NoOp wrote:
Anyone notice that you need cookies turned on to get Google search to
work properly? Meaning that: enter a search into the search box, click
the search button where search info normally is, is blank/white.
Works fine here with Google cookies rejected. Verified with Cookie
Hi,
We use Seamonkey in a small company with about 400 PC's (Windows XP)
Software is installed only by the administrator, all users run with
limited privileges including .xpi installation disabled in a
general.config file. We don't want the admin nightmare of all users
running with extensions
I chatted about it on the IRC channel and found that I can do
it like this:
Add to global.config file:
lockPref(extensions.autoDisableScopes, 11);
lockPref(extensions.enabledScopes, 4);
lockPref(extensions.shownSelectionUI, true);
Put extensions in extensions subdir of the program installation
Can anyone give me a clue how to stop this from happening?
Lori
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hey Guys,
So I have to say, I am quite annoyed with Symantec/Norton at the moment.
Our Beta 2, which has been out for ~ a week, and I submitted the
whitelist request to Norton ~12 hours before the *DAY* of our release,
still is not complete.
With the release
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 08/12/2012 00:10:
Jim Taylor wrote:
On the corporate side, where end users have no choice about their
antivirus product, I don't know if Symantec's corporate products
detect the false positive or not. But even if they do I doubt that
many large companies are using
Lori wrote:
Can anyone give me a clue how to stop this from happening?
Lori
More details, Lori, would help.
Do you mean that once you read an e-mail, it disappears from view?? If
so, have a look at View-Threads-All and View-Messages-All
If this is not your problem..more details,
Ray_Net wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 08/12/2012 00:10:
Jim Taylor wrote:
On the corporate side, where end users have no choice about their
antivirus product, I don't know if Symantec's corporate products
detect the false positive or not. But even if they do I doubt that
many large
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/12/05/tsr-pkg-moos-youtube-bank-robber.cnn
win xp sp3
unable to view video's on cnn.com (see link above)
seems to have current adobe flash 11.502.510.110
cleared Cache... no help
any other options here ?
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Do we know /which/ Norton we're talking about? I'm willing to believe
that some Norton software users have a problem, but I'm a Norton user
and have never had the slightest problem installing any Mozilla product
(going all the way back to Netscape 4.x). So for me it's
On 12/8/12 7:42 AM, rjkrjk wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/12/05/tsr-pkg-moos-youtube-bank-robber.cnn
win xp sp3
unable to view video's on cnn.com (see link above)
seems to have current adobe flash 11.502.510.110
cleared Cache... no help
any other
Ray_Net wrote:
MCBastos wrote, On 07/12/2012 02:00:
Interviewed by CNN on 06/12/2012 19:57, Ray_Net told the world:
If it's better imap than pop ... i prefer to go on the web interface
directly into gmail :-)
That is an option if...
a) You don't hate webmail with a passion
b) You have just
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
My proposal:
I think that's a reasonable approach.
In particular, if handling of betas is an issue, I might go even a bit
further with documentation, of advising beta users that they should
replace Norton, if they find that Norton use is generating
Frank Wein wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hey Guys,
So I have to say, I am quite annoyed with Symantec/Norton at the moment.
Our Beta 2, which has been out for ~ a week, and I submitted the
whitelist request to Norton ~12 hours before the *DAY* of our release,
still is not complete.
With
Michael Ströder wrote:
After the update I'm experiencing some weird effects on my Inbox files (mbox).
Subjects and messages are messed up. Were there significant changes to the
relevant code?
Probably. Such issues do not appear out of nowhere.
I'm using mail filters to move messages from my
Justin Wood (Callek) schrieb:
My proposal:
+1 on all accounts.
Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
(pre-video) commercials seem to be Ok for me also, but no story video
being displaying... what makes you think it's a CNN problem, rather than
a adobe flash / mozilla ( FF/SM- tried both) situation ?
David E. Ross wrote, On 12/8/2012 11:00 AM:
On 12/8/12 7:42 AM, rjkrjk wrote:
Michael Gordon schrieb:
In addition to listing on your download page, also note the AV/Firewall
applications that work well with SM, FireFox, and ThunderBird. (Writing
of the latter two, how do they handle this problem?
No, please don't. We are not a free advertisement shop. If some provider
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Michael Gordon schrieb:
In addition to listing on your download page, also note the AV/Firewall
applications that work well with SM, FireFox, and ThunderBird. (Writing
of the latter two, how do they handle this problem?
No, please don't. We are not a free advertisement
Frank Wein schrieb:
After all our builds should not be that
different as the NSS dlls (which do the encryption) use exactly the same
code as the Firefox ones.
AFAIK, they're using MD5 checksums to identify them, so any bit that
comes out different in compilation makes up for something
David E. Ross schrieb:
3. At the top of the Browser pane in the Display on area, ...
You apparently don't know what about:home and about:newtab (the default
for browser.newtab.url) are. Both are functionalities that can't be had
with SeaMonkey at this time.
Robert Kaiser
Ed Mullen schrieb:
Any idea if that will ever make it into SeaMonkey? I find it very useful.
I think both those features would not be too hard to port over, and just
need someone to do the work. I'm pretty sure we'd be happy if you try to
do that!
Robert Kaiser
rjkrjk wrote:
(pre-video) commercials seem to be Ok for me also, but no story video
being displaying... what makes you think it's a CNN problem, rather than
a adobe flash / mozilla ( FF/SM- tried both) situation ?
David E. Ross wrote, On 12/8/2012 11:00 AM:
On 12/8/12 7:42 AM, rjkrjk
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Michael Gordon schrieb:
In addition to listing on your download page, also note
the AV/Firewall applications that work well with SM,
FireFox, and ThunderBird. (Writing of the latter two, how
do they handle this problem?
No, please don't. We are not a free
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/7/12 6:16 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/7/12 10:48 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
I notice in Firefox about:home will open your home page. Also, there is
a pref: browser.newtab.url
which allows one to specify what opens when you open a new tab.
Any idea
On 12/07/2012 10:49 PM, Paul wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/07/2012 10:34 PM, NoOp wrote:
Anyone notice that you need cookies turned on to get Google search to
work properly? Meaning that: enter a search into the search box, click
the search button where search info normally is, is blank/white.
rjkrjk wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/12/05/tsr-pkg-moos-youtube-bank-robber.cnn
win xp sp3
unable to view video's on cnn.com (see link above)
seems to have current adobe flash 11.502.510.110
cleared Cache... no help
any other options here ?
Commercial and
stango wrote:
rjkrjk wrote:
No problems here. I see both the commercials and the news story. Using
same version of flash but running Windows 7 Pro 64 bit.
I'm using AdBlock Plus, so I saw only the story, not the ads.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
rjkrjk wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/12/05/tsr-pkg-moos-youtube-bank-robber.cnn
win xp sp3
unable to view video's on cnn.com (see link above)
seems to have current adobe flash 11.502.510.110
cleared Cache... no help
any other options here ?
Wow, that
On 12/8/12 9:48 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
David E. Ross schrieb:
3. At the top of the Browser pane in the Display on area, ...
You apparently don't know what about:home and about:newtab (the default
for browser.newtab.url) are. Both are functionalities that can't be had
with SeaMonkey at
Please remove me from the list. Too technical for me.
--
support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote:
Send support-seamonkey mailing list submissions to
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
To
On 12/8/12, Lori na...@verizon.net wrote:
Please remove me from the list. Too technical for me.
--
support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote:
Send support-seamonkey mailing list submissions to
Jens Hatlak j...@junetz.de wrote:
I think it is this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815012
In any case I shall add a warning to the SM 2.14 and 2.15 Release Notes
ASAP.
Are you sure the corruption is in mbox and not in your IMAP account?
I have seen corruption in IMAP
When I first got into computers, Norton Anti-Virus was one of those
essentials that everyone had to have on their machines. Over the years
it has become more intrusive, more bloated, and more CPU hungry than
almost anything else I can think of.
I've also registered far more false alarms with
Rob wrote:
Jens Hatlak j...@junetz.de wrote:
I think it is this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815012
In any case I shall add a warning to the SM 2.14 and 2.15 Release Notes
ASAP.
Are you sure the corruption is in mbox and not in your IMAP account?
If you mean the IMAP
Brian Mailman wrote:
(snippage)
Thanks everyone to answered in this thread. Valuable info, good stuff!
B/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
rjkrjk wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/12/05/tsr-pkg-moos-youtube-bank-robber.cnn
win xp sp3
unable to view video's on cnn.com (see link above)
seems to have current adobe flash 11.502.510.110
cleared Cache... no help
any other options here ?
Win7 64bit
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
When I first got into computers, Norton Anti-Virus was one of those
essentials that everyone had to have on their machines. Over the years
it has become more intrusive, more bloated, and more CPU hungry than
almost anything else I can think of.
I've also registered far more
Why can't I type www.google.com and get to www.google.com, the browser
always changes it to www.google.ca?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
G Tod wrote:
Why can't I type www.google.com and get to www.google.com, the browser
always changes it to www.google.ca?
Because Google knows where you are.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 12-12-09 2:27 AM, G Tod wrote:
Why can't I type www.google.com and get to www.google.com, the browser
always changes it to www.google.ca?
Google detects your location and its Google that redirects you. There
should be a link at the bottom of the page that says Google.com.
Google then
41 matches
Mail list logo
