[freenet-support] Solving "I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0%" : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-24 Thread freenetw...@web.de
1) CHK-keys are already long enough 2) why add something that tries to fix something broken (routing?) or contradicts the concept (caching of keys around the key location; unused content gets dropped) if a) unwanted content is supposed to be dropped from the network to make space for fresh stuff

Re: [freenet-support] Solving I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0% : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-24 Thread freenetw...@web.de
1) CHK-keys are already long enough 2) why add something that tries to fix something broken (routing?) or contradicts the concept (caching of keys around the key location; unused content gets dropped) if a) unwanted content is supposed to be dropped from the network to make space for fresh stuff

[freenet-support] Probably a bug: please report: 3 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets.

2008-11-16 Thread freenetw...@web.de
build #1179, svn revision 23640 Probably a bug: please report: 3 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug

[freenet-support] Probably a bug: please report: 3 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets.

2008-11-16 Thread freenetw...@web.de
build #1179, svn revision 23640 Probably a bug: please report: 3 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, >> "freenetwork at web.de" wrote: >> >> Hi list, >> >> after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my >> downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface >> freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Hi list, after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected" as error message. The downloads have been started and taken over from a previous build. Now

[freenet-support] Nearly no content left with correct compression?

2008-10-29 Thread freenetw...@web.de
1166 has already been released, so using trunk after 1166 got out essentially is "1166+minors" Maybe I am wrong here? Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 18:27, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> I have. With the results shown below... so I downgraded again to >>

[freenet-support] Nearly no content left with correct compression?

2008-10-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Great! However I thought it would be finished before release of 1166, but so I'll wait for 1167+ or fixed trunk. Matthew Toseland wrote: > It's a bug. It will be fixed before we release the code. > > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 09:37, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I just

[freenet-support] Nearly no content left with correct compression?

2008-10-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
I have. With the results shown below... so I downgraded again to 1165+minors. bqz69 wrote: > You must upgrade to 1166, which was released yesterday. > *** > > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10.37.19 freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I just updated to current head and have to find to

[freenet-support] Nearly no content left with correct compression?

2008-10-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Hi guys, I just updated to current head and have to find to my dislike that nearly nothing is fetchable anymore. Be it either the found data structure is "too old" and inaccessible: Error: Archive failure Freenet was unable to retrieve this file. This is a fatal error. It is unlikely that

[freenet-support] Official SVN repository - where?

2008-09-04 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Hi, The Freenet Project seems to be hosted on multiple repositories: - http://freenet.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/freenet (head is 22287, last checkin 12:30:37, 31.08.2008, UUID 3a10de70-7c39-0410-8089-25560844f2f1, obtained from http://freenetproject.org/download.html) -

[freenet-support] quick question

2008-06-08 Thread freenetw...@web.de
If these ten nodes are only interconnected with themselves they -of course- have no access to the larger network and therefore form a small private, albeit darknet, network. If one of the nodes is connected to the "global" darknet, then the ten nodes have access to the global darknet but

[freenet-support] NPE at freenet.clients.http.bookmark.BookmarkManager.(BookmarkManager.java:82)

2007-11-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
* svn build 16004 * clean install (only freenet[-ext].jar in directory) * called with java -jar [...] node.Node [...] Initializing SSK Datastore Opened main database for ssk-store- Opening access times database for ssk-store- Opened access times database for ssk-store- Opening block db index

[freenet-support] java.lang.NullPointerException with purest vanilla freenet

2007-07-05 Thread freenetw...@web.de
svn revision 13945 when running "java -Xmx512M -cp freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar;freenet-ext.jar freenet.node.Node" within a directory that only contains "freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar" and "freenet-ext.jar" leads to this: console log: [...] Initializing SSK Datacache (15344 keys) Opened main database

[freenet-support] MAIN LOOP TERMINATED!

2007-07-01 Thread freenetw...@web.de
svn revision 13858 console log: [...] Freenet 0.7 Build #1040 r at custom@ FNP port is on 0.0.0.0:FNPDarknetPort TMCI started on 127.0.0.1:2323 Loading persistent request 1 of 4... Loading persistent request 2 of 4... Loading persistent request 3 of 4... Loading persistent request 4 of 4...

[freenet-support] Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException

2007-06-30 Thread freenetw...@web.de
svn revision 13841 console log: [...] FNP port is on 0.0.0.0:xxx Error in WrapperListener.start callback. java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.node.IPDetectorPluginManager.tryMaybeRun(IPDetectorPluginManager.java:155) at

[freenet-support] 'problem loading page' - 'unable to connect'

2007-02-13 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Have you chosen as you node's port?! Don't do this as it's need for FProxy. Take a random number between 1024 and 65535 and try again >If I had to guess, it looks like you may be running as a limited user. > The install script is installing a service (which requires admin >privileges).

[freenet-support] looking for reference

2007-02-10 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Hi Tom, please visit #freenet-refs at irc.freenode.com Don't post refs on the mailing lists as they disturb >Hi, >I'm looking for references. Can anybody send me the reference? >My reference: >lastGoodVersion=Fred,0.7,1.0,1010

[freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888.

2007-01-16 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>> try both "localhost:" and "127.0.0.1:" as "localhost" is most of = >the case !=3D 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) >Why would localhost !=3D 127.0.0.1? for me "localhost" is "192.168.2.1", my inferface's IP and 127.0.0.1 is only "virtual loopback" without a "real"

[freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888.

2007-01-07 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>> what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text >> passage describing a a node identity, do you mean that or just a >> http://localhost:/XXX at YYY-link? >I added 13 peers where 2 are connected and the rest are disconnected, >one of them has Version 1007 >>

[freenet-support] Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at localhost:8888.

2007-01-06 Thread freenetw...@web.de
be more verbose try both "localhost:" and "127.0.0.1:" as "localhost" is most of the case != 127.0.0.1 (do you read me, Worst-developer? ;) which version of freenet so you use - 0.5 or 0.7? what exact build? what do you mean with "references"? references is a reserved word for a text

[freenet-support] Node doesn't start anymore... "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config"

2006-12-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>Doesn't happen here. Maybe an SVN/compiling glitch? You did compile it >yourself, correct? With sun java or GCJ? 1. "ant clean" 2. delete test folder contents as it depends on junit, regardless the proclamation of default target being independent of them now it still is (here) 3. "ant" 4.

[freenet-support] Node doesn't start anymore... "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config"

2006-12-22 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Bug still in build 11514 :( >As far as I know this is fixed. >On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:43:09AM +0100, freenetwork at web.de wrote: >> >> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh* >> >> build 11507 >> >> >>=20 >> >You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds

[freenet-support] Node doesn't start anymore... "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config"

2006-12-22 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh* >> build 11507 >> >You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds of alpha >software, right? If you aren't doing it to test the software, I >suggest you stick to the "stable" releases. If you are reporting a >bug,

[freenet-support] Node doesn't start anymore... "java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: config"

2006-12-21 Thread freenetw...@web.de
...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh* build 11507 Initializing SSK Datacache (15344 keys) Opening database using .\ssk-xxx.cache Opening block db index Keys in store: db 4422 file 4422 / max 15344 Deleted 0 of 0 temporary files (0 non-temp files in temp directory) in

[freenet-support] HELP!!!!!

2006-12-18 Thread freenetw...@web.de
basically it's working if http://127.0.0.1:/darknet/ shows some peers with a green "CONNECTED". for starters see here: http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetConnections (and the other wiki pages) >i just downloaded the freenet software not sure if its working correctly >, i read the "set

[freenet-support] ant build problems

2006-12-16 Thread freenetw...@web.de
hi guys, recenty i've got heavy problems with the ant dist build target. for some odd reason it now wants to compile the test units that a) won't compile here at all, so i had to delete the test directory! b) "dist" won't build because it depends on junit which isn't installed here so i had to

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1001

2006-11-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>> >Freenet 0.7 build 1001 is now available. Please upgrade. Tell me if the >> >auto-update doesn't work for you. 1000 and 1001 consist mostly of >> >bugfixes, mostly relating to recent problems with high bandwidth usage >> >(above the specified limit) and low payload (efficiency) percentage. If

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1001

2006-11-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>Freenet 0.7 build 1001 is now available. Please upgrade. Tell me if the >auto-update doesn't work for you. 1000 and 1001 consist mostly of >bugfixes, mostly relating to recent problems with high bandwidth usage >(above the specified limit) and low payload (efficiency) percentage. If >you are

[freenet-support] build 10982 NPE hangs node on startup

2006-11-18 Thread freenetw...@web.de
[...] Written freenet.ini.tmp and moved to freenet.ini Extra peer data reading and processing completed Node initialization completed. Exception in thread "freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler at 42cbda" java.lang.NullPointerException at

[freenet-support] build 10536 - ERROR + FEC: NPE causing ExceptionInInitializerError

2006-09-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
from console: [...] Node initialization completed. Written freenet.ini.tmp and moved to freenet.ini Failed to load native FEC: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at freenet.client.StandardOnionFECCodec.(StandardOnionFECCodec.java:137) at

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 *PLONK*

2006-08-29 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Don't feed the troll >Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet >failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha >with open-net. > > >___ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Freenet gets stuck on shutdown

2006-08-28 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Current svn-snapshot [--- node startup ---] Creating ARKFetchManager Creating PeerManager Read X peers from .\peers-X Initializing CHK Datastore (X keys) Opening block db index Keys in store: 1587 / 49101 (db 1587 file 1587) Initializing CHK Datacache (59790:12276 keys) Opening block db index

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-25 Thread freenetw...@web.de
0) be sure you have Java version 1.5 or 1.6 (1.4 will/should work too) - type "java -version" in a console and watch the output 1) download these two files into a separate directory you've created forehand: - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar -

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-24 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Choose: 1) 0.5: - the branch stable is in effect the branch unstable. both share the same code, eventhough the 'stable' is called 0.5 and the unstable "pre 0.6" or something like that - unstable (eventhough the branch is called 'stable'): there are still major problems with the

[freenet-support] Caught a FetchException

2006-08-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Current svn snapshot: Aug 23, 2006 17:08:08:818 (freenet.client.async.SplitFileFetcherSegment, FCP input handler for /127.0.0.1:2580, ERROR): Failing with FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null but already started decode FetchException:Cancelled:null:-1:null:false:null:null

[freenet-support] Logs

2006-08-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
try to avoid setting the log level to DEBUG or MINOR.. that's insane - no wonder your logs are that big :D then again i suppose "Maximum disk space used by old logs" should work nevetheless if i understand it's purpose correctly... --Original Message Text--- From: Stefan Gr?nberg Date: Wed,

[freenet-support] Logs

2006-08-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
try setting the log level from NORMAL to ERROR. also... why are your logs this big? o_O On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:09:09 +0200, Stefan Gr??nberg wrote: >is there any way to limit the log size so i dont keep getting 1 gig logs >all the time? > >ive set max 100k lines in ram, 10M in ram >and 50M

[freenet-support] Some NPEs on node shutdown

2006-08-21 Thread freenetw...@web.de
As on toad's request these go here: This appened on node (svn build 10227) shutdown. Exception in thread "freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler at 1be22a5" java.lang.NullPointerException at java.io.DeleteOnExitHook.add(DeleteOnExitHook.java:33) at

[freenet-support] 2 crashes during night

2006-08-21 Thread freenetw...@web.de
SUN current release 1.5.0_08 available at http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp SUN early access 1.6 beta 2 available at http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/ea.jsp I'm running: java version "1.6.0-beta2" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-beta2-b85) Java HotSpot(TM) Client

[freenet-support] 2 crashes during night

2006-08-21 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Which JVM? Which OS? freenet can do ***nothing*** about crashing and buggy Java Environments. Get the current release and check your libraries. >2 crashes during night >

[freenet-support] NPE while updating

2006-08-05 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>>1) but it's showing three times the "starting the update process" line, which >>looks strange >>2) but on the fproxy homepage the warning "A new stable version of Freenet is >>available" does not disappear anymore >>3) there's no feedback to the user that the node won't update because there's

[freenet-support] NPE while updating

2006-08-05 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>tested with build 924 > >now it doesn't throw an npe anymore: > >Found new update edition 925 >Starting the update process: found the update (925), now fetching it. >Starting the update process: found the update (925), now fetching it. >Starting the update process: found the update (925), now

[freenet-support] NPE while updating

2006-08-05 Thread freenetw...@web.de
tested with build 924 now it doesn't throw an npe anymore: Found new update edition 925 Starting the update process: found the update (925), now fetching it. Starting the update process: found the update (925), now fetching it. Starting the update process: found the update (925), now fetching

[freenet-support] NPE while updating

2006-08-03 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Found 921 Searching for revocation key Revocation counter: 0 Update in progress Exception : java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.node.updater.NodeUpdater.innerUpdate(NodeUpdater.java:219) at

[freenet-support] dedicated linux server

2006-06-06 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Try Freenet 0.7. It's much more ressource friendly than 0.5 is/was and is the current main project. Check out http://wiki.freenetproject.org for installation details and more info. HTH >OK, Freenet is making my windows box run way too hot. (3.0 AMD / 2G /XP Pro) >Normally runs 94-98F, when

[freenet-support] Build problem

2006-03-25 Thread freenetw...@web.de
javac automatically includes the main rt.jar java library, jikes does not. you'll have to add rt.jar to your classpath it you're using jikes >Hi, > >After got freenet-ext.jar (make getseeds) make jar return the error: > >make jar >jikes -bootclasspath lib/freenet-ext.jar -sourcepath src -d

[freenet-support] Re: Turning off or shutting down Freenet

2005-12-22 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>>> Right now this isn't directly possible via freenet.exe (the systray app) as >>> far >>> as I can tell. It does take command line args, but not a shutdown one. It >>> could >>Heh ignore that, I'm an idiot, obviously running freenet.exe -shutdown to call >>ExitFServe would spawn a new process

[freenet-support] Question.7

2005-09-23 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 05:48:37PM -0400, Juiceman wrote: >> Wasn't there an idea to have a separate encrypted user store with a >> key that is only in ram? When a person turns off their node or >> computer the user store is essentially unreadable and would be erased >> on next start-up?

[freenet-support] Re: "Could not find the Main class" error

2005-09-21 Thread freenetw...@web.de
>6. Enter "java -Xmx128M -cp freenet.jar freenet.node.Main" without the quotes. make that "java -Xmx128M -cp freenet.jar;freenet-ext.jar;%CLASSPATH% freenet.node.Main"