Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
fre, 2003-02-07 kl. 01:40 skrev Matthew Toseland: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:17:21PM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 22:28 bdonlan wrote: > > > On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:11 pm, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > > > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > > > > You need > > > > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > > > > > > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > > > > '*'? > > > > > > Probably 0.0.0.0/0. You see, it's a subnet mask. First part is the IP, second > > > the number of on bits at the beginning of the mask. > > > > D*mn, is that's all there's too it. Why did have I ignored that for so > > long time... Oh well, tried that to, and it doesn't work either. > > Build 555 should fix all this... does it? Wait a sec ... yes, it surely seems like it does. Thanks. -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Healing feature
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:43:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It would be nice that during a FEC download, aborting > the healing phase automatically save the file. > > Now if you abort the healing the download is lost. The healing phase occurs after each segment. > > > JM2C. Marco > > > -- > + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+ > * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit* > * Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it* > * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * > + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + > -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/3arPAuj7w-c/ ICTHUS. msg02842/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
Success, for me. Good job :) Matthew Toseland wrote: D*mn, is that's all there's too it. Why did have I ignored that for so long time... Oh well, tried that to, and it doesn't work either. Build 555 should fix all this... does it? -- --- TLD > I have evil to make function freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Throttling not working?
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 04:00:38PM -0700, Jack D. Ripper wrote: > On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:32 pm, Jack D.Ripper wrote: > > On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:35 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > maximumThreads=60 > > > defaultResetProbability=0.01 > > > > I already had maximumThreads set at 50 (sorry I didn't mention that, > > there's so many configuration variables that I have fiddled with trying to > > tune this thing that I forget what I've done to what!). When Frost > > overloaded my node, it had *HUNDREDS* of threads open, though. How could > > that be?! (My node is running Mandrake 9.0 Linux, stock 2.4.19 kernel). > > > > I will add the defaultResetProbability line and see if that helps. Thanks, > > Hmm, didn't help. maximumThreads set at 50, defaultResetProbability set at > 0.01, fired up Frost again, and here we go: Which Frost? The old one or the new (with FEC splitfile support) one? The new one seems reasonably well-behaved. > > (from Environment screen) > ---snip--- > Pooled Thread Consumers > Class Threads used > Checkpoint: Fetching ARK freenet:SSK 1 > freenet.interfaces.LocalInterface$ConnectionShell 2 > freenet.Message: ClientGet 11 > freenet.OpenConnectionManager$ConnectionJob 69 > freenet.node.states.request.RequestInitiator 9 > Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint 1 > freenet.client.InternalClient$ClientMessageVector 2 > freenet.Message: QueryRejected > ---snip--- > > > Why do I have 69 Connectionjob threads when I have maximumThreads set at 50? > It seems to me that this beast is initiating and accepting connections after > it hits that limit! At the very least it should not be initiating connections > after we hit maximumThreads, or assigning sockets to connections threads > after we hit maximumThreads, right? Otherwise, what use is maximumThreads?! > > Worse, this is actually *understimating* the number of threads outstanding. > ps -ax shows approximately 300 Java threads actually running! > > Something isn't getting throttled right. What now? > > Build Number 554 CVS Revision 1.90.2.30 > Mandrake 9.0 Linux stock 2.4.19 kernel > > -- > Jack D. Ripper, NORAD HQ, Cheyenne Mountain, CO [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/3arPAuj7w-c/ ICTHUS. msg02840/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:17:21PM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 22:28 bdonlan wrote: > > On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:11 pm, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > > > You need > > > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > > > > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > > > '*'? > > > > Probably 0.0.0.0/0. You see, it's a subnet mask. First part is the IP, second > > the number of on bits at the beginning of the mask. > > D*mn, is that's all there's too it. Why did have I ignored that for so > long time... Oh well, tried that to, and it doesn't work either. Build 555 should fix all this... does it? > > -- > Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/3arPAuj7w-c/ ICTHUS. msg02839/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] New build, local interfaces bugfixes
New freenet stable and unstable builds are available (555 and 661 respectively). These fix some problems introduced in the last few months relating to determining whether an incoming connection is allowed to access the freenet web interface. Upgrading would be a good idea, and is strongly recommended if you have changed mainport.bindAddress or mainport.allowedHosts. The snapshots have been rebuilt, all you have to do is run the update script. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/3arPAuj7w-c/ ICTHUS. msg02869/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] Throttling not working?
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:32 pm, Jack D.Ripper wrote: > On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:35 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > maximumThreads=60 > > defaultResetProbability=0.01 > > I already had maximumThreads set at 50 (sorry I didn't mention that, > there's so many configuration variables that I have fiddled with trying to > tune this thing that I forget what I've done to what!). When Frost > overloaded my node, it had *HUNDREDS* of threads open, though. How could > that be?! (My node is running Mandrake 9.0 Linux, stock 2.4.19 kernel). > > I will add the defaultResetProbability line and see if that helps. Thanks, Hmm, didn't help. maximumThreads set at 50, defaultResetProbability set at 0.01, fired up Frost again, and here we go: (from Environment screen) ---snip--- Pooled Thread Consumers Class Threads used Checkpoint: Fetching ARK freenet:SSK 1 freenet.interfaces.LocalInterface$ConnectionShell 2 freenet.Message: ClientGet 11 freenet.OpenConnectionManager$ConnectionJob 69 freenet.node.states.request.RequestInitiator 9 Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint 1 freenet.client.InternalClient$ClientMessageVector 2 freenet.Message: QueryRejected ---snip--- Why do I have 69 Connectionjob threads when I have maximumThreads set at 50? It seems to me that this beast is initiating and accepting connections after it hits that limit! At the very least it should not be initiating connections after we hit maximumThreads, or assigning sockets to connections threads after we hit maximumThreads, right? Otherwise, what use is maximumThreads?! Worse, this is actually *understimating* the number of threads outstanding. ps -ax shows approximately 300 Java threads actually running! Something isn't getting throttled right. What now? Build Number 554 CVS Revision 1.90.2.30 Mandrake 9.0 Linux stock 2.4.19 kernel -- Jack D. Ripper, NORAD HQ, Cheyenne Mountain, CO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 22:28 bdonlan wrote: > On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:11 pm, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > > You need > > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > > '*'? > > Probably 0.0.0.0/0. You see, it's a subnet mask. First part is the IP, second > the number of on bits at the beginning of the mask. D*mn, is that's all there's too it. Why did have I ignored that for so long time... Oh well, tried that to, and it doesn't work either. -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 06 February 2003 02:11 pm, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > > I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > > > browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? > > > > Yes. The only reason it worked before was a bug. You have > > mainport.allowedHosts=192.168.1.0/24 > > or something like that in your config. > > mainport.allowedHosts=* > > I like to keep access control in my iptables-config > > > You need > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > '*'? Probably 0.0.0.0/0. You see, it's a subnet mask. First part is the IP, second the number of on bits at the beginning of the mask. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QtOLx533NjVSos4RAmhDAJ4opks7l1UrEusZJFFHfw3SNpVXRQCglpWg SSuUfGF7ANg/qj+D+PPpMos= =mr2S -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Freenet-list] Freenet: Kaffe (free software) compatibility: Was: R freesite
Jack D. Ripper: > If the FreeNet Project wants to support a "free" Java product, GCJ is the > proper product to support. GCJ (the GNU Compiler for Java) is under active > development and has re-implemented a number of the more interesting Sun > libraries, though there is still much to be done. It also has the advantage > of producing code that runs considerably faster than Kaffe, and on par or > better than Sun's latest JDK1.4. Don't even think about it. Beating the bugs out of that monster would cost one hundred times what we'd spend getting Kaffe fixed up. Whether or not GCJ ever works correctly is entirely up to its developers. ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Freenet-list] Freenet: Kaffe (free software) compatibility: Was: R freesite
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It is really impossible to find a trade off > between new developement and the existing > features of Kaffe ? Mostly a matter of Kaffe implementing such an ancient and limited version of Java that modern Java programmers can't deal with it easily, and the owner of the copyright on the Kaffe code has apparently abandoned it. If the FreeNet Project wants to support a "free" Java product, GCJ is the proper product to support. GCJ (the GNU Compiler for Java) is under active development and has re-implemented a number of the more interesting Sun libraries, though there is still much to be done. It also has the advantage of producing code that runs considerably faster than Kaffe, and on par or better than Sun's latest JDK1.4. -- Jack D. Ripper, NORAD HQ, Cheyenne Mountain, CO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] ARK gone nuts
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:35 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > maximumThreads=60 > defaultResetProbability=0.01 I already had maximumThreads set at 50 (sorry I didn't mention that, there's so many configuration variables that I have fiddled with trying to tune this thing that I forget what I've done to what!). When Frost overloaded my node, it had *HUNDREDS* of threads open, though. How could that be?! (My node is running Mandrake 9.0 Linux, stock 2.4.19 kernel). I will add the defaultResetProbability line and see if that helps. Thanks, - JDR ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Freenet-list] Freenet: Kaffe (free software) compatibility: Was: R freesite
At 18.46 06/02/03 +, you wrote: > Re [freenet-support] Re [Free4.ems[Free4.ems <0880.0002>> > >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva: >>=20 >> > >> is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a >> > >> slow system; the memory profile and resource use of kaffe >> > >> is far better respect sun jre. >> > >> Take care of this compatibility; IMHO is more important >> > >> then that the mean Freenet developer think. >> > > >> > >It crashes in minutes on my machine. The developers have been somewhat >> > >nonresponsive, the bugs seem to be deep magick and the Project Leaders >> > >have determined that we don't need to spend money making Kaffe work wi= >th >> > >Freenet. >> >=20 >> > This statement is very important; IMHO the Freenet Project=20 >> > need an explicit position on that question. >> >=20 >> > Project Leaders, can we hear you ? >> >=20 >> > Releasing the main code under GPL is ineffective, if the >> > .jar need proprietary software; in my understanding >> > the use of the GPL licence is incorrect; I think in >> > this case LGPL is the right type of licence. >> >=20 >> > Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe >> > compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from >> > the point of view of free software and from the security. >> >=20 >> > The only other way to solve this problem is IMU, to=20 >> > release a C (or other freely compilable/runnable language) >> > version >>=20 >> Totally agree with Marco: this shows my old sensation, Freenet is a good >> project but not its developer group :-( >Yeah yeah whatever. We can release a C version, but that means no new >features, no significant bugfixes and no speed improvements for a year. >And we need you to fund me to the tune of $1,250/month for all that >time. And finally it would be much easier to go to C++ and it would run >on almost as many platforms. A year is probably an underestimate for C, >since it'd have to be pretty much a complete reimplementation. AFAIK, Mattew, you are probably the only person in the world (if any) that understand the overall Freenet software architecture. Can you try to explain me why a software that run smootly in the stable version (552) on Kaffe 1.0.7, so desperately need other java features in the developement branch ? It is really impossible to find a trade off between new developement and the existing features of Kaffe ? What new vital feature need it ? I need just one good reason to change my mind. Thanks a lot for your patience . Ciao. Marco -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+ * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit* * Marco A. Calamari[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it* * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 20:36 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > > You need > > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > > '*'? > * Buf that's exactly what I have in my config, and that doesn't work... -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:11:08PM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > > I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > > > browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? > > Yes. The only reason it worked before was a bug. You have > > mainport.allowedHosts=192.168.1.0/24 > > or something like that in your config. > mainport.allowedHosts=* > > I like to keep access control in my iptables-config > > > You need > > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to > '*'? * > > -- > Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- msg02830/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] ARK gone nuts
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:14:13PM -0700, Jack D.Ripper wrote: > Class Threads used > Checkpoint: Fetching ARK freenet:SSK 34 > freenet.interfaces.LocalInterface$ConnectionShell 5 > freenet.OpenConnectionManager$ConnectionJob > > This is about thirty minutes after I overwhelmed my node by trying out Frost, > and maxed out my process table. Build Number 554 CVS Revision 1.90.2.30 Hmmm. > > It appears that Fred is trying to catch up on all those ARK jobs that didn't > get fired off because of being unable to spawn threads, and as a result > recovery from an overload is taking a *LONG* time. > > Is there some configuration option I can use to a) help prevent overloads, and > b) help recover from them faster? My main limitation is CPU, not memory. I > have plenty of memory, but only a Pentium 166MMX CPU. Upgrading the CPU on my > FreeNetmachine is not practical (I'd basically need a new machine). I > already bumped my max connections WAY down (to 10), which keeps my node from > getting overloaded in normal use (i.e., just fetching stuff via port ), > but Frost seems to utterly overwhelm it. maxConnections is ignored. maximumThreads is the relevant parameter. Try: maximumThreads=60 defaultResetProbability=0.01 > > - JDR -- msg02829/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[freenet-support] ARK gone nuts
Class Threads used Checkpoint: Fetching ARK freenet:SSK 34 freenet.interfaces.LocalInterface$ConnectionShell 5 freenet.OpenConnectionManager$ConnectionJob This is about thirty minutes after I overwhelmed my node by trying out Frost, and maxed out my process table. Build Number 554 CVS Revision 1.90.2.30 It appears that Fred is trying to catch up on all those ARK jobs that didn't get fired off because of being unable to spawn threads, and as a result recovery from an overload is taking a *LONG* time. Is there some configuration option I can use to a) help prevent overloads, and b) help recover from them faster? My main limitation is CPU, not memory. I have plenty of memory, but only a Pentium 166MMX CPU. Upgrading the CPU on my FreeNetmachine is not practical (I'd basically need a new machine). I already bumped my max connections WAY down (to 10), which keeps my node from getting overloaded in normal use (i.e., just fetching stuff via port ), but Frost seems to utterly overwhelm it. - JDR ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 19:49 skrev Matthew Toseland: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > > I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > > browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? > Yes. The only reason it worked before was a bug. You have > mainport.allowedHosts=192.168.1.0/24 > or something like that in your config. mainport.allowedHosts=* I like to keep access control in my iptables-config > You need > mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 Okie. I've never really gotten that format. What's the equivalent to '*'? -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Tld wrote: > Tld wrote: > >Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > >>I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > >>browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? > >Stupid Q: Have you restarted the node (shut down and re-launched)? I get > >the very same error when I haven't restarted the node. > Okay, I get the same error with the same build. I guess it's the build > that's broken :-| No, it's your config file that is broken (probably :)). See previous mail. > > -- > --- TLD > > I have evil to make function freenet > > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- msg02826/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? Yes. The only reason it worked before was a bug. You have mainport.allowedHosts=192.168.1.0/24 or something like that in your config. You need mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.1.0/24 > > -- > Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ___ > support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > -- msg02825/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)
Are you sure you aren't using a nonstandard JVM? The IBM JVM has been known to have serious problems, as has Kaffe, and old versions of the Sun one sometimes have nasty bugs.. On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote: > 659 would seem to have some problems with announcing. One of the nodes I > upgraded yesterday hasn't done a single usefult thing since... > > > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:20 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:21 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:31 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, > QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: > freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(eda1 570b d062 a746 > 1a54 e1cf 2800 9cf4 250f 5328) @ 193.11.247.167:61608 - Cannot connect > to: 193.11.247.167:61608 (terminal) > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:32 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, > QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: > freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(e3d9 6da2 c70f 7b75 > 0ad3 f077 236f bae0 6ed7 7e01) @ 217.215.123.28:19790 - Cannot connect > to: 217.215.123.28:19790 (terminal) > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:32 PM (freenet.OpenConnectionManager, QThread-5): > Established connection: tcpconnection: 134.147.115.87:26277 > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:34 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:39 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # > tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 160.26.102.198:4620 > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:40 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, > QThread-4): Inbound connection failed: java.io.EOFException > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:41 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:44 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # > tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 217.84.0.234:4103 > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:48 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory > checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:39:51 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:00 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Polling and aggregation of > diagnostics. > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:01 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory > checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, > QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: > freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(50a8 f534 ea52 f574 > 455c 00d9 5f7e e11d 2eb4 4570) @ 134.147.115.87:26277 - authentication > timed out (terminal) > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, > QThread-6): Announcement failed to eda1 570b d062 a746 1a54 e1cf 2800 > 9cf4 250f 5328 at depth 15. > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, > QThread-6): Announcement failed to e3d9 6da2 c70f 7b75 0ad3 f077 236f > bae0 6ed7 7e01 at depth 15. > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, > QThread-6): Announcement failed to 50a8 f534 ea52 f574 455c 00d9 5f7e > e11d 2eb4 4570 at depth 15. > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:04 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, > QThread-4): Inbound connection failed: java.io.EOFException > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:05 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # > tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 129.116.44.183:33608 > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:11 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:14 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # > tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 217.84.0.234:4141 > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:17 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:21 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, > QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint > Feb 4, 2003 5:40:34 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, > QThread-10): Inbound connection failed:
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Freenet-list] Freenet: Kaffe (free software) compatibility: Was: R freesite
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva: > > > >> is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a > > >> slow system; the memory profile and resource use of kaffe > > >> is far better respect sun jre. > > >> Take care of this compatibility; IMHO is more important > > >> then that the mean Freenet developer think. > > > > > >It crashes in minutes on my machine. The developers have been somewhat > > >nonresponsive, the bugs seem to be deep magick and the Project Leaders > > >have determined that we don't need to spend money making Kaffe work with > > >Freenet. > > > > This statement is very important; IMHO the Freenet Project > > need an explicit position on that question. > > > > Project Leaders, can we hear you ? > > > > Releasing the main code under GPL is ineffective, if the > > .jar need proprietary software; in my understanding > > the use of the GPL licence is incorrect; I think in > > this case LGPL is the right type of licence. > > > > Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe > > compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from > > the point of view of free software and from the security. > > > > The only other way to solve this problem is IMU, to > > release a C (or other freely compilable/runnable language) > > version > > Totally agree with Marco: this shows my old sensation, Freenet is a good > project but not its developer group :-( Yeah yeah whatever. We can release a C version, but that means no new features, no significant bugfixes and no speed improvements for a year. And we need you to fund me to the tune of $1,250/month for all that time. And finally it would be much easier to go to C++ and it would run on almost as many platforms. A year is probably an underestimate for C, since it'd have to be pretty much a complete reimplementation. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at ICTHUS. msg02823/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
tor, 2003-02-06 kl. 11:28 skrev Tld: > Tld wrote: > > Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: > >> I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to > >> browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? > > Stupid Q: Have you restarted the node (shut down and re-launched)? I get > > the very same error when I haven't restarted the node. > Okay, I get the same error with the same build. I guess it's the build > that's broken :-| Okay, then it's not just me then. "Happy" to hear that. -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: Freenet: Kaffe (free software) compatibility: Was: Re: [freenet-support] freesite
At 19.34 05/02/03 -0500, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe >> compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from >> the point of view of free software and from the security. > >What exactly do you mean by "Kaffe compatibility"? If Matthew & co. >write code which conforms to the specifications of the Java language, >but it crashes Kaffe, then clearly this is a bug in Kaffe. Attempting >to find workarounds which avoid Kaffe bugs might be helpful for you >and me in the short term, but it's a fundamental waste of time for >the project in the long term, if efforts could instead be focused >on improving Freenet itself. This is not so simple; version specification does matter. Kaffe implement 1.0 java spec with some 1.1 features. So the request "maintain Kaffe compatibility" can be expanded in "use java spec 1.0 with only 1.1 extension Kaffe supports". Oskar please Help me . >As for the license issue that you mentioned The GPL says: > > "Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not > covered by this License; they are outside its scope." > >Can Freenet be copied? Yes. >Can Freenet be distributed? Yes. >Can Freenet be modified? I believe so. > >Then, the GPL goes on to cover the detailed conditions which apply >to these three fundamental activities. > > "1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's > source code [...]" > >No problem here. > > "2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion > of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and > distribute such modifications [...] provided [...]: > >"a) [statement that you changed the files, and when] >"b) [all third parties are licensed to use it at no charge] >"c) [must print disclaimer of warranty if it's interactive]" > >Again, no problem here, except possibly 2c, but that only applies >to freenet.client.cli.* which most people don't use anyway. And it's >trivial to fix if anyone actually cares. > > "3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, > under Section 2) in object code or executable form [...] provided > that you also do one of the following: > >"a) [provide source code] >"b) [offer to provide source code at minimal cost] >"c) [pass along someone else's offer to provide source code] > >Now here's the important part: > > "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for > making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source > code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any > associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to > control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a > special exception, the source code distributed need not include > anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary > form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the > operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component > itself accompanies the executable." > >Whenever I see a discussion of the GPL, this paragraph is the one that >usually causes the most trouble. In the context of placing Freenet >under the GPL, however, it *does not matter whether Freenet can be >run on a free Java virtual machine*, because the GPL does not concern >itself with the use of the program -- only with copying, distributing >and modifying the program. > >The real issue is whether Freenet can be *developed* with free tools. >The answer to this, IMHO, can take a couple different forms: > > 1) If Sun's Java Software Development Kit is considered "the operating >system on which the executable runs", then the non-free javac >(compiler) can be considered a normally distributed major component >of that operating system. This is an open question. > > 2) If Freenet can be developed entirely with alternative tools, which >could (at least in theory) be distributed along with Freenet, then >this paragraph is also satisfied. I compile Freenet using jikes >and ant. Jikes is in Debian's main repository, meaning it's >Free Software according to Debian's guidelines. Ant, however, is >in the "contrib" section, which is a trickier matter. Software >in contrib is free, but depends on something which isn't. I don't >feel like tracking down all of ant's dependencies and license >clauses at the moment. > >I believe (but I may be mistaken) that Freenet can also be developed >without using ant. Jikes and make might be sufficient. If that's >the case, then everything should be fine -- just include a written >offer to provide jikes (since make is clearly a normal component >of every Unix-like system). I can't foresee anyone actually taking >you up on the offer, when they could download jikes directly from >IBM far more quickly -- but even if the
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
Tld wrote: Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? Stupid Q: Have you restarted the node (shut down and re-launched)? I get the very same error when I haven't restarted the node. Okay, I get the same error with the same build. I guess it's the build that's broken :-| -- --- TLD > I have evil to make function freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requeststo port 8888
Allan Beaufour Larsen wrote: I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? Stupid Q: Have you restarted the node (shut down and re-launched)? I get the very same error when I haven't restarted the node. -- --- TLD > I have evil to make function freenet ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Build 659 (unstable)
659 would seem to have some problems with announcing. One of the nodes I upgraded yesterday hasn't done a single usefult thing since... Feb 4, 2003 5:39:20 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:39:21 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:39:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:39:31 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(eda1 570b d062 a746 1a54 e1cf 2800 9cf4 250f 5328) @ 193.11.247.167:61608 - Cannot connect to: 193.11.247.167:61608 (terminal) Feb 4, 2003 5:39:32 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(e3d9 6da2 c70f 7b75 0ad3 f077 236f bae0 6ed7 7e01) @ 217.215.123.28:19790 - Cannot connect to: 217.215.123.28:19790 (terminal) Feb 4, 2003 5:39:32 PM (freenet.OpenConnectionManager, QThread-5): Established connection: tcpconnection: 134.147.115.87:26277 Feb 4, 2003 5:39:34 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:39:39 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 160.26.102.198:4620 Feb 4, 2003 5:39:40 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, QThread-4): Inbound connection failed: java.io.EOFException Feb 4, 2003 5:39:41 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-4): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:39:44 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 217.84.0.234:4103 Feb 4, 2003 5:39:48 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:39:51 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:40:00 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Polling and aggregation of diagnostics. Feb 4, 2003 5:40:01 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.SendAnnouncement, QThread-6): Sending NodeAnnouncement failed: freenet.ConnectFailedException: Against peer DSA(50a8 f534 ea52 f574 455c 00d9 5f7e e11d 2eb4 4570) @ 134.147.115.87:26277 - authentication timed out (terminal) Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, QThread-6): Announcement failed to eda1 570b d062 a746 1a54 e1cf 2800 9cf4 250f 5328 at depth 15. Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, QThread-6): Announcement failed to e3d9 6da2 c70f 7b75 0ad3 f077 236f bae0 6ed7 7e01 at depth 15. Feb 4, 2003 5:40:03 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, QThread-6): Announcement failed to 50a8 f534 ea52 f574 455c 00d9 5f7e e11d 2eb4 4570 at depth 15. Feb 4, 2003 5:40:04 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, QThread-4): Inbound connection failed: java.io.EOFException Feb 4, 2003 5:40:05 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 129.116.44.183:33608 Feb 4, 2003 5:40:11 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:40:14 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 217.84.0.234:4141 Feb 4, 2003 5:40:17 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:40:21 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:40:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses Feb 4, 2003 5:40:31 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-6): Executing Checkpoint: Native Filesystem Directory checkpoint Feb 4, 2003 5:40:34 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, QThread-10): Inbound connection failed: java.io.EOFException Feb 4, 2003 5:40:35 PM (freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner, QThread-4): Inbound connection failed: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out Feb 4, 2003 5:40:40 PM (freenet.interfaces.PublicInterface, Interface # tcp/14166): Accepted connection: tcpconnection: 217.84.0.234:4166 Feb 4, 2003 5:40:41 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, QThread-10
[freenet-support] Build 554: Server sends no data on requests to port 8888
I've just upgraded to build 554, and now I get no data when trying to browse localhost:. It worked fine in 552. Any explanation? -- Allan Beaufour Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
