in clear, so that they could
record or modify it. A competent real attacker would use a domain name
that, at first glance, looked like it was a Microsoft one.
Should I accept the cert? I'm using Pidgin 2.9.0 in Windows.
No.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
you can hope for is to be pointed to the existing
instructions. It is very unlikely that anyone will write detailed
instructions for one person for free.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here
it, but
then it also did it while I was available. I tried restarting Pidgin. I
want it to never email me...
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice
.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support
' locale setting mechanism, so to work
well, it has to try and get things right without help from the user.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice
Microsoft Windows). That might give some clue as to what is
going wrong. Please note this is a public archived, mailing list.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
at your support
mailing list, not this one (it is difficult to support modified versions).
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address
method is XMPP. Apologies if mistranslated your question.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
Unicode.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support
would assume
that this level of input method processing is handled entirely by GTK+,
and you should probably start looking into its bug reports.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world
Catherine Day wrote:
they are on-line. I only have a few buddies and I'm not with AOL nor
are any of them. I sometimes show as on-line when I am, but also
Who are you with? Who are they with? (The answer must be compatible.)
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters
wrote:
Tencent QQ is not normal landing, tips available, is to connect the
state for 30 minutes ... ...
QQ is no longer officially supported (there are no Pidgin developers who
use QQ and the QQ protocol has had undocumented changes).
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business
for a very small
number of named, closed source, ones, and no longer make information
about protocol changes available to open source authors. That means
that all changes have to be reverse engineered from what goes over the wire.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters
recently changed their protocol, but don't publish it. At the
same time, I'm not sure that any Pidgin developer currently has access
to QQ to reverse engineer the changes and work round them.
Note this is an English language, public, mailing list.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal
typing this under
Linux, but if I remember correctly, system tray applications don't show
up in the application list, but are still running. You probably have to
terminate it from a right click on the system tray icon.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
satar asaads wrote:
Nothing at all, with a subject that translates, from Arabic, as download.
This is an English language public mailing list for peer support. You
are most
likely to have success with detailed explanations of the problem, and
supporting
evidence, in English.
--
David
colinita solomons wrote:
HOW DO I GET PIGIN TO WORK ON MY LAPTOP
Ask MXit support,, but don't SHOUT! They promised to answer here but
haven't done so for a very long time.
Note that Pidgin 2.6.3 is obsolete, although the MXit plugin may well be
that old.
--
David Woolley
Emails
.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support@pidgin.im
and NAT is being done by the router.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I have installed pidgin-awayonlock on Ubuntu Linux 11.04 (Natty).
away-on-lock is a third party plugin, so not supported here. It's web
site is http://costela.net/projects/awayonlock/
Why did you address this directly to Etan?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal
operator. Some may
even profile your messages to target advertising.
If you want plausible deniability one way of achieving that is using
Off The Record (OTR). Have a look at http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr for
more information.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
and
cause some users of Pidgin problems.)
This is not a case of bug fixes, where you can avoid the situation that
manifests the bug, rather than updating. It is a case of having to
track and un-published, but moving specification.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters
Jose Matarazzo wrote:
Do you know why this happend to some people and to others don't ? Thanks!
At least at one stage, the problem was that this was not happening to
the developers, so answering that question is probably the key to
solving the problem.
--
David Woolley
Emails
of Pidgin, are the most likely. The debug log may give more clues;
obscure sensitive data before posting it to this, public, mailing list.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
Sam Ch wrote:
*Gadu-Gadu library (libgadu):* Internal
I assume this is the service you are trying to use. I seem to remember
that there is currently no developer supporting this protocol. Could
someone confirm or deny that?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters
mr.i.is...@gmail.com wrote:
umm, not sure what that means, but I am using the MSN protocol that came
with pidgin 2.7.11 (or how would I find out if I am?)
You didn't provide that important bit of information, so I was trying to
guess from the information that was provided.
--
David Woolley
, the caller
pays the excess costs. That means that anyone gatewaying between IM and
SMS has to have some means of recovering the costs.
believe there are some XMPP services which bridge to text messaging but
you can search Google for them as well as I can at this point.
--
David Woolley
of
this screen is to use Alt-PrintScrn, paste into paint brush, and save in
PNG format.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address
, there has been no sign of them for many months.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
Jan Breet wrote:
I received this error when I trying to connect to Mxit. I am an
registered user. Please help?
The MXit support people stopped responding here very soon after their
plugin got official status. You need to contact them directly.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal
the official client for that service works
- anything that might limit network connectivity (most businesses and
some ISPs impose restrictions)
In many cases, the contents of the debug window (in which you should
minimally obscure sensitive information) is helpful.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal
for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This email
It has been sent to everyone in the world (and maybe off it too) who
wants to read it! This is a public mailing list.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855
will want to use the corresponding instant messaging services.
handcuff is a particular bad translation. I can't guess the correct word.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
it keeps coming back.
I imagine it is being forced in by the the Microsoft service. It's not
going to be anything imposed by Pidgin.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
version of Pidgin.
The debug log may well help. Remember this is a public mailing list, so
you need to remove sensitive data. Please post as plain text. Having to
unwrap an image in a Microsoft proprietary format means less people are
going to bother to look.
--
David Woolley
Emails
Daniel Atallah wrote:
FWIW, there is a third party plugin that implements facebook support
in another manner that you can search for.
However, recently, quite a few people have sent misdirected reports here
saying it no longer works.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters
?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support@pidgin.im
, so support is only possible by using the Skype API, which can't
be done from the core code because it would violate the terms of the GPL.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
Kumar Jadhav wrote:
RE: Pidgin installation over LAN.
Duplicate of thread posted under that, slightly better, but still
misleading, subject.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here
, you can also use XMPP to access facebook.
Details of the settings are available from the facebook web site.
A much better subject would have been:
Facebook: You are not permitted to do it
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says
company is very much
interested to carry on business with your site.I can further explain the
details. Are you interested?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
. However, in practice,
they only responded for a few weeks, responded slowly, and generally
just responded with their getting started boiler plate text.
They haven't responded here for several months.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855
Sorry, I meant to copy this to the list and set replies there.
David Woolley wrote:
Brett Carrie wrote:
I’ve had no reply to this email as to my problem with Pidgin, is there
somewhere else I should be contacting??
This isn't a place that you contact, this is a mailing list of Pidgin
.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support@pidgin.im
if you use Pidgin 2.7.11?
What service are you trying to access?
What is in the debug log (minimally obfuscate sensitive data as this is
a public, archived, mailing list).
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address
explains BOS
servers (Basic Online Services). This seems to deal with coordinating
your session after you have logged in, routing requests to more
appropriate servers.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address
is not maintained by the Pidgin developers. Either seek
support from its developers, or use XMPP to access Facebook, instead.
See http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=371950911048id=210368314792
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says
the procedure in the above URL.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing
as
possible) and sensitive information. (For that reason, I wouldn't
provide pcap files unless and until a developer asks for them as private
email.)
Note, it is possible that there is an open bug report that I failed to find.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses
though.
That's because the Skype protocol is a trade secret and the only way of
using Skype is by using the Skype API.
Incidentally, I'm not sure how the plugin gets round the Pidgin
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says
in even looking further, but
platform and network also matter.
Can you say what it can be?
Using a non-current version?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer
have been
removed, as they did cause confusion, in which case you will need to
specify XMPP specifically.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe? Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
/ticket/13298
If there were a solution, I would expect it to be in the recent fixes
list on the first support web page.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
party plugin.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
by
catching them by ReceivedImMsg and SentImMsg but I need load old history
too.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may
Pidgin code.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support
, and is not supported here. Seek support from
its developers (try http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-facebookchat/), or
use XMPP.
The obvious answer to your question is to not do the unspecified thing
that was not permitted.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe? Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
where it
wasn't supported, probably XMPP, which I think is used for Google, but
it didn't have a well crafted subject, so I can't find it easily.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing
tracey brown wrote:
I'm unable to open my pidgin account. I've recently received a new
laptop and I'm not to sure if my account setting is correct.
Please contact Oracle IT support. You do not have a Pidgin account, but
rather an account on their (XMPP?) server.
--
David Woolley
Emails
development or IT management skills.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
sorts of XMPP accounts, etc.
We certainly didn't send you any account information.
Also note that this is a public mailing list, which is archived in many
places. You have just made your password public knowledge.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may
starts contributing
code updates.
In particular, the QQ protocol doesn't seem to be published, so a QQ
user will need to reverse engineer the changes.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here
Brian Morrison wrote:
Perhaps this is one of the recent MSN issues he is referring to.
I assume the file transfers don't work one is the other one.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here
Nick Leskiw wrote:
I'm trying to get fancy with blist xml. I'm using Sametime in a corp
No Pidgin developer currently has access to a Sametime server. At least
that was the case as of a few weeks ago.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want
reports of the second problem, but I've not heard
of a developer being able to reproduce it.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address
David Woolley wrote:
The first message doesn't appear to exist in Pidgin 2.7.10 - it may have
come directly from the service, or may have been mis-copied. The second
My mistake. It was split across lines in the source. It is also only
associated with MSN.
--
David Woolley
Emails
hjgjkghjghj jhgjkghjghjg wrote:
Do you have support in French?
Je n'ai jamais vu une personne francaise repondre en francais ici.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
of an FAQ, even if not an official one.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
can send me
files I can send no one files.
For Yahoo and MSN, are you using their respective services? If not
which of the services are you using?
If this were just MSN, http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/12990 might
have applied, but as it is general, I suspect a firewall
--
David Woolley
differs from the original.*
**
Pidgin WAS running, and the AIM server returned error code 1.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice
David Woolley wrote:
Could you please supply the exact text of the error message in its
original language. That will make it easy to find the correct
translation into English or any other supported language. agreed is
probably the wrong word.
He replied off list. The message he
I fired up
Wireshark here at home and was able to verify that the client is not
sending typing notifications. I installed a fresh copy of Pidgin and
tried again but still nothing is being picked up by a packet capture.
Which version of Pidgin? Which protocol(s)?
--
David Woolley
Emails
this is a public archived mailing list, is it possible to
give an example of an actual failing address?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive
changed the protocol so as to break older
version much more recently than that.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may
Ethan Blanton wrote:
David Woolley spake unto us the following wisdom:
Fábio Rodrigues wrote:
Hello, Pidgin is not adding Hotmail users. Is there an update to
fix this error?
Depends on what version of Pidgin you are running! There is no
known problem on 2.7.9.
Actually, it's been
advertising image; it greatly bloats your message.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
of this nature, but no-one ever
provides the details needed to work out how the developers can reproduce
the problem.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good
?
IMAP is not an instant messaging protocol.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
, and that is supported
here.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
have restricted internet access, and therefore require proxies, etc.
configuring. Connection timeout does tend to suggest a firewall, which
is dropping, rather than rejecting, so preventing a prompt detection of
a problem.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
seem to work initially but when they reach anywhere between
98%-100% (inclusive) all transfers fail, so basically it doesnt work either.
That sounds strange. Again debug logs. Which direction?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says
header look natural. as in a printed
memo, at least in the original, US, context.)
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may
David Woolley wrote:
believe that Firefox is still correct in interpreting it as a bare
I meant, of course, Thunderbird!
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
David Woolley wrote:
Also please submit a bug report on your email program. It has placed a
,, outside of quotation marks, in the human readable part of the name,
in the From: header. Although this is slightly obscured by the coding
Please ignore this. Having checked RFC 2047, it looks
for their server
products and it may be at added cost.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work
Rene ' wrote:
hi where's the auto update feature on pidgin plz ?
No, which I think is a good thing.
I believe, if you enable the Release Notification plugin, you will be
told of updated versions becoming available.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
.
There are also good security reasons. If the distribution machine for a
popular auto-updated package gets compromised, very large numbers of
machines could get compromised very quickly.
anyway can you direct me to that plugin you mentioned plz ?
I have. It is included, but disabled.
--
David
on.
Incidentally, another problem with auto-updates is many people actually
end up relying on bugs, or at least on features that were never
officially supported.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here
No it is not. Nothing posted to this public mailing list can ever be
confidential. Crying confidential when it isn't may lead people to
believe you didn't mean it when you did, but there was some doubt in the
recipient's mind.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want
matthew hutchinson wrote:
hey can u please give me there email address? Thanks
They used to post from: mxitsupp...@mxit.com
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam
talk3.l.google.com.
_xmpp-client._tcp.gmail.com. 86400 IN SRV 20 0 5222
talk2.l.google.com.
These DNS lookups seem to be fallbacks for the initial attempt, with the
network unreachable error, so fixing that may be enough.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
help
Although the MXit people promised to support their plugin via this list,
there has been little sign of that happening. You may have more luck
approaching them directly.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should
_Error_ : Connection error from Notification server:Connection
timed out.
My immediate reaction would be to assume a firewall issue, so can you
please describe how you are connected to the internet.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855
access
is being blocked.
If they are neutral, see if you can get some information on the firewall
policies.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice
source developers in China itself, as it is likely to require someone
who uses QQ to reverse engineer the changes in the protocol and have the
motivation to update the Pidgin code and make it public.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says
to?
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Support
501 - 600 of 821 matches
Mail list logo
