Re: [sumo-user] Different Lane configurations

3-lane edge into three distinct 1-lane edges with alternating driving > directions. > > Am Mi., 1. März 2023 um 08:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Good Morning, >> >> I hope this email finds you well. >> >> I know how

[sumo-user] Different Lane configurations

Good Morning, I hope this email finds you well. I know how to configure lanes from the same inflow lane. But when I try different lane configurations (shown in the figure) I get an invalid target alert. I wonder if it is possible the way I wanted to build the intersection with different

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4

Hello Again, In addition to the previous question, which emission data is more strong for *HBEFA- 4 and EU-5*? Many thanks in advance. Regards Radha On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:15 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I changed my simulations from emission class 3 ( HBEFA3

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4

models and the data basis > for CNG is not that strong but I found that increase also strange. Is > this straight driving with constant speed or a stop and go scenario? > > Best regards, > Michael > > Am 09.09.22 um 09:15 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Hello, > > >

[sumo-user] Regarding Emissions Class 4

Hello, Recently I changed my simulations from emission class 3 ( HBEFA3/PC_G_EU4 ) to 4 (HBEFA4/PC_CNG_petrol_Euro-5_(CNG)), and from EU4 to EU5. I have difficulty understanding the emissions. In class 3, to travel a 1000meters vehicle, consume 85 to 170ml. When I check class 4, the fuel

Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

ko > > > > > > > > -Original-Nachricht- > > Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-08T11:31:27+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "m.bartha...@t-online.de" > > > > > >

Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

achricht- > > Betreff: Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-08T10:09:41+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "m.bartha...@t-online.de" , "Sumo project > User discussions" > > > > > > > Many than

Re: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

achricht- > > Betreff: [sumo-user] Electricity Consumption > > Datum: 2022-08-06T23:04:43+0200 > > Von: "Radha Reddy" > > An: "Sumo project User discussions" > > > > > > > Hello, > > I have two scenarios in which Battery Ele

[sumo-user] Electricity Consumption

Hello, I have two scenarios in which Battery Electric Vehicles are driven by Krauss CFM (Human driver) and ACC CFM (Autonomous driver). When I compared the electricity consumption results, the ACC-driven vehicles consumed more than the Krauss CFM (between 2 to 7Wh), Is there any explanation for

Re: [sumo-user] FCD Output

https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#determine_why_the_traci_client_cannot_connect > > Am Do., 23. Juni 2022 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Good Morning, >> >> There might be many answers regarding

[sumo-user] FCD Output

Good Morning, There might be many answers regarding this query, but sorry for asking again. I wanted to get FCD out of *time, id, speed, pos, and lane* only, and for that, I gave the following command. *traci.start([sumoBinary, "-c", "data/intersection.sumocfg",

[sumo-user] No. of vehicles using Poisson

Hello, I have used the flow defined using Poisson distribution. I wanted to find the *no. of continuous* vehicles that are injected within the time <=4s, we call it the burst. Various average rates are tested and above 0.05veh/s, the no. of continuous vehicles is saturated at 10vehicles (figure

Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson

Thanks, Jakob, In Windows11 the Poisson distribution is working. But it is strange that not working in Ubuntu Linux. On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 2:06 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > > Probably the SUMO website must be updated with the* period instead of > probability*. > > Thanks! Fixed now. >

Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson

Hello Jakob, Yes I am using the new version of sumo 1.13.0 on Ubuntu Linux. Regards Radha On Tue, May 24, 2022, 12:31 Jakob Erdmann wrote: > You need to upgrade to version 1.13.0 to use Poisson flows. > > Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 13:18 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.redd

Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson

Sorry, but I have the same error with the period Error: Attribute 'period' in definition of flow 'f1' is not a time value. Error: flow cannot be created Loading of additional-files failed. Quitting (on error). On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:15 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > Many thanks Ja

Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson

vehicles comes from an exponential distribution) > > Am Di., 24. Mai 2022 um 12:50 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Again, >> >> I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following >> way. >>

[sumo-user] Flow definition using Poisson

Hello Again, I tried to define the flow using Poisson distribution in the following way. * * But I end up with an error Error: Attribute 'probability' in definition of flow 'f1' is not of type float. Error:

Re: [sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output

Erdmann wrote: > Please provide your traffic definitions. > > > Am Mo., 9. Mai 2022 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Many thanks for your kind information. >> >> I have tried from 10% to 90% of electric vehicl

Re: [sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output

s more likely to start. > Check for > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/VehicleInsertion.html#delayed_departure > > Am So., 8. Mai 2022 um 09:21 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> Hope everything is going well. >>

[sumo-user] Differences in Krauss CFM Output

Hello, Hope everything is going well. I tried to analyze the Krauss CFM with 50% Gasoline and 50% Electric vehicles, with identical parameter values. When I compare the number of vehicles in a specific time period, say 1h, the electric vehicles are higher than the gasoline vehicles, 40veh. I do

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Queue Length

gt; https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output/Lanearea_Detectors_%28E2%29.html#generated_output > > Am So., 23. Jan. 2022 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Again, >> >> I have been wondering if there is any formulati

[sumo-user] Regarding Queue Length

Hello Again, I have been wondering if there is any formulation utilized in estimating the queue length by the SUMO framework. Does it only produce the queue length in meters? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To

Re: [sumo-user] Left to right-hand convert

lse -o righthand.net.xml > > Am Mi., 19. Jan. 2022 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I have seen converting from right-hand to left-hand driving. But, I have >> a left-hand driving network and I wanted to c

[sumo-user] Left to right-hand convert

Hello, I have seen converting from right-hand to left-hand driving. But, I have a left-hand driving network and I wanted to convert it to right-handed using netconvert. Is it possible? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To

[sumo-user] Lane Capacity and Queue Length

Hello Good Afternoon, For my simulations, I have utilized a 500m length road, 5m vehicle length, and 5m safe distance. Then the lane capacity is 500/(5+5) = 50vehicles. I have analyzed the queue length by considering the entire lane for several TLC control mechanisms from 0.05veh/s to 0.4veh/s

Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic

e same number of cars as the original and > adds buses on top of that. > By adding more vehicles you also increase the flow (which shows that the > intersection wasn't yet saturated). > > Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 21:48 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: &g

Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic

1440veh/h. Please check the attachment for the correct version of the Cars-only scenario. On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:48 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > Sorry for sending different TLC plans. I have updated both of them being > unique, but the results are the same. > The Cars-only scenario served

Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic

this happened. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Jakob Erdmann >> wrote: >> >>> Did you try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds >>> and averaging the results to check whether this is j

Re: [sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic

try running your scenarios multiple times with different seeds and > averaging the results to check whether this is just random noise? > > Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 13:22 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello SUMO Community, >> >> I

[sumo-user] Car vs Bus traffic

Hello SUMO Community, I was analyzing the Intersection Throughput for an hour in two scenarios for 30KMPH: 1. only cars (100%), and 2. cars (99%) with Buses (1%). Surprisingly, Scenario 2 has higher throughput values than Scenario 1, I do not understand why. When the length of some vehicles

[sumo-user] Regarding Flow Definitions

Hello, I am trying to analyze different flows, i.e., three consecutive flows injected from 8 inflow lanes of a 2x2 grid. The initial flow definition is working fine, but when I added 2nd and 3rd definitions the following warning is occurring and vehicles are not injected to the road network.

[sumo-user] Different Traffic Densities

Hello SUMO community, I am using RandomTrips.py to generate vehicles in a 2x2 grid of intersections. It is generating 1000 vehicles. I wanted to test different traffic densities (0.1veh/s, 0.2veh/s, etc) and various numbers of vehicles (eg., 1500, 2000, etc). Is there a way to do so? Many

Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

gt; > Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 10:18 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> I'm sorry for the mistake. Please check the file attached for the >> tracefile. >> >> Regards >> Radha >> traceF

Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

t whereas the traceFile is a list of traci commands > generated by the python client. > Here is the link again: > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands > > Am Mi., 16. Juni 2021 um 09:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <

Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

Radha On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:24 PM Radha Reddy wrote: > I have solved the issue by increasing the vehicle width to 2m from the > default 1.8m in vType. I guess it satisfies my requirements. > > Regards > Radha > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 5:11 PM Jakob Erdmann > w

Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

gt; https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI/Interfacing_TraCI_from_Python.html#generating_a_log_of_all_traci_commands > (along with any required input files such as generated traffic). > > Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 10:00 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >

Re: [sumo-user] libproj.so.12 Error

> >> try to clean up your compile folder and remake again with CMake. >> >> >> Regards >> ------ >> *Von:* sumo-user im Auftrag von Radha >> Reddy >> *Gesendet:* Montag, 7. Juni 2021 14:29:49 >> *An:* Sumo project User di

[sumo-user] libproj.so.12 Error

Hello, Ubuntu has been updated from 18 to 20.04. Now it raises the following error. /sumo/bin/duarouter: error while loading shared libraries: libproj.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Then the TraCI server is not connected. Any suggestions? Regards Radha

Re: [sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

ow vType definitions. Regards Radha On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Set vType attribute lcLaneDiscipline="1" latAlignment="center" and do not > set lcTurnAlignmentDistance. > > Am Fr., 4. Juni 2021 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy &

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

n file. > > Am Mi., 2. Juni 2021 um 14:14 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks very much for your kind information. >> >> I have placed the detectors on edges and gave permission on sumocfg and >> netccfg files. When I ran the simula

[sumo-user] Two vehicles sharing the same lane

Hello, I'm getting a different behavior than expected. Two vehicles are sharing the same lane side-by-side. Please check the attached figure, and provide me a solution, thus vehicles follow FIFO, but not sharing the same lane side-by-side. Regards Radha

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

:45 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This is a visualization bug in netedit. ( > https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8693) > The detectors will work in the expected direction and look correct in > sumo-gui. > > Am Sa., 29. Mai 2021 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > r

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

Fr., 28. Mai 2021 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the 1.9.2 msi >> version, but the problem remains the same. >> >> Where did I go wrong

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

Hello Jakob, I have downloaded the nightly snapshot and replaced it with the 1.9.2 msi version, but the problem remains the same. Where did I go wrong? Regards Radha On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Many thanks for your great help Jakob, > > Regards > Radh

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

Many thanks for your great help Jakob, Regards Radha On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Download tomorrow at > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version > > Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.r

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

e problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than the > geometrical length. > > regards, > Jakob > > Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Jakob, >> >> Many thanks for your em

[sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

Hello, I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position for detEntry*. Any suggestions? How to solve this problem? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list

[sumo-user] Variable Traffic

Hello, Hope everything is going well during this pandemic. My question is if we can assign variable traffic in SUMO 1.9.0. For instance, x vehicle rate between t0 and t1, y vehicle rate between t1 and t2, z vehicle rate between t2 and t3, .. Regards Radha

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding the Waiting Time in Tripinfo

lation/Output/TripInfo.html#generated_output > ? If so, what is unclear about this? > > Am Do., 1. Okt. 2020 um 09:38 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I am really interesting in understanding the *waiting time* in tripinfo

[sumo-user] Regarding the Waiting Time in Tripinfo

Hello, I am really interesting in understanding the *waiting time* in tripinfo output file. Can you please provide any document(s) that explain the mathematical expressions behind this? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list sumo-user@eclipse.org To

Re: [sumo-user] The definition of time loss in tripinfo output

fers from v_max). > > Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2020 um 18:44 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> But for me Michael sent the following formulation. Now I am confused. >> >> Hi, >> the time loss in a single time step is calculated as >

Re: [sumo-user] The definition of time loss in tripinfo output

But for me Michael sent the following formulation. Now I am confused. Hi, the time loss in a single time step is calculated as step_length * (1 - v / v_max) where v_max takes into account the speedFactor, maxSpeed on the lane and the vType. For a time interval it is simply summed up. Best

Re: [sumo-user] MSLCM_LC2013 Error

f them is raising this error. > If you build the release version instead it should behave as on windows > (and also run *much* faster). > > Am Do., 11. Juni 2020 um 12:12 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I was run

Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles

Dear Jakob, In the battery results, I saw *negative values for energy consumption and acceleration*. Is there any reason or documentation that explains this effect? Regards Radha On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Thank you very much for the clarity. > > Regard

Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles

and tire wear > but this in not modeled by SUMO (neither for electric nor combustion > vehicles). > > regards, > Jakob > > Am So., 10. Mai 2020 um 11:35 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> Many t

Re: [sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles

: > see the example at > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Electric.html#defining_electric_vehicles > > Am Sa., 9. Mai 2020 um 18:51 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles. >>

[sumo-user] Defining Electric Vehicles

Hello, I need to analyze the Electric Vehicles. How I can define electric vehicles in TraCI (attached runner file)? Please help me in this. Regards Radha #!/usr/bin/env python # Eclipse SUMO, Simulation of Urban MObility; see https://eclipse.org/sumo # Copyright (C) 2009-2019 German

Re: [sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions

: > see https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Output.html#values_for_junctions > > Am Fr., 8. Mai 2020 um 18:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I need to measure the rate for an existing simulation. >> >> Re

Re: [sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions

Dear Jakob, I need to measure the rate for an existing simulation. Regards Radha On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > Do you wish to measure the rate for an existing simulation or do you wish > to change that rate? > > Am Fr., 8. Mai 2020 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb

[sumo-user] Vehicles Entering Rate from different directions

Hello SUMO Community, In TraCI, I have mentioned the traffic arrival rates (eg., 0.1 to 0.5) that follow *random.uniform(0, 1) < traffic arrival rate*. My doubt is how to estimate/understand *the vehicles entering rate* from each direction, i.e., North, East, South, and West. Many thanks in

[sumo-user] RMSE Evaluation

Hello, I am using HBEFA emissions model for estimating the fuel consumption and other emissions. I would like to know if there is a way to estimate the RMSE for HBEFA model for 1000 vehicle scenario. Thank you for your time in advance. Regards Radha

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Safety distance among Vehicles

Dear Jakob, Many thanks for your kind response. Regards Radha On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > This is a bug (https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/6728). As a > workaround, define minGap as half the desire value. > > Am Di., 3. März 2020 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb

[sumo-user] Regarding Safety distance among Vehicles

Hello, I am trying a mixed vehicle scenario in which AVs are represented by the ACC car-following model while Human vehicles are by the Krauss model. We set 5meters as the safety distance among vehicles. On sumo-gui, we see the 5meters distance among human vehicles (equal to vehicle length), but

Re: [sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution

symptotic limit of increasing the number of insertion > attempts (with proportionally reduced probability) which, as already noted > is not achievable due to time discretization. > > Am Mi., 15. Jan. 2020 um 08:26 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: >

Re: [sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution

e probability. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Definition_of_Vehicles,_Vehicle_Types,_and_Routes.html#repeated_vehicles_flows > and > https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Randomness.html#flows_with_a_random_number_of_vehicles > > regards, > Jakob > > > Am Di., 1

[sumo-user] Traffic generation by using Poisson distribution

Dear Jakob, I really appreciate your time for answering a lot of questions. In the SUMO provided runner.py file, the traffic flow is generated by using Random and Uniform distribution. Can we use Poisson distribution instead of Random (may be yes). Can you please share any example in which

Re: [sumo-user] No valid route error Reg.

gt; https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/NETEDIT.html#edit_connections > > Am So., 17. Nov. 2019 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I wanted to add left and right crossing routes to the existing TraCI_tls >> (initially,

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo

or, maxSpeed on the lane and > the vType. For a time interval it is simply summed up. > > Best regards, > Michael > > Am 06.11.19 um 19:34 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Dear Manh, > > > > Many thanks for your response. > > > > But my question is about the

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo

e area detector), > firstly you have to install E2 in each lanes in your traffic simulation > model, then you can have many information from output fine of E2, for > example, jam lengths, time loss, mean time loss,..etc > > Regards, > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:24 PM Radha Reddy &

[sumo-user] Regarding Time Loss in Tripinfo

Hello, I am analyzing the time loss parameter of TraCI, however, there is no much information on how this time loss will be estimated. Anyone, please provide me some documents where I can find detailed information about time loss. Regards Radha ___

Re: [sumo-user] SUMO-V2X

You can check the link https://veins.car2x.org/tutorial/ They have clearly mentioned every step. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:16 AM Gui Vickey wrote: > I want to use OMNeT + +, venis and Sumo for v2x simulation, but I have > no way to start. I hope to get a simple Python script with code

Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model

e-formula in the actual model (HelpserHBEFA3.h) does not have this > factor anymore. > > Am Mi., 23. Okt. 2019 um 09:48 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I went through the document to understand the emission models. &

Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model

please correct me. Regards Radha On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote: > The document ist here: https://elib.dlr.de/75422/ but for some reasons it > was not set as publicly available. I'm sending it privately to you. > > Am So., 20. Okt. 2019 um 10:42 Uhr schrieb

Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model

um 10:42 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Raaj, >> >> Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? >> >> Dear Jakob, >> >> I was also looking for this emission models. >> I have checked

Re: [sumo-user] Logic behind Emission model

Dear Raaj, Did you find the complete document (at least emission formulas)? Dear Jakob, I was also looking for this emission models. I have checked the links you sent, and I read some more documents, the one in German also tried to understand (thesis). But, I didnt find the deliverable iTETRIS

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Vehicles Turns at the Intersection

can create a routes files with desired vehicle generation of > turning left or right or straight by defining the the route Id in such a > way that the vehicle follows that route's direction of turning left or > right or straight. > > On Thu, 26 Sep, 2019, 1:52 PM Radha Reddy, >

[sumo-user] Regarding Vehicles Turns at the Intersection

Dear Sumo Community, I observed that the vehicle turns (left, right, straight) at the intersection is assigned when a vehicle reached the intersection. Is there any possibility to assign/knowing the vehicles turns when they are injected to the road network? By depending on the vehicle turn I

[sumo-user] Regarding Manhattan Model

Dear Jakob, I am trying to understand the Manhattan model. But, how to check this model in SUMO-Gui? I would like to impose mixed vehicles (different car-following models). Can you please help me in doing this? Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing

[sumo-user] Regarding Traffic Generation

Hello, With the following lines, the traffic will be generated from East to West: if random.uniform(0, 1) < pEW: #East to South - Left Crossing print('' % (vehNr, i), file=routes) vehNr += 1 My question is, how to generate the traffic at East that

[sumo-user] Regarding Variations in TraCI Traffic Demand generation

Hello, For my simulations, I have to use (used) the same parameter values of TraCI. But, the demand generation is very different from TraCI. For instance, NS in TraCI generates 111 buses, but in my scenario, it generates 123, for EW in TraCI it is 344 vehicles in my case its 286, and in WE route

Re: [sumo-user] Getting nightly build of sumo under windows (was: Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version))

y_Snapshots > The plus version number will be higher than 1266, but this does not matter > > Regards, Harald > > Am 07.08.19 um 09:04 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Dear Harald, > > I am sorry, I dont know how it happened. > > Many thanks for your kind information. >

Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)

uch higher, if you do NOT use the > confidental mode > > Am 04.08.19 um 15:02 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Radha Reddy has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode: > > [image: Gma il logo]Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs > (not working with netedit 1.2.0

Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)

Radha Reddy has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode:Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs (not working with netedit 1.2.0 - release version)This message was sent on Aug 4, 2019 at 6:03:03 AM PDTYou can open it by clicking the link below. This link will only work for sumo

[sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding mathematical formulas for Tripinfo file

Hello, I need to understand and analyze the generated output data in tripinfo.xml file. I would like to know the mathematical formulas and any other detailed information about each parameter, for instance, waiting time, lost time, speed factor, and others. Please provide me if there is any

[sumo-user] Regarding mathematical formulas for Tripinfo file

Hello, I need to understand and analyze the generated output data in tripinfo.xml file. I would like to know the mathematical formulas and any other detailed information about each parameter, for instance, waiting time, lost time, speed factor, and others. Please provide me if there is any

Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs

Harald > > Am 24.07.19 um 15:34 schrieb Radha Reddy: > > Hello, > > Many thanks for your kind response. > > I followed the steps mentioned in the link, but not successful. > > I have selected the number of edges for placing sign, but there is no icon > or something a

Re: [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs

* sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] > *Im Auftrag von *Radha Reddy > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 10:53 > *An:* Sumo project User discussions > *Betreff:* [sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs > > > > Hello, > > > >

[sumo-user] Fwd: Regarding Variable Speed Signs

Hello, I have to place a variable speed sign on an edge. But I do not understand how to place variable speed sign by using Netedit. Can you please suggest me, how to place these kind of signs. Regards Radha ___ sumo-user mailing list

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO

, how to save the custom_1 model, so when I reopen can see all objects in the network. Regards Radha On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:41 AM Radha Reddy wrote: > Dear Jakob, > > Many thanks for your kind response and help. > > Regards > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM J

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO

en starts the > simulation. > > Am Do., 11. Juli 2019 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy < > radha.reddy@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Jacob, >> >> Many thanks for your kind response and information. >> >> However, I have one more do

Re: [sumo-user] Regarding Road Partition in SUMO

equence of edges. The easiest > way to do so is with Netedit using 'grid' mode. You can set the grid size > to the desired segment length to achieve equidistant division. See > https://sumo.dlr.de/wiki/NETEDIT#Background_Grid > > regards, > Jakob > > Am Mi., 10. Ju