Please try following my instructions and see if it'll help. If it won't
help, please give a concise explanation of what went wrong, including
direct copy-pastes of relevant lines from wrapper.log or freenet-*.log.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
On 19.05.2015 19:32, Dave Larsen wrote:
> i
e size: 1GB
Do not change any other settings before you've run Freenet successfully
for at least a month or so, then you can start to gently tweak your
configuration further.
Finally, do not start more than ~10 downloads at once, especially if
they're for large (> 100 MB) files.
Regards
rther in the darknet chain
requires cooperation with the remote ISP, which is something everyone
considers to be relatively difficult to achieve.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with M
s traffic pattern is *extremely* unusual
(long-lived multi-host random-port UDP conversations). I don't think
there's anything that could be done about it short-term.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG
me servers. Next,
Freenet nodes have random UDP ports, which is also not very typical for
online games.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFKjpYRx7AVSvyjsUARArRzAJ9s9s7c6Qp
#x27;ll be the simplest way.
If you're proficient with Java, another way would be to create a simple
opennet harvester (which constantly gets connections to new nodes,
discovers more nodes, then blocks their IP addresses).
With best regards,
Victor Denisov.
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
> Ok p
loads, and can say that
on my machine the node works much better now, unless I really stress it
(like queuing 100+ downloads).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Victor - might this be your issue as well?
>
> ROFL. So that just leaves victor...
Sorry, was away on a long weekend :-(. I'll fire up the node first thing
tomorrow with requested logging and will report back.
Regards,
Victor De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Victor - might this be your issue as well?
>
> ROFL. So that just leaves victor...
Sorry, was away on a long weekend :-(. I'll fire up the node first thing
tomorrow with requested logging and will report back.
Regards,
Victor De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Additional useful info, if you don't mind parting with it:
> Network, friends and physical security levels.
All on NORMAL here.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
CPU load when Freenet is running. Note
that firewall contributes to this number, as its driver runs in kernel
space, obviously.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKAdp51O5
inutes, or ~ 8 Kb/s
(which probably translates into ~10 to 20 writes per second, considering
internal buffering and OS write-behind caching).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozd
ed
for the entire duration Freenet was running, as were MySQL and MS SQL
Server instances I work on. I also tried disabling my antivirus/personal
firewall (Agnitum Outpost Security Suite), but it didn't result in a
noticeable improvement in performance.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PG
I was thinking more about allocation/invocation counts, available in
both profilers. Perhaps some method/query is being called unexpectedly
often, or a certain object is being persisted too often, etc. Also, it
could be that a certain method blocks too often and for too much time in
Windows, leading to
ofiler (I have academic licenses for both
7.5 and 8.0, IIRC) or VisualVM (which is now a part of the JDK
distributive) on my machine help? Any logging I can turn on to help?
BTW, I have logging set to ERROR for now, as with NORMAL level it logs
~2Mb per minute, adding noticeably to overall dis
5 Kb/s, with 1208+ anywhere from 10 to 50 Kb/s,
depending on how much disk thrashing is going on.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKAYwn1O5++4rTuI0RAosNAJ9zYaUKLu8MTM1dPoUzqyQ9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Additional useful info, if you don't mind parting with it:
> Network, friends and physical security levels.
All on NORMAL here.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using
CPU load when Freenet is running. Note
that firewall contributes to this number, as its driver runs in kernel
space, obviously.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKAdp51O5
inutes, or ~ 8 Kb/s
(which probably translates into ~10 to 20 writes per second, considering
internal buffering and OS write-behind caching).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozd
ed
for the entire duration Freenet was running, as were MySQL and MS SQL
Server instances I work on. I also tried disabling my antivirus/personal
firewall (Agnitum Outpost Security Suite), but it didn't result in a
noticeable improvement in performance.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PG
I was thinking more about allocation/invocation counts, available in
both profilers. Perhaps some method/query is being called unexpectedly
often, or a certain object is being persisted too often, etc. Also, it
could be that a certain method blocks too often and for too much time in
Windows, leading to
ofiler (I have academic licenses for both
7.5 and 8.0, IIRC) or VisualVM (which is now a part of the JDK
distributive) on my machine help? Any logging I can turn on to help?
BTW, I have logging set to ERROR for now, as with NORMAL level it logs
~2Mb per minute, adding noticeably to overall dis
5 Kb/s, with 1208+ anywhere from 10 to 50 Kb/s,
depending on how much disk thrashing is going on.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKAYwn1O5++4rTuI0RAosNAJ9zYaUKLu8MTM1dPoUzqyQ9
ual. I'm too lazy to check
what Freenet is holding, but my guess would be that most of them are
file handles for various files opened by both Freenet and JVM itself.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: U
ual. I'm too lazy to check
what Freenet is holding, but my guess would be that most of them are
file handles for various files opened by both Freenet and JVM itself.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: U
ry available, I
hadn't seen it allocate more than ~ 80 Mb.
Any thoughts on why this could be happening? I hadn't seen anyone
complain about the performance of 1208/09 yet, so it is probably
something with my machine :-(, but it beats me what it could be :-(.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
ry available, I
hadn't seen it allocate more than ~ 80 Mb.
Any thoughts on why this could be happening? I hadn't seen anyone
complain about the performance of 1208/09 yet, so it is probably
something with my machine :-(, but it beats me what it could be :-(.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
o only happen with Frost-inserted
contents (at least, as far as I was able to verify my download history).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJQpgQ1O5++4rTuI0RAkmHAJ4
o only happen with Frost-inserted
contents (at least, as far as I was able to verify my download history).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJQpgQ1O5++4rTuI0RAkmHAJ4
actors mean I haven't had much
> time to work on it lately ...
Well, it's not something to loose sleep over. If db4o branch would fix
the problem, then it seems to be a good idea to concentrate on that.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJQUDP1O5++4rTuI0RAo1XAJ4o4WNS8wqiVtXaJXhGpRSc9TVzNgCg4GDG
l3oYqSw7NqjAuLJFd+V60dM=
=XJyI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
actors mean I haven't had much
> time to work on it lately ...
Well, it's not something to loose sleep over. If db4o branch would fix
the problem, then it seems to be a good idea to concentrate on that.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
er restart).
Running 1192 on Java 1.6.0_06 64-bit, Windows XP x64.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJQFgE1O5++4rTuI0RAqWWAKCT/GC6MRbx3YAfViaesBZakhcCxACfQGIx
LeHCLRnEzih7G
er restart).
Running 1192 on Java 1.6.0_06 64-bit, Windows XP x64.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJQFgE1O5++4rTuI0RAqWWAKCT/GC6MRbx3YAfViaesBZakhcCxACfQGIx
LeHCLRnEzih7G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Argh. Are these simple downloads (CHK at .../filename), or parts of
freesites
>> (mutliple slashes, maybe USKs)??
All simple CHKs, inserted with Frost (judging by the redirects).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
cing.
Running on Windows XP x64 with Java 1.6.0_06, 64 bit.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJHfU31O5++4rTuI0RAhAFAKDFwm8VLevPNMI3v/+ArCgrIkAs0wCgp7kX
rcAT4OtPrWEnOiMuRG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> Argh. Are these simple downloads ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/filename), or parts of
freesites
>> (mutliple slashes, maybe USKs)??
All simple CHKs, inserted with Frost (judging by the redirects).
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN P
cing.
Running on Windows XP x64 with Java 1.6.0_06, 64 bit.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJHfU31O5++4rTuI0RAhAFAKDFwm8VLevPNMI3v/+ArCgrIkAs0wCgp7kX
rcAT4OtPrWEnOiMuRG
ative library?
On a related topic, Windows x86-64 native binary for Onion FEC isn't
present as well. Are there plans to include it in the foreseeable future?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.
ative library?
On a related topic, Windows x86-64 native binary for Onion FEC isn't
present as well. Are there plans to include it in the foreseeable future?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.
at it won't be started before I had the
chance to enter the volume password.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
Hierophant wrote:
| Do any of you know whether this has worked?
|
| I'm running Freenet 0.7 in Ubuntu 8.04 in VMware Server 1.0 in a
| TrueCrypt volume in Windows Server 2003, and it all w
at it won't be started before I had the
chance to enter the volume password.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
Hierophant wrote:
| Do any of you know whether this has worked?
|
| I'm running Freenet 0.7 in Ubuntu 8.04 in VMware Server 1.0 in a
| TrueCrypt volume in Windows Server 2003, and it all w
, from the log
files? Should I increase logging level to achieve this?
If not, perhaps I can try and see if I'll be able to understand how the
queue manager works, to add this functionality - where should I start
looking?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
, from the log
files? Should I increase logging level to achieve this?
If not, perhaps I can try and see if I'll be able to understand how the
queue manager works, to add this functionality - where should I start
looking?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
? Does it try local cache first? Could it be
that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHg/4HS81Mh9/iCDgRAjhJAKCMdNyfUT9
? Does it try local cache first? Could it be
that large files (with lots of blocks) choke small files?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHg/4HS81Mh9/iCDgRAjhJAKCMdNyfUT9
e system certain additional memory to
manage its internal structures - hence the difference.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDhgX+1RzgtNlvsKoRAicxAJ9eg6Lvs
e system has to be rebooted about once a week.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDhcb31RzgtNlvsKoRAr30AJ9J142lHKL1F0YR9f6CoYqi9RSkogCeMayW
Z8Rwh2+2pS74q65plZTFueY=
=fs41
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
e system certain additional memory to
manage its internal structures - hence the difference.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDhgX+1RzgtNlvsKoRAicxAJ9eg6Lvs
e system has to be rebooted about once a week.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDhcb31RzgtNlvsKoRAr30AJ9J142lHKL1F0YR9f6CoYqi9RSkogCeMayW
Z8Rwh2+2pS74q65
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone wrote:
> Victor Denisov schrieb:
>
> | Yes, you have to forward ports if you're behind NAT, regardless of the
> | DMZ. All that DMZ really does is that router doesn't perform any traffic
> | filtering for it by
that
connections on this certain port should be forwarded to that specific IP
address behind NAT. Also, make sure, if possible, that you really can
connect to Freenet node from the outside - just do a telnet to your
external IP:port from some outside account and see if TCP connection
will be esta
d from experience that sometimes Freenet project's site
is somewhat slow in responding, and it confuses the installer - maybe
there's some sort of too short a timeout somewhere in the download
code... So, if you're sure you can download files from Freenet website,
you can try to insta
1.4.0 had some known nio problems, so its not recommended as well.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 4:23 AM
Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)
>
&g
7;s a heavy stuff. Also, such drastic measures
aren't required, in most scenarios. Last, but not least - some of the things
you ask for _are_ implemented, others - aren't so easy, or considered not to
be important by the developers. That's an open source project - so, of
course, yo
affic limit (and
$10/Gb over the limit) or 128/64 unlimited, both for $99/month.
Regards,
Victor Denisov,
CEO, Jera Systems, Moscow, Russia
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
ava went quite far in the past couple of years, but I still
doubt it can fit in small amount of L2 cache available on modern low-end
CPUs.
Regards,
Victor Denisov,
CEO, Jera Systems, Moscow, Russia
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
d by your node grows constantly,
until you start getting Out Of Memory errors (or OOMs for short).
So far, attempts by developers to catch this
particular bug weren't successful. The only
advice I can give is to restart a node once in a while (every 6 to 12 hours
seems to be a good choice).
gives?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
mm. Not that my node is overloaded (it can handle ~2-4 qph easily,
at least, w/ NGR). And it has a decent advertise probability.
So, why no one talks to me, just a single lousy node? What should I do?
With best regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
Support mailing list
Hmmm. Strange. This was the first thing I've thought, so I've tried setting
it to 30 minutes (actual FEC encoding takes ~ 12 mins on this machine) - no
luck, the error still happens.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMA
ected as well. If any additional
information would help - I'll be happy to provide it.
Is this a bug with FIW/Freenet or am I doing something stupid?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
higher priority for java seem to be negligible.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
socket for each node it contacts
(or, God forbid, for each request it makes - but this isn't likely, judging
by the number of open sockets I see when loading TFE), I'd like to hear if
this is under consideration for modification in future versions.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
t ranges (or if they're defined at all). If they aren't defined,
maybe it would be possible to consider to make such an option?
With best regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
wer thousands range (3000-4000,
somewhere there), with connections denied on those ports by the firewall,
obviously. What exact port ranges I have to open for Freenet to work?
With best regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://h
have too many logfiles, I think :-))).
One thing I was thinking about is if the recompiling of the source on my
machine (with all local settings) would help. I'll have to try it during the
weekend.
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
support
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:56:38PM +0400, Victor Denisov wrote:
> For a couple of builds now I can't use freenet. The following message
fills
> freenet.log when I try to access the web interface (below is just a small
> example):
>
>
t 0.5 rc1, build 523 - it shows exact
same bug. Any suggestions?
Regards,
Victor Denisov.
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
rom list admins, just
configure your client to ignore messages from this list - it's not _that_
difficult, and the traffic on the list is quite small.
BTW, this list is open to non-subscribers, so no wonder everyone can send
messages to it. AFAIU, this was a deliberate (though questio
69 matches
Mail list logo
