Seems that if you put a
wireless card in the lan
there is no option to make it a hostap only bss and ibss. Also other features
that are available in opt wireless interfaces are
missing.
Just a not
of thanks to the pfsense team.
We deployed a test of a three
way bridge the other day.
Wan
|
|
LAN
OPT1
All bridged to WAN. Made allow
all rules and then a few rules to minimise access to web interface and ssh
All is roses 20 clients running on a test with
two ATH
Bastian Schern, you probably already know this, but your email is busted.
--Bill
On 8/22/05, Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the Postfix program at host server19.greatnet.de.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more
There was a nasty bug in .79 that partially reverted the config file
version. This left a config file that had newer syntax and an older
version number. Upgrading past .79 w/out taking some corrective
measure will break your system. Again, if you installed or upgraded
to .79 and plan on using
Hi,
is it possible to upgrade from a CF-Card Version of m0n0wall to pfSense?
pfSense seems to be more reasonable to me, due to need of two PPPoE
Connections...
Regards,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi Holger,
I could not have multiwan work here. Tryed with OPT1 and OPT2 for wan, can
you have some example of configuration?
Thanks
Moacyr
- Original Message -
From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:15 AM
Currently you can only specify an IP address for entries. Some
clients (such as my belkin network KVM) don't pass a client
name. Others (such as my Series 2 TiVo) pass a less than useful one
(in this case, the serial number.) Is there some reason this field
couldn't take a name? Maybe
I did this with 0.74 and 0.76 but no sucess.
I have one LAN and three WAN.
put gateway in the OPT1 and OPT2 interfaces
created nat outbound for lan via WAN OPT1 and OPT2
created rules for http for each interface
by now reading again the post of multi-wan in the blogspot I have doubt
about the
Thanks for the input but one more ?When I kick off the installer from the console menu in the way you specify ... it looks like it is installing FreeBSD/DragonflyBSD and not pfSense, and also another point is that there is no provisioning for making a swap partition/slice as there had been
I'll check it out. I really need to rip out the interfaces crap and
redo it completely. But no time and a feature freeze. GRR.
On 8/23/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems that if you put a wireless card in the lan there is no option to make
it a hostap only bss and ibss.
On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing.
Following ports work without authentication:
MySQL, smtp, ping, ssh, name. Others I didn´t check.
m0n0wall (1.2b9) doesn´t show this behaviour.
Is this a bug or
On 8/23/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll check it out. I really need to rip out the interfaces crap and
redo it completely. But no time and a feature freeze. GRR.
Yeah, I think this work is slated for 2.x / next hackathon or
something. The right way to do this requires a
On 8/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a test, I tried to create a rule to send all VNC traffic over the
OPT1 WAN interface, but it always used the default WAN interface.
I must be missing something. How can this be done when the second WAN
interface has a static
Crud, that explains a lot...
I at least think that I have the outbound NAT entries setup for WAN and OPT1:
nat on xl2 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any - (xl2)
nat on xl1 from 192.168.1.0/24 to any - (xl1)
I seem to be stuck trying to create an outbound rule. Everything I
try says pass in in the
If so, you need to do an update for a file I just commited.
From the shell type:
update_file.sh /etc/inc/services.inc
Now reboot each firewall.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
That config is a bit weired but doable with some changes.
I would suggest making LAN1 and LAN2 seperate interfaces (if they are not
already, from the line to the switch it seems to be one and virtual ips won't
work for different subnets on the same nic) and different networks: Connect
LAN1 to
Please try 0.79.4 and report back if you have had problems with
previous LiveCD's.
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Please try 0.79.4 and report back if you have had problems with
previous LiveCD's.
I have just done update (0.79.2 0.79.4), and the first thing I noticed
is that you lose all states in the table after the update reboot (ie:
all connections broken - http, IPSec,
18 matches
Mail list logo
