts Actions, Business Logic and Data Model
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tiles and validator contain functionality not readily available in JSF.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Guido García Bernardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:41 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Struts vs JSP : Validators
What do you think
James Mitchell wrote:
Sorry for the late response.
I finally got some time to take a look at this and after fixing a few
problems related to cactus configuration, I finally got the tests to run.
Unfortunately, a few minutes and 665 tests later it bombed on the ErrorsTag
tests.
It seems we
Can somebody tell me which is the best way to do this?
Oh boy :)
There was a long discussion not so long ago about
the problems with extending the tags (not limited
to the Struts tags, btw) on this list.
You're stuck with copy-and-pasteing TextTag.doStartTag()
into your new tag, then
You're stuck with copy-and-pasteing TextTag.doStartTag()
into your new tag, then sprinkling your modifications
in there.
Alternatively, you could refactor TextTag to make it easier to
extend, and then submit the refactoring as a request-for-enhancement,
and extend the refactored version...
Joe
Paananen, Tero wrote:
Can somebody tell me which is the best way to do this?
Oh boy :)
There was a long discussion not so long ago about
the problems with extending the tags (not limited
to the Struts tags, btw) on this list.
If you do want to extend a tag, try to use the nightly source
I finally did it (thanks to Chris Gastin for putting me o/t track). But instead
of extending the TextTag, i extended the BaseFieldTag. In the constructor,
I wrote:
public StrutsDateChooserTag() {
super();
type = "text";
}
Further, I did only override
public int doStartTag() throws
public int doStartTag() throws JspException {
int tempValue = super.doStartTag();
StringBuffer href = new StringBuffer(some stuff);
ResponseUtils.write(pageContext, sb.toString());
return tempValue;
}
This all works fine for me!
So you're doing
Hi,
How to create a bean corresponding to a tagLib, and how to generate an Action like
/logon.
Thanks..
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Guido García Bernardo wrote:
What do you think about Struts validators vs JSF validators ?
(advantages, etc)
I think you encourage the user to migrate to jsf html tags instead of
using the struts ones (at least for new projects), but what about
validators?
This isn't really an either-or
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rleland 2003/09/26 09:53:42
Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml
Log:
Bug#: 22384 context diff provided by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modify javascript to honor datapattern option.
Revision ChangesPath
1.41 +6 -3 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22384.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be
100%.
I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status is to
make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which has
released in August
and been designated an Alpha. I propose that this
+1
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
678.910.8017
770.822.3359
AIM:jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: [Short Term Plan] Struts
I agree 100%. +1 to using commons-validator 1.1.0.
David
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be
100%.
I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status
is to
make the nightly build of struts
+1
Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be
100%.
I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status
is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which
has released in August
and been designated an Alpha. I propose
turner 2003/09/26 11:12:24
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen
ValidWhen.java
Log:
Changed validator signatures to use ActionMessages rather than ActionErrors, was
+1 here too
Also note that in deprecating ActionErrors (whomever did
that, it's lost in the bowels of my e-mail archive), it
broke all the default validators because they had
ActionErrors in their method signatures. I released a fix
for it today.
James
-Original Message-
From: James
Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use
ActionErrors because the ActionForm.validate() method returns an instance
of that class. ActionMessage should be used instead of ActionError
though.
David
--- James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 here too
Also note
Ok, color me confused.
Why then is are the validator methods being called with an
ActionMessages object rather than an ActionErrors object?
That's what was breaking things.
(This is what happens when you step away to deal with the
Real World for a few months...)
James
-Original
David Graham wrote:
Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use
ActionErrors because the ActionForm.validate() method returns an instance
of that class. ActionMessage should be used instead of ActionError
though.
Eventually we'll need to add a method that will allow
Some other suggestions:
findErrors()
getErrors()
getErrorMessages()
getActionMessages()
I like doValidate(), validateForm(), getActionMessages() and
getErrorMessages().
Matt
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
turner 2003/09/26 12:14:06
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator Resources.java
Log:
Fix to successfully pass errors to validators
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +5 -5
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/Resources.java
Index:
Maybe we can wait until it's time to add a form of validate that will
just take a mutable ActionContext and return void, and deprecate it all
at once.
Robert Leland wrote:
David Graham wrote:
Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use
ActionErrors because the
To enable action chaining in an intuitive way, it seems that when the ActionServlet is
called, it can look for an attribute in the request that indicates whether it has run
before in this request. If the attribute is not there, do everthing and then set the
attribute; if the attribute is there,
The bean:page tag is not one of the tags listed as not being ported into struts-el
(http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/faqs/struts-el.html). This means that bean:page can
do something struts-el cannot. Will someone point out to me what this is? I wrote a
test JSP and cannot find any functionality
There are probably many different solutions to make action chaining more
intuitive. However, action chaining is not considered a best practice in
the Struts community so effort will not be put forward to make it easier to
do. There has been a lot of discussion of action chaining in both the user
-Original Message-
From: Derek Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The bean:page tag is not one of the tags listed as not being
ported into struts-el
(http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/faqs/struts-el.html). This
means that bean:page can do something struts-el cannot. Will
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we can wait until it's time to add a form of validate that will
just take a mutable ActionContext and return void, and deprecate it all
at once.
Well, ActionError was easily replaced with ActionMessage. Also, I updated
most references to
In the context of new development You might be thinking of the JSTL
tags (struts-el). Since JavaServer Faces is still in the Early Access
stage, I don't believe any of us would be recommending JSF for new
development that you planned on shipping yourself. The Early Access
license says that
These types of questions are best asked on the Struts USER list.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/using.html#Lists
khabot zakaria wrote:
Hi,
How to create a bean corresponding to a tagLib, and how to generate an Action like
/logon.
Thanks..
--
Ted Husted,
Don Brown wrote:
Regarding wildcards
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21813), I decided
to hold of on putting them as it seemed a 1.1.1(2?) was around the
corner. However, as it looks like it is not, I'd like to put it in
this weekend.
It sounded to me like this code was
Chris Gastin wrote:
As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people to use the JSTL, and
there was a political bent
I was trying to avoid rehashing old arguments about action chaining. I have heard two
arguments: one, it is not supported and can cause strange results and, two, it is
indicative of bad design (the argument made below).
I disagree that action chaining is always indicative of bad design. See my
For the first time in many months, there was some visible progress in the
area of acceptance of submissions on tags. Thank you David and Robert.
I do have some points that I am sure will draw fire, but I have been an
idiot on this forum for so long...
1) It is fine that the basic tags in struts
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Gastin wrote:
As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
However, at this time, we have a Struts-el taglib in circulation. We
even have a Struts-faces
--- Edgar P Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the first time in many months, there was some visible progress in
the
area of acceptance of submissions on tags. Thank you David and Robert.
I do have some points that I am sure will draw fire, but I have been an
idiot on this forum for so
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
However, at this time, we have a Struts-el
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Of course if I really want that I should probably just use
Velocity, huh? ;)
+1. I do =:)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL
In the beginning, there was no Jakarta Taglibs, or inkling of something
like JSTL. So, Craig bravely put together a useful implementation of
some custom tags that did two things. First, they exposed the internals
of the Struts Controller framework. Second, they provided some basic
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
For the first time in many months, there was some visible progress in the
area of acceptance of submissions on tags. Thank you David and Robert.
Yes, the progress has been heartening. I'll throw some of my own
thoughts in on your points below.
I do have some points
It is becoming commonplace to use an Action as a front for a server
page. This is not what people mean when they talk about Action chaining.
Some people start to use the Actions as finely-grained business actions.
For example, they want to accomplish a move by forwarding to a
copy Action and
I haven't seen anyone mention the most common use of Action
chaining, which is to process the form values from a submit,
and use them to prepopulate a second page. Currently, this
requires two Actions because there is no officially
sanctioned method of instantiating a new form from an Action
to
Personally, I would tend to use a coarse-grained bean that contained the
properties for both pages.
But, AFAIK, calling RequestUtils.createActionForm directly is
sanctioned, especially as a way of obtaining a DynaActionForm.
-Ted.
James Turner wrote:
I haven't seen anyone mention the most
55 matches
Mail list logo
