It is clear now, and I thank you.
Mort
WaltS48 wrote:
On 5/30/18 7:20 PM, Mort Linder wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
You posted your message on this newsgroup using SeaMonkey 2.49.3. That
is the latest end-user version. What more do you want?
I am still asking why I still get a red
Mort Linder wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
You posted your message on this newsgroup using SeaMonkey 2.49.3. That
is the latest end-user version. What more do you want?
I am still asking why I still get a red on-screen message that this
version of SeaMonkey is not supported regarding
On 5/30/18, Mort Linder wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> You posted your message on this newsgroup using SeaMonkey 2.49.3. That
>> is the latest end-user version. What more do you want?
>
> I am still asking why I still get a red on-screen message that this
> version of SeaMonkey is not
On 5/30/18 7:20 PM, Mort Linder wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
You posted your message on this newsgroup using SeaMonkey 2.49.3. That
is the latest end-user version. What more do you want?
I am still asking why I still get a red on-screen message that this
version of SeaMonkey is not
David E. Ross wrote:
You posted your message on this newsgroup using SeaMonkey 2.49.3. That
is the latest end-user version. What more do you want?
I am still asking why I still get a red on-screen message that this
version of SeaMonkey is not supported regarding updates. Is this
question
On 5/28/2018 2:47 PM, Mort Linder wrote:
> EE wrote:
>> Larry S. wrote:
>>> I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working,
>>> but now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an
>>> updater.exe, sourced from the
EE wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working,
but now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an
updater.exe, sourced from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive,
and asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down
Larry S. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working,
but now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an
updater.exe, sourced from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive, and
asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down, but it keeps
it. If you do a
check for updates and it comes up should be ok.
FRG
Larry S. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working, but
now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an updater.exe,
sourced from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive
Larry S. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working, but now my
wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an updater.exe, sourced from
the Seamonkey location on her hard drive, and asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down, but it keeps
be ok.
FRG
Larry S. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working,
but now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an
updater.exe, sourced from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive,
and asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down
. wrote:
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working, but now
my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an updater.exe, sourced
from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive, and asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down, but it keeps coming. So
I was under the impression that the Seamonkey updater wasn't working,
but now my wife (but not me) is getting a notice that there is an
updater.exe, sourced from the Seamonkey location on her hard drive, and
asking to be executed.
So far she is turning it down, but it keeps coming. So
Hi,
Seamonkey 2.12 just auto-updated to Seamonkey 2.13.1 and Norton Internet Security detected (and removed) a virus!
Program Files\Seamonkey\nssckbi.dll allegedly contained Suspicious.Cloud.7.F upon launching your downloader update.
I think you need want to check this out immediately, or forward
This is not a help request, but just a suggestion. I could not find
instructions for where to send suggestions.
When SeaMonkey needs to update, Windows 7 gives me a query about
running updater.exe. Might it not be preferable to give the file a
name like seamonkeyupdater.exe so that the user can
An excellent point. We are constantly warned about using software from
unknown sources, but for some reason Seamonkey updates come as unknown
sourced software. I suppose we can decline the undate and download it
from the Seamonkey site, but it would be much more convenient to just
identify
So, if you see seamonkeyupdater.exe now, it's a virus, malware or trojan :-)
Not@home wrote, On 29/04/2012 23:02:
An excellent point. We are constantly warned about using software
from unknown sources, but for some reason Seamonkey updates come as
unknown sourced software. I suppose we can
Nickname wrote:
This is not a help request, but just a suggestion. I could not find
instructions for where to send suggestions.
When SeaMonkey needs to update, Windows 7 gives me a query about
running updater.exe. Might it not be preferable to give the file a
name like seamonkeyupdater.exe
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Nickname wrote:
This is not a help request, but just a suggestion. I could not
find instructions for where to send suggestions.
When SeaMonkey needs to update, Windows 7 gives me a query about
running updater.exe. Might it not be preferable to give the file
a name
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
--
Maybe it's like an ant hive... Bees man, bees have hives. You know
what I mean. It's like one female that runs the whole show. Yes, the
queen. Yeah the mamma. She is bad*ss, man. I mean big. These things
ain't
Ant schrieb:
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 will be generated and
offered within the next weeks, but are not ready yet.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how
On 6/11/2011 4:32 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 will be generated and
offered within the next weeks, but are not ready yet.
Ah. So should I wait for those or just
Robert Kaiser a écrit :
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 will be generated and
offered within the next weeks, but are not ready yet.
Hello,
Thank-you for your answer. I will wait for the updates from 2.0.14 to 2.1.
___
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
On 6/11/2011 4:32 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 will be generated and
offered within the next weeks, but are not ready yet.
Interviewed by CNN on 11/06/2011 08:43, Ant told the world:
Ah. So should I wait for those or just overinstall with the full
installer? I assume the upgrade patch is smaller.
Probably not that much smaller -- it's a pretty substantial change (new
Gecko version, new bookmarks engine, a lot of
wouldn't be surprised
if the auto-update ends up being *larger* than the full release.
Apparently the auto-update system uses a lesser form of file compression
than the full releases...
Ah OK. I will not wait for the updater then. I might upgrade later today
or tomorrow. I don't want to hose my SM2
On 06/11/2011 10:13 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
On 6/11/2011 4:32 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14 to 2.1 will be generated and
On 6/11/2011 9:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/11/2011 10:13 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
On 6/11/2011 4:32 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed:
Or is it just me on my three PCs (64-bit W7 HPE, XP Pro. SP3, and
Debian/Linux)?
Automatically appliable updates for 2.0.14
Rufus wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in
advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13
...
Why would I want to do that? I
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in
advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13
...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through
Daniel wrote:
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in
advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13
...
Why would I want to do that? I just want
cyberzen a écrit :
Ant a écrit :
On 3/24/2011 2:18 AM PT, Ray_Net typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its updater
On 3/24/2011 7:24 PM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Ant wrote:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
IIUC the updates were just activated, and the announcements posted. Bear
with the release guys, they are only volunteers and pretty busy these days.
Yea
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
--
There are things in the Universe billions of years older than either of
our races. They are vast, timeless, and if they are aware of us at all,
it is as little more than ants and we have as much chance of
communicating
Ant wrote:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org
On 3/24/2011 2:18 AM PT, Ray_Net typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its updater.
--
Each of us needs to withdraw from
Ant a écrit :
On 3/24/2011 2:18 AM PT, Ray_Net typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its updater.
the updater does
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its updater.
the updater does not respond
Ant wrote:
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13 ...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its updater.
the updater does
PhillipJones wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 3/24/2011 8:02 AM PT, cyberzen typed:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
Add-Remove program of your SM 2.0.12 then ... install the SM 2.0.13
...
Why would I want to do that? I just want to upgrade through its
updater
Ant wrote:
Hi! What's up? Is the updater not ready yet? Thank you in advance. :)
IIUC the updates were just activated, and the announcements posted. Bear
with the release guys, they are only volunteers and pretty busy these days.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey
On 3/24/2011 4:24 PM PT, Jens Hatlak typed:
IIUC the updates were just activated, and the announcements posted. Bear
with the release guys, they are only volunteers and pretty busy these days.
Thanks Jens! I got it on three PCs (Debian/Linux and Windows [XP Pro.
SP3 and 64-bit W7 HP]). :)
42 matches
Mail list logo
