Re: DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-11 Thread JeffM
JeffM wrote: In this hierarchy, the test group is mozilla.test. FMurtz wrote: if there was a problem with this specific group, would exactly the same problem occur with mozilla.test? If the *server* is offline, that will be revealed. If you can get to the server, there is a high probability

Re: DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-11 Thread Chris Ilias
On 10-09-11 1:05 AM, FMurtz wrote: if there was a problem with this specific group,would exactly the same problem occur with mozilla.test? In almost all cases, yes. The only way to find out is to post there first. -- Chris Ilias http://ilias.ca List-owner: support-firefox,

Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds

2010-09-11 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of what we need ...

Re: DO NOT MAKE *TEST* POSTS IN THIS GROUP

2010-09-11 Thread Jay Garcia
On 11.09.2010 00:05, FMurtz wrote: --- Original Message --- JeffM wrote: FMurtz wrote: gjvjhv Subject line changed from test. DO NOT made test posts to any group which does not have *test* in its name. In this hierarchy, the test group is mozilla.test. If you want a second opinion on

Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds

2010-09-11 Thread Rick Merrill
Daniel wrote: Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of

Re: Google Instant

2010-09-11 Thread David Wilkinson
Larry wrote: Worked for me yesterday and just now. Vista / SM207 Larry: Thanks. OK, I got it to work on FireFox by clearing the cookies for google.com (at least I think that's what did it), but I really do not want to clear my SeaMonkey cookies. Did you have to clear cookies to make it

Re: Google Instant

2010-09-11 Thread Ed Mullen
David Wilkinson wrote: Larry wrote: Worked for me yesterday and just now. Vista / SM207 Larry: Thanks. OK, I got it to work on FireFox by clearing the cookies for google.com (at least I think that's what did it), but I really do not want to clear my SeaMonkey cookies. Did you have to clear

Re: files 1117 vs. 1119

2010-09-11 Thread Stéphane Grégoire
Hi, Paul a tapoté, le 09/09/2010 05:58: Next I will install 1119 on the new machine and copy all the files from here to there. Copy files and then install Seamonkey is maybe better. -- Stéphane http://pasdenom.info ___ support-seamonkey mailing

Re: Google and Seamonkey

2010-09-11 Thread Ray_Net
Ed Mullen wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: S. Beaulieu wrote: Ray_Net a écrit : Last week, i typed the search string into the input zone then click on the Google Search button. From now ... i never need to touch this button who dissapeared as soon i type. The search is done immediately

Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread Beverly Howard
In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a map comes up in satellite view, seamonkey essentially locks up This impacts not only

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread d...@kd4e.com
Beverly Howard wrote: In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a map comes up in satellite view, seamonkey essentially locks up This

Re: updating from SM 1.18 to the latest version

2010-09-11 Thread Gloria
On Sep 9, 2:28 am, Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote: Gloria wrote: On Sep 7, 9:15 pm, Gloriagmt...@shaw.ca  wrote: On Sep 7, 8:06 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com  wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: cqbrodie wrote: Hello: If I update to the latest

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread Ed Mullen
Beverly Howard wrote: In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a map comes up in satellite view, seamonkey essentially locks up This

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread d...@kd4e.com
Beverly Howard Do any of these google-alternative reources work? http://www.bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/ Their FAQ says they currently only support Internet Explorer 6.0 or above, Mozilla Firefox 3.5.1 or above, Netscape 6.0 or above on Windows platform. http://www.bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/faq.html

Re: Google Instant

2010-09-11 Thread David Wilkinson
Ed Mullen wrote: Go to Search Settings and set your preference there. It should save that in a cookie along with your other prefs. If Google, for some reason, thinks that your browser is not instant-capable, it will not show you that option. -- David Wilkinson

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread Beverly Howard
I think it's there, but I can't see it (I see one unread message)... so, reposting; Seamonkey locks up when google maps satellite view is selected The maximum problems are observed when google maps is showing a detail area 4-5 miles across or less... for example, the problem is not there

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread David E. Ross
On 9/11/10 9:08 AM, Beverly Howard wrote: In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a map comes up in satellite view, seamonkey

Re: files 1117 vs. 1119

2010-09-11 Thread denewton
Stéphane Grégoire a écrit : Hi, Paul a tapoté, le 09/09/2010 05:58: Next I will install 1119 on the new machine and copy all the files from here to there. Copy files and then install Seamonkey is maybe better. Hello, it is dangerous, whyle the place in the new PC isn't not quite the same.

Re: files 1117 vs. 1119

2010-09-11 Thread Rubens
denewton wrote, on 11/9/2010 15:57: Stéphane Grégoire a écrit : Hi, Paul a tapoté, le 09/09/2010 05:58: Next I will install 1119 on the new machine and copy all the files from here to there. Copy files and then install Seamonkey is maybe better. Hello, it is dangerous, whyle the place in

Re: updating from SM 1.18 to the latest version

2010-09-11 Thread Ray_Net
Gloria wrote: On Sep 9, 2:28 am, Ray_Nettbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote: Gloria wrote: On Sep 7, 9:15 pm, Gloriagmt...@shaw.cawrote: On Sep 7, 8:06 pm, Paul B. Gallagher pau...@pbgdashtranslations.comwrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: cqbrodie wrote: Hello: If I update to the

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread stango
Beverly Howard wrote: In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a map comes up in satellite view, seamonkey essentially locks up

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Beverly Howard wrote: I think it's there, but I can't see it (I see one unread message)... so, reposting; Seamonkey locks up when google maps satellite view is selected The maximum problems are observed when google maps is showing a detail area 4-5 miles across or less... for example, the

Re: Google Maps and SM

2010-09-11 Thread David E. Ross
On 9/11/10 11:43 AM, David E. Ross wrote: On 9/11/10 9:08 AM, Beverly Howard wrote: In addition to the google/seamonky search issues currently being discussed, I'm experiencing a serious problem trying to use http://maps.google.com (currently running 1.1.17 for stability issues) When a

Re: 7 years waiting for a simple developement action in 30 seconds

2010-09-11 Thread Jay Garcia
On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message --- Chris Ilias wrote: On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 No changes from 7 years ago. The request is already coded when we do a forward. So it should be easy to implement it