On Friday 25 Feb 2011 19:53:49 folkert wrote:
> >
> > We did think about an "is the lan trusted?" option some time ago. This
> > would both announce and open FCP and Fproxy. Unfortunately defining "the
> > lan" is hard, when big untrusted NATed networks (e.g. ISPs in russia etc)
> > often use p
> > > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> > > which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and
> > > speed up distribution of data.
>
> There is a plugin:
> MDNSDiscovery.
> This uses it to
On Saturday 19 Feb 2011 19:24:30 Edzard Pasma wrote:
>
> Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven:
>
> >>> Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many
> >>> nodes
> >>> in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict
> >>> access to
> >>>
On Friday 18 Feb 2011 19:40:59 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote:
> > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> > which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect a
On Friday 18 Feb 2011 19:40:59 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote:
> > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> > which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect a
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:24:30 +0100, Edzard Pasma wrote:
>
> Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven:
>
> >>> Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many
> >>> nodes
> >>> in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict
> >>> access to
> >
Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven:
Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many
nodes
in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict
access to
what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start
talking
about installin
> > Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many nodes
> > in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict access to
> > what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start talking
> > about installing filters.
>
> This is why you /don't/ want any kind of b
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:35:00 +0100, folkert wrote:
> Well I was thinking maybe in the future we're all using mesh
> networking over wifi (or whatever wireless protocol we then have).
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_networking
Freenet-Darknet should work wonderfully over such a network :). (Wel
> Normal people (your neighbour so to say) start to know these things like
> FreeNet/Tor. This week there was an item on national television in the
> Netherlands about how Tor helps oppressed people to get their
> opinions/news items/etc. out!
Oh it was also a rather positive news item.
http://nos
> > True, but it can be used to find a way to other nodes further down the
> > path. This way one doesn't need to connect to the central seednodes to
> > find ways to reach the global network/the rest of the freenet network.
>
> Ah, for initial connection to Freenet that might be useful, although
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:08:19 +0100, folkert wrote:
> > > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan
> > > (s) to which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can
> > > interconnect and speed up distribution of data.
> >
>
> > What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> > (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> > which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and
> > speed up distribution of data.
>
> Data distribution on Freenet doesn't work like that. Data seg
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:01:10 +0100, folkert wrote:
> What about that the freenet daemon periodically
> (configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
> which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and
> speed up distribution of data.
Data distribution on F
Hi,
what he maybe means is called Local Peer Discovery [1] and many
peer-to-peer software (like Azureus, Transmission) have this to discover
peers running on the local network. This makes sure that the peers are
not connecting over the public IP/interface (ppp0) but instead on the
private IP/inter
What about that the freenet daemon periodically
(configurable/disable-ble of course) announces itself on the lan(s) to
which it is connected? That way freenet-nodes can interconnect and speed
up distribution of data. Maybe even via
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Location_Protocol so that one
Idea/algorithm : Fair use media file transformer
A potential way to transform media files for legal
sharing via fair use.
Consider a desired media file (for example a song),
as an array A[1..N] of numbers.
Consider a New work B [1..k*N] of numbers.
Initialize B to a completely new (or random
I tryed windinstaller but it gave me a warning that with explorer its
dangerous so I uninstall.
THank You
- Original Message -
From: "Mathew Ryden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-support]
- Original Message -
From: "Vitenka - Zen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Damn - forgot my other suggestion.
>
> Why not register fcp:// or similar, so that we can give links into freeweb
from external websites
> without having to rely upon guessing the client port the user has chosen?
How would
Damn - forgot my other suggestion.
Why not register fcp:// or similar, so that we can give links into freeweb from
external websites
without having to rely upon guessing the client port the user has chosen?
Forgive me if that's alreasy been done somewhere.
>> Also a text tip "freenet is loading, please wait..." would prevent
>> ultra-newbies to immediately try and click on it.
>
>These are good suggestions. But the problem is that the freenet.log
>never actually says WHEN the node is ready. It says "Starting
>interfaces" but even then the interfac
>> but the tray utility appears almost instantly, it would be neat not to
>> display the red rabbit while the node is loading but the red rabbit
>> with the grean arrow on it.
>>
>> Also a text tip "freenet is loading, please wait..." would prevent
>> ultra-newbies to immediately try and click on
Zlatin Balevsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> since Fred still takes up to 20 or 30 seconds to load on slower machine,
You have some really WEIRD notions of what constitutes a "slower
machine". If your node only takes 20 seconds to start up, you've
got a pretty fast machine, or a very small data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
since Fred still takes up to 20 or 30 seconds to load on slower machine,
but the tray utility appears almost instantly, it would be neat not to
display the red rabbit while the node is loading but the red rabbit with
the grean arrow on it.
Also a
24 matches
Mail list logo
