Robert Kaiser wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
Even so, why would v. 2.12.1 elicit such a dire warning?
I was referring to the
Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey.
quoted in the original post.
And the reply to that is Because it has some grave security issues
Desiree wrote:
Sandy sa...@millport.net wrote in message
news:y8ednfyynp_lyutnnz2dnuvz_rodn...@mozilla.org...
Why does the partial update fail? This is the third time in a row that I
have had to endure the very slow servers and download the full update.
Why
is this?
I'm not going to further
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Link (2) gives the very detailed comment that Nothing but security
fixes and link (3) just mentions SM 2.13.1 but gives no differences
between SM 2.13 and SM 2.13.1 and the wiki page is as good as blank!!
Changes between minor versions of a release are only
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
As an experiment, I also went to the SeaMonkey website and downloaded
the full version of SeaMonkey Setup 2.13.1.exe, declared to be 16 MB,
but the download manager claimed it was 19.1 MB. When it completed, the
download manager reported 19.3 MB, but the Windows property
James Robinson wrote:
My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date To), that were
always immediately above the individual email message bodies, are no
longer there. Does anyone know how or where to correct this?
Try playing with View/Headers (especially if you have Mnenhy installed
On 13/10/12 04.12, Edmund Wong ha scritto:
The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.13.1: An updated
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download [1]
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox
release, it delivers the latest developments
Gabriel wrote:
I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version
(OSX) doesn't auto update?
Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a
few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases.
Do I have to manually install the new 2.13.1 ?
If
On 14/10/12 12.17, Jens Hatlak ha scritto:
Gabriel wrote:
I'm on the beta update channel, why does my 2.13b6 installed version
(OSX) doesn't auto update?
Because it'll auto-update to 2.14b1 once released (which will be in a
few days from now). Betas don't auto-update to releases.
I didn't
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Jens, great, this page does give some details as to what was done and
why, so why isn't this page linked to in the release notification e-mail
or news post??
Because we forgot about it (Edmund in this case, but I'm not blaming him
since I would probably have
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:26:36 -0700, NoOp wrote:
Robert, any idea why 720619:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720619
is still block if you are not on the security list?
You are not authorized to access bug #720619. To see this bug, you must
first log in to an account with
On 10/10/2012 04:25 PM, LR wrote:
On Oct 10, 10:10 am, LR lr...@superlink.net wrote:
I just installed 2.13 and I'm having some trouble loading some sites.
Another problem.
I tried to use email and 2.13 doesn't seem to remember my old accounts
and is asking me to set up new ones.
James Robinson wrote:
I recently received and updated my SeaMonkey program to ver. 2.13.1,
thru the automatic update notice service, on my Gateway Laptop using
Windows7.
My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date To), that were
always immediately above the individual email message
James Robinson wrote:
I recently received and updated my SeaMonkey program to ver. 2.13.1,
thru the automatic update notice service, on my Gateway Laptop using
Windows7.
My problem is that the headings (Subject, From, Date To), that were
always immediately above the individual email message
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the
On 10/13/2012 11:24 PM PT, V S Rawat gmoz typed:
in ff13, thru Options - contents - I unticked load images
automatically.
Since then all other sites, including fb, are indeed dutifully not
loading images,
however Google news sites
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated with Foxfire and Sea
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release.
Indeed and around the time we released this,
Hello.
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh! Does one
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the standard HTTP downloads, you get
On 10/14/12 10:37 AM, Steve Wendt wrote:
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have
received it quickly if they are running slowly.
The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use
the
On 10/14/2012 12:18 PM PT, Ant typed:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video blocker
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Jim wrote:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated
Ant wrote:
Hello.
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video blocker like FlashBlock. Ugh!
On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
associated
On 10/14/2012 1:24 PM PT, Rufus typed:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video blocker
On Oct 14, 3:31 pm, Ant a...@zimage.comANT wrote:
On 10/14/2012 1:24 PM PT, Rufus typed:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification
with a checksum that is not just SHA-1 but
On 2012-10-14, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video
On 10/14/12 3:09 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
I go to the FTP server so that I can also download the related SHA1
checksum.
FYI, if you use the SeaMonkey-internal update mechanism, you get both
the advantages of using as-local-as-possible mirrors *and* verification
Ant wrote:
On 10/14/2012 1:21 PM PT, Rufus typed:
I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it fixed
it
(like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
Anyway, according to MozillaZine, it says this is a false positive,
John Thompson wrote:
On 2012-10-14, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I
On 10/14/2012 3:24 PM, Rufus wrote:
Ant wrote:
Hello.
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5
On 10/14/2012 2:18 PM PT, John Thompson typed:
Has anyone noticed that today? I am getting some HTML5 videos, and not
Flash in my Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.13.1 web browsers (similiar to the
latest Firefox web browsers)! I need a HTML5 video blocker like
FlashBlock. Ugh! :(
I need a HTML5 video
33 matches
Mail list logo
