On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:24:30 +0100, Edzard Pasma wrote: > > Op 19-feb-2011, om 18:21 heeft folkert het volgende geschreven: > > >>> Ok, that was not your point :-) Ok currently maybe not too many > >>> nodes > >>> in the net but maybe this changes when governments restrict > >>> access to > >>> what you can browse. Here in Europe governments already start > >>> talking > >>> about installing filters. > >> > >> This is why you /don't/ want any kind of broadcasting, or any other > >> kind of leak of identifiable traffic. Just encrypted > >> non-identifiable "noise". > > > > Then we definately need a solution around the seed nodes. I mean > > traffic > > going to them is a big fat warning that someone is doing freenet :-) > > > > > > Folkert van Heusden > > > The seednodes might then once be blocked by authorities in their > struggle against the evil. The solution seems to have as many > potential seednodes as their are users. Thus one automatically > becomes one after a while. The other way around, any foreigner is > then a potential seednode. Adddresses can dynamically be collected > to be used at a next start.
Again, this is why darknet mode was implemented. There are no seednodes in darknet, only friends you know and trust, and that cannot be identified. (I believe Freenet 0.7 was intended to be a darknet, and opennet (i.e. how Freenet 0.5 operates) was only later added to make things easier for newbies.) _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
