On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:31:23PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
| Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node
| responds in a reasonable
On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:58 pm, David Masover wrote:
| not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for
| choosing Java should be obvious; platform independence and a
| rich API that comes standard with the language.
As a purely academic argument, Parrot and .NET both do those
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Oliveri wrote:
[...]
| days. Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it
uses
| for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)?
Yes. It's on the firewall machine, which really only does NAT anyway.
| I have an 2.5G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?
I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable. Don't
know RNF or DNF from Dionsaur. 5-10 connections, 2 or 3 loaded before
the browser timed out (guess).
|
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC encoders to get
something approaching reasonable performance. Fast
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
a href=http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45250;Java vs C++/a
Java vs C++ Shootout Revisited
June 15, 2004
Summary
I was sick of hearing people say Java was slow,
On Friday 09 July 2004 12:15 am, David Masover wrote:
What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm getting lots of
pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
though the browser is on
All this aside, when routing doesn't work in Freenet it can't be blamed on
the language it was implemented in. Broken routing can easily be coded in
C, Python, assembler or whatever language you desire. On the other hand
being tied to a proprietary language like Java under Sun's control
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:15:50PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?
I'm not sure. It depends on various factors. For example, which branch
you are running.
I'm getting lots of
pages taking
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
helping matters much. It's hoped this will change when one of the Free
Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt
Freenet.
I lost the meaning in the last sentence. What was intended by wrt?
with-respect-to
11 matches
Mail list logo
