On 10/6/2009 5:44 PM Bob Fleischer wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 10/5/2009 10:35 PM Bob Fleischer wrote:
Does that mean there won't be another beta before release?
Correct, only 1-2 Release Candidates. Code Freeze is tomorrow already
after all.
Sorry, I forget that your definition is
Jens Hatlak wrote:
The standard reply to questions when there will be a release has been
when it's done. That worked as long as there was no light at the end
of the tunnel but at some point the decision was made to put an end to
the delay. The reasons for releasing this month go beyond bug
On 10/6/2009 7:51 PM chicagofan wrote:
[Bugzilla]
It has occurred to me, after reading responses there on several bugs,
that the project members might not want users who can't help
technically to clutter up that forum. Is that the case? I could
understand that... just trying to determine if
chicagofan schrieb:
It's been marked as *fixed* now [mark messages] which is great news. :)
Do I understand correctly that the final release is scheduled for
October... sometime?
That's correct.
regards
Martin
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
chicagofan wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 9/16/2009 10:07 PM chicagofan wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Known:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514876
I reported this earlier at bugzilla too, but I'm not tech savvy, and
can't
help find where it went wrong between b1 and b2. I sure hope
On 10/5/2009 10:35 PM Bob Fleischer wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Do I understand correctly that the final release is scheduled for
October... sometime?
Does that mean there won't be another beta before release?
Correct, only 1-2 Release Candidates. Code Freeze is tomorrow already
after all.
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 9/16/2009 10:07 PM chicagofan wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Known:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514876
I reported this earlier at bugzilla too, but I'm not tech savvy, and can't
help find where it went wrong between b1 and b2. I sure hope someone will
look
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:33 PM Bob Fleischer wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.0b2 on Vista: reading sequentially through unread emails
in a folder (or news items in a newsgroup) using a separate message window
doesn't mark the subsequent messages as read.
Known:
chicagofan wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:33 PM Bob Fleischer wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.0b2 on Vista: reading sequentially through unread emails
in a folder (or news items in a newsgroup) using a separate message window
doesn't mark the subsequent messages as read.
On 9/16/2009 10:07 PM chicagofan wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Known: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514876
I reported this earlier at bugzilla too, but I'm not tech savvy, and
can't help find where it went wrong between b1 and b2. I sure hope
someone will look at this soon,
Using SeaMonkey 2.0b2 on Vista: reading sequentially through unread
emails in a folder (or news items in a newsgroup) using a separate
message window doesn't mark the subsequent messages as read.
Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.0b2 on Vista: reading sequentially through unread
emails in a folder (or news items in a newsgroup) using a separate
message window doesn't mark the subsequent messages as read.
Bob
Same on XP.
--
Gerald Ross
Cochran, GA
How long a minute is depends on
Other things fail on the subsequent messages (but not the first). For
example, if images are blocked, one cannot show them.
Bob
Gerald Ross wrote:
Bob Fleischer wrote:
Using SeaMonkey 2.0b2 on Vista: reading sequentially through unread
emails in a folder (or news items in a newsgroup) using
13 matches
Mail list logo
