Re: User agent problem

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I would like to chang

Re: User agent problem

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: But now I see in your later posts that SeaMonkey already doesn't work with Chase? Or are you just getting a nag that you can dismiss and ignore, like when you update Flash and it always wants to bundle McAfee or Yahoo or Chrome or something? Immediately after signing on

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 03/28/2016 10:03 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaM

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I would like to change my User Agent that is se

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph composed on 2016-03-28 19:32 (UTC-0700): In any event as many people as possible should be point banks that do as Chase seems to be doing to the instructions on: http://geckoisgecko.org/ Banks, like other web sites, can, and should, be supporting browser functionality, not

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I would like to change my User Agent that is s

Re: User agent problem

WaltS48 wrote: On 03/28/2016 10:03 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved

Re: User agent problem

Felix Miata wrote: Ken Rudolph composed on 2016-03-28 18:52 (UTC-0700): Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); Are you sure? Your email reports an outdated UA:

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph composed on 2016-03-28 18:52 (UTC-0700): Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); Are you sure? Your email reports an outdated UA: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; L

Re: User agent problem

On 03/28/2016 10:03 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I wou

Re: User agent problem

Ken Rudolph wrote: Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I would like to change my User Agent that is sent

User agent problem

Chase Bank is insisting that soon they are going to refuse to access their site with my "outdated" browser. Of course my SeaMonkey browser is up to date (Win 7, SM 2.39); but they don't accept SeaMonkey as an approved browser. I would like to change my User Agent that is sent out to Firefox 3

Re: Did your SeaMonkey v2.39 break the "Allow remote content for ..."?

Ray_Net wrote: J. Weaver Jr. wrote on 28/03/2016 15:54: Ray_Net wrote: Ant wrote on 23/03/2016 23:08: On 3/23/2016 7:08 AM, chaa...@gmail.com wrote: Still broken in 2.40 as far as I can see. Back to 2.26 (again). Yep, still broken in v2.40. I think v2.38 was fixed and working. :( I am und

Re: text formatting

On 03/28/2016 04:28 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Ray_Net wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28/03/2016 18:11: Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27/03/2016 17:25: Looking at the source of a message composed in HTML and only sent as plain text, shows only pl

Re: text formatting

Ray_Net wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28/03/2016 18:11: Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27/03/2016 17:25: Looking at the source of a message composed in HTML and only sent as plain text, shows only plain text formatting. Probably the reason the HTML formatting bar does

Re: text formatting

On 03/28/2016 03:37 PM, Ray_Net wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28/03/2016 18:11: Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27/03/2016 17:25: Looking at the source of a message composed in HTML and only sent as plain text, shows only plain text formatting. Probably the reason the

Re: text formatting

mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 28/03/2016 18:11: Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27/03/2016 17:25: Looking at the source of a message composed in HTML and only sent as plain text, shows only plain text formatting. Probably the reason the HTML formatting bar doesn't appear. To t

Re: Did your SeaMonkey v2.39 break the "Allow remote content for ..."?

J. Weaver Jr. wrote on 28/03/2016 15:54: Ray_Net wrote: Ant wrote on 23/03/2016 23:08: On 3/23/2016 7:08 AM, chaa...@gmail.com wrote: Still broken in 2.40 as far as I can see. Back to 2.26 (again). Yep, still broken in v2.40. I think v2.38 was fixed and working. :( I am under v2.38 and I d

Re: What is an "Active Link"?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: From , describing the CSS attribute used to style "active" elements: The :active pseudo-class applies while an element is being activated by the user. For

Re: text formatting

Ray_Net wrote: I have for my account Composition & Addressing, - "Compose messages in HTML format". All goes well ... when composing the html-formatting bar is present ... then I send the mail, and SM propose me to send in "html and plain text" or in "html only" or in "plain text only". When I c

Re: text formatting

Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 27/03/2016 17:25: Looking at the source of a message composed in HTML and only sent as plain text, shows only plain text formatting. Probably the reason the HTML formatting bar doesn't appear. To the composition window it is a plain text message you are editing.

Re: Did your SeaMonkey v2.39 break the "Allow remote content for ..."?

On 3/28/2016 6:54 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Ant wrote on 23/03/2016 23:08: On 3/23/2016 7:08 AM, chaa...@gmail.com wrote: Still broken in 2.40 as far as I can see. Back to 2.26 (again). Yep, still broken in v2.40. I think v2.38 was fixed and working. :( I am under v2.38 and I

Re: Did your SeaMonkey v2.39 break the "Allow remote content for ..."?

Ray_Net wrote: Ant wrote on 23/03/2016 23:08: On 3/23/2016 7:08 AM, chaa...@gmail.com wrote: Still broken in 2.40 as far as I can see. Back to 2.26 (again). Yep, still broken in v2.40. I think v2.38 was fixed and working. :( I am under v2.38 and I did not see any problem with ""Allow remote