Cross-Posting

2015-09-05 Thread David E. Ross
I do indeed believe there are legitimate reasons to cross-post some newsgroup messages. The recent announcement of the official release of SeaMonkey 2.35 is an example of a good reason to cross-post. Because bug #43278 remains open, however, cross-posting should include indicating a Followup

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-14 Thread Rufus
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. I just replied/cross

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-14 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: [snippage] just like I don't care about the difference between Webkit and Gekko; Webkit and Gekko are both browser engines, like Ford and Chevrolet are both cars. E-mail and News would be more like sedans and motorcycles. They both

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-14 Thread F Murtz
Jonathan N. Little wrote: F Murtz wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: On which newsserver? And 11 xposts! Looks like asbestos-underwear worthy. The group is aus.politics and it is inhabited by ratbags you just have to look at the posters that don't get replies, may be because they are ratbags

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-14 Thread Stéphane Grégoire
Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Jonathan N. Little
F Murtz wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote: On which newsserver? And 11 xposts! Looks like asbestos-underwear worthy. The group is aus.politics and it is inhabited by ratbags you just have to look at the posters that don't get replies, may be because they are ratbags and partly because of the

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. I just replied/cross posted another Reply to the

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Jonathan N. Little
F Murtz wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 04:12: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
. A single reply contains all crossposted newsgroup. Same as with reply all But be aware that in both case IF the guy had put a list in a reply--to zone. the sending goes to that list. Depends on how the post is addressed, I guess. Cross posted ones I generally see have the cross posting addy(s

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. I just replied/cross posted another Reply to the Test group, which I do *not* subscribe to...and I bet it will

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
Ray_Net wrote: Ray_Net wrote on 13/01/2015 23:21: Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 21:05: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. I just replied/cross posted another Reply to the Test group, which I do *not* subscribe to...and I

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread F Murtz
Jonathan N. Little wrote: F Murtz wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Rufus
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. I just replied/cross posted another Reply to the Test group, which

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 04:14: john sumner wrote: Rufus wrote: Use Reply All instead of Reply. but be carful where you cross post otherwise people will get pissed I generally never cross post unless I am replying to s cross post...that's when Reply All comes in handy. A single reply

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Stéphane Grégoire
that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each address in turn and posting separately. Is this sea monkey

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 04:12: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread F Murtz
Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Jonathan N. Little
Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread WaltS48
F Murtz wrote: I will try subscribing to all groups in the cross post next time but what I really want is for the group it was posted from to get it but If I hit reply to a cross posted post nothing gets posted and as I do not know which group the original post came from I have been sending

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread F Murtz
Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread F Murtz
Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Ray_Net wrote on 13/01/2015 23:21: Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 21:05: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Rufus wrote: I agree - you can *send* to a non-subscribed NG (it's just an e-mail), No, you aren't sending an e-mail. You are sending a news post. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 21:03: Ray_Net wrote: Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 04:12: Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-13 Thread Ray_Net
Rufus wrote on 13/01/2015 21:05: Ray_Net wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote on 13/01/2015 10:43: Hi, F Murtz a écrit le 12/01/2015 15:00 : It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I

Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread F Murtz
It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each address in turn and posting separately. Is this sea

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Richard Falken
F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each address in turn and posting separately

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Ray_Net
Richard Falken wrote on 12/01/2015 15:33: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Rufus
F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each address in turn and posting separately

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Jonathan N. Little
Rufus wrote: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each address in turn and posting

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Rufus
john sumner wrote: Rufus wrote: Use Reply All instead of Reply. but be carful where you cross post otherwise people will get pissed I generally never cross post unless I am replying to s cross post...that's when Reply All comes in handy. -- - Rufus

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Rufus
Jonathan N. Little wrote: Rufus wrote: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which means removing each

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread john sumner
Rufus wrote: Use Reply All instead of Reply. but be carful where you cross post otherwise people will get pissed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Cross posting

2015-01-12 Thread Jonathan N. Little
Ray_Net wrote: Richard Falken wrote on 12/01/2015 15:33: F Murtz wrote: It seem that cross posting is barred. It is extremely annoying that when replying to a post that is cross posted, first it does not go anywhere and when I discover this I have to manually post to each NG in turn which

Re: cross posting ???

2009-02-08 Thread NoOp
On 02/08/2009 12:34 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: However connected to the server newsgroups.bellsouth.net, when I tried to cross post my article, I received the error message that I can not post an article to two servers! I had to post the article separately to each group!

Re: To Danieldxmm, Re: cross posting ???

2009-02-08 Thread »Q«
In news:w8-dnestq_l3cxlunz2dnuvz_g6wn...@mozilla.org, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj urj...@bellsouth.net wrote: Mozilla.support.seamonkey was added to server newsgroups.bellsouth.net on 9/23/08 and receiving messages from wherever until 1/20/09. [big snip] On Friday evening I wrote to our news

Re: cross posting ???

2009-02-08 Thread Moz Champion (Dan)
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: NoOp wrote: On 02/08/2009 12:34 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: However connected to the server newsgroups.bellsouth.net, when I tried to cross post my article, I received the error message that I can not post an article to two servers! I had to post

cross posting ???

2009-02-07 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
SM 1.1.14 on Win98se. I wanted to cross post an article to mozilla.support.seamonkey and bellsouth.net.support.news-service. The news server newsgroups.bellsouth.net carries both groups and I am subscribed to the mozilla.support.seamonkey newsgroup on both servers. However connected to the