[freenet-support] averagebandwidthlimit results

2004-05-25 Thread Phillip Hutchings
OK, I enabled an average[input|output]bandwidthlimit of 500. In 5 hours I've transferred 400MiB of data, which is still far too high, considering that I should be transferring 288MiB each way per day (which is also too high). Anyway, when I'm back on my cable connection (I'm away from my place

[freenet-support] Re: averagebandwidthlimit results

2004-05-25 Thread Wayne McDougall
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I enabled an average[input|output]bandwidthlimit of 500. In 5 hours I've transferred 400MiB of data, which is still far too high, considering that I should be transferring 288MiB each way per day (which is also too high). The average is

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-25 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node needs to know how much bandwidth is available to estimate how much is being used and therefore how many queries to allow.

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-25 Thread dave
How did you install Freenet, what version did you install, and what is your operating system? Can't explain what's wrong until you tell us what you did. Also did you edit the freenet.conf file manually by hand? At first glance it looks like freenet.conf is corrupted so maybe try deleting it and

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:36 am, Robert Greenage wrote: This appears to be a major blow to the development of freenet.Conrad is a major force behind the whole project.Without him I don't see any other developer capable of stepping up and filling the void. He has a good point with the constant

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java. I hate this depate. It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than non-OO programming, but that's trivial compared to the structuring you

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Christopher Brian Jack
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ian Clarke wrote: That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues (consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks and array overflows had we

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Paul Derbyshire
On 25 May 2004 at 13:37, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ian Clarke wrote: That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues (consider the amount of time we would spend

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 26/05/2004, at 9:36 AM, Paul Derbyshire wrote: ... rather than just having one, platform dependent #idfef-filled source file with the appropriate functions duplicated for all the different supported platforms. That's the perfect reason to use Java! It may not be the nicest code, but you only

[freenet-support] Couldn't retrieve key

2004-05-25 Thread Leo Holland
I just found out about freenet and it sound so good!but I installed it and I can't get it working! I have Zonealarm installed and gave all of the programs full access, this is the error I get when triing to run it. Freenet Route Not FoundNetwork Error Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL