Hartmut Figge schrieb:
First i had posted about this issue several weeks ago in
4abf7628.4060...@hfigge.myfqdn.de, also dcsm.n-b. And later i thought
that some numbers would be nice. *g*
As it looks like we have a real problem with a reproducible and
logically explainable cause, do we also
On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I have 'Check for...' turned off for all news servers, but have
grown accustom to the high cpu when checking my gmane.org newsgroups
in 2.0 where I have at least 25 subscribed groups.
Yes, it doesn't matter if you check manually or if
NoOp:
On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
I have already given the time frame. First the problem could be avoided
by backing out 'Patch, version 1.1' from
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774.
4ac0a452.4070...@hfigge.myfqdn.de.
Ok I give, what specifically is:
On 11/01/2009 04:12 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
I have already given the time frame. First the problem could be avoided
by backing out 'Patch, version 1.1' from
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774.
NoOp:
On 11/01/2009 04:12 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Well, using the MIDF
Obviously you are not from Malaysia :-)
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/MIDF
:-P http://messageidfinder.mozdev.org/
But this one will not work on SM2. I had to fix it for my personal
needs. And there will be no
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:28:48 -0800, NoOp wrote:
On 11/01/2009 04:12 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
The Message ID: 4ac0a452.4070...@hfigge.myfqdn.de
I don't use google groups et al; nor do many others.
Well, using the MIDF
Obviously you are not from Malaysia :-)
Philip Chee:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:28:48 -0800, NoOp wrote:
On 11/01/2009 04:12 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Well, using the MIDF
Obviously you are not from Malaysia :-)
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/MIDF
Well I am, so that reference by Hartmut confused me no end.
Didn't know,
An update to the reoccuring stalling mystery of SM 2.0 that I posted in detail
earlier. After many hours of close observation of the CPU load on the individual
CPU cores on the multi-core CPU I am running on, using both the AMD Power
Monitor (which displayed individual core load and dynamic
Are you doing updates more than once a day?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Nope. I always disable all automatic updates for all my software if at all
possible, including SM. The release I am currently running is the original
release posted on the official Seamonkey project page on the first day it was
released. It has not been updated since nor am I aware that there
Hartmut Figge wrote:
User:
An update to the reoccuring stalling mystery of SM 2.0 that I posted in detail
earlier. After many hours of close observation of the CPU load on the individual
CPU cores on the multi-core CPU I am running on, using both the AMD Power
Monitor (which displayed
User:
One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the
Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the news
folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either
highlight
the news server or open it and highlight one of the
Hartmut Figge wrote:
User:
One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the
Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the news
folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either highlight
the news server or open it and
User:
Thanks again for your reply. Do you have any confirmation whether the
collapsed news server state in SM 1.X resulted in the application
from skipping of the news server fetch operation?
Too long ago for me. I am using self compiled nightlies for many years
and SM1, well, after deleting
On 10/31/2009 04:58 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
User:
One thing I have never been too clear about the newsgroup function on the
Mozilla suite / Seamonkey - if I have a newsgroup server collapsed in the
news
folder pane, then the newsgroup server is NOT accessed UNTIL I either
highlight
the
NoOp:
I have 'Check for...' turned off for all news servers, but have
grown accustom to the high cpu when checking my gmane.org newsgroups
in 2.0 where I have at least 25 subscribed groups.
Yes, it doesn't matter if you check manually or if that si done
automatically.
When I first open the
On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
NoOp:
I have 'Check for...' turned off for all news servers, but have
grown accustom to the high cpu when checking my gmane.org newsgroups
in 2.0 where I have at least 25 subscribed groups.
Yes, it doesn't matter if you check manually or if
NoOp wrote:
When I first open the server (click the right triangle next to the
server name), cpu skyrockets all things mozilla pause. I can confirm
that this does not happen when doing the same from my 1.1.18 (linux
windows).
Strangely also, when the newsgroup auto check messages function is
Update to the original feedback post I made earlier - After extensive monitoring
of individual core load on the multi-core CPU while playing back many different
Flash FLV videos, I can positively confirm that virtually all of the time, Flash
FLV playback using the exact same Flash plug-in that
19 matches
Mail list logo
