[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Garb
Conrad Sabatier wrote: I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a poor choice of language in which to implement a project of this size and complexity. As far as I see it, freenet is

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Roger Oksanen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 27 May 2004 00:34, Dave wrote: Just for an update on this, bouncing the thread appropriately for devl: What are the current outstanding issues with GCJ compatibility (or, for that matter, Kaffe/Blackdown/IBM java compatibility) IBM's

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Ian Clarke
Marc Lehmann wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:25AM +0100, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our rant You are living in a dream world, really. No, you are

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Garb wrote: Conrad Sabatier wrote: I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a poor choice of language in which to implement a project of

Re: Re[5]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote: But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP or dns server ? Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ? Lot of constraint for

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:53:51AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have re download the seednode after thinking freenet was frozen for 5 minutes because no progress bar working (another bug). What exactly happened? You tried to access a freenet site and it took more than 5 minutes to fetch

[freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread cryptic_org
As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the freenet.ini. I wish freenet is able to do a simple nslookup for

[freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread cryptic_org
As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the freenet.ini. I wish freenet is able to do a simple nslookup for

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:27:07PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the

RE: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from theproject

2004-05-27 Thread Nicholas Sturm
You did, but limit to developers and the boxes trying to give some support will likely also decline. But then, if that were the goal, keep it private until it works well enough that the public knows when it is and isn't working (much). [Original Message] From: Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re[5]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Below Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's established, but before that it needs to announce an IP and port to connect to over

Re: Re[5]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote: Below Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's established, but

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Thursday 27 May 2004 09:43 am, Marc Lehmann wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a

Re: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-27 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 28/05/2004, at 4:40 AM, Toad wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote: But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP or dns server ? Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the external IP so no way to go throw a

[freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)

2004-05-27 Thread magetoo
Hi. I recently got my broadband connection, and of course I want to run Freenet, but I ran into some problems. Summary: I have/run NetBSD 1.6. There is a sun-java 1.4 package, but it will only install under NetBSD-current. Freenet doesn't seem to like 1.3.1.10. Sun java detected. 1.3.1_10

[freenet-support] freenet store compromised?? netbus

2004-05-27 Thread tripolar
Hello I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked out firestarter ( GUI firewall program). When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* . Under service it says netbus . Thinking this was not a good thing I closed ports on firewall/router