Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Mehma Sarja
On 10/14/10 1:38 PM, RB wrote: On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22, Mehma Sarja wrote: [snip] I researched an earlier post of "SUPERMICRO MBD-X7SPE-H-O Mini ITX Intel [snip] I'm a big fan of the Jetway barebones cases, [snip] The Atom Jetway, 512M of memory, a SATA/CF adapter and a 4GB CF c

Re: [pfSense Support] Squid Active Directory Authentication.

2010-10-14 Thread Dominic
Hi, I managed to resolve this, upgraded Squid to the Squid3 package and then upgraded the openldap-client package (openldap-client-2.4.11). The openldap update was the primary fix but not keen to mess with it now and revert back on Squid version... Hope this helps someone else, if not at le

RE: [pfSense Support] Teak 3035S as a pfSense Unit ?

2010-10-14 Thread Daniel Davis
Forgot to mention, they can be purchased from Eltech Solutions (www.eltech.co.uk). Regards, Daniel Davis -Original Message- From: Daniel Davis [mailto:daniel.da...@lasseters.com.au] Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 9:20 AM To: 'support@pfsense.com' Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Teak 3035

RE: [pfSense Support] Teak 3035S as a pfSense Unit ?

2010-10-14 Thread Daniel Davis
The Arbor units look nice (http://www.arboraust.com/network-and-box-pcs/network-server) but the NIC interfaces are in the back which is a bit of pain. Regards, Daniel Davis -Original Message- From: Gavin Spurgeon [mailto:gspurg...@dageek.co.uk] Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 8:02 AM To:

[pfSense Support] ADSL2+ PCI Card (from LinITX.com) in a pfSense Box ?

2010-10-14 Thread Gavin Spurgeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List (Again) Just stumbled upon this cool little PCI card over @ LinITX.com http://linitx.com/viewproduct.php?prodid=12181 and wondered if anyone here had used this (or similar) car in a pfSense Unit ? I have a cheap ADSL2+ Router here @ home th

[pfSense Support] Teak 3035S as a pfSense Unit ?

2010-10-14 Thread Gavin Spurgeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I have a new project coming on-line in the next week or so that will require some new pfSense Hardware going into some DCs here in London. I have used all sorts of units in the past as pfSense Hardware, but this job wants the hardware to "Lo

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:41:10PM -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote: > So the current comparison is between a fanless enclosure and a > supermicro atom server. Let's leave off the drive and memory for now. You will need some minimal air flow, especially in a rack. I think the Supermicros are a bit on

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Mehma Sarja
So the current comparison is between a fanless enclosure and a supermicro atom server. Let's leave off the drive and memory for now. I'll probably spring for a SSD as suggested. Do I need 4 GB memory or 2... I don't know as yet. * A minibox.com fanless enclosure with external 80 watt ps runs

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread RB
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22, Mehma Sarja wrote: > I researched an earlier post of "SUPERMICRO MBD-X7SPE-H-O Mini ITX Intel > Atom" board and it looks like a good option. Albeit a bit expensive. It can > handle 4 GB RAM. So the question is what kinds of enclosures are good for > this form-factor

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:51:41PM -0400, Andrew Cotter wrote: > I was thinking of picking up a couple of these and one thing I have > stumbled across is that one of the newer supermicro atom boards is too > short to be able to use the slot for an extra card in their case. Yes, this has bitten me,

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:22:55AM -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote: > I've been following the hardware threads comparing embedded versus more > horsepower systems and came to the conclusion that I'd stick with my > embedded Alix board because it is stable and low-power. Recently, > however, I am see

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:22:55AM -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote: > I've been following the hardware threads comparing embedded versus more > horsepower systems and came to the conclusion that I'd stick with my > embedded Alix board because it is stable and low-power. Recently, > however, I am see

[pfSense Support] Squid Active Directory Authentication.

2010-10-14 Thread Dominic
Hi, I am having trouble getting Squid in pfSense 1.2.3 to authenticate against a 2003 Active Directory. Can anyone perhaps share some light on their config for this? I either get the authentication popup returning (authentication failure?) or a browser window saying the page is currently unavail

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Andrew Cotter
I was thinking of picking up a couple of these and one thing I have stumbled across is that one of the newer supermicro atom boards is too short to be able to use the slot for an extra card in their case. Can anyone confirm this? Andrew On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Conrad Brown wrote: > If

Re: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Jeppe Øland
> I researched an earlier post of "SUPERMICRO MBD-X7SPE-H-O Mini ITX Intel > Atom" board and it looks like a good option. Albeit a bit expensive. It can > handle 4 GB RAM. So the question is what kinds of enclosures are good for > this form-factor? I'll probably go with a laptop drive. The enclosur

RE: [pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Conrad Brown
If you are not set on that particular board you can try http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/#Atom. The 5015A-EHF or the 5015A-PHF in particular. I personally have the 5015A-H and it does the job without any problems. -Original Message- From: Mehma Sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmai

[pfSense Support] Enclosure recommendations for a Mini ITX Motherboard

2010-10-14 Thread Mehma Sarja
I've been following the hardware threads comparing embedded versus more horsepower systems and came to the conclusion that I'd stick with my embedded Alix board because it is stable and low-power. Recently, however, I am seeing botnet attempts, reported via OpenDNS, against my home network. So,

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin

2010-10-14 Thread Seth Mos
Op 13-10-2010 23:55, James Bensley schreef: Thank you too all for your input. I think running two VMs on top of the host OS (although it would be nice) is too much overhead for my liking given the spec of the box. I like the sound of jailctl, I will give this a go and report back my findings ;)

Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 and SpamAssassin

2010-10-14 Thread Seth Mos
Hi, Yeah if you can run VMware ESXi on the box and then run whatever VMs you need, that's a good solution. Or you can look at the jailctl package and run a full jail for spamassassin and whatever else you want to throw on it. This is in production at one site atleast, a all in one wonder with