Unfortunately, Freenet requires Java 1.4.x JVM, because it relies on nio
(non-blocking input/output) API only available in 1.4.x. For the same
reason, Freenet can't be run under open-source JVMs - Classpath's nio
implementation is buggy (this _should_ change in the near future).
Also, 1.4.0 had so
Hello
I am running freenet on a linux system. All seemed well until I checked
out firestarter ( GUI firewall program).
When I noticed requests from my machine 192.168.*.*:12345 to 81.53.*.* .
Under service it says "netbus" . Thinking this was not a "good thing" I
closed ports on firewall/router
Hi.
I recently got my broadband connection, and of course I want to run
Freenet, but I ran into some problems.
Summary:
I have/run NetBSD 1.6.
There is a sun-java 1.4 package, but it will only install under
NetBSD-current.
Freenet doesn't seem to like 1.3.1.10.
Sun java detected.
1.3.1_10
Ol
On 28/05/2004, at 4:40 AM, Toad wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP
or dns server ?
Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
external IP so no way to go throw a fi
On Thursday 27 May 2004 09:43 am, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:37PM -0500, Conrad Sabatier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I find Java's memory requirements to be totally unreasonable, its
> > performance lackluster, and I've finally come to the conclusion that it
> > was ind
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:37:24PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Below
> >
> > Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your
> > freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've
> > disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's
> > establ
Below
>
> Or use a service such as dyndns.org and put your hostname in your
> freenet.ini. Freenet has routines to check for IP changes (I've
> disabled them - static IP), so it should work pretty well once it's
> established, but before that it needs to announce an IP and port to
> connect to
You did, but limit to developers and the boxes trying to give some support
will likely also decline. But then, if that were the goal, keep it private
until it works well enough that the public knows when it is and isn't
working (much).
> [Original Message]
> From: Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:27:07PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall
>
> ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which
> point to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it i
> As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall
ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point
to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the freenet.ini.
I wish freenet is able to do a simple nslookup for retriev
> As I said above, it is technically possible to run it behind a firewall
ok so I have put an automatic update of dns name in my internal Dns server which point
to my external IP (externalIP.server.network) and put it in the freenet.ini.
I wish freenet is able to do a simple nslookup for retriev
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:09:17AM +0100, Dave wrote:
> > > Bandwidth isn't THAT expensive. People who want bandwidth will switch
> > > ISPs in a healthy market. I have been tempted by some DSL deals but
> > > unless Cable starts imposing and enforcing bandwidth limitations, I'm
> > > sticking to m
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:53:51AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have re download the seednode after thinking freenet was frozen for 5 minutes
> because no progress bar working (another bug).
What exactly happened? You tried to access a freenet site and it took
more than 5 minutes to fetch
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:49:30PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> >But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP
> >or dns server ?
> >Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
> >external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ?
> >Lot of constr
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Garb wrote:
> >Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > I find Java's memory requirements to be totally
> > unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've
> > finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a
> > poor choice of language in which to implement a proj
Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:25AM +0100, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks
and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our
You are living in a dream world, really.
No, you are living
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 27 May 2004 00:34, Dave wrote:
> Just for an update on this, bouncing the thread appropriately for
> devl: What are the current outstanding issues with GCJ compatibility
> (or, for that matter, Kaffe/Blackdown/IBM java compatibility)
IBM's
> But if I understand, Freenet can't work on a network without fixed IP or
dns server ?
> Freenet can't work with an internal IP and port redirection from the
external IP so no way to go throw a firewall ?
> Lot of constraint for trying to make a free network with everyone.
Not exactly so. While F
>Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> I find Java's memory requirements to be totally
> unreasonable, its performance lackluster, and I've
> finally come to the conclusion that it was indeed a
> poor choice of language in which to implement a project
> of this size and complexity.
As far as I see it, freenet
> > Bandwidth isn't THAT expensive. People who want bandwidth will switch
> > ISPs in a healthy market. I have been tempted by some DSL deals but
> > unless Cable starts imposing and enforcing bandwidth limitations, I'm
> > sticking to my cable modem for now. If they do, I'll take my business
> > e
20 matches
Mail list logo
