On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote:
> > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
> > > steady (has been running
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
steady (has been running for the last couple of days).
I did following:
[cut]
That's an ugly[1] hack :). And, doesn't your run.sh start a wrapper
that should do
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running
steady (has been running for the last
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:56:48 +, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know
the key before the upload of the file.
Yes IMHO.
There's no such thing as
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:11:07 -0500, Dennis Nezic
wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:41:42 +, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>
> > On Friday 26 December 2008 17:50, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my
> >
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:11:07 -0500, Dennis Nezic
denn...@dennisn.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:41:42 +, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
On Friday 26 December 2008 17:50, Dennis Nezic wrote:
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:41:42 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2008 17:50, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my
> > wrapper will suddenly crash:
> >
> > "JVM appears hung: Timed out waitin
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:50:11 + (GMT), Mr Mr
wrote:
> I no longer use freenet, I don't want to receive any more emails that
> have nothing of interest to me.
Have you tried "unsubscribing", using the link that is appended to
every single message here? :)
And, if it's of no interest to you,
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:50:11 + (GMT), Mr Mr mrm...@rocketmail.com
wrote:
I no longer use freenet, I don't want to receive any more emails that
have nothing of interest to me.
Have you tried unsubscribing, using the link that is appended to
every single message here? :)
And, if it's of no
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my wrapper
will suddenly crash:
"JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM."
"JVM did not exit on request, terminated"
"JVM received a signal SIGKILL (9)."
"Reloading Wrapper configuration..."
It's not a new problem.
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my wrapper
will suddenly crash:
JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM.
JVM did not exit on request, terminated
JVM received a signal SIGKILL (9).
Reloading Wrapper configuration...
It's not a new problem.
Does this
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:21:32 +, jdavies wrote:
> I see this in my "alerts" section:
>
> Build too old
> This node's software is older than the oldest version (Build #1192)
> allowed by the newest peers we try to connect to. Please update your
> node as soon as possible as you will not be
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:21:32 +, jdavies jdavie...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I see this in my alerts section:
Build too old
This node's software is older than the oldest version (Build #1192)
allowed by the newest peers we try to connect to. Please update your
node as soon as possible as you
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:29:09 +, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
If I were to have grounds to believe you were using Freenet - even
0.5 - to pirate music, I'd have to block you in my procmail ...
PLEASE DO NOT USE FREENET TO VIOLATE COPYRIGHT LAW ! Per Grokster vs
MGM, we
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:39:59 +0100, "Level 13"
wrote:
> What could be the problem? I have the latest Java installed.
Outdated freenet.jar and/or freenet-ext.jar.
> I admit I hadn't run the 0.7 node for some time, and last time I ran
> it, it already reported it was too old. (Which also brings
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:39:59 +0100, Level 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What could be the problem? I have the latest Java installed.
Outdated freenet.jar and/or freenet-ext.jar.
I admit I hadn't run the 0.7 node for some time, and last time I ran
it, it already reported it was too old. (Which
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:32:07 +0100, Repu Blica
wrote:
> Yes this may go against the great Ivory Tower principle of utter
> Tolerance and Free Speech. The Tower may not be as straight and
> pretty anymore but it is still standing. Compare it to the
> alternative that provoked users topple the
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:32:07 +0100, Repu Blica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes this may go against the great Ivory Tower principle of utter
Tolerance and Free Speech. The Tower may not be as straight and
pretty anymore but it is still standing. Compare it to the
alternative that provoked users
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:55:50 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Changes in 1185:
> - Maybe fix the bandwidth collapsing bug. When a connection stalled,
> this bug caused us to lose messages, resulting in finished requests
> not being removed, resulting in the node thinking it is more
> overloaded
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:55:50 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes in 1185:
- Maybe fix the bandwidth collapsing bug. When a connection stalled,
this bug caused us to lose messages, resulting in finished requests
not being removed, resulting in the node thinking it is more
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic:
> > >> > WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version
> > >> > "3.3.1"
> > > while the version of
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic:
WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version
3.3.1
while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is
3.2.3.
That looks
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:16:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00), vinyl1
wrote:
> Node won't start. I did a full manual update with update.cmd, same
> result. Java stack points to: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/tools/bzip2/CBZip2InputStream. Here is full output from
> wrapper log:
>
> WARNING
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:16:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00), vinyl1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Node won't start. I did a full manual update with update.cmd, same
result. Java stack points to: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tools/bzip2/CBZip2InputStream. Here is full output from
wrapper log:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...
Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^
You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:21:50 -0500, Dennis Nezic
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>
> > Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available.
I spoke too soon. It works fine for an hour or two, but then, at least
for me, all communcation (net inpu
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:21:50 -0500, Dennis Nezic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available.
I spoke too soon. It works fine for an hour or two, but then, at least
for me, all communcation
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available.
Wow! What a difference. 1178 is like a totally different program, with
respect to both cpu and memory usage. THANK YOU! It's no longer peaking
for minutes at a time. It's consistently low. My
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:56:25 + (GMT), Markus Hahn
wrote:
> Dear Supporters,
>
> the question I have sent to you some hours ago is obsolete. I have
> found the button to start it again. Freenet is running properly. Now
> I should try to find some "friends". But still I don't know how to
>
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:52:46 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> It still has 100% CPU most of the time then? Apparently resulting
> from Freenet itself rather than downloads etc?
Well, it's not /so/ serious that it stays at 100% all the time. It
jumps up for a few minutes, then calms down to
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:16:55 +, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1175 is now available. Please upgrade. Changes:
> - Handle the "Packet X sent Yms ago and still not acked" bug better.
> Don't complain in the log until 10 minutes, then disconnect from the
> peer and log the fact.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:16:55 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1175 is now available. Please upgrade. Changes:
- Handle the Packet X sent Yms ago and still not acked bug better.
Don't complain in the log until 10 minutes, then disconnect from the
peer and log
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:52:46 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It still has 100% CPU most of the time then? Apparently resulting
from Freenet itself rather than downloads etc?
Well, it's not /so/ serious that it stays at 100% all the time. It
jumps up for a few minutes, then
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:56:25 + (GMT), Markus Hahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Supporters,
the question I have sent to you some hours ago is obsolete. I have
found the button to start it again. Freenet is running properly. Now
I should try to find some friends. But still I don't know
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available.
Wow! What a difference. 1178 is like a totally different program, with
respect to both cpu and memory usage. THANK YOU! It's no longer peaking
for minutes at a time. It's
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my
downloads are failing with Internal error: Found interface
freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected as error
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:09:42 -0500,
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
> In this last 2min test of mine, all of the errors came from my 1173
> opennet peers. Only one of them was listed as "BACKED OFF" (I
> was/am connected to him for 4h49m)--the other two were (and still
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 00:22:11 +,
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> Freenet 0.7 build 1173 is now available.
It is still using much more of (my 1.2GHz) cpu than I would like. It
regularly hovers at 100% for a few minutes, then calms down, then
repeats.
And, probably not unrelated, it is still
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:02:55 +,
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> Would you mind trying a recent testing build? update.sh testing /
> update.cmd testing ? The bugs in trunk have been largely fixed...
Yes--things seem to be running a lot better as of r23371--the jvm
hasn't hung yet after almost
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:02:55 +,
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you mind trying a recent testing build? update.sh testing /
update.cmd testing ? The bugs in trunk have been largely fixed...
Yes--things seem to be running a lot better as of r23371--the jvm
hasn't hung yet
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:09:42 -0500,
Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this last 2min test of mine, all of the errors came from my 1173
opennet peers. Only one of them was listed as BACKED OFF (I
was/am connected to him for 4h49m)--the other two were (and still are)
CONNECTED (for 48m
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 00:22:11 +,
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1173 is now available.
It is still using much more of (my 1.2GHz) cpu than I would like. It
regularly hovers at 100% for a few minutes, then calms down, then
repeats.
And, probably not unrelated,
Hrm.. sorry.. it seems to be working now that I'm using r23350.
I was having all my problems with r23352--which I could have sworn was
referenced in freenet-stable-latest.jar.url this morning :|.
Anywho, sorry for the noise.
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:13:11 -0500,
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
> I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've
> never seen them that high before.
Update: I tried it again, except this time I accidentally forgot to
give it a seednodes.fref. The first attempt,
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:42:35 -0500,
> Dennis Nezic wrote:
>
> ., constantly using 100% cpu since being launched.
I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never
seen them that high before.
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +,
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive
> changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of
> the connectivity problems that have been reported recently:
I'm having a LOT of trouble
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +,
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive
changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of
the connectivity problems that have been reported recently:
I'm having a LOT
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:42:35 -0500,
Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
., constantly using 100% cpu since being launched.
I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never
seen them that high before.
___
Support mailing
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:13:11 -0500,
Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've
never seen them that high before.
Update: I tried it again, except this time I accidentally forgot to
give it a seednodes.fref. The first attempt
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:28:38 -0500,
Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. BUT it was still consuming all the cpu!--supposedly not
doing anything!? At this point I turned the logger back on, and to my
horror, it immediately filled to over 70MB, 69.9 of which were errors
of the form
Hrm.. sorry.. it seems to be working now that I'm using r23350.
I was having all my problems with r23352--which I could have sworn was
referenced in freenet-stable-latest.jar.url this morning :|.
Anywho, sorry for the noise.
___
Support mailing list
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:00:52 +,
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> It could very well be. Lack of memory resulting in constant garbage
> collection could easily cause a timeout.
I really don't think it's low memory. I increased
wrapper.java.maxmemory to 300, and even though only about 180MB is
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:00:52 +,
Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could very well be. Lack of memory resulting in constant garbage
collection could easily cause a timeout.
I really don't think it's low memory. I increased
wrapper.java.maxmemory to 300, and even though only
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:58:08 +0100,
> bqz69 wrote:
>
> I have almost the same problem - my freenet continues to shut down
> several times a day, and I have to restart and get connected to open
> net peers.
>
> I am using: Build #1168 r23201 and -ext Build #24 r 23199
My node also crashes many
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:58:08 +0100,
bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have almost the same problem - my freenet continues to shut down
several times a day, and I have to restart and get connected to open
net peers.
I am using: Build #1168 r23201 and -ext Build #24 r 23199
My node also
My freenet node keeps crashing on me. The wrapper.log file simply
says... "Restarting node: MessageCore froze for 3 minutes!"
...at which point it begins to cleanly close the databases/datastores
and does finally say a clean "Goodbye from freenet.node.Node at asdf (USM
deadlock)".
This term
My freenet node keeps crashing on me. The wrapper.log file simply
says... Restarting node: MessageCore froze for 3 minutes!
...at which point it begins to cleanly close the databases/datastores
and does finally say a clean Goodbye from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (USM
deadlock).
This term deadlock came up
301 - 359 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
