James wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
James wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 10/25/2010 12:46 PM, James wrote:
You make it seem as if you never sent or received an encrypted
email using your method. If you had, you would know what each
participant is required to have. Still, when I have time, I will
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/
There is either a non-obvious block or an app not responding.
WLS wrote:
KompoZer is a better for HTML then Composer.
I prefer the cleaned up HTML that Composer produces, at least at this point in
time.
2) How portable should TB 2.x profiles be headed over to SM?
On Linux under Tools Import you can select to import all or just
select what you want
Greetings:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on URL links
in SM emails?
Thanks!
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on URL
links in SM emails?
Thanks!
I presume this would occur if Foxy was the default browser,
not IE or any other.
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Click Here to Enter:
http://newonlineguide.com/12/old-english-font
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
old english fonts
old english font
download free old english font
free old english font
free
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on URL
links in SM emails?
Thanks!
Michael, if you are using SM as your mail agent, it is my understanding
that you *must* use SM Browser to open any URLs
After all, it's all the one
Michael Lueck wrote:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on
URL links in SM emails?
Hm. Begs the question then, why would you use SeaMonkey for mail/news
and not Thunderbird?
--
-bts
-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
Daniel wrote:
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on URL
links in SM emails?
Thanks!
Michael, if you are using SM as your mail agent, it is my understanding
that you *must* use SM Browser to open any URLs
That is not my
Daniel wrote:
Why would you want to open URLs in any other Browser program?
I am just fine using the latest Firefox, however I was stuck at TB 2.0.0.24
prior to migrating to SM.
For now, I am training myself to copy the URL instead of clicking the link,
then paste it into a FF window. A bit
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Hm. Begs the question then, why would you use SeaMonkey for mail/news
and not Thunderbird?
Due to TB 3.x being so undesirable.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
support-seamonkey
JeffM wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I am finding more and more often,
that open tabs which are loading just keep on 'loading' forever.
[...] the circling arrow and progress bar never stop working.
[. . .]
I do not understand all the nuances of how the internet works,
I note that you haven't
On 27.10.2010 05:56, Michael Lueck wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Greetings:
How can I specify that I want Firefox to be launched when I click on URL
links in SM emails?
Thanks!
You can't that I am aware of. It's an old bug from the Netscape 7 days
that you can't use another
On 27.10.2010 07:20, Michael Lueck wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Hm. Begs the question then, why would you use SeaMonkey for mail/news
and not Thunderbird?
Due to TB 3.x being so undesirable.
Start a new thread and list your undesirable findings and
Jay Garcia wrote:
You can't that I am aware of. It's an old bug from the Netscape 7 days
that you can't use another browser. It seems that it's never been fixed yet.
Thanks! Then I will train myself to copy the URL's instead of clicking the
links.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
? Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/
There is either a non-obvious
Jay Garcia a écrit :
You can't that I am aware of. It's an old bug from the Netscape 7 days
that you can't use another browser. It seems that it's never been fixed yet.
Why would that be a bug? SM is an all-in-one. I wouldn't expect it to
work any other way.
S.
On 27.10.2010 09:05, S. Beaulieu wrote:
--- Original Message ---
Jay Garcia a écrit :
You can't that I am aware of. It's an old bug from the Netscape 7 days
that you can't use another browser. It seems that it's never been
fixed yet.
Why would that be a bug? SM is an all-in-one. I
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
? Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
doc@ kd4e.com wrote:
I have tried this on two laptops, one SM 2.0.8
the other 2.0.9 and it won't play - shows the promo page
but no streaming video when clicked.
http://www.syfy.com/rewind/riese/1255985/
There is
Hi,
Is Seamonkey 2.0.9 or Seamonkey 2.1b1 affected by this bug :
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/
--
Stéphane
http://pasdenom.info
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Stéphane Grégoire wrote:
Is Seamonkey 2.0.9 or Seamonkey 2.1b1 affected by this bug :
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/
The 2.0 branch is affected for sure; it uses the same back-end as
Firefox 3.5. SeaMonkey 2.0.10 will be
Doug Fisher wrote:
I wish SM could figure get on more compliant lists
- or figure out a way to work around this.
What I wish is that people would stop
blaming a browser that works PERFECTLY on properly-build sites
when that browser encounters a site built by an incompetent bozo
who should be
Danny Kile wrote:
I was not able to play the video when spoofing FF or IE,
I was however able to play it if I ran IE Tabs.
So, to review:
A site that not only requires an Internet Exploder identity reported,
it is actually built to require that broken rendering engine.
Another moron Web developer
JeffM wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
I was not able to play the video when spoofing FF or IE,
I was however able to play it if I ran IE Tabs.
So, to review:
A site that not only requires an Internet Exploder identity reported,
it is actually built to require that broken rendering engine.
Another
JeffM wrote:
Doug Fisher wrote:
I wish SM could figure get on more compliant lists
- or figure out a way to work around this.
What I wish is that people would stop
blaming a browser that works PERFECTLY on properly-build sites
when that browser encounters a site built by an incompetent bozo
David Wilkinson wrote:
Zeb Carter wrote:
I am in the process of setting up a new computer for a friend of mine -
old computer running XP Home, new computer Win 7. Both have SM 2.0.8.
When I do this, I first close SeaMonkey on the old computer, and copy
the entire profile folder (e.g.
JeffM wrote:
Doug Fisher wrote:
I wish SM could figure get on more compliant lists
- or figure out a way to work around this.
What I wish is that people would stop
blaming a browser that works PERFECTLY on properly-build sites
when that browser encounters a site built by an incompetent bozo
You might have heard about the 0day exploit recently found in Gecko,
affecting probably all SeaMonkey versions (except trunk) as well. Of
course, we are preparing a fast oilspill security update for this,
under the version of SeaMonkey 2.0.10, to be released tomorrow if possible.
Windows
Stéphane Grégoire schrieb:
Is Seamonkey 2.0.9 or Seamonkey 2.1b1 affected by this bug :
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/10/26/critical-vulnerability-in-firefox-3-5-and-firefox-3-6/
SeaMonkey 2.0.9 is affected and we are working on 2.0.10 right now to
fix it. SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is at
Greetings Chris-
Chris Ilias wrote:
This pref is old and has not been tested on SM2, but you could give it a
try: http://seamonkey.ilias.ca/mailnewsfaq/http.
Thanks very much. That link put me onto an extension called Launchy. I was
quickly / easily able to come up with an XML file to launch
JeffM wrote:
Contact the jackass who can't built a proper Web page.
Direct your bile at the moron who obviously
doesn't do proper testing on the crap pages he produces.
Ed Mullen wrote:
Err, contact, perhaps, a commenter who can get his verb tenses right?
Have I erred in ASSuMEing
that someone
31 matches
Mail list logo
