NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
Only the beta versions of Lightning are compatible with SeaMonkey releases.
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta
...
SourceRepository=https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta
...
Hi,
EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 :
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus.
Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it
will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either.
This is a
Yamo' wrote:
Hi,
EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 :
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus.
Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it
will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either.
This
EE wrote:
The problem with Adblock Plus was fixed. It involved changing this
setting:
dom.indexedDB.enabled - true
Which is the default anyway. Only a user knowledgeable enough and
interested enough to change that setting would experience the problem.
--
War doesn't determine who's right,
Perhaps consider adblock edge, which I started using a while back, its a
fork.
https://bitbucket.org/adstomper/adblockedge
been using it fine here with the latest seamonkey for the past week.
Yamo' wrote:
Hi,
EE a écrit le 16/01/2015 18:23 :
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
There
On 02/02/2015 11:21 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 03/02/2015 14:20, NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
On 03/02/2015 14:20, NoOp wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the
On 02/02/2015 11:23 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Philip Chee wrote on 01/15/2015 05:08 AM:
On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility
with this version?
See
On 1/23/2015 8:47 AM, Neil wrote:
Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it?
As far as I know, there are no end-user controls for the behaviour, sorry.
Thanks. Too bad it can't be done with about:config too. :(
--
I'm not a worker ant. I'm like a queen. Or maybe a
Ant wrote:
Are you saying I would have to be a coder to change to tweak it?
As far as I know, there are no end-user controls for the behaviour, sorry.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
On 1/22/2015 1:27 AM, Neil wrote:
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to
autocomplete?
Thunderbird is still tweaking autocomplete, but you'd have to try a
trunk nightly to see whether it works better for you.
The long answer is that the autocomplete search backend is
Ant wrote:
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to
autocomplete?
Thunderbird is still tweaking autocomplete, but you'd have to try a
trunk nightly to see whether it works better for you.
The long answer is that the autocomplete search backend is a component,
so if
Is there a way to have SeaMonkey not use the e-mail address to
autocomplete? I have nicknames for them. Thank you in advance. :)
On 1/15/2015 12:33 AM, Ant wrote:
It looks like they went to old address book autocompletion method?
On 1/14/2015 5:05 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The
NoOp wrote on 18/01/2015 03:22:
On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of
In news:9cgdntt7kvbnmchjnz2dnuu7-kgdn...@mozilla.org,
EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does
not block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will
Ray_Net wrote on 18/01/2015 09:25:
NoOp wrote on 18/01/2015 03:22:
On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that
On 18/01/15 17:43, NoOp wrote:
On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM
2.31,
Ray_Net wrote:
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
...I'll chip in too!
What
NoOp wrote:
On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Miles Fidelman wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes.
Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that
individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop
releasing a Mac version.
Sure.
Instead of
On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote:
Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage
to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the
thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows.
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM
2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also,
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with
Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite).
No, that is not correct. Microsoft had to skip Windows *9* because, in
programming code where the version is searched, the Windows 95 and 98
Philip Chee wrote:
On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote:
Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage
to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the
thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows.
I only looked at windows because I only
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
*PhillipJones* schrieb:
Mac, iPhone, iPads are the fast growing Market in computer industry
today. Apple is making the Most money of any Computer Tech company in
existence today. Microsoft keeps sputtering and sputtering even more
Window 8/8.1 Has not been the hit it should have been, and
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM
2.31, there are no
PhillipJones wrote:
...I'd like you to be more specific in the Release Notes.
Some one of you has a Mac - the task should have been passed off to that
individual. If nobody can do that job, then perhaps you should stop
releasing a Mac version.
Sure.
Instead of trying to recruit some
PhillipJones wrote:
RISC - Reduced Instruction Set Computing Very little Code just barely
enough to get computer to boot burned into the code. System Code has
to tell it practically everything Therefor size is large and Clunky
and slow to load even with tons of system Ram But advantage is
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 17/01/2015 04:55, Rufus wrote:
Glad to read it's still under investigation! Would be further encourage
to read that the developers are looking at more than one platform - the
thread seems to indicate they only looked at Windows.
I only looked at windows
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
...I'll chip in too!
--
- Rufus
PhillipJones wrote:
and They have Decide to rename the new system System 10 to compete with
Mac OSX.10.10.1 (Yosemite).
No, that is not correct. Microsoft had to skip Windows *9* because, in
programming code where the version is searched, the Windows 95 and 98
versions would report positive.
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
...I'll chip in too!
What distribution
On 01/17/2015 03:06 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 17/01/2015 19:05:
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of YouTube and it appears if I am
On 01/17/2015 06:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
In news:ayadnbzu1fbkosfjnz2dnuu7-igdn...@mozilla.org,
EE nu...@bees.wax wrote:
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not
block ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will
appear on the first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running
On 18/01/2015 05:47, Miles Fidelman wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
RISC - Reduced Instruction Set Computing Very little Code just
barely enough to get computer to boot burned into the code. System
Code has to tell it practically everything Therefor size is large
and Clunky and slow to load even
On 01/17/2015 03:10 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Rufus wrote on 17/01/2015 20:50:
Mason83 wrote:
On 17/01/2015 13:27, Philip Chee wrote:
I only looked at windows because I only have windows. I'm an unpaid
volunteer. Would you like to buy me a Mac?
I will buy you a copy of Linux! ^_^
Regards.
On 01/15/2015 07:08 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility
with this version?
See
Yamo' wrote:
Hi,
Cecil Bankston a écrit le 15/01/2015 16:52 :
Could you please explain how you edited the installation file? I need
the Windows version. Does your edited version install and function
normally?
Open the xpi file with a tool like 7zip and edit the install.rdf file.
After
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain
Pololo wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
snip
Because Ghostery requires the FF Australis which SeaMonkey does not
use. I just switched to Bluhell Firewall
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bluhell-firewall/?src=api
Download the latest version of Ghostery 5.4.1 form AMO, and
NFN Smith wrote:
EE wrote:
If only that version had not broken Adblock Plus!
What do you mean by break -- what are the symptoms? And what version
of ABP are you running?
I updated my Windows installation to SM 2.32 yesterday, and I see that
I'm running ABP 2.6.7, and not seeing any
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
EE wrote:
There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus.
Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it
will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either.
This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I
EE wrote:
I am using the latest version of Adblock Plus, 2.6.7. It does not block
ads with SM 2.32. There is a large ad banner that will appear on the
first page of YouTube and it appears if I am running SM 2.32. With SM
2.31, there are no ads visible on YouTube. Also, the toolbar button
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the
documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the
PC version, and then victory was advertized.
But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations
as to
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32,
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 5:33 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the
documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the
PC version, and then victory was advertized.
But it's broke on the Mac version, and
Pololo wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2],
WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/16/2015 03:57 PM, Rufus wrote:
Pololo wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the
documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the
PC version, and then victory was advertized.
But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations
as to
Desiree wrote:
On 1/16/2015 10:53 AM, Rufus wrote:
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of
SeaMonkey
2.32!
On 1/16/2015 10:51 AM, Rufus wrote:
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of
On 1/16/2015 5:50 AM, Pololo wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the
Desiree wrote:
On 1/16/2015 10:51 AM, Rufus wrote:
Desiree wrote:
On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of
SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more
X-No-Archive :yes
X-OS :Debian Jessie
Archive:no
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: gzqdnt_4mf-xnyxjnz2dnuu7-k2dn...@mozilla.org
Lines: 14
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.233.201.43
X-AuthenticatedUsername:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Yamo' wrote:
Hi,
Le 14/01/2015 16:12, Cecil Bankston a écrit :
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues
PhillipJones schrieb:
Thanks. I've turned back on SSL3. Next time I have to do this will see
if this happens again.
Note that this means you are making your computer intentionally
insecure, for more information read
On 15-Jan-15 15:05, Larry S. wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2],
EE wrote:
There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus. Adblock Plus
no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it will not update and
one cannot install a new version manually either. This is a deal-breaker
for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing. I even
EE wrote:
There is a big problem with SM 2.32. It breaks Adblock Plus.
Adblock Plus no longer blocks ads with that version of SM. Also, it
will not update and one cannot install a new version manually either.
This is a deal-breaker for me. I do not want ads when I am browsing.
I even tried
On 1/15/2015 1:46 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in
On 1/15/2015 4:35 PM, Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
On 1/15/2015 5:33 PM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the
documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the
PC version, and then victory was advertized.
But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all
EE wrote:
If only that version had not broken Adblock Plus!
What do you mean by break -- what are the symptoms? And what version
of ABP are you running?
I updated my Windows installation to SM 2.32 yesterday, and I see that
I'm running ABP 2.6.7, and not seeing any problems with that
Larry S. wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a
Philip Chee wrote:
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the
It looks like they went to old address book autocompletion method?
On 1/14/2015 5:05 AM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32
On 15/01/2015 07:24, WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Is there any way to edit the Lightning addon to force compatibility
with this version?
See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.support.calendar/8wBkove7-O4/RlzJWeC_Y64J
It looks like SeaMonkey users
On 15/01/2015 13:19, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes
Hi,
Le 14/01/2015 16:12, Cecil Bankston a écrit :
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
David H. Durgee wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
josephus wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes
SamuelS wrote:
On 15-Jan-15 15:05, Larry S. wrote:
David H. Durgee wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the
Daniel wrote:
On 15/01/15 07:12, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
josephus wrote:
snip
Maybe because SeaMonkey is already your default browser. NOTE: the flash
updater does update your flash plugin in SeaMonkey (you can check from
Tools Addon Manager Plugins) but the after-install check to see
Rufus wrote:
So why does this appear under bugs fixed? I don't get the
documentation...I followed the bug thread, victory was declared for the
PC version, and then victory was advertized.
But it's broke on the Mac version, and now I get all these explanations
as to why - I certainly *believe*
josephus wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known
On 01/14/2015 10:12 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 09:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and
WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2],
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a
On 01/14/2015 09:01 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
WaltS48 wrote:
On 01/14/2015 07:19 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in
On 15/01/15 07:12, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
josephus wrote:
Cecil Bankston wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey
2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Edmund Wong wrote:
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to
Greetings,
The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.32!
For a more complete list of changes in SeaMonkey 2.32, see the What's
New in SeaMonkey 2.32 section of the Release Notes [2], which also
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked
98 matches
Mail list logo
