Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-11 Thread TCW
On 9/11/2017 12:00 PM, John Duncan wrote: The seemingly arbitrary and heavily bureaucratic decimation of a large number of older APIs and core features that power users depend on (in Mozilla's desperate bid to stay relevant in a world dominated by people who get flustered when the homepage of

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-11 Thread John Duncan
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: They still have a lot of money to burn. Market share in 5 to 6 months should show if it is a success. I have my doubts. If you p*ss off enough power users who recommend it to others not much left. "Normal" users will just continue using Chrome. They don't care about

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-11 Thread John Duncan
WaltS48 wrote: On 9/10/17 11:04 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I probably need to do a Fx Nightly again just to see what changed but this is all so much urgkkk for only fanboys to love. This is all rushed and I personally hope it backfires but even this would do SeaMonkey no good. Do you

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-11 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
I call the whole package rushed. Photon should be fine. With it overall further reduction of colors in icons and styles it does not appeal to me but it should work. The biggest problems I am having is with web extensions deficits/design and the gutting of the source tree two release before an

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-10 Thread WaltS48
On 9/10/17 11:04 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I probably need to do a Fx Nightly again just to see what changed but this is all so much urgkkk for only fanboys to love. This is all rushed and I personally hope it backfires but even this would do SeaMonkey no good. Do you really call Photon

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-10 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
> Right, I keep forgetting that the C++ download manager is being retired. Gone in 2.52. > Cool. I will try out 2.53 then, as there is a noticeable speed difference > (especially javascript) between the current FF nightly and SM 2.48. 2.49.1 should be quite nice. Its my main browser for months

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-10 Thread John Duncan
> Download Manager e.g. needs a serious makeover before I would want it to > be released. This is more a case study since 2.52 :) Right, I keep forgetting that the C++ download manager is being retired. > I am still on 2.53. Didn't check if DOMi and cZ still work but if not > they could surely

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-10 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
> Forgive me if I have misunderstood the meeting minutes, but since the nightly > release channel will continue to support things like XUL overlays, legacy > extensions, webextension eperiments, etc. [0], why don't you continue to > ingest & build off of mozilla-central? Nightlies will, of

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-10 Thread John Duncan
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed before I would call it usable. I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want it shoot me a mail Can bake any platform but Linux i686. FRG TCW wrote: On 9/7/2017 1:26 PM, S

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-09 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Please send me an email for the download link. FRG TCW wrote: On 9/8/2017 11:24 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed before I would call it usable. I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want it shoot

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-08 Thread TCW
On 9/8/2017 11:24 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed before I would call it usable. I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want it shoot me a mail Can bake any platform but Linux i686. FRG TCW wrote:

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-08 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
I have a pacthes up 2.54 but it still needs at least two bugs fixed before I would call it usable. I am using a 2.53 with a few fixes still in review applied. If you want it shoot me a mail Can bake any platform but Linux i686. FRG TCW wrote: On 9/7/2017 1:26 PM, S Slicer wrote: TCW

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-07 Thread TCW
On 9/7/2017 1:26 PM, S Slicer wrote: TCW wrote: Before l10n.mozilla-community.org went down, I had the 2.52b x64 akalla built but it seems to be corrupt. Tried google but nothing's coming up. 2.51 is the newest I could fine. Anyone have the x64 2.52b build handy? I have 2.53a1, but this

Re: Anyone have the akalla x64 SM 2.52b somewhere?

2017-09-07 Thread S Slicer
TCW wrote: Before l10n.mozilla-community.org went down, I had the 2.52b x64 akalla built but it seems to be corrupt. Tried google but nothing's coming up. 2.51 is the newest I could fine. Anyone have the x64 2.52b build handy? I have 2.53a1, but this newsgroup would not let me attach it