Re: [sumo-user] Different Lane configurations
Many thanks, Jakob, for the quick response. Is there any default option split the 3-lane edge into 1-lane edges, or should I do it manually? Regards Radha On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 8:06 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > to get the connections indicated by the red arrows, you need to split each > 3-lane edge into three distinct 1-lane edges with alternating driving > directions. > > Am Mi., 1. März 2023 um 08:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Good Morning, >> >> I hope this email finds you well. >> >> I know how to configure lanes from the same inflow lane. But when I try >> different lane configurations (shown in the figure) I get an invalid target >> alert. >> >> I wonder if it is possible the way I wanted to build the intersection >> with different crossing directions? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Different Lane configurations
Good Morning, I hope this email finds you well. I know how to configure lanes from the same inflow lane. But when I try different lane configurations (shown in the figure) I get an invalid target alert. I wonder if it is possible the way I wanted to build the intersection with different crossing directions? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4
Hello Again, In addition to the previous question, which emission data is more strong for *HBEFA- 4 and EU-5*? Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:15 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I changed my simulations from emission class 3 ( HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4 > ) to 4 (HBEFA4/PC_CNG_petrol_Euro-5_(CNG)), and from EU4 to EU5. > > I have difficulty understanding the emissions. In class 3, to travel a > 1000meters vehicle, consume 85 to 170ml. When I check class 4, the fuel > consumption is showing above 40k ml. Is this correct? or is there any error > in storing the emissions data, for instance interchanging the data between > CO to fuel and vice versa? > > Am I reading this correctly? > > Regards > Radha > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4
Many thanks for the response, Michael. The scenario has both cases of driving through and stop-and-go. Is there a gasoline class for emission- 4 and EU-5? Regards Radha On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 5:58 AM Michael Behrisch wrote: > Hi Radha, > there have been major changes to the emission models and the data basis > for CNG is not that strong but I found that increase also strange. Is > this straight driving with constant speed or a stop and go scenario? > > Best regards, > Michael > > Am 09.09.22 um 09:15 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Hello, > > > > Recently I changed my simulations from emission class 3 ( > > |HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4| ) to 4 (HBEFA4/PC_CNG_petrol_Euro-5_(CNG)), and from > > EU4 to EU5. > > > > I have difficulty understanding the emissions. In class 3, to travel a > > 1000meters vehicle, consume 85 to 170ml. When I check class 4, the fuel > > consumption is showing above 40k ml. Is this correct? or is there any > > error in storing the emissions data, for instance interchanging the data > > between CO to fuel and vice versa? > > > > Am I reading this correctly? > > > > Regards > > Radha > > > > ___ > > sumo-user mailing list > > sumo-user@eclipse.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4
Hello, Recently I changed my simulations from emission class 3 ( HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4 ) to 4 (HBEFA4/PC_CNG_petrol_Euro-5_(CNG)), and from EU4 to EU5. I have difficulty understanding the emissions. In class 3, to travel a 1000meters vehicle, consume 85 to 170ml. When I check class 4, the fuel consumption is showing above 40k ml. Is this correct? or is there any error in storing the emissions data, for instance interchanging the data between CO to fuel and vice versa? Am I reading this correctly? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Many thanks Mirko, You mean both ACC and Krauss vehicles are electric vehicles ( After switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only 0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle )? In my scenarios, I let Krauss be the ICEV/BEV and ACC be the BEAV. I tested two scenarios 1. Mixed ICEV (Krauss) and BEV (Krauss) and 2. Mixed ICEV (Krauss) and BEVs (ACC) for an hour simulation. Finally, I have considered the average result of one simulation hour and compared the battery electricity consumption. So I tried checking how individual vehicles consume when there are no traffic signals assigned (free flow) by mixing ICEV/BEV and Krauss/ACC. I got the results of ACC BEV being the highest electricity consumer 8.8Wh than the Krauss BEV in the signal-free road. My question is if this high consumption is related to the sensors/computing or the higher speed of ACC? I am sorry for asking the same question. Regards Radha On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM m.bartha...@t-online.de < m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: > Well I don't see that much of weird behaviour in this example. After > switching all vehicles to electric engine, the ACC vehicle consumes only > 0.4% more than the leading Krauss vehicle. It drives faster for some time > also when it wants to overtake. By the way: You used a lane change > parameter (lcLaneDiscipline) belonging to the sublane model but didn't > activate that one. > > > > Best regards > > Mirko > > > > > > > > -Original-Nachricht- > > Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-08T11:31:27+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "m.bartha...@t-online.de" > > > > > > > Hello Mirko, > > Please check the attached zip file, in which I have attached a different > network file, a 2x2 grid network of intersections in which only 3 vehicles > are injected using flow definition (2 HVs - Krauss CFM and 1 AV - ACC CFM). > I assigned only the green light to let these 3 vehicles pass without > stopping. All vehicles cross straight at intersection 0, turn right at > intersection 2, cross straight at intersection 3, and exit the network. > > We can observe the weird behavior of the ACC vehicle at intersection 2 > when it turns right side. > > REgards > Radha > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 10:16 AM m.bartha...@t-online.de < > m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Hi Radha, >> >> >> >> I would like to take a closer look on your example scenario. Do you want >> to share the files? >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Mirko >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Original-Nachricht- >> >> Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption >> >> Datum: 2022-08-08T10:09:41+0200 >> >> Von: "Radha Reddy" >> >> An: "m.bartha...@t-online.de" , "Sumo project >> User discussions" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Many thanks Mirko, for your information. >> >> My test network is an isolated intersection with each road from the >> intersection being 500meters in length. My intention was how the >> human-driven (Krauss) and Autonomous-driven (ACC) vehicles consume battery >> electricity. The human vehicle exhibits jerky driving behavior while the >> autonomous vehicle utilizes its maximum speed without jerky behavior. >> >> The electricity consumption of ACC is strange that in the straight lane, >> it consumes ~0.57 while turning to the right/left, consuming 20 times extra >> from 10 to 15 (for 3 to 4 seconds, the time required to cross the >> intersection). In Krauss CFM, it is of utmost 5 and recovers some energy >> when there is a jerk. >> >> In the literature, the higher electricity consumption of autonomous >> vehicles is related to the power consumption of sensors and computing for >> autonomous driving. My question is if the ACC has a similar explanation. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:48 AM m.bartha...@t-online.de < >> m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> these are different CFM generating different speed profiles. So it >>> should be expected that electricity consumption may differ. The difference >>> does not sound very big either, as it is in the range of a few % of an >>> average consumption per km. Still depends on how your test network looks >>> like, though. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Mirko >>> >>> >>
Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Hello Mirko, Please check the attached zip file, in which I have attached a different network file, a 2x2 grid network of intersections in which only 3 vehicles are injected using flow definition (2 HVs - Krauss CFM and 1 AV - ACC CFM). I assigned only the green light to let these 3 vehicles pass without stopping. All vehicles cross straight at intersection 0, turn right at intersection 2, cross straight at intersection 3, and exit the network. We can observe the weird behavior of the ACC vehicle at intersection 2 when it turns right side. REgards Radha On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 10:16 AM m.bartha...@t-online.de < m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi Radha, > > > > I would like to take a closer look on your example scenario. Do you want > to share the files? > > > > Best regards > > Mirko > > > > > > > > -Original-Nachricht- > > Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-08T10:09:41+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "m.bartha...@t-online.de" , "Sumo project > User discussions" > > > > > > > Many thanks Mirko, for your information. > > My test network is an isolated intersection with each road from the > intersection being 500meters in length. My intention was how the > human-driven (Krauss) and Autonomous-driven (ACC) vehicles consume battery > electricity. The human vehicle exhibits jerky driving behavior while the > autonomous vehicle utilizes its maximum speed without jerky behavior. > > The electricity consumption of ACC is strange that in the straight lane, > it consumes ~0.57 while turning to the right/left, consuming 20 times extra > from 10 to 15 (for 3 to 4 seconds, the time required to cross the > intersection). In Krauss CFM, it is of utmost 5 and recovers some energy > when there is a jerk. > > In the literature, the higher electricity consumption of autonomous > vehicles is related to the power consumption of sensors and computing for > autonomous driving. My question is if the ACC has a similar explanation. > > Regards > Radha > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:48 AM m.bartha...@t-online.de < > m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> these are different CFM generating different speed profiles. So it should >> be expected that electricity consumption may differ. The difference does >> not sound very big either, as it is in the range of a few % of an average >> consumption per km. Still depends on how your test network looks like, >> though. >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Mirko >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Original-Nachricht- >> >> Betreff: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption >> >> Datum: 2022-08-06T23:04:43+0200 >> >> Von: "Radha Reddy" >> >> An: "Sumo project User discussions" >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by >> Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I compared >> the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles consumed more >> than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any explanation for this? >> >> Many thanks in advance. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > <> ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Many thanks Mirko, for your information. My test network is an isolated intersection with each road from the intersection being 500meters in length. My intention was how the human-driven (Krauss) and Autonomous-driven (ACC) vehicles consume battery electricity. The human vehicle exhibits jerky driving behavior while the autonomous vehicle utilizes its maximum speed without jerky behavior. The electricity consumption of ACC is strange that in the straight lane, it consumes ~0.57 while turning to the right/left, consuming 20 times extra from 10 to 15 (for 3 to 4 seconds, the time required to cross the intersection). In Krauss CFM, it is of utmost 5 and recovers some energy when there is a jerk. In the literature, the higher electricity consumption of autonomous vehicles is related to the power consumption of sensors and computing for autonomous driving. My question is if the ACC has a similar explanation. Regards Radha On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:48 AM m.bartha...@t-online.de < m.bartha...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > > these are different CFM generating different speed profiles. So it should > be expected that electricity consumption may differ. The difference does > not sound very big either, as it is in the range of a few % of an average > consumption per km. Still depends on how your test network looks like, > though. > > > > Best regards > > Mirko > > > > > > > > > > -Original-Nachricht- > > Betreff: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-06T23:04:43+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "Sumo project User discussions" > > > > > > > Hello, > > I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by > Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I compared > the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles consumed more > than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any explanation for this? > > Many thanks in advance. > > Regards > Radha > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Electricity Consumption
Hello, I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I compared the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles consumed more than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any explanation for this? Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] FCD Output
Sorry for asking.
I have several traffic flow definitions, fn1, fn2,
I only need to export the FCD data for the vehicles that are generated
under specific flow definitions, say fn1. Is this possible?
Regards
Radha
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 9:51 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote:
> see
> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#determine_why_the_traci_client_cannot_connect
>
> Am Do., 23. Juni 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>
>> Good Morning,
>>
>> There might be many answers regarding this query, but sorry for asking
>> again.
>>
>> I wanted to get FCD out of *time, id, speed, pos, and lane* only, and
>> for that, I gave the following command.
>>
>>
>> *traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/intersection.sumocfg",
>>"--fcd-output.attributes time,id,speed,pos,lane",
>> "file.xml"])*
>> I am getting the following error:
>> C:\Program Files (x86)\Eclipse\Sumo\tools\traci\main.py:159: UserWarning:
>> Could not connect to TraCI server using port 55103 (TraCI server already
>> finished). Retrying with different port.
>> warnings.warn(("Could not connect to TraCI server using port %s (%s)." +
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "runner.py", line 89, in
>> traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/intersection.sumocfg",
>> File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Eclipse\Sumo\tools\traci\main.py", line
>> 162, in start
>> raise FatalTraCIError("Could not connect.")
>> traci.exceptions.FatalTraCIError: Could not connect.
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong? I am not sure if I specify it correctly.
>> Regards
>> Radha
>>
>>
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] FCD Output
Good Morning,
There might be many answers regarding this query, but sorry for asking
again.
I wanted to get FCD out of *time, id, speed, pos, and lane* only, and for
that, I gave the following command.
*traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/intersection.sumocfg",
"--fcd-output.attributes time,id,speed,pos,lane", "file.xml"])*
I am getting the following error:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Eclipse\Sumo\tools\traci\main.py:159: UserWarning:
Could not connect to TraCI server using port 55103 (TraCI server already
finished). Retrying with different port.
warnings.warn(("Could not connect to TraCI server using port %s (%s)." +
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "runner.py", line 89, in
traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/intersection.sumocfg",
File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Eclipse\Sumo\tools\traci\main.py", line 162,
in start
raise FatalTraCIError("Could not connect.")
traci.exceptions.FatalTraCIError: Could not connect.
Am I doing something wrong? I am not sure if I specify it correctly.
Regards
Radha
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] No. of vehicles using Poisson
Hello, I have used the flow defined using Poisson distribution. I wanted to find the *no. of continuous* vehicles that are injected within the time <=4s, we call it the burst. Various average rates are tested and above 0.05veh/s, the no. of continuous vehicles is saturated at 10vehicles (figure attached). Is it correct? or are any hidden factors affecting it? ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson
Thanks, Jakob, In Windows11 the Poisson distribution is working. But it is strange that not working in Ubuntu Linux. On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 2:06 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > > Probably the SUMO website must be updated with the* period instead of > probability*. > > Thanks! Fixed now. > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson
Hello Jakob, Yes I am using the new version of sumo 1.13.0 on Ubuntu Linux. Regards Radha On Tue, May 24, 2022, 12:31 Jakob Erdmann wrote: > You need to upgrade to version 1.13.0 to use Poisson flows. > > Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 13:18 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Sorry, but I have the same error with the period >> >> Error: Attribute 'period' in definition of flow 'f1' is not a time value. >> Error: flow cannot be created >> Loading of additional-files failed. >> Quitting (on error). >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM Radha Reddy >> wrote: >> >>> Many thanks Jakob, >>> >>> Probably the SUMO website must be updated with the* period instead of >>> probability*. >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:13 PM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> period="exp(0.01)" >>>> >>>> (the period between vehicles comes from an exponential distribution) >>>> >>>> Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello Again, >>>>> >>>>> I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following >>>>> way. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> >>>> end="4000">>>>> type="typedist2" route="fromNorth1"/>* >>>>> >>>>> But I end up with an error >>>>> >>>>> Error: Attribute 'probability' in definition of flow 'f1' is not of >>>>> type float. >>>>> Error: flow cannot be created >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something? Where it went wrong please suggest to me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson
Sorry, but I have the same error with the period Error: Attribute 'period' in definition of flow 'f1' is not a time value. Error: flow cannot be created Loading of additional-files failed. Quitting (on error). On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > Many thanks Jakob, > > Probably the SUMO website must be updated with the* period instead of > probability*. > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html > > Regards > Radha > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:13 PM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> period="exp(0.01)" >> >> (the period between vehicles comes from an exponential distribution) >> >> Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hello Again, >>> >>> I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following >>> way. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *>> id="f1" probability="exp(0.01)" type="VehType" route="fromNorth"/> >>>>> end="4000">>> type="typedist2" route="fromNorth1"/>* >>> >>> But I end up with an error >>> >>> Error: Attribute 'probability' in definition of flow 'f1' is not of type >>> float. >>> Error: flow cannot be created >>> >>> Am I missing something? Where it went wrong please suggest to me. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson
Many thanks Jakob, Probably the SUMO website must be updated with the* period instead of probability*. https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html Regards Radha On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:13 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > period="exp(0.01)" > > (the period between vehicles comes from an exponential distribution) > > Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Again, >> >> I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following >> way. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *> id="f1" probability="exp(0.01)" type="VehType" route="fromNorth"/> >>> end="4000">> type="typedist2" route="fromNorth1"/>* >> >> But I end up with an error >> >> Error: Attribute 'probability' in definition of flow 'f1' is not of type >> float. >> Error: flow cannot be created >> >> Am I missing something? Where it went wrong please suggest to me. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson
Hello Again, I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following way. * * But I end up with an error Error: Attribute 'probability' in definition of flow 'f1' is not of type float. Error: flow cannot be created Am I missing something? Where it went wrong please suggest to me. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output
Hello Again, Following are the vehicle type definitions. * * Regards Radha On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:26 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Please provide your traffic definitions. > > > Am Mo., 9. Mai 2022 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Many thanks for your kind information. >> >> I have tried from 10% to 90% of electric vehicles with 90% to 10% of >> gasoline vehicles, and the average of several runs compared. >> >> In all the cases, I observed similar results that electric vehicles are >> higher ~40veh than gasoline. The observed departure delays around 1h are >> between 0 and 11s. I am not sure if the departure delay is a strong reason. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:51 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Most likely, this is an artifact of defining more vehicles than the road >>> can take in a way that makes one of the two types more likely to start. >>> Check for >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/VehicleInsertion.html#delayed_departure >>> >>> Am So., 8. Mai 2022 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Hope everything is going well. >>>> >>>> I tried to analyze the Krauss CFM with 50% Gasoline and 50% Electric >>>> vehicles, with identical parameter values. >>>> >>>> When I compare the number of vehicles in a specific time period, say >>>> 1h, the electric vehicles are higher than the gasoline vehicles, 40veh. I >>>> do not understand where it went wrong or why this difference? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output
Many thanks for your kind information. I have tried from 10% to 90% of electric vehicles with 90% to 10% of gasoline vehicles, and the average of several runs compared. In all the cases, I observed similar results that electric vehicles are higher ~40veh than gasoline. The observed departure delays around 1h are between 0 and 11s. I am not sure if the departure delay is a strong reason. Regards Radha On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:51 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Most likely, this is an artifact of defining more vehicles than the road > can take in a way that makes one of the two types more likely to start. > Check for > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/VehicleInsertion.html#delayed_departure > > Am So., 8. Mai 2022 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> Hope everything is going well. >> >> I tried to analyze the Krauss CFM with 50% Gasoline and 50% Electric >> vehicles, with identical parameter values. >> >> When I compare the number of vehicles in a specific time period, say 1h, >> the electric vehicles are higher than the gasoline vehicles, 40veh. I do >> not understand where it went wrong or why this difference? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output
Hello, Hope everything is going well. I tried to analyze the Krauss CFM with 50% Gasoline and 50% Electric vehicles, with identical parameter values. When I compare the number of vehicles in a specific time period, say 1h, the electric vehicles are higher than the gasoline vehicles, 40veh. I do not understand where it went wrong or why this difference? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Queue Length
Many thanks Jakob, Are there any mathematical formulations behind this queue length in meters? Regards Radha On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:18 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > queue-output only gives output in meters but the laneArea detector also > provides jam lengths in vehicle number. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/Lanearea_Detectors_%28E2%29.html#generated_output > > Am So., 23. Jan. 2022 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Again, >> >> I have been wondering if there is any formulation utilized in estimating >> the queue length by the SUMO framework. >> >> Does it only produce the queue length in meters? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Queue Length
Hello Again, I have been wondering if there is any formulation utilized in estimating the queue length by the SUMO framework. Does it only produce the queue length in meters? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Left to right-hand convert
Many thanks, Jakob, It is converting the left hand to the right-hand lane driving but some of the lanes are deleted from the network. I do not understand where is the problem. Regards Radha On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 3:12 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > netconvert -s lefthand.net.xml --lefthand false -o righthand.net.xml > > Am Mi., 19. Jan. 2022 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I have seen converting from right-hand to left-hand driving. But, I have >> a left-hand driving network and I wanted to convert it to right-handed >> using netconvert. >> >> Is it possible? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Left to right-hand convert
Hello, I have seen converting from right-hand to left-hand driving. But, I have a left-hand driving network and I wanted to convert it to right-handed using netconvert. Is it possible? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Lane Capacity and Queue Length
Hello Good Afternoon, For my simulations, I have utilized a 500m length road, 5m vehicle length, and 5m safe distance. Then the lane capacity is 500/(5+5) = 50vehicles. I have analyzed the queue length by considering the entire lane for several TLC control mechanisms from 0.05veh/s to 0.4veh/s where the lane saturates. The queue length is not growing beyond 380m, i.e., 38vehicles even at saturation level whatever the TLC mechanism is at 30 and 50Kmph speeds. I would like to know if there is something limiting the queue length not growing until 500m. Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic
Thanks Jakob, After sending the emails to you I realized what I did. With your email I confirm that. Sorry once again. Radha On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 2:18 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Contrary to your claim that the Bus-Cars scenario contains 99% cars and 1% > buses, it actually contains the same number of cars as the original and > adds buses on top of that. > By adding more vehicles you also increase the flow (which shows that the > intersection wasn't yet saturated). > > Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 21:48 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Sorry for sending different TLC plans. I have updated both of them being >> unique, but the results are the same. >> The Cars-only scenario served 1320veh/h while in Bus-cars scenario it was >> 1440veh/h. A small change won't increase that much right, even if it is >> only Krauss CFM. There's something we are missing. >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:03 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> - Your two scenarios are using different traffic light plans >>> - Your busses are driving with the Krauss carFollowModel which makes >>> better use of the defined maximum acceleration >>> >>> Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 16:23 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Yes Jakob, 5 times with different random seeds. The average of 5 >>>> results show that the intersection throughput of mixed cars and buses is >>>> higher than the cars only scenario. >>>> I do not understand why this happened. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Jakob Erdmann >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did you try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds >>>>> and averaging the results to check whether this is just random noise? >>>>> >>>>> Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello SUMO Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two >>>>>> scenarios for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses >>>>>> (1%). >>>>>> >>>>>> Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario >>>>>> 1, I do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles increased >>>>>> (i.e., Bus), it would be expected to reduce the performance right. >>>>>> >>>>>> Will you please provide some insights why it is happening? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Radha >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic
Hello Jakob, SOrry initially I sent a wrong Cars-only scenario (different TLC program), but I have used the correct program only (attached) to compare with the Bus-cars scenario. As I mentioned in the previous email, in Cars-only scenarios ~1320veh/h are serviced while in Bus-cars scenarios it's 1440veh/h. Please check the attachment for the correct version of the Cars-only scenario. On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:48 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > Sorry for sending different TLC plans. I have updated both of them being > unique, but the results are the same. > The Cars-only scenario served 1320veh/h while in Bus-cars scenario it was > 1440veh/h. A small change won't increase that much right, even if it is > only Krauss CFM. There's something we are missing. > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:03 PM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> - Your two scenarios are using different traffic light plans >> - Your busses are driving with the Krauss carFollowModel which makes >> better use of the defined maximum acceleration >> >> Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 16:23 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Yes Jakob, 5 times with different random seeds. The average of 5 results >>> show that the intersection throughput of mixed cars and buses is higher >>> than the cars only scenario. >>> I do not understand why this happened. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Did you try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds >>>> and averaging the results to check whether this is just random noise? >>>> >>>> Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello SUMO Community, >>>>> >>>>> I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two >>>>> scenarios for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses >>>>> (1%). >>>>> >>>>> Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario 1, >>>>> I do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles increased (i.e., >>>>> Bus), it would be expected to reduce the performance right. >>>>> >>>>> Will you please provide some insights why it is happening? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > Cars-only.rar Description: Binary data ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic
Sorry for sending different TLC plans. I have updated both of them being unique, but the results are the same. The Cars-only scenario served 1320veh/h while in Bus-cars scenario it was 1440veh/h. A small change won't increase that much right, even if it is only Krauss CFM. There's something we are missing. On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:03 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > - Your two scenarios are using different traffic light plans > - Your busses are driving with the Krauss carFollowModel which makes > better use of the defined maximum acceleration > > Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 16:23 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Yes Jakob, 5 times with different random seeds. The average of 5 results >> show that the intersection throughput of mixed cars and buses is higher >> than the cars only scenario. >> I do not understand why this happened. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Did you try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds >>> and averaging the results to check whether this is just random noise? >>> >>> Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello SUMO Community, >>>> >>>> I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two >>>> scenarios for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses >>>> (1%). >>>> >>>> Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario 1, >>>> I do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles increased (i.e., >>>> Bus), it would be expected to reduce the performance right. >>>> >>>> Will you please provide some insights why it is happening? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic
Yes Jakob, 5 times with different random seeds. The average of 5 results show that the intersection throughput of mixed cars and buses is higher than the cars only scenario. I do not understand why this happened. Regards Radha On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Did you try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds and > averaging the results to check whether this is just random noise? > > Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello SUMO Community, >> >> I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two scenarios >> for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses (1%). >> >> Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario 1, I >> do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles increased (i.e., >> Bus), it would be expected to reduce the performance right. >> >> Will you please provide some insights why it is happening? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic
Hello SUMO Community, I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two scenarios for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses (1%). Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario 1, I do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles increased (i.e., Bus), it would be expected to reduce the performance right. Will you please provide some insights why it is happening? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Flow Definitions
Hello, I am trying to analyze different flows, i.e., three consecutive flows injected from 8 inflow lanes of a 2x2 grid. The initial flow definition is working fine, but when I added 2nd and 3rd definitions the following warning is occurring and vehicles are not injected to the road network. Warning: Route file should be sorted by departure time, ignoring 'w20'! The 3 consecutive flow definitions for an inflow pasted below. I applied the same definitions appropriate with each inflow lane. Are these kinds of definitions wrong? Please advise me to solve the problem. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Different Traffic Densities
Hello SUMO community, I am using RandomTrips.py to generate vehicles in a 2x2 grid of intersections. It is generating 1000 vehicles. I wanted to test different traffic densities (0.1veh/s, 0.2veh/s, etc) and various numbers of vehicles (eg., 1500, 2000, etc). Is there a way to do so? Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind information. Unfortunately the problem still exists with the --lateral-resolution value 5, and even with edgewidth 3.5 :( Regards Radha On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:02 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Hello Radha, > lcLaneDiscpline only tries to make vehicles stay full within one lane. In > your scenario, the lanes are 5m wide so two vehicles can drive next to each > other and still stay within the lane. > > In your particular case you can avoid the issue by setting > --lateral-resolution 5 instead of 2.5 > > regards, > Jakob > > Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 10:18 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> I'm sorry for the mistake. Please check the file attached for the >> tracefile. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> traceFile.xml >> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R92cru7rOQHFoLIVAuwkmzPWsytISH4r/view?usp=drive_web> >> >> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:53 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> you sent fcd-output whereas the traceFile is a list of traci commands >>> generated by the python client. >>> Here is the link again: >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands >>> >>> Am Mi., 16. Juni 2021 um 09:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello Jakob, >>>> >>>> I thought the problem was solved by increasing the vehicle width, but >>>> after clear observation the problem still exists. >>>> Please check the attached >>>> sumoTrace.xml >>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DAK-aMeb6JALYZ75ioe6PfIB6P-xF3n1/view?usp=drive_web> >>>> trace file generated. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:24 PM Radha Reddy >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have solved the issue by increasing the vehicle width to 2m from the >>>>> default 1.8m in vType. I guess it satisfies my requirements. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jakob Erdmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Your scenario fails to run on my machine. Please provide a >>>>>> traci-traceFile instead: >>>>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands >>>>>> (along with any required input files such as generated traffic). >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please check the zip attachment for the scenario. Mongodb needs to >>>>>>> be active to run the attached scenario. >>>>>>> The event is occurring at 1650+ at the (bottom) left hand side >>>>>>> intersection. The figure is also attached. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please attach your scenario files and state the time and vehicle id >>>>>>>> where this occurs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 09:34 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I set both parameters as you suggested (lcLaneDiscipline="1" >>>>>>>>> latAlignment="center"). Before it was too many vehicles shared a >>>>>>>>> single >>>>>>>>> lane side-by-side. Even after setting those parameters the *problem >>>>>>>>> still exists* but very few instances. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please check the below vType definitions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>&
Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
Hello Jakob, I'm sorry for the mistake. Please check the file attached for the tracefile. Regards Radha traceFile.xml <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R92cru7rOQHFoLIVAuwkmzPWsytISH4r/view?usp=drive_web> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:53 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > you sent fcd-output whereas the traceFile is a list of traci commands > generated by the python client. > Here is the link again: > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands > > Am Mi., 16. Juni 2021 um 09:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> I thought the problem was solved by increasing the vehicle width, but >> after clear observation the problem still exists. >> Please check the attached >> sumoTrace.xml >> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DAK-aMeb6JALYZ75ioe6PfIB6P-xF3n1/view?usp=drive_web> >> trace file generated. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:24 PM Radha Reddy >> wrote: >> >>> I have solved the issue by increasing the vehicle width to 2m from the >>> default 1.8m in vType. I guess it satisfies my requirements. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Your scenario fails to run on my machine. Please provide a >>>> traci-traceFile instead: >>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands >>>> (along with any required input files such as generated traffic). >>>> >>>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>> >>>>> Please check the zip attachment for the scenario. Mongodb needs to be >>>>> active to run the attached scenario. >>>>> The event is occurring at 1650+ at the (bottom) left hand side >>>>> intersection. The figure is also attached. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please attach your scenario files and state the time and vehicle id >>>>>> where this occurs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 09:34 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I set both parameters as you suggested (lcLaneDiscipline="1" >>>>>>> latAlignment="center"). Before it was too many vehicles shared a single >>>>>>> lane side-by-side. Even after setting those parameters the *problem >>>>>>> still exists* but very few instances. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please check the below vType definitions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" >>>>>>> probability="0.5" >>>>>>> carFollowModel="ACC" sigma="0" tau="1" color="1, 1, 0" >>>>>>> eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>>>>> >>>>>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" >>>>>>> probability="0.5" >>>>>>> sigma="0.5" tau="1" color="1, 1, 1" eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" >>>>>>> lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Set vType attribute lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center" and >>>>>>>> do not set lcTurnAlignmentDistance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < &g
Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
Hello Jakob, I thought the problem was solved by increasing the vehicle width, but after clear observation the problem still exists. Please check the attached sumoTrace.xml <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DAK-aMeb6JALYZ75ioe6PfIB6P-xF3n1/view?usp=drive_web> trace file generated. Regards Radha On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:24 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > I have solved the issue by increasing the vehicle width to 2m from the > default 1.8m in vType. I guess it satisfies my requirements. > > Regards > Radha > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> Your scenario fails to run on my machine. Please provide a >> traci-traceFile instead: >> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands >> (along with any required input files such as generated traffic). >> >> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hello Jakob, >>> >>> Please check the zip attachment for the scenario. Mongodb needs to be >>> active to run the attached scenario. >>> The event is occurring at 1650+ at the (bottom) left hand side >>> intersection. The figure is also attached. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please attach your scenario files and state the time and vehicle id >>>> where this occurs. >>>> >>>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 09:34 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>> >>>>> I set both parameters as you suggested (lcLaneDiscipline="1" >>>>> latAlignment="center"). Before it was too many vehicles shared a single >>>>> lane side-by-side. Even after setting those parameters the *problem >>>>> still exists* but very few instances. >>>>> >>>>> Please check the below vType definitions. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" >>>>> probability="0.5" >>>>> carFollowModel="ACC" sigma="0" tau="1" color="1, 1, 0" >>>>> eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>>> >>>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" >>>>> probability="0.5" >>>>> sigma="0.5" tau="1" color="1, 1, 1" eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" >>>>> lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Set vType attribute lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center" and do >>>>>> not set lcTurnAlignmentDistance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm getting a different behavior than expected. Two vehicles are >>>>>>> sharing the same lane side-by-side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please check the attached figure, and provide me a solution, thus >>>>>>> vehicles follow FIFO, but not sharing the same lane side-by-side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > cross.sumocfg Description: Binary data ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
I have solved the issue by increasing the vehicle width to 2m from the default 1.8m in vType. I guess it satisfies my requirements. Regards Radha On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Your scenario fails to run on my machine. Please provide a traci-traceFile > instead: > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands > (along with any required input files such as generated traffic). > > Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> Please check the zip attachment for the scenario. Mongodb needs to be >> active to run the attached scenario. >> The event is occurring at 1650+ at the (bottom) left hand side >> intersection. The figure is also attached. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Please attach your scenario files and state the time and vehicle id >>> where this occurs. >>> >>> Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 09:34 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello Jakob, >>>> >>>> I set both parameters as you suggested (lcLaneDiscipline="1" >>>> latAlignment="center"). Before it was too many vehicles shared a single >>>> lane side-by-side. Even after setting those parameters the *problem >>>> still exists* but very few instances. >>>> >>>> Please check the below vType definitions. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" probability="0.5" >>>> carFollowModel="ACC" sigma="0" tau="1" color="1, 1, 0" >>>> eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>> >>> length="5" minGap="5" maxSpeed="8.333" vClass="passenger" probability="0.5" >>>> sigma="0.5" tau="1" color="1, 1, 1" eClass="HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4" >>>> lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Set vType attribute lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center" and do >>>>> not set lcTurnAlignmentDistance. >>>>> >>>>> Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm getting a different behavior than expected. Two vehicles are >>>>>> sharing the same lane side-by-side. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please check the attached figure, and provide me a solution, thus >>>>>> vehicles follow FIFO, but not sharing the same lane side-by-side. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Radha >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] libproj.so.12 Error
Thanks very much for your suggestions, with rebuilding CMAKE solved the problem. Regards Radha On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:30 PM Mehdi Khaleghian wrote: > Hi > > Try: /usr/share/sumo/tools/duarouter.py > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:53 AM wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> try to clean up your compile folder and remake again with CMake. >> >> >> Regards >> ------ >> *Von:* sumo-user im Auftrag von Radha >> Reddy >> *Gesendet:* Montag, 7. Juni 2021 14:29:49 >> *An:* Sumo project User discussions >> *Betreff:* [sumo-user] libproj.so.12 Error >> >> Hello, >> >> Ubuntu has been updated from 18 to 20.04. Now it raises the following >> error. >> >> /sumo/bin/duarouter: error while loading shared libraries: libproj.so.12: >> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >> >> Then the TraCI server is not connected. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] libproj.so.12 Error
Hello, Ubuntu has been updated from 18 to 20.04. Now it raises the following error. /sumo/bin/duarouter: error while loading shared libraries: libproj.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Then the TraCI server is not connected. Any suggestions? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
Hello Jakob, I set both parameters as you suggested (lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center"). Before it was too many vehicles shared a single lane side-by-side. Even after setting those parameters the *problem still exists* but very few instances. Please check the below vType definitions. Regards Radha On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Set vType attribute lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center" and do not > set lcTurnAlignmentDistance. > > Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm getting a different behavior than expected. Two vehicles are sharing >> the same lane side-by-side. >> >> Please check the attached figure, and provide me a solution, thus >> vehicles follow FIFO, but not sharing the same lane side-by-side. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Hello Jakob, Please check the attachments for sumocfg and det files. Unfortunately, I didn't find what mistake I made. Regards Radha On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:08 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Did you figure out the problem? If not, please post your sumocfg and the > detector definition file. > > Am Mi., 2. Juni 2021 um 14:14 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks very much for your kind information. >> >> I have placed the detectors on edges and gave permission on sumocfg and >> netccfg files. When I ran the simulation, I did not see the detectors on >> SUMO-GUI. I do not understand what the issue is. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 7:45 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> This is a visualization bug in netedit. ( >>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8693) >>> The detectors will work in the expected direction and look correct in >>> sumo-gui. >>> >>> Am Sa., 29. Mai 2021 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Dear Jakob, >>>> >>>> Now it is working, I can place detectors on the left-hand driving >>>> edges. But unfortunately, they are outbound (Fig. attached). >>>> >>>> Is there a way to make them inbound? or at least convert this >>>> left-hand driving model into a right-hand driving model. >>>> >>>> I saw there is a way to convert right to left-hand driving. But I am >>>> not sure if the same works for my case. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:58 PM Jakob Erdmann >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you for pointing this out. An update should be available >>>>> tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> Am Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> In that case, I need to wait for the latest development version, as >>>>>> the last commit was on 19th May 2021. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You need the latest development version instead of the release: >>>>>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/daily/sumo-win64-git.msi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the >>>>>>>> 1.9.2 msi version, but the problem remains the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Where did I go wrong? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Many thanks for your great help Jakob, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann < >>>>>>>>> namdre.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Download tomorrow at >>>>>>>>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks very much Jakob, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work >>>>>>>>>>> right. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>>>>> >
[sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane
Hello, I'm getting a different behavior than expected. Two vehicles are sharing the same lane side-by-side. Please check the attached figure, and provide me a solution, thus vehicles follow FIFO, but not sharing the same lane side-by-side. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Thanks very much for your kind information. I have placed the detectors on edges and gave permission on sumocfg and netccfg files. When I ran the simulation, I did not see the detectors on SUMO-GUI. I do not understand what the issue is. Any suggestions? Regards Radha On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 7:45 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This is a visualization bug in netedit. ( > https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8693) > The detectors will work in the expected direction and look correct in > sumo-gui. > > Am Sa., 29. Mai 2021 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> Now it is working, I can place detectors on the left-hand driving edges. >> But unfortunately, they are outbound (Fig. attached). >> >> Is there a way to make them inbound? or at least convert this left-hand >> driving model into a right-hand driving model. >> >> I saw there is a way to convert right to left-hand driving. But I am not >> sure if the same works for my case. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:58 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for pointing this out. An update should be available tomorrow. >>> >>> Am Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> In that case, I need to wait for the latest development version, as the >>>> last commit was on 19th May 2021. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You need the latest development version instead of the release: >>>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/daily/sumo-win64-git.msi >>>>> >>>>> Am Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the 1.9.2 >>>>>> msi version, but the problem remains the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where did I go wrong? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Radha >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Many thanks for your great help Jakob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Download tomorrow at >>>>>>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks very much Jakob, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work >>>>>>>>> right. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann < >>>>>>>>> namdre.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed ( >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692) >>>>>>>>>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer >>>>>>>>>> than the geometrical length. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>> Jakob >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
In that case, I need to wait for the latest development version, as the last commit was on 19th May 2021. On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > You need the latest development version instead of the release: > https://sumo.dlr.de/daily/sumo-win64-git.msi > > Am Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the 1.9.2 msi >> version, but the problem remains the same. >> >> Where did I go wrong? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Radha Reddy >> wrote: >> >>> Many thanks for your great help Jakob, >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Download tomorrow at >>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version >>>> >>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Thanks very much Jakob, >>>>> >>>>> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed ( >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692) >>>>>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than >>>>>> the geometrical length. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> Jakob >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please post your input files. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving >>>>>>>>> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid >>>>>>>>> position for detEntry*. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Hello Jakob, I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the 1.9.2 msi version, but the problem remains the same. Where did I go wrong? Regards Radha On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Many thanks for your great help Jakob, > > Regards > Radha > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> Download tomorrow at >> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version >> >> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Thanks very much Jakob, >>> >>> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed ( >>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692) >>>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than >>>> the geometrical length. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello Jakob, >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please post your input files. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving >>>>>>> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position >>>>>>> for detEntry*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Radha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Many thanks for your great help Jakob, Regards Radha On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Download tomorrow at > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version > > Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks very much Jakob, >> >> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed ( >>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692) >>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than >>> the geometrical length. >>> >>> regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello Jakob, >>>> >>>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please post your input files. >>>>> >>>>> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving >>>>>> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position >>>>>> for detEntry*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Radha >>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Thanks very much Jakob, Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right. Regards Radha On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed ( > https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692) > The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than the > geometrical length. > > regards, > Jakob > > Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Please post your input files. >>> >>> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving >>>> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position >>>> for detEntry*. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving
Hello, I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position for detEntry*. Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Variable Traffic
Hello, Hope everything is going well during this pandemic. My question is if we can assign variable traffic in SUMO 1.9.0. For instance, x vehicle rate between t0 and t1, y vehicle rate between t1 and t2, z vehicle rate between t2 and t3, .. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding the Waiting Time in Tripinfo
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response. I saw the definition of Waiting Time, but my question is about the *mathematical equations for the same definition*. Regards Radha On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:41 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Did you look at > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/TripInfo.html#generated_output > ? If so, what is unclear about this? > > Am Do., 1. Okt. 2020 um 09:38 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I am really interesting in understanding the *waiting time* in tripinfo >> output file. >> >> Can you please provide any document(s) that explain the mathematical >> expressions behind this? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding the Waiting Time in Tripinfo
Hello, I am really interesting in understanding the *waiting time* in tripinfo output file. Can you please provide any document(s) that explain the mathematical expressions behind this? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] The definition of time loss in tripinfo output
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for the clarification. Regards Radha On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:48 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The formula I wrote corresponds to the value of v_max in Michaels formula > (to explain that your change in driving speed triggers timeLoss whenever > your set v differs from v_max). > > Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2020 um 18:44 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> But for me Michael sent the following formulation. Now I am confused. >> >> Hi, >> the time loss in a single time step is calculated as >> step_length * (1 - v / v_max) >> where v_max takes into account the speedFactor, maxSpeed on the lane and >> the vType. For a time interval it is simply summed up. >> >> Best regards, >> Michael >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:39 AM MohamadReza-Haghani >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you very much for your answer. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/ >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] The definition of time loss in tripinfo output
But for me Michael sent the following formulation. Now I am confused. Hi, the time loss in a single time step is calculated as step_length * (1 - v / v_max) where v_max takes into account the speedFactor, maxSpeed on the lane and the vType. For a time interval it is simply summed up. Best regards, Michael Regards Radha On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:39 AM MohamadReza-Haghani wrote: > Thank you very much for your answer. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/ > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] MSLCM_LC2013 Error
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response and information. It is working now after changing to the release version. Regards Radha On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > On linux you are somehow using the debug version which performs some extra > tests and one of them is raising this error. > If you build the release version instead it should behave as on windows > (and also run *much* faster). > > Am Do., 11. Juni 2020 um 12:12 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I was running an intersection management simulation which was running >> fine on Windows10, but raising an error on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. >> >> Please check the attachment for error (note that for lower traffic >> arrival rate 0.05 and 0.1 the simulation is working fine, but for 0.2 it >> raises the error and terminates the simulations). >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles
Dear Jakob, In the battery results, I saw *negative values for energy consumption and acceleration*. Is there any reason or documentation that explains this effect? Regards Radha On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Thank you very much for the clarity. > > Regards > Radha > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> The model is for plug-in-electric vehicles which burn no fossil fuels at >> all and thus generate no CO, CO2 and NOx. >> You are right, that most vehicles generate PMx from braking and tire wear >> but this in not modeled by SUMO (neither for electric nor combustion >> vehicles). >> >> regards, >> Jakob >> >> Am So., 10. Mai 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Dear Jakob, >>> >>> Many thanks for your kind response. >>> >>> I see that the emissions such as CO, CO2, NOx, PMx of electric vehicles >>> are 0.00. >>> Is these values are correct? But in general electric vehicles generate >>> some emissions right. >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 7:40 AM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> see the example at >>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Electric.html#defining_electric_vehicles >>>> >>>> Am Sa., 9. Mai 2020 um 18:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles. >>>>> >>>>> How I can define electric vehicles in TraCI (attached runner file)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> length="5" minGap="2.5" maxSpeed="8.3" guiShape="passenger" >>>>> carFollowModel="ACC" tau="1" sigma="0.5" *type="ElectricVehicle"* >>>>> probability="0.5" color="1, 1, 0" /> >>>>> >>>>> Please help me in this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles
Thank you very much for the clarity. Regards Radha On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The model is for plug-in-electric vehicles which burn no fossil fuels at > all and thus generate no CO, CO2 and NOx. > You are right, that most vehicles generate PMx from braking and tire wear > but this in not modeled by SUMO (neither for electric nor combustion > vehicles). > > regards, > Jakob > > Am So., 10. Mai 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> Many thanks for your kind response. >> >> I see that the emissions such as CO, CO2, NOx, PMx of electric vehicles >> are 0.00. >> Is these values are correct? But in general electric vehicles generate >> some emissions right. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 7:40 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> see the example at >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Electric.html#defining_electric_vehicles >>> >>> Am Sa., 9. Mai 2020 um 18:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles. >>>> >>>> How I can define electric vehicles in TraCI (attached runner file)? >>>> >>>> >>> length="5" minGap="2.5" maxSpeed="8.3" guiShape="passenger" >>>> carFollowModel="ACC" tau="1" sigma="0.5" *type="ElectricVehicle"* >>>> probability="0.5" color="1, 1, 0" /> >>>> >>>> Please help me in this. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response. I see that the emissions such as CO, CO2, NOx, PMx of electric vehicles are 0.00. Is these values are correct? But in general electric vehicles generate some emissions right. Regards Radha On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 7:40 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > see the example at > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Electric.html#defining_electric_vehicles > > Am Sa., 9. Mai 2020 um 18:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles. >> >> How I can define electric vehicles in TraCI (attached runner file)? >> >> > minGap="2.5" maxSpeed="8.3" guiShape="passenger" carFollowModel="ACC" >> tau="1" sigma="0.5" *type="ElectricVehicle"* probability="0.5" color="1, >> 1, 0" /> >> >> Please help me in this. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles
Hello,
I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles.
How I can define electric vehicles in TraCI (attached runner file)?
Please help me in this.
Regards
Radha
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Eclipse SUMO, Simulation of Urban MObility; see https://eclipse.org/sumo
# Copyright (C) 2009-2019 German Aerospace Center (DLR) and others.
# This program and the accompanying materials
# are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v2.0
# which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
# http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v20.html
# SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0
# @filerunner.py
# @author Lena Kalleske
# @author Daniel Krajzewicz
# @author Michael Behrisch
# @author Jakob Erdmann
# @date2009-03-26
# @version $Id$
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
import os
import sys
import optparse
import random
# we need to import python modules from the $SUMO_HOME/tools directory
if 'SUMO_HOME' in os.environ:
tools = os.path.join(os.environ['SUMO_HOME'], 'tools')
sys.path.append(tools)
else:
sys.exit("please declare environment variable 'SUMO_HOME'")
from sumolib import checkBinary # noqa
import traci # noqa
def generate_routefile():
random.seed(18) # make tests reproducible
N = 2480 # number of time steps
# demand per second from different directions
pWE = 0.1
#pEW = 1. / 10
#pNS = 1. / 10
with open("data/cross.rou.xml", "w") as routes:
print("""
""", file=routes)
vehNr = 0
for i in range(N):
if random.uniform(0, 1) < pWE:
print('' % (
vehNr, i), file=routes)
vehNr += 1
if random.uniform(0, 1) < pWE:
print('' % (
vehNr, i), file=routes)
vehNr += 1
if random.uniform(0, 1) < pWE:
print('' % (
vehNr, i), file=routes)
vehNr += 1
if random.uniform(0, 1) < pWE:
print('' % (
vehNr, i), file=routes)
vehNr += 1
print("", file=routes)
# The program looks like this
#
# the locations of the tls are NESW
#
#
#
#
#
def run():
"""execute the TraCI control loop"""
step = 0
# we start with phase 2 where EW has green
traci.trafficlight.setPhase("0", 0)
while traci.simulation.getMinExpectedNumber() > 0:
traci.simulationStep()
step += 1
traci.close()
sys.stdout.flush()
def get_options():
optParser = optparse.OptionParser()
optParser.add_option("--nogui", action="store_true",
default=False, help="run the commandline version of
sumo")
options, args = optParser.parse_args()
return options
# this is the main entry point of this script
if __name__ == "__main__":
options = get_options()
# this script has been called from the command line. It will start sumo as a
# server, then connect and run
if options.nogui:
sumoBinary = checkBinary('sumo')
else:
sumoBinary = checkBinary('sumo-gui')
# first, generate the route file for this simulation
generate_routefile()
# this is the normal way of using traci. sumo is started as a
# subprocess and then the python script connects and runs
traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/cross.sumocfg",
"--tripinfo-output", "tripinfo.xml"])
run()
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions
May be I did not explain my question clearly. For example, I have specified the traffic arrival rate is 0.1Veh/S, then what is the rate of vehicles that are injected from each road (from the North road, for instance). This was my question. On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 5:14 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > see https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output.html#values_for_junctions > > Am Fr., 8. Mai 2020 um 18:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I need to measure the rate for an existing simulation. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Do you wish to measure the rate for an existing simulation or do you >>> wish to change that rate? >>> >>> Am Fr., 8. Mai 2020 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hello SUMO Community, >>>> >>>> In TraCI, I have mentioned the traffic arrival rates (eg., 0.1 to 0.5) >>>> that follow *random.uniform(0, 1) < traffic arrival rate*. >>>> >>>> My doubt is how to estimate/understand *the vehicles entering rate* >>>> from each direction, i.e., North, East, South, and West. >>>> >>>> Many thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions
Dear Jakob, I need to measure the rate for an existing simulation. Regards Radha On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Do you wish to measure the rate for an existing simulation or do you wish > to change that rate? > > Am Fr., 8. Mai 2020 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello SUMO Community, >> >> In TraCI, I have mentioned the traffic arrival rates (eg., 0.1 to 0.5) >> that follow *random.uniform(0, 1) < traffic arrival rate*. >> >> My doubt is how to estimate/understand *the vehicles entering rate* from >> each direction, i.e., North, East, South, and West. >> >> Many thanks in advance. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions
Hello SUMO Community, In TraCI, I have mentioned the traffic arrival rates (eg., 0.1 to 0.5) that follow *random.uniform(0, 1) < traffic arrival rate*. My doubt is how to estimate/understand *the vehicles entering rate* from each direction, i.e., North, East, South, and West. Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] RMSE Evaluation
Hello, I am using HBEFA emissions model for estimating the fuel consumption and other emissions. I would like to know if there is a way to estimate the RMSE for HBEFA model for 1000 vehicle scenario. Thank you for your time in advance. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Safety distance among Vehicles
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response. Regards Radha On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This is a bug (https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/6728). As a > workaround, define minGap as half the desire value. > > Am Di., 3. März 2020 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I am trying a mixed vehicle scenario in which AVs are represented by the >> ACC car-following model while Human vehicles are by the Krauss model. >> >> We set 5meters as the safety distance among vehicles. On sumo-gui, we see >> the 5meters distance among human vehicles (equal to vehicle length), but >> the safety distance among consecutive AVs are showing 10 meters. In the >> Figure attached, can see the West road. >> >> Is there any explanation for this? I wonder why this is. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Safety distance among Vehicles
Hello, I am trying a mixed vehicle scenario in which AVs are represented by the ACC car-following model while Human vehicles are by the Krauss model. We set 5meters as the safety distance among vehicles. On sumo-gui, we see the 5meters distance among human vehicles (equal to vehicle length), but the safety distance among consecutive AVs are showing 10 meters. In the Figure attached, can see the West road. Is there any explanation for this? I wonder why this is. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your firm response. Regards Radha On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:52 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This runner file generates Vehicles with a Bernoulli process and thereby > achieves a binomial distribution as already recommended. The Poisson > distribution is the asymptotic limit of increasing the number of insertion > attempts (with proportionally reduced probability) which, as already noted > is not achievable due to time discretization. > > Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 08:26 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> Many thanks for your kind response, the runner.py file associated with >> the TraCI_TLS example. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:37 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> - SUMO provides multiple runner.py files. Which one exactly do you mean? >>> - Since SUMO is a time-discrete simulation anyway (In every simulation >>> step you have to decide whether to insert a vehicle or not), I recommend >>> that you use the Binomial Distribution which is quite similar to the >>> Poisson distribution. Traffic flow with Binomial distribution is supported >>> by defining a with attribute probability. See >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#repeated_vehicles_flows >>> and >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html#flows_with_a_random_number_of_vehicles >>> >>> regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> >>> Am Di., 14. Jan. 2020 um 16:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Dear Jakob, >>>> >>>> I really appreciate your time for answering a lot of questions. >>>> >>>> In the SUMO provided runner.py file, the traffic flow is generated by >>>> using Random and Uniform distribution. >>>> >>>> Can we use Poisson distribution instead of Random (may be yes). Can you >>>> please share any example in which Poisson distribution is employed for >>>> routefile generation? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Radha >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response, the runner.py file associated with the TraCI_TLS example. Regards Radha On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:37 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > - SUMO provides multiple runner.py files. Which one exactly do you mean? > - Since SUMO is a time-discrete simulation anyway (In every simulation > step you have to decide whether to insert a vehicle or not), I recommend > that you use the Binomial Distribution which is quite similar to the > Poisson distribution. Traffic flow with Binomial distribution is supported > by defining a with attribute probability. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#repeated_vehicles_flows > and > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html#flows_with_a_random_number_of_vehicles > > regards, > Jakob > > > Am Di., 14. Jan. 2020 um 16:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I really appreciate your time for answering a lot of questions. >> >> In the SUMO provided runner.py file, the traffic flow is generated by >> using Random and Uniform distribution. >> >> Can we use Poisson distribution instead of Random (may be yes). Can you >> please share any example in which Poisson distribution is employed for >> routefile generation? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution
Dear Jakob, I really appreciate your time for answering a lot of questions. In the SUMO provided runner.py file, the traffic flow is generated by using Random and Uniform distribution. Can we use Poisson distribution instead of Random (may be yes). Can you please share any example in which Poisson distribution is employed for routefile generation? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] No valid route error Reg.
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response and information. It has solved the problem. Regards Radha On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:43 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The tutorial network does not allow turns. You first need to add new > connections before you can define new routes. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/NETEDIT.html#edit_connections > > Am So., 17. Nov. 2019 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I wanted to add left and right crossing routes to the existing TraCI_tls >> (initially, it has only straight crossing). >> >> I have added the routes in runner.py file, but I am getting an error >> saying there is no valid route between edges 2i and 3o. But in NETEDIT it >> is showing there is a route. >> >> Please check the attachments, netedit file showing route, edges in python >> file, and the error, and please help me in solving this error. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo
Dear Michael, Many thanks for your kind response and information. Regards Radha On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:04 PM Michael Behrisch wrote: > Hi, > the time loss in a single time step is calculated as > step_length * (1 - v / v_max) > where v_max takes into account the speedFactor, maxSpeed on the lane and > the vType. For a time interval it is simply summed up. > > Best regards, > Michael > > Am 06.11.19 um 19:34 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Dear Manh, > > > > Many thanks for your response. > > > > But my question is about the documentation or mathematical formulation > > that have used in estimating the Time Loss. > > > > Regards > > Radha > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:33 PM Manh Do Van > <mailto:man...@utc.edu.vn>> wrote: > > > > FYI, > > I think you should use the out-put files from E2 (lane area > > detector), firstly you have to install E2 in each lanes in your > > traffic simulation model, then you can have many information from > > output fine of E2, for example, jam lengths, time loss, mean time > > loss,..etc > > > > Regards, > > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:24 PM Radha Reddy > > mailto:radha.reddy@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am analyzing the time loss parameter of TraCI, however, there > > is no much information on how this time loss will be estimated. > > Anyone, please provide me some documents where I can find > > detailed information about time loss. > > > > Regards > > Radha > > ___ > > sumo-user mailing list > > sumo-user@eclipse.org <mailto:sumo-user@eclipse.org> > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or > > unsubscribe from this list, visit > > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > > -- > > > > */Many thanks and Best Regard ! > > /* > > > > *Manh, Do Van ( Mr ) > > * > > > > *Civil Engineering Faculty* > > > > *UNIVERSITY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS*** > > Add: No.3 Cau Giay St, Lang Thuong Ward, Dong Da Dist, Ha Noi Viet > Nam > > > > Mobile : +84-972573673 > > > > Email: man...@utc.edu.vn <mailto:man...@utc.edu.vn>; > > manhtracdiav...@gmail.com <mailto:manhtracdiav...@gmail.com> > > > > Website: http://www.utc.edu.vn <http://www.uct.edu.vn/> > > > > ___ > > sumo-user mailing list > > sumo-user@eclipse.org <mailto:sumo-user@eclipse.org> > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or > > unsubscribe from this list, visit > > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > > > > ___ > > sumo-user mailing list > > sumo-user@eclipse.org > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo
Dear Manh, Many thanks for your response. But my question is about the documentation or mathematical formulation that have used in estimating the Time Loss. Regards Radha On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:33 PM Manh Do Van wrote: > FYI, > I think you should use the out-put files from E2 (lane area detector), > firstly you have to install E2 in each lanes in your traffic simulation > model, then you can have many information from output fine of E2, for > example, jam lengths, time loss, mean time loss,..etc > > Regards, > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:24 PM Radha Reddy > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am analyzing the time loss parameter of TraCI, however, there is no >> much information on how this time loss will be estimated. Anyone, please >> provide me some documents where I can find detailed information about time >> loss. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > -- > > > *Many thanks and Best Regard !* > > > *Manh, Do Van ( Mr ) * > > *Civil Engineering Faculty* > > *UNIVERSITY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS* > Add: No.3 Cau Giay St, Lang Thuong Ward, Dong Da Dist, Ha Noi Viet Nam > > Mobile : +84-972573673 > > Email: man...@utc.edu.vn ; manhtracdiav...@gmail.com > > Website: http://www.utc.edu.vn <http://www.uct.edu.vn/> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo
Hello, I am analyzing the time loss parameter of TraCI, however, there is no much information on how this time loss will be estimated. Anyone, please provide me some documents where I can find detailed information about time loss. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] SUMO-V2X
You can check the link https://veins.car2x.org/tutorial/ They have clearly mentioned every step. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:16 AM Gui Vickey wrote: > I want to use OMNeT + +, venis and Sumo for v2x simulation, but I have > no way to start. I hope to get a simple Python script with code comments. > In addition, I found the script of ‘sumo-launchd.py’ in veins. I hope you > can find the API to connect with sumo. I need help very much.Thank you! > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response and alert. Regards Radha On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:41 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This converted from hourly values to per-second values. The author tells > me that the original the training data was scaled. Note, that the > compute-formula in the actual model (HelpserHBEFA3.h) does not have this > factor anymore. > > Am Mi., 23. Okt. 2019 um 09:48 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I went through the document to understand the emission models. >> It is really worth the document is, however, I didn't understand one >> parameter employed in Eq (4-5). >> In the Eq(4-5) there is 3600 over the formula, what is this value? >> Is it the simulation time? 3600 seconds! >> >> Can you please correct me. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> The document ist here: https://elib.dlr.de/75422/ but for some reasons >>> it was not set as publicly available. I'm sending it privately to you. >>> >>> Am So., 20. Okt. 2019 um 10:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Dear Raaj, >>>> >>>> Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? >>>> >>>> Dear Jakob, >>>> >>>> I was also looking for this emission models. >>>> I have checked the links you sent, and I read some more documents, the >>>> one in German also tried to understand (thesis). >>>> But, I didnt find the deliverable iTETRIS D3.1: Traffic Modelling: >>>> Environmental Factors. >>>> Can you please share this document if you have access to it? >>>> >>>> Regarding >>>> Radha >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM Raaj Striker >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you so much, Jakob. I've seen your replies for a lot of >>>>> discussions. Really appreciate the way you're helping everyone with >>>>> precise >>>>> answers. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct, 2019, 2:23 PM Jakob Erdmann, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's all in the code: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.h >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.cpp >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you so much for your response. >>>>>>> How can I get the parameter values for each vehicle class and each >>>>>>> pollutant (equation parameters)? Should I derive it myself by collecting >>>>>>> data and then use elimination methods to get it? Or is it documented and >>>>>>> available? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Sep, 2019, 11:44 AM Jakob Erdmann, >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> see https://elib.dlr.de/89398/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2019 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>>>>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> I want to understand the logic or the relationship implementation >>>>>>>>> behind the SUMO Emissions Model HBEFA! Since it is lql open source, >>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>> anyone tell me where can I find it? >>>>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>>> To change your delivery o
Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model
Dear Jakob, I went through the document to understand the emission models. It is really worth the document is, however, I didn't understand one parameter employed in Eq (4-5). In the Eq(4-5) there is 3600 over the formula, what is this value? Is it the simulation time? 3600 seconds! Can you please correct me. Regards Radha On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The document ist here: https://elib.dlr.de/75422/ but for some reasons it > was not set as publicly available. I'm sending it privately to you. > > Am So., 20. Okt. 2019 um 10:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Raaj, >> >> Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? >> >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I was also looking for this emission models. >> I have checked the links you sent, and I read some more documents, the >> one in German also tried to understand (thesis). >> But, I didnt find the deliverable iTETRIS D3.1: Traffic Modelling: >> Environmental Factors. >> Can you please share this document if you have access to it? >> >> Regarding >> Radha >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM Raaj Striker >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you so much, Jakob. I've seen your replies for a lot of >>> discussions. Really appreciate the way you're helping everyone with precise >>> answers. >>> >>> On Tue, 1 Oct, 2019, 2:23 PM Jakob Erdmann, >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It's all in the code: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.h >>>> >>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.cpp >>>> >>>> Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Thank you so much for your response. >>>>> How can I get the parameter values for each vehicle class and each >>>>> pollutant (equation parameters)? Should I derive it myself by collecting >>>>> data and then use elimination methods to get it? Or is it documented and >>>>> available? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 25 Sep, 2019, 11:44 AM Jakob Erdmann, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> see https://elib.dlr.de/89398/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2019 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> I want to understand the logic or the relationship implementation >>>>>>> behind the SUMO Emissions Model HBEFA! Since it is lql open source, can >>>>>>> anyone tell me where can I find it? >>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model
Dear jakob, Many thanks for your kind help. Regards Radha On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 08:27 Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The document ist here: https://elib.dlr.de/75422/ but for some reasons it > was not set as publicly available. I'm sending it privately to you. > > Am So., 20. Okt. 2019 um 10:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Raaj, >> >> Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? >> >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I was also looking for this emission models. >> I have checked the links you sent, and I read some more documents, the >> one in German also tried to understand (thesis). >> But, I didnt find the deliverable iTETRIS D3.1: Traffic Modelling: >> Environmental Factors. >> Can you please share this document if you have access to it? >> >> Regarding >> Radha >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM Raaj Striker >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you so much, Jakob. I've seen your replies for a lot of >>> discussions. Really appreciate the way you're helping everyone with precise >>> answers. >>> >>> On Tue, 1 Oct, 2019, 2:23 PM Jakob Erdmann, >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It's all in the code: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.h >>>> >>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.cpp >>>> >>>> Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Thank you so much for your response. >>>>> How can I get the parameter values for each vehicle class and each >>>>> pollutant (equation parameters)? Should I derive it myself by collecting >>>>> data and then use elimination methods to get it? Or is it documented and >>>>> available? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 25 Sep, 2019, 11:44 AM Jakob Erdmann, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> see https://elib.dlr.de/89398/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2019 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >>>>>> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> I want to understand the logic or the relationship implementation >>>>>>> behind the SUMO Emissions Model HBEFA! Since it is lql open source, can >>>>>>> anyone tell me where can I find it? >>>>>>> ___ >>>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model
Dear Raaj, Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? Dear Jakob, I was also looking for this emission models. I have checked the links you sent, and I read some more documents, the one in German also tried to understand (thesis). But, I didnt find the deliverable iTETRIS D3.1: Traffic Modelling: Environmental Factors. Can you please share this document if you have access to it? Regarding Radha On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM Raaj Striker wrote: > Thank you so much, Jakob. I've seen your replies for a lot of discussions. > Really appreciate the way you're helping everyone with precise answers. > > On Tue, 1 Oct, 2019, 2:23 PM Jakob Erdmann, wrote: > >> It's all in the code: >> >> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.h >> >> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/blob/master/src/utils/emissions/HelpersHBEFA3.cpp >> >> Am Di., 1. Okt. 2019 um 08:17 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < >> raajstrik...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Thank you so much for your response. >>> How can I get the parameter values for each vehicle class and each >>> pollutant (equation parameters)? Should I derive it myself by collecting >>> data and then use elimination methods to get it? Or is it documented and >>> available? >>> >>> On Wed, 25 Sep, 2019, 11:44 AM Jakob Erdmann, >>> wrote: >>> see https://elib.dlr.de/89398/ Am Mi., 25. Sept. 2019 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Raaj Striker < raajstrik...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > I want to understand the logic or the relationship implementation > behind the SUMO Emissions Model HBEFA! Since it is lql open source, can > anyone tell me where can I find it? > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or > unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Vehicles Turns at the Intersection
Dear Raaj, Many thanks for your kind response, but my question is, if we can know the turn (left, right, or straight) of every single vehicle at the beginning of the trip. Not at the entrance of the intersection. Regards Radha On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 09:53 Raaj Striker wrote: > I think you can create a routes files with desired vehicle generation of > turning left or right or straight by defining the the route Id in such a > way that the vehicle follows that route's direction of turning left or > right or straight. > > On Thu, 26 Sep, 2019, 1:52 PM Radha Reddy, > wrote: > >> Dear Sumo Community, >> >> I observed that the vehicle turns (left, right, straight) at the >> intersection is assigned when a vehicle reached the intersection. >> >> Is there any possibility to assign/knowing the vehicles turns when they >> are injected to the road network? >> >> By depending on the vehicle turn I would like to assign traffic light >> signal so that the vehicle access the intersection without stopping. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Vehicles Turns at the Intersection
Dear Sumo Community, I observed that the vehicle turns (left, right, straight) at the intersection is assigned when a vehicle reached the intersection. Is there any possibility to assign/knowing the vehicles turns when they are injected to the road network? By depending on the vehicle turn I would like to assign traffic light signal so that the vehicle access the intersection without stopping. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Manhattan Model
Dear Jakob, I am trying to understand the Manhattan model. But, how to check this model in SUMO-Gui? I would like to impose mixed vehicles (different car-following models). Can you please help me in doing this? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Traffic Generation
Hello,
With the following lines, the traffic will be generated from East to West:
if random.uniform(0, 1) < pEW:
#East to South - Left Crossing
print('' % (vehNr, i), file=routes)
vehNr += 1
My question is, how to generate the traffic at East that can take either
West, South or North?
If I use the above code 3 times each for West, South or North the traffic
generation is multiple, I dont need that, I need multiple directions from
single. E.g., East to West, South, and North.
Please help me in solving this issue.
Regards
Radha
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding Variations in TraCI Traffic Demand generation
Hello, For my simulations, I have to use (used) the same parameter values of TraCI. But, the demand generation is very different from TraCI. For instance, NS in TraCI generates 111 buses, but in my scenario, it generates 123, for EW in TraCI it is 344 vehicles in my case its 286, and in WE route of TraCI its 321 vehicles while for me its 369 vehicles. How to overcome this issue? For my scenario, I need to generate the same number of vehicles as in TraCI. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Getting nightly build of sumo under windows (was: Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version))
Dear Harald, Many thanks for your kind help and information. I have installed the version you have mentioned (after removing older version) but, the following system error is generated: "The code execution cannot proceed because MSVCP120.dll was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem". However, in the SUMO/bin I found MSVCP140.dll file. Please help me in resolving this problem. Regards Radha On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:40 AM Harald Schaefer wrote: > Hi Radha, > > you might try the 64 or 32bit msi files from > https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Downloads#Nightly_Snapshots > The plus version number will be higher than 1266, but this does not matter > > Regards, Harald > > Am 07.08.19 um 09:04 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Dear Harald, > > I am sorry, I dont know how it happened. > > Many thanks for your kind information. > > Sorry to ask again, how can I update Netedit v1_2_0+1266-10a1b2a205 in > windows10. > > Regards > Radha > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:28 PM Harald Schaefer wrote: > >> Your chances to get a response are much higher, if you do NOT use the >> confidental mode >> >> Am 04.08.19 um 15:02 schrieb Radha Reddy: >> >> Radha Reddy has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode: >> >> [image: Gma il logo]Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs >> (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version) >> <https://confidential-mail.google.com/msg/ABTZP1zrnfiY5FgLx88ZKorZx7X--OswzHvDJnFKHl_RPXMnypQ3cBUC_8TAB7x7TVqSY0pe_qm95vCINsJ59bx9KAh3e0fo2Dlp6cjLs51GX2ihPcAXb2VZQ7iAAi1UN_2bIlH9DwlTj3yY9FGpirAW1CU=> >> >> This message was sent on Aug 4, 2019 at 6:03:03 AM PDT >> You can open it by clicking the link below. This link will only work for >> sumo-user@eclipse.org. >> >> View the email >> <https://confidential-mail.google.com/msg/ABTZP1zrnfiY5FgLx88ZKorZx7X--OswzHvDJnFKHl_RPXMnypQ3cBUC_8TAB7x7TVqSY0pe_qm95vCINsJ59bx9KAh3e0fo2Dlp6cjLs51GX2ihPcAXb2VZQ7iAAi1UN_2bIlH9DwlTj3yY9FGpirAW1CU=> >> >> Gmail confidential mode gives you more control over the messages you >> send. The sender may have chosen to set an expiration time, disable >> printing or forwarding, or track access to this message. Learn more >> <https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7674059> >> Gmail: Email by Google >> Use is subject to the Google Privacy Policy >> <https://myaccount.google.com/privacypolicy?hl=en> >> Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA >> You have received this mes sage because someone sent you an email via >> Gmail confidential mode. >> [image: Google logo] >> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing listsumo-u...@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from >> this list, visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> >> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > > ___ > sumo-user mailing listsumo-u...@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)
Dear Harald, I am sorry, I dont know how it happened. Many thanks for your kind information. Sorry to ask again, how can I update Netedit v1_2_0+1266-10a1b2a205 in windows10. Regards Radha On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:28 PM Harald Schaefer wrote: > Your chances to get a response are much higher, if you do NOT use the > confidental mode > > Am 04.08.19 um 15:02 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Radha Reddy has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode: > > [image: Gma il logo]Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs > (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version) > <https://confidential-mail.google.com/msg/ABTZP1zrnfiY5FgLx88ZKorZx7X--OswzHvDJnFKHl_RPXMnypQ3cBUC_8TAB7x7TVqSY0pe_qm95vCINsJ59bx9KAh3e0fo2Dlp6cjLs51GX2ihPcAXb2VZQ7iAAi1UN_2bIlH9DwlTj3yY9FGpirAW1CU=> > > This message was sent on Aug 4, 2019 at 6:03:03 AM PDT > You can open it by clicking the link below. This link will only work for > sumo-user@eclipse.org. > > View the email > <https://confidential-mail.google.com/msg/ABTZP1zrnfiY5FgLx88ZKorZx7X--OswzHvDJnFKHl_RPXMnypQ3cBUC_8TAB7x7TVqSY0pe_qm95vCINsJ59bx9KAh3e0fo2Dlp6cjLs51GX2ihPcAXb2VZQ7iAAi1UN_2bIlH9DwlTj3yY9FGpirAW1CU=> > > Gmail confidential mode gives you more control over the messages you send. > The sender may have chosen to set an expiration time, disable printing or > forwarding, or track access to this message. Learn more > <https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7674059> > Gmail: Email by Google > Use is subject to the Google Privacy Policy > <https://myaccount.google.com/privacypolicy?hl=en> > Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA > You have received this mes sage because someone sent you an email via > Gmail confidential mode. > [image: Google logo] > > ___ > sumo-user mailing listsumo-u...@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)
Radha Reddy has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode:Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)This message was sent on Aug 4, 2019 at 6:03:03 AM PDTYou can open it by clicking the link below. This link will only work for sumo-user@eclipse.org.View the emailGmail confidential mode gives you more control over the messages you send. The sender may have chosen to set an expiration time, disable printing or forwarding, or track access to this message. Learn moreGmail: Email by GoogleUse is subject to the Google Privacy PolicyGoogle LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USAYou have received this mes sage because someone sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode. ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding mathematical formulas for Tripinfo file
Hello, I need to understand and analyze the generated output data in tripinfo.xml file. I would like to know the mathematical formulas and any other detailed information about each parameter, for instance, waiting time, lost time, speed factor, and others. Please provide me if there is any detailed documentation for these parameters (how to calculate them). So, I can understand what I got from simulations. The below link does not provide the detailed information that I need. https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Simulation/Output/TripInfo Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Regarding mathematical formulas for Tripinfo file
Hello, I need to understand and analyze the generated output data in tripinfo.xml file. I would like to know the mathematical formulas and any other detailed information about each parameter, for instance, waiting time, lost time, speed factor, and others. Please provide me if there is any detailed documentation for these parameters (how to calculate them). So, I can understand what I got from simulations. The below link does not provide the detailed information that I need. https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/Simulation/Output/TripInfo Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs
Dear Harald, Many thanks for your kind information. I am using Netedit 1.2.0 the latest version, but unfortunately, it didn't work for me. Regards On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:18 PM Harald Schaefer wrote: > Hello, > > for me it works in one of the latest development versions like this: > > please select one or more lanes in netedit, > Go to additional mode, select „VariableSpeedSign“ and click use selected > lanes. Then a white line shows up, Use the right mouse button for a context > menu and select "Open variable Speed Sign Dialog" > > Regards, Harald > > Am 24.07.19 um 15:34 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Hello, > > Many thanks for your kind response. > > I followed the steps mentioned in the link, but not successful. > > I have selected the number of edges for placing sign, but there is no icon > or something appeared when I click or press enter. > > Regards > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:18 AM wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Go to additional mode, select „VariableSpeedSign“ and select lanes in >> which VSS will be placed (see attached image). For more information check: >> >> >> >> https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Variable_Speed_Signs >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> *Von:* sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: >> sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] *Im Auftrag von *Radha Reddy >> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 10:53 >> *An:* Sumo project User discussions >> *Betreff:* [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I have to place a variable speed sign on an edge. >> >> But I do not understand how to place variable speed sign by using Netedit. >> >> Can you please suggest me, how to place these kind of signs. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Radha >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > > ___ > sumo-user mailing listsumo-u...@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > > > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs
Hello, Many thanks for your kind response. I followed the steps mentioned in the link, but not successful. I have selected the number of edges for placing sign, but there is no icon or something appeared when I click or press enter. Regards On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:18 AM wrote: > Hi, > > > > Go to additional mode, select „VariableSpeedSign“ and select lanes in > which VSS will be placed (see attached image). For more information check: > > > > https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Variable_Speed_Signs > > > > Regards > > > > *Von:* sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] > *Im Auftrag von *Radha Reddy > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 10:53 > *An:* Sumo project User discussions > *Betreff:* [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs > > > > Hello, > > > > I have to place a variable speed sign on an edge. > > But I do not understand how to place variable speed sign by using Netedit. > > Can you please suggest me, how to place these kind of signs. > > > > Regards > > Radha > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
[sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs
Hello, I have to place a variable speed sign on an edge. But I do not understand how to place variable speed sign by using Netedit. Can you please suggest me, how to place these kind of signs. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO
Dear Jakob, I have designed a junction in netedit along with the loop detectors (sensors) and the grid model (attachment). I save it with ctrl+S and close, but again it is aking to save or quit, I opt save. When I reopen I do not see neither grid nor loop detectors. Can you please suggest me, how to save the custom_1 model, so when I reopen can see all objects in the network. Regards Radha On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:41 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Dear Jakob, > > Many thanks for your kind response and help. > > Regards > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM Jakob Erdmann > wrote: > >> The appriate way to run the traci_tls example is to execute runner.py >> with the python interpreter. >> This causes the file 'cross.rou.xml' to be generated and then starts the >> simulation. >> >> Am Do., 11. Juli 2019 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >> >>> Dear Jacob, >>> >>> Many thanks for your kind response and information. >>> >>> However, I have one more doubt. >>> I tried to run the "traci_tls" example but sumo says there is no >>> cross.rou.xml file. >>> I have copied the cross.rou.xml file from sourceforge. But the following >>> error occurs. >>> >>> Loading configuration... done. >>> Loading net-file from >>> 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.net.xml'... >>> done (11ms). >>> Loading additional-files from >>> 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.det.xml'... >>> done (3ms). >>> Loading done. >>> Error: The edge '1fi' within the route '1_right' is not known. >>> The route can not be build. >>> Quitting (on error). >>> >>> Can you please help in this regard? >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jakob Erdmann >>> wrote: >>> >>>> For lateral division, you can divide your road edge into multple lanes. >>>> For longitudinal division you can create a sequence of edges. The easiest >>>> way to do so is with Netedit using 'grid' mode. You can set the grid size >>>> to the desired segment length to achieve equidistant division. See >>>> https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Background_Grid >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> Am Mi., 10. Juli 2019 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Please check the attachment. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 12:22 Radha Reddy >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am new to SUMO simulator, trying to build a road model for my work. >>>>>> In which the road is divided into equal-sized cells (please check >>>>>> the attached figure). >>>>>> I do not know how to do this partition. >>>>>> Is there any option or any leads? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Radha >>>>>> >>>>> ___ >>>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or >>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO
Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response and help. Regards On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The appriate way to run the traci_tls example is to execute runner.py with > the python interpreter. > This causes the file 'cross.rou.xml' to be generated and then starts the > simulation. > > Am Do., 11. Juli 2019 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jacob, >> >> Many thanks for your kind response and information. >> >> However, I have one more doubt. >> I tried to run the "traci_tls" example but sumo says there is no >> cross.rou.xml file. >> I have copied the cross.rou.xml file from sourceforge. But the following >> error occurs. >> >> Loading configuration... done. >> Loading net-file from >> 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.net.xml'... >> done (11ms). >> Loading additional-files from >> 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.det.xml'... >> done (3ms). >> Loading done. >> Error: The edge '1fi' within the route '1_right' is not known. >> The route can not be build. >> Quitting (on error). >> >> Can you please help in this regard? >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> For lateral division, you can divide your road edge into multple lanes. >>> For longitudinal division you can create a sequence of edges. The easiest >>> way to do so is with Netedit using 'grid' mode. You can set the grid size >>> to the desired segment length to achieve equidistant division. See >>> https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Background_Grid >>> >>> regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> Am Mi., 10. Juli 2019 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < >>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Please check the attachment. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 12:22 Radha Reddy >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I am new to SUMO simulator, trying to build a road model for my work. >>>>> In which the road is divided into equal-sized cells (please check the >>>>> attached figure). >>>>> I do not know how to do this partition. >>>>> Is there any option or any leads? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Radha >>>>> >>>> ___ >>>> sumo-user mailing list >>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>>> >>> ___ >>> sumo-user mailing list >>> sumo-user@eclipse.org >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO
Dear Jacob, Many thanks for your kind response and information. However, I have one more doubt. I tried to run the "traci_tls" example but sumo says there is no cross.rou.xml file. I have copied the cross.rou.xml file from sourceforge. But the following error occurs. Loading configuration... done. Loading net-file from 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.net.xml'... done (11ms). Loading additional-files from 'C:\Users\ID0086D\Sumo\Sumo\doc\tutorial\traci_tls\data\cross.det.xml'... done (3ms). Loading done. Error: The edge '1fi' within the route '1_right' is not known. The route can not be build. Quitting (on error). Can you please help in this regard? Regards Radha On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > For lateral division, you can divide your road edge into multple lanes. > For longitudinal division you can create a sequence of edges. The easiest > way to do so is with Netedit using 'grid' mode. You can set the grid size > to the desired segment length to achieve equidistant division. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Background_Grid > > regards, > Jakob > > Am Mi., 10. Juli 2019 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Please check the attachment. >> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 12:22 Radha Reddy >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am new to SUMO simulator, trying to build a road model for my work. >>> In which the road is divided into equal-sized cells (please check the >>> attached figure). >>> I do not know how to do this partition. >>> Is there any option or any leads? >>> >>> Regards >>> Radha >>> >> ___ >> sumo-user mailing list >> sumo-user@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >> > ___ > sumo-user mailing list > sumo-user@eclipse.org > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user > ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
