- Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1232 build01232
- Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
So far I've understood the backoff percentages in advanced connection
details but no longer.
The attached picture shows what I'm saying.
What ticks me off the most is being connected for over 90 minutes to peers
that are
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
You know, I do think that freenet is a good idea. And in fact, until
freenet users will consume too much traffic, i'm not going to ban
them. Because i don't want to. In fact, right now 100.0% of major
traffic consumers are using *other* P2P networks. Mostly torrents,
The only problem that I can see here (and it may be kind of serious)
would be: what if your bosses realize that you use resources, work
hours, etc to catch Freenet users, and then you don't actually ban them?
If you don't have a good excuse for that, may be better just forget the
whole idea.
In recent weeks a number of established seednodes have gone offline and/or
changed IP without their owners sending me the new noderef. We are now down to
11 seednodes, but more importantly, bootstrapping is becoming a problem, with
automated tests sometimes failing to get 10 nodes in 10
Sorry... I'll just post the commit changelog.
object c5009c153b0745ad19f16e478fc619a8864d241c
type commit
tag build01227
tagger Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org 1249153708 +0100
1227: 1224 mandatory 7 August
Client layer:
- Fix instant timeouts on startup trying to defrag with a big
Sorry folks, don't use 1231 (fortunately the upload to the auto-update didn't
complete), it had a severe bug preventing startup. 1232 fixes this and also has
some minor work on plugins.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I've just found Freenet, and it looks really great. I've always considered
freedom of speech pretty much the most important thing you can have, so I
love what this is doing. Anyway, I've had what seems to be a good idea -
set up people at my school to use freenet. I'm planning to bundle it with
