Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Aug 23, 2017 13:43, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: There's also a licensing component here. One cannot distribute GPLv2-only software linking to OpenSSL 1.1. Don't buy into the crazy FSF crap. It's bullshit, and it's just a bedtime story made up by the FSF to try to push

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Sunday, 6 August 2017 00:07:30 PDT Dirk Hohndel wrote: > While I don't even pretend to be a security expert, this is a topic that I > have quite some familiarity with. Yes, right now OpenSSL 1.0.2 (latest) is > still considered "as secure" as 1.1.0 latest. I can understand the Qt team >

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Sunday, 6 August 2017 18:42:24 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Patch and diff links in > > http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/? > > id=cfbe03a6e035ab3cce5f04962cddd06bd414dcea > > It doesn't really apply

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Patch and diff links in > http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/? > id=cfbe03a6e035ab3cce5f04962cddd06bd414dcea It doesn't really apply cleanly, but it's fixable, so I have 5.9 on F26 working. Linus

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

inful. /D ⁣-- From my phone​ Original Message From: Thiago Macieira <thi...@macieira.org> Sent: Sun Aug 06 05:26:04 GMT+01:00 2017 To: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Subsurface Mailing List <subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> Subject: Re: Qt

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Saturday, 5 August 2017 17:07:50 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > You don't use old versions of security software. It's that easy. Not done, > not acceptable, not a solution. To be clear: OpenSSL 1.0.2l was released on the very same day as 1.1.0f. Both branches are currently maintained. --

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Saturday, 5 August 2017 20:54:59 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Aug 5, 2017 20:48, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > From the Qt Project's point of view, it's a new feature, so it was added to > the devleopment branch. But it seems the patch is clean enough to be > backported

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Aug 5, 2017 20:48, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >From the Qt Project's point of view, it's a new feature, so it was added to the devleopment branch. But it seems the patch is clean enough to be backported if a Linux distribution wants it for its purposes. Christ, you

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Saturday, 5 August 2017 17:07:50 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > I did see some patches, and another big report that was allegedly closed > because of those patches, but they don't actually seem to be merged > although the bug report said they were upstream. I suspect that there is > some branch

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Saturday, 5 August 2017 15:40:01 PDT Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, I've worked around this by just using my old build, but it means > that ssl doesn't work, which in turn means that I can't actually do > the cloud access etc on my F26 desktop. > > So I'm tried of my old broken At-5.9 build, and

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On Aug 5, 2017 16:44, "Lubomir I. Ivanov" wrote: this post suggests a solution; use older openssl - e.g. 1.0.2: Oh, I know about *that* solution, but that's just a bad joke. You don't use old versions of security software. It's that easy. Not done, not acceptable, not a

Re: Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

On 6 August 2017 at 01:40, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, I've worked around this by just using my old build, but it means > that ssl doesn't work, which in turn means that I can't actually do > the cloud access etc on my F26 desktop. > > So I'm tried of my old broken

Qt 5.9 openssl problems on F26

Ok, I've worked around this by just using my old build, but it means that ssl doesn't work, which in turn means that I can't actually do the cloud access etc on my F26 desktop. So I'm tried of my old broken At-5.9 build, and would like to know how to make a proper build against openssl-1.1.0,