Justin Wood (Callek) ha scritto:
On 7/16/2011 10:05 PM, Graham wrote:
Once again, I thank the Mozilla and Seamonkey teams for all their
efforts: the web and all its browsers are much better for their efforts;
even IE has improved by leaps and bounds because of Firefox. I won't be
along for the
On 7/17/2011 4:24 AM, Francesco Presel wrote:
So since, if I've understood correctly, passing from SM 2.1 to 2.2 and
so on is like it was passing from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2, couldn't add-on
developers usually just put a generic 2.* max version, and still be sure
that their extension will work, just as
On 7/16/11 7:19 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 2:12 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
I have four profiles. For some reason, one of the profiles still has
SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.1. The other three have SeaMonkey Default
Theme 2.2.
How can I update the one profile? I cannot find
On 7/17/2011 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/16/11 7:19 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 2:12 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
I have four profiles. For some reason, one of the profiles still has
SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.1. The other three have SeaMonkey Default
Theme 2.2.
How can
Chris Ilias n...@ilias.ca wrote in message
news:q_ednwzxwbanelztnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org...
On 11-07-15 11:30 PM, JohnQPublic wrote:
I use the Flashblock add-on in Firefox which comes up OK when I search
for
Flashblock with the Firefox Add-ons Manager, along with 23 other
related
I'm not very happy with the Password Manager not working in many
trivial cases such as when the form has been either produced by an
XSL transformation or generated by a script, so I've done a bit of
digging a have come to the following workaround others may find
helpful, too.
The solution
On 11-07-17 1:14 PM, JohnQPublic wrote:
Chris Iliasn...@ilias.ca wrote in message
news:q_ednwzxwbanelztnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org...
I think it is more about the version of Flashblock on AMO being
Firefox-only.
For instance, if you go to
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let forms =
Thanx for everyone's answers. That was very helpful.
Hawker
On 7/15/2011 12:47 PM, The digits of Jens Hatlak's hands composed the
following:
hawker wrote:
1) I see my 2.0.x still says no update. Will there be a 2.2 auto update
soon?
There will be one but I cannot tell when.
I'm wondering
That sounds about the same as I would have done except there
is one other set of files I would have moved Import these
in the same way you did the other set. Hopefully these will
help: E:\Documents and
Settings\Jim\Local Settings\Application
On 7/17/11 9:31 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/17/2011 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/16/11 7:19 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 2:12 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
I have four profiles. For some reason, one of the profiles still has
SeaMonkey Default Theme 2.1. The other
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a user,
A critique that comes as late as so many of these do
could
On 16/07/11 17:59, Philip Chee wrote:
Several people have noticed this including in the Mozillazine forums.
This was a deliberate change I introduced when I implemented scrollable
tabs. I think this should go into the FAQ so that I can point people at it.
Secondly, should we revert this
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a user,
A critique that comes as late as so many
On 7/17/11 1:02 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 16/07/11 17:59, Philip Chee wrote:
Several people have noticed this including in the Mozillazine forums.
This was a deliberate change I introduced when I implemented scrollable
tabs. I think this should go into the FAQ so that I can point people
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
let
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox?
Dick
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:12:46 -0500, /JD/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Here's already revised code to handle forms found in frames,
additionally:
let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsILoginManager);
function fillForms(doc) {
let
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox?
Dick
I can enable and disable Java
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm = Components.classes[@mozilla.org/login-manager;1]
JeffM wrote:
those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
If you want people to comment before something is finalized,
you have to
JeffM wrote:
Not complaining about the content; it's the *timing* that bugs me.
Michael Gordon wrote:
Don't be too harsh on these late posters.
Well, as long as they don't get *too* whiney.
Some of us will not upgrade
until most of the major bugs have been corrected.
...which is a choice
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 10:05 PM, Graham wrote:
Once again, I thank the Mozilla and Seamonkey teams for all their
efforts: the web and all its browsers are much better for their efforts;
even IE has improved by leaps and bounds because of Firefox. I won't be
along for the ride,
On 7/17/11 3:58 PM, JD wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm =
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 3:58 PM, JD wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:12 PM, JD wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:58:16 +0300, /Stanimir Stamenkov/:
Now I've created and placed a custom button on my toolbar with the
following code to execute:
let lm =
On 07/17/2011 04:21 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
...
Alternatively, you can wait for PrefBar 6.x. I don't know what x will
be, but it should be available soon.
...
David, check my post in p.m.p
Gary
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 7/17/2011 3:00 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 9:31 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/17/2011 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/16/11 7:19 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 2:12 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
I have four profiles. For some reason, one of the profiles still
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a user,
A critique that comes as late as so many
On 07/17/2011 04:57 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 07/17/2011 04:21 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
...
Alternatively, you can wait for PrefBar 6.x. I don't know what x will
be, but it should be available soon.
...
David, check my post in p.m.p
Gary
Reply was to your post in: public.mozdev.p...
On 7/17/11 5:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/17/2011 3:00 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 9:31 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/17/2011 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/16/11 7:19 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 7/16/2011 2:12 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
I have four
JeffM wrote:
those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
All right , then where does the developer coouncil/
governing body
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a user,
A critique
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
All right , then where does the developer coouncil/
On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a
On 18/07/2011 12:50, Philip Chee wrote:
On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 15/07/2011 10:41, hawker told the world:
This is not a flame, I've rewritten it twice to reduce personal criticism. It's
just how I see the new model;.
2) I'm just curious about versioning. Perhaps I just don't understand
fully what changed. From what
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
The issue was caused by a change that Thunderbird developers made to
shared code. (...)
Thank you for clarifying, any hope that the Tbird team will accept what
fixes are in SM, or are they incompatible.
We need to fix it on our
Stan wrote:
I tried to send an E-mail to some...@town.somerset.mass.us. The 'mass'
should be 'ma'.
When I use the incorrect E-mail address, I get this message:
The size of the message you are trying to send exceeds a temporary size
limit of the server. The message was not sent; try to reduce
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
All right , then where does the developer coouncil/
40 matches
Mail list logo
