Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it
had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I
had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry
keys, etc.
Then a re-boot into Win7 again, and I was being offered to install
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to
the Mozilla branch that SeaMonkey 2.0.x is
On 6/22/2011 6:28 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the security fixes to
the Mozilla
Rick Merrill wrote:
Paul wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911
Its your browser doing that.
You can change its settings to download all of them if you want,
but thats a lot of downloading.
Yes, The 500 is a suggested limit to prevent
On 6/22/11 5:50 AM, Ant wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday, I was messing with a new/clean installation of SM v2.1 in a
XP Pro. SP2 (IE6) virtual machine at work to see which of my current
extensions work or not.
I decided to try the latest PrefBar extension first from
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 10:08, Daniel told the world:
Tonight, I started my computer up in its Windows 7 profile, because it
had been a while since I had gotten the MS updates. It then (before I
had gotten to the desktop) installed about 12,500 updates of registry
keys, etc.
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
seamonkey...
Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb
browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly. Extension
JeffM wrote:
sean nathan bean wrote:
it displays no problem,
but won't let me install the firefox compatible addon...
The version numbers of SeaMonkey
are at least one integer behind Firefox.
If an extension checks for a version number upon installation,
first, you better assure that the
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
seamonkey...
Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb
browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly.
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
Bob
On 6/22/11 9:48 AM, AlainF wrote:
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
That would break a number of extensions and other add-ons that indicate
maximum
On 6/22/11 10:19 AM, sean nathan bean wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/06/2011 01:36, sean nathan bean told the world:
wondering how this will work to get http://www.fbpurity.com/ working in
seamonkey...
Not at all. Advertising Firefox compatibility only helps to get dumb
I just tried this upgrade but was never asked which profile should be migrated.
The new installation is completely bare, with nothing carried over from 1.1.18.
The official installation instructions may apply just to upgrades from 2.0 to
2.1; they don't provide any special instructions or
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on backporting the
AlainF wrote:
Seamonkey should use the same version number as the firefox version it's
using. If it's base on Firefox 4 then Seamonkey 4.xx and now with
Firefox 5 then Seamonkey 5.xx.
It's a common misconception that SeaMonkey is based on Firefox. It's
based on the Mozilla platform, which
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on
MCBastos wrote:
Advertising Firefox compatibility
only helps to get dumb browser-sniffing webpages to load correctly.
I call those Web pages constructed by idiots
but you're a more kind and gentle soul than I am.
Extension compatibility is an entirely different subject.
I'm a one-step-at-a-time
Philip Chee wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on
Ray_Net wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Paul wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911
Its your browser doing that.
You can change its settings to download all of them if you want,
but thats a lot of downloading.
Yes, The 500 is a suggested
Bob Fleischer schrieb:
My wife still uses SeaMonkey 2.0.x on a Power PC Mac running Mac OS 10.4.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1, and that there
will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
None,
Philip Chee schrieb:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:28:06 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I saw Firefox v3.6.18 and Thunderbird v3.1.11 were released earlier
today. Will SeaMonkey v2.0.14 be getting any more updates too? I am not
ready for v2.1.x yet.
Probably not, as nobody is working on
Team,
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Ant.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Antman008 wrote:
Team,
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Ant.
Sorry, that should have read 2.2.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
SeaMonkey 2.2 Beta 1 is available for free download [1] now in 14
languages and makes a list of new functionality available to a wider
testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release
version is still intended for testers only and might still show some
problems in
Antman008 wrote:
How does the release of Firefox 5 effect the SeaMonkey branch?
Are we going to see a 2.1 or 3.0 version soon?
Sorry, that should have read 2.2.
SM 2.2b1 was released today; 2.2 final is expected next week or the week
after. Both are based on the same platform as FF 5 and
Stan wrote:
TmoWizard wrote:
Stan schrieb:
I can't ignore the message because the SM Add-Ons Manager marked Stumble
3.91 as Disabled when I switched over to SM 2.1 yesterday.
In about:config you must set /extensions.checkCompatibility/ from *true*
to *false* and it works.
Please install
Bob Fleischer wrote:
[...]Mac OS 10.4.
Apple: The new Borg.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
Bob Fleischer wrote:
[...]Mac OS 10.4.
Apple: The new Borg.
I understand that she cannot upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.1,
and that there will be no further security fixes to SeaMonkey 2.0.
Besides buying a new computer, what alternatives might there be?
My first post. Please be kind.
I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with
no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to Mailwasher Pro 2011. I am
using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after
it has downloaded my Email, it can't find it. I
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
Infnord practice, there is. Yogi Berra
Ross Simon wrote:
My first post. Please be kind.
I have been using Seamonkey and Mailwasher together for many years with
no problem. Recently Mailwasher upgraded to Mailwasher Pro 2011. I am
using SM 2.0.1.4. When asking MW to go to the SM mail application after
it has downloaded my Email, it
Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
--
Thanks! 73, KD4E
David Colburn http://kd4e.com
Have an
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
Methinks google is still the Borg ... Apple the Cardasians (sp?),
and Microsoft looking more and more like the Ferrengei(sp?).
So who is IBM? :-)
A shadow of the former Klingon empire?
I don't know, given what Microsoft,
CONGRATULATIONS, Seamonkey development crew, and contributing community
members. Your extraordinary work is certainly appreciated.
I am proud to be a Seamonkey User.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
35 matches
Mail list logo
