[freenet-support] update and more questions

Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a Win BAT file that facilitates running multiple instances with different profiles. I've had a node up on a Win NT box

[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

> You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately! I know, I was merely joking. :) > What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued > requests and/or > inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using > now? > > If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl

[freenet-support] update and more questions

Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a Win BAT file that facilitates running multiple instances with different profiles. I've had a node up on a Win NT box

[freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

venSecurity > > *http://archives.freenetproject.org/message/20080407.160132.8fa35bc2.en.html > touches the issue vaguely. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080428/bd6b9c13/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

> Thanks again. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080428/d04f09d6/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

e: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080428/6db7a489/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

On Monday 28 April 2008 05:38, Simply Paranoid wrote: > Hello fellow paranoids! > > I've spent ~a good hour on the site trying to find answers for 2 simple > yet important questions regarding insecure mode: > 1. Can my ISP know what am I downloading/uploading to FreeNet? Not easily. Your ISP can

Re: [freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

> You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately! I know, I was merely joking. :) > What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued > requests and/or > inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using > now? > > If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl

Re: [freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

On Saturday 26 April 2008 02:43, Jim Cook wrote: > As far as I know, I don't know anyone running Freenet, so I'm running > in insecure/promiscuous mode. Freenet kindly warns me that others > can therefore identify my node and attack it. However, although I've > read the FAQ and googled some, I

Re: [freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

Simply Paranoid a écrit : > Hello fellow paranoids! Hi, > I've spent ~a good hour on the site trying to find answers for 2 simple > yet important questions regarding insecure mode: > 1. Can my ISP know what am I downloading/uploading to FreeNet? No, he can't. This is clearly mentionned in the Fr

[freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

Hello fellow paranoids! I've spent ~a good hour on the site trying to find answers for 2 simple yet important questions regarding insecure mode: 1. Can my ISP know what am I downloading/uploading to FreeNet? 2. Can the nodes I download/upload from (Read: NSA in disguise) see what I'm doing? Of cou