Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/12/2013 21:15, hawker told the world:
* If I delete it on my phone (IMAP) will it be deleted and not
downloaded to my PC-Mozilla?
It should do so, yes. It's also possible (depending on how your
server handles it) that
NO wrote:
Since upgrading to SM 2.22 on two (2) machines, one with Vista
Business and the other Win 8, emailing from any program in MS Office
cannot be completed. There is consistently the error message General
mail failure. Quit Microsoft Office, restart the mail system and try
again
I have
(frustrating, emails not going to the list by default. Wish they would
fix the headers.)
Daniel a écrit :
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/12/2013 21:15, hawker told the world:
* If I delete it on my phone (IMAP) will it be deleted and not
downloaded to my
andré wrote:
(frustrating, emails not going to the list by default. Wish they would
fix the headers.)
Daniel a écrit :
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/12/2013 21:15, hawker told the world:
* If I delete it on my phone (IMAP) will it be deleted and not
It is not a big thing, but nearly every day one or more of my ca. 10
filters item are disabled. Is there a solution?
Klaus
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 12/4/2013 8:38 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/12/2013 21:15, hawker told the world:
Can I IMAP on my Phone (HTC Android) and POP on my Mozilla Mail client
without a mess?
In theory... yes. Lots of servers allow it. But you should check the
documentation on your particular
Interviewed by CNN on 05/12/2013 04:44, andré told the world:
I've switched all my gmail account to other providers, since I also use
POP access, and with POP (or IMAP) access, anything gmail has classified
as spam is invisible, and is automatically deleted if not reclassified
in 30 days.
On 12/5/2013 10:00 AM, MCBastos wrote:
big snip
Yeah, many home users will instead use a single webmail account. This
doesn't work for me because:
1. I hate webmail.
2. I don't have a single account, I have about ten.
3. Webmail is crap. It lacks significant functionality of dedicated
clients,
Interviewed by CNN on 05/12/2013 12:52, hawker told the world:
I use MAPI/IMAP at work because for that usage it works best but still
use POP for personal because, up to recently it has also been the best
choice. My life is changing to be more on the go, less time at home on
y personal
On 12/5/2013 10:19 AM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/12/2013 12:52, hawker told the world:
I use MAPI/IMAP at work because for that usage it works best but still
use POP for personal because, up to recently it has also been the best
choice. My life is changing to be more on the go,
andré wrote:
hawker a écrit :
I tried asking this on the Thunderbird forum but all I got was someone
trying to convince me to use G-Mail.
I noticed that discussion. Reference to Gmail may be a useful example,
but just because somebody prefers it doesn't mean that it's a solution
for you.
MCBastos wrote:
1. I hate webmail.
2. I don't have a single account, I have about ten.
3. Webmail is crap. It lacks significant functionality of dedicated
clients, and it's slow.
4. No, I don't want to consolidate. I have excellent reasons for
segregating different uses into different accounts.
On 05/12/13 10:34, Pugilares wrote:
Yes and this is related not only to MS Office, but also other programs.
Eg. what I use is OpenOffice and when trying to e-mail document through
OpenOffice menu get more or less the same result as you.
For OpenOffice goes to Tools - Options - Internet -
hawker wrote, On 05/12/2013 00:15:
I tried asking this on the Thunderbird forum but all I got was someone
trying to convince me to use G-Mail.
I don't use IMAP, only POP, but for Gmail, i have some problem.
I have a mailbox at my ISP.
I access it with POP with the program PopTray that i use
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Inventions have long since
Ed Mullen wrote:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
Hmm. Did a couple of tests. Seems to only
Ed Mullen:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
Hmm. Did a couple of tests.
On 12/5/2013 1:38 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
On 12/5/2013 1:38 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
W3BNR wrote:
On 12/5/2013 1:38 PM Ed Mullen submitted the following:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever
Ed Mullen wrote:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
It still works. In plain text you type
Ed Mullen wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
Am I imagining that that was ever true?
Hmm. Did a couple of
I have a file hiding system I use to keep people
out of banking and stock files called Hide Files
and Folders.
Up until just recently it worked fine (have a
shortcut key set up).
Suddenly it has been throwing up the little Enter
Password window unprompted at odd times.
I have to click
Ed Mullen wrote, On 12/05/2013 11:38 AM:
I have a recollection that SeaMonkey would display an image in emails if
there were emoticons in plain text. e.g., a wink ;-) would be rendered
with the appropriate SM internal smiley face.
your ;-) showed up right after the word wink ... for me
DoctorBill wrote:
I have a file hiding system I use to keep people out of banking and
stock files called Hide Files
and Folders.
Up until just recently it worked fine (have a shortcut key set up).
Suddenly it has been throwing up the little Enter Password window
unprompted at odd times.
I have
Interviewed by CNN on 05/12/2013 15:15, Ray_Net told the world:
NOW with Gmail and his POP access.
I have a Gmail-box and i have some problems.
I can have the list of mails residing on the gmail-pop-server as many
time i want with PopTray.
BUT When i read a mail using PopTray this
MCBastos wrote:
So, there are some oddities. One major oddity is how Gmail processes
POP deletion requests -- instead of actually deleting the message, it
by default only hides the message from POP clients (although I
think this behavior can be changed in the Gmail settings).
I don't know
On 12/5/2013 4:27 PM, DoctorBill wrote:
I have a file hiding system I use to keep people
out of banking and stock files called Hide Files
and Folders.
Up until just recently it worked fine (have a
shortcut key set up).
Suddenly it has been throwing up the little Enter
Password window
28 matches
Mail list logo
