On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:49:21 -0700
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:
impact of patches on each
other to some degree. Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Applying patches
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Da
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:23:39 -0700
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subjec
At 10:43 AM -0700 2002/10/04, Taylor, Jason wrote:
>Maybe we can come up with some process of reviewing patches so that
>struts-dev subscribers can take care of some of the quality control tasks
>and committers can review the reviews, if that makes sense. Struts is so
>good at divvying up work be
t: RE: Applying patches
- Maybe we should start a discussion on using the Voting in bugzilla?
Although
that is meant for prioritizing
- Or maybe a "+1 I tried it" in the comments to help committers feel more
comfortable.
I am one of those people that is trying to be more active on the
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, John Yu wrote:
> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:04:15 +0800
> From: John Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Applying patches
>
> A
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:43:48 -0700
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subjec
Hey - that's a good idea.
Questions that come to mind:
- Do commiters have time to involve themselves in reviewing these on
a regular basis - and time for follow-through?
- How many folks are actually going to involve themselves in the voting?
- How will folks be informed there is so
If I can help in this type of area by trying patches and voting for
ones that work, that would be great.
rom: Taylor, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Applying patches
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:43:48 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_=_NextPart_
At 01:43 am 05-10-2002, you wrote:
>Is there anything we can do to help committers review patches? Maybe people
>could post their own digests of the bug list that prioritize bugs, scope the
>issues and give their opinions on the possible solutions or the posted
>patches that are available. We co
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Edgar Dollin wrote:
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:50:43 -0400
> From: Edgar Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Apply
AM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Applying patches
Isn't this part of a bigger problem that the whole open source community
is wrestling with? How do the boys doing Linux do it or is that community
better funded so the committers can spend full time on it?
One other issu
Isn't this part of a bigger problem that the whole open source community
is wrestling with? How do the boys doing Linux do it or is that community
better funded so the committers can spend full time on it?
One other issue regarding this issue and struts that I think is worth
mentioning is that t
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Applying patches
> In addition, I want committers to start adding unit tests
> t
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Joachim Gjesdal wrote:
> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 12:47:30 +0200
> From: Joachim Gjesdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joachim,
+1 from my side. I think this is especially true for all the small patches
provided to the documentation.
There's not really something to test there, and I'd appreciate some feedback
(positive or negative) too, even if it was something like "Sorry, there's
some errors" or "I can't accept
*you* can see what it is like first hand :-).
>
>Craig
>
>
>On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Eddie Bush wrote:
>
>
>
>>Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 14:27:13 -0500
>>From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Eddie Bush wrote:
> I'm sure there's some protocol for applying patches that fits into the
> Struts development cycle, but I'm not aware of what it is. I have to
> admit it's somewhat annoying to find a bug, patch it, build a patch
> file, and submit it, o
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>Are you ready to do my job for me (60 hours a week lately), including my
>travel schedule (such as Tokyo last week for JavaOne Japan), so I can
>work on Struts? Or, better yet, pay me enough so I can work on it full
>time? If you're not, then I find your attitude pre
3 Oct 2002, Eddie Bush wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 14:27:13 -0500
> From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Applying patches
>
> I'm sur
anks,
Dave
>From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Applying patches
>Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 14:27:13 -0500
>
>I'm sure there&
---
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:27 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Applying patches
I'm sure there's some protocol for applying patches that fits into the
Struts development cycle, but I'm not aware of what it is. I have to
I'm sure there's some protocol for applying patches that fits into the
Struts development cycle, but I'm not aware of what it is. I have to
admit it's somewhat annoying to find a bug, patch it, build a patch
file, and submit it, only to have it seemingly ignored. I hon
23 matches
Mail list logo
