As you might already have understood, Freenet will continue to
function perfectly fine if the computer is restarted during datastore
maintenance. We do however advise users to avoid restarting Freenet
while the maintenance is in progress, as Freenet would have to do all
the work all over again on
Datastore(PUBKEY-cache) maintenance in progress: 445568/502974. Freenet is
rebuilding the slot filter index for your datastore, probably because Freenet
did not shut down properly at some point. This allows Freenet to access the
disk a lot less, but rebuilding the indexes will involve some
ns.org
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:12:08 -0500
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:45:30 +, Guillaume LEROY wrote:
> >
> > Hello support!
> > I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote:
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and
correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS and cannot
send messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry 0
+
CC: sesef...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote:
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and
correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards
@freenetproject.org
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:38:03 +
CC: sesef...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Why, why, why, oooh why???!!!
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 19:45:30 Guillaume LEROY wrote:
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID and correct
connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS and cannot send
messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry 0 messages and I cannot
insert one...
I am running on Vista 32 and all the
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:45:30 +, Guillaume LEROY wrote:
Hello support!
I did upgrade to Freenet 1305 and I seem to have a correct node ID
and correct connection; However, I cannot refresh the boards in FMS
and cannot send messages either. Same thing with Frost. Boards carry
0 messages
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:04:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Sunday 25 July 2010 21:49:43 user1 wrote:
Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay.
I have found out, that when I close all my running programs on my desktop
machine, and disconnect the freenet server,
On Sunday 25 July 2010 21:49:43 user1 wrote:
Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay.
I just checked the speed of my desktop machine when the freenet machine
is running at the same time.
Speed of desktop machine:
Download speed= 1904 Kbps
Upload speed = 167
I have been running a smal fit-pc with freenet as a kind of Freenet
server for more than a year.
Then my internet service provider provided me with a new Thomson Gateway
Router, so I have broadband internet and ordinary telephony on the same
system, that's to the ordinary telephone jack.
I
Then I removed the freenet fit-pc, and now skype works well again.
Any suggestions, possible a set-up I can do on freenet, so freenet does
not disturb my ordinary internet system.
With my desktop machine running alone speedtest.net showed:
Download 2.06 Mbps
Upload 0.45 Mbps
Freenet fit-pc
Before I got the new Gateway Router everything seemed to work okay.
I just checked the speed of my desktop machine when the freenet machine
is running at the same time.
Speed of desktop machine:
Download speed= 1904 Kbps
Upload speed = 167 Kbps
___
Not sure why adding the router would change it(I'm not sure exactly what
you setup is/was,) but I would add an input bandwidth limit. Note that the
freenet limit uses bytes, while your speed is measured in bits. So your
speed, 450kbps, is 56KB/s. I'd set the input limit to 20. Even if all
On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote:
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> >> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
> >
> > More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
>
> My main complain
On Friday 27 February 2009 21:17:21 bqz69 wrote:
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
My main complain is, that is not
Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
>> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
>
> More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
My main complain is, that is not possible to use Freenet anonymously for
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic
> User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use
> Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream.
What you are dreaming of is an entire
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?
>
> I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
> for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
> people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
>
> It can be used mostly only
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
> It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do "emerge freenet", and
*done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard
first :P. In Window$, I assume, you
I was just wondering?
I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
It can be used mostly only by small groups of smart
bqz69 wrote:
I was just wondering?
I have tried out freenet for years, but it still seems not to be ready
for serious use by individual people, that is the huge group of ordinary
people out there on the Internet, who are in serious need for a Freenet.
It can be used mostly only by small
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
*done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard
first :P. In Window$, I assume, you
Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people.
More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and
My main complain is, that is not possible to use Freenet anonymously for
individual
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote:
The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic
User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use
Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream.
What you are dreaming of is an entire
bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?
> I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
> possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
bqz69 wrote:
I was just wondering?
snip
I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Level 13 wrote:
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to
90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a
few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up
(that is, until the
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to
90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a
few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up
(that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start
the node). Why is
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to
90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a
few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up
(that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start
the node). Why is
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 07:25:48PM +, this.is.not.my.real.email.addres
s wrote:
> Matthew Toseland writes:
>
> >
> > So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable -
> > 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any
> > conclusion?
> >
> > My 2 cents:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable -
> 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any
> conclusion?
>
> My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting
So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable -
1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any
conclusion?
My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting
just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7
uses
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
>Content-Type:
"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ?
That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly
not before 1.0.
0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer
updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g.
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote:
>
> Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
>
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
>
> Until Freenet 0.7 has
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
as the preferred download.
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
Until Freenet 0.7
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Disposition: inline
--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type:
Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download
page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the
preferred download.
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated in
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:48:24AM -0800, A. Censor wrote:
Approximately Jan 29th I tried to make a ONE time $10 contribution to freenet
to support what you guys do.
Thank you.
That contribution went through.
However what troubles me is that you guys then appeared to continue to try to
Right.
We had a lot more of those problems in the past, and I clearly remember
that I changed the (paypal)page a bit (making it clearer) a year ago, as
to avoid this. It helped, but apparently some folks still klick on it by
mistake, though now you really have to be with your mind elsewhere
Because all the nodes are backed off. If you upgrade to 5085 this will
be clearer.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:36:08PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun
JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is
I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun
JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is normal,
but I noticed that many of them RNF instantly and say no nodes were tried. If
it's not too hard to explain, I'd like to know the reason for
I've been getting this for about a week:
Download of NodeConfig.exe failed: 'connecting to host'. Try again.
I've tried several permutations of the possible answers, but in the final
analysis, nothing gets me the new version of Freenet.
For Windows.
I have two versions of
7:17:00 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] Why?
I've been getting this for about a week:
Download of NodeConfig.exe failed: 'connecting to host'. Try again.
I've tried several permutations of the possible answers, but in the final
analysis, nothing gets me the new version of Freenet
Build 6449 has been out for several days, 6450 just became available
yesterday, yet my routing table still has quite a few nodes running 6448.
What's up with that?
--
Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
Hello!
I have router - firewall - PC
Normally the port should be open.
To be sure, I tried Kazaa. Kazaa will work.
I closed kazaa and tried freenet with the same port: listenPort=1214
But at freenet work only the update function.
When I start freenet, freenet is not able to connect to the
No worries, I've seen stubbier questions.
Your .ini looks fine to me - how do you know Freenet cannot connect to the
internet?
When I start freenet, freenet is not able to connect to the Internet.
What exactly do you mean by that? How do you know freenet is not able to
connect to the Internet?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/3/2003 3:42:05 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection?
No worries, I've seen stubbier questions.
Your .ini looks fine to me - how do you know Freenet cannot connect to the
internet?
When I start freenet, freenet
# The IP address of this node as seen by the public Internet. You only need to
override this if it cannot be autodetected, for example if you have a NAT
(a.k.a. IP Masquerading) firewall/router, in which case you will need to set
it to the IP address or DNS name of the internet-side
Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore,
QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtnodes_14166a
Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore,
QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtprops_14166b
Version 660
/N
___
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:49:06PM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore,
QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtnodes_14166a
Feb 7, 2003 12:07:42 PM (freenet.support.SimpleDataObjectStore,
QThread-486): Trying to write to c:\rtprops_14166b
Now you are jesting with me Matthew.
But what it is actually doing is writing out the routing table.
The real question was why are the files stored in 'c:\'? I haven't told my
node to put anything there as far as I know. If I happened to run linux
would the files be
placed in '/'?
/N
It really irritating to keep being asked if I really want to download
that mp3.
Rob.
--
-
The Numeric Python EM Project
www.pythonemproject.com
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It really irritating to keep being asked if I really want to download
that mp3.
You can add it yourself you know. :)
I don't know the real reason, but if someone is using wmp (windows media
player) to play their audio it will guess the
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:22:25PM -0500, Mathew Ryden wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It really irritating to keep being asked if I really want to download
that mp3.
You can add it yourself you know. :)
I don't know the real reason, but if someone
56 matches
Mail list logo
